Browse

Search for: rheumatoid arthritis    methotrexate    autoimmune disease    biomarker    gene expression    GWAS    HLA genes    non-HLA genes   

ID PMID Title PublicationDate abstract
25318612 Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with methotrexate alone and in combination with other co 2015 Feb The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of treatment with methotrexate (MTX), by itself or combined with other non-biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (methotrexate, MTX with prednisolone, MTX with leflunomide, MTX with chloroquine, and MTX with sulfasalazine) on clinimetric outcomes in a retrospective cohort with a 6-month follow-up and under a Treat to Target (T2T) approach. Patients in treatment with conventional DMARDs and classified as moderate disease activity (MDA) and high disease activity (HDA) were included. Changes in disease activity score (DAS28), health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), tender joint count (TJC), and swollen joint count (SJC) are compared using the Wilcoxon nonparametric test for paired data. Hypothesis contrasts were raised in order to look for differences between the different exposure groups and the outcomes defined by means of the Kruskal-Wallis (KW) nonparametric test. Follow-up was documented in 307 patients, including 250 (81.4%) women. At the onset, 243 subjects (79.2%) were classified as MDA and 64 (20.9%) in HDA. A total of 247 subjects (80.4%) presented some degree of improvement, with 156 subjects (51%) entering remission, which is a significant number (p value = 0.047). There were no differences in the level of severity between the treatment groups (p = 0.98). This study, developed in a cohort of patients with RA with moderate or severe disease activity who were treated with MTX by itself or combined with other non-biological DMARDs under T2T strategy, showed a decrease in the severity of disease activity in 80% of patients. The difference between monotherapy (MTX) and the combinations with other non-biological DMARDs could not be established.
24782176 RFC1 80G>A is a genetic determinant of methotrexate efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis: a hu 2014 May OBJECTIVE: Associations have been reported between candidate genes and the response to methotrexate (MTX) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, but most of the studies have been small and have yielded conflicting results. This study was undertaken to provide a systematic review of all genetic variant associations with MTX efficacy and toxicity, and to conduct a meta-analysis evaluating the most commonly studied single-nucleotide polymorphism for which prior cumulative analysis has been lacking. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to identify genetic variant associations with MTX efficacy and toxicity. Studies were identified from the Medline, EMBase, HuGENet Navigator, and Cochrane Library databases through December 2012, and from the 2009-2011 abstracts of the American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism annual meeting proceedings. Additional unpublished genotype data from a Canadian cohort of patients with early RA were also included. RESULTS: Among the 87 identified studies examining genetic associations with MTX efficacy and toxicity, the reduced folate carrier 1 gene (RFC1) variant 80G>A (Arg(27) His, rs1051266) was selected for random-effects meta-analysis. RFC1 80G>A was associated with MTX efficacy in both the recessive model (odds ratio [OR] 1.42, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.04-1.93) and the additive model (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.10-1.49). Restriction of the sensitivity analyses to studies that involved Caucasian subjects only and that used similar outcome measures (MTX failure versus nonfailure) maintained and improved the associations in both models. No significant association between RFC1 80G>A and MTX toxicity was detected. CONCLUSION: In these analyses of available data from observational studies, RFC1 80G>A was found to be associated with MTX efficacy, but not toxicity, in RA patients. This variant merits further prospective analysis as a potential predictor of MTX efficacy. Variability in the definitions of response in pharmacogenetic studies is a source of data heterogeneity that should be addressed.
23434570 Adalimumab added to a treat-to-target strategy with methotrexate and intra-articular triam 2014 Apr OBJECTIVES: An investigator-initiated, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, treat-to-target protocol (Clinical Trials:NCT00660647) studied whether adalimumab added to methotrexate and intra-articular triamcinolone as first-line treatment in early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA) increased the frequency of low disease activity (DAS28CRP<3.2) at 12 months. METHODS: In 14 Danish hospital-based clinics, 180 disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD)-naïve ERA patients (<6 months duration) received methotrexate 7.5 mg/week (increased to 20 mg/week within 2 months) plus adalimumab 40 mg every other week (adalimumab-group, n=89) or methotrexate+placebo-adalimumab (placebo-group, n=91). At all visits, triamcinolone was injected into swollen joints (max. four joints/visit). If low disease activity was not achieved, sulfasalazine 2 g/day and hydroxychloroquine 200 mg/day were added after 3 months, and open-label biologics after 6-9 months. Efficacy was assessed primarily on the proportion of patients who reached treatment target (DAS28CRP<3.2). Secondary endpoints included DAS28CRP, remission, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), EQ-5D and SF-12. Analysis was by intention-to-treat with last observation carried forward. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. In the adalimumab group/placebo group the 12-month cumulative triamcinolone doses were 5.4/7.0 ml (p=0.08). Triple therapy was applied in 18/27 patients (p=0.17). At 12 months, DAS28CRP<3.2 was reached in 80%/76% (p=0.65) and DAS28CRP was 2.0 (1.7-5.2) (medians (5th/95th percentile ranges)), versus 2.6 (1.7-4.7) (p=0.009). Remission rates were: DAS28CRP<2.6: 74%/49%, Clinical Disease Activity Index≤2.8: 61%/41%, Simplified Disease Activity Index<3.3: 57%/37%, European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Boolean: 48%/30% (0.0008
24733191 Comparison of Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F with methotrexate in the treatment of active r 2015 Jun OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F (TwHF) with methotrexate (MTX) in the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Design: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. All patients were assessed by trained investigators who were unaware of the therapeutic regimen. INTERVENTION: 207 patients with active RA were randomly allocated (1:1:1) to treatment with MTX 12.5 mg once a week, or TwHF 20 mg three times a day, or the two in combination. At week 12, if reduction of the 28-joint count Disease Activity Score (DAS28) was <30% in the monotherapy groups, the patient was switched to MTX+TwHF. The primary efficacy point was the proportion of patients achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 response at week 24. RESULTS: 174/207 (84.1%) patients completed 24 weeks of the trial. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the proportion of patients reaching the ACR50 response criteria was 46.4% (32/69), 55.1% (38/69) and 76.8% (53/69), respectively, in the MTX, TwHF and MTX+TwHF groups (TwHF vs MTX monotherapy, p=0.014; MTX+TwHF vs MTX monotherapy, p<0.001). Similar statistically significant patterns at week 24 were found for ACR20, ACR70, clinical Disease Activity Index good responses, EULAR good response, remission rate and low disease activity rate. Significant improvement in the Health Assessment Questionnaire and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire scores from baseline to week 24 was seen in each treatment arm (p<0.05), though no significant difference was found among the treatment arms (p>0.05). The result of per-protocol analysis agreed with that seen in the intention-to-treat analysis. Seven, three and five women in the TwHF, MTX and combination groups, respectively, developed irregular menstruation (TwHF vs MTX monotherapy, p=0.216). CONCLUSIONS: TwHF monotherapy was not inferior to, and MTX+TwHF was better than, MTX monotherapy in controlling disease activity in patients with active RA. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01613079.
25146044 Bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of jaw reoccurrence after methotrexate therapy: a 2014 Sep INTRODUCTION: Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) is a well-known complication caused by amino-bisphosphonate therapy. We document one case of BRONJ associated with oral administration of methotrexate, a known immunosuppressive drug used to treat rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: A 66-year-old woman was referred for evaluation and endodontic surgery of recently re-treated tooth 13. Tooth 14 was extracted 3 months prior, and the extraction site had not completely healed. Her medical history revealed rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis. She had been taking Fosamax (alendronate) 70 mg daily. Because of adequate root canal therapy of tooth 13, endodontic surgery was performed. Five months after apicoectomy, her symptoms had not changed. Tooth 13 was extracted, and the socket healed without complications. The socket of extracted tooth 14 was also healing. At the 3-month recall visit, bone exposure and purulent discharge at the site of extracted tooth 14 were noted. The patient had recently received methotrexate. The methotrexate was discontinued, and she was given course of amoxicillin. RESULTS: At the 18-month follow-up, the healing progressed, and the wound was closed. CONCLUSIONS: A medication that suppresses the immune system such as methotrexate may complicate the management of BRONJ. Once a diagnosis of BRONJ is made, a closely monitored conservative approach is recommended.
23934386 Factors associated with methotrexate dosing and therapeutic decisions in veterans with rhe 2014 Jan The purpose of this study is to explore patient factors associated with differences in methotrexate (MTX) dosing and to compare patient factors and MTX-dosing patterns between those who remained on MTX monotherapy and those who were switched or had additional therapy. A retrospective cohort of 7,017 patients with newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was identified in the United States Department of Veterans Affairs administrative databases between 1 October 1999 and 30 September 2009. Regression analyses were used to study the association of MTX start and maximum dose attained with various patient characteristics and compare differences between groups who had therapeutic change (having switched to or added another anti-rheumatic agent or having steroids increased by 2.5 mg of prednisone or equivalent) with those remaining on MTX monotherapy. Abnormal serum creatinine (>1.5 mg/dL) was associated lower start and peak MTX doses (p < 0.01). Older RA patients were less likely to attain peak MTX dose of 15 mg or more (p < 0.01). Males and patients 75 and older (compared with <45) had lower risk of therapeutic change (hazard ratio, [HR] 0.80, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.90, and HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.42-0.36-0.50, respectively). Patients who attained higher peak MTX dose had lower risk of therapeutic change compared with those dosed at less than 15 mg/week (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.77-0.92 for 15 to <20 and HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.72-0.86 for 20 or more). Injectable MTX use conferred lower risk of therapeutic change (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.52-0.78). Two thirds did not attain a maximum MTX dose of 20 mg/week or more before therapeutic change occurred. Older age and renal insufficiency were barriers to the use of higher MTX maximum dosages. Use of injectable MTX and higher maximum MTX dose were independently associated with higher likelihood to remain on MTX monotherapy. Further studies are needed to explore targeted interventions that may optimize MTX dosing to improve success rates of MTX monotherapy.
23961667 [DMARDs (disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs)]. 2013 Jul Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have largely contributed to recent paradigm shift of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment strategy. DMARDs can be indicated for all RA patients and early use of DMARDs after diagnosis of RA is recommended. Individual DMARDs have common characteristics. Understanding these characteristics is very important in treating RA. As for safety, the pattern of adverse reactions (ADRs) associated with DMARDs has been generally understood. It is necessary to select DMARDs and follow up patients with recognition of the pattern of ADRs. Regular monitoring is also essential to ensure the safety of DMARDs. This chapter deals with some major DMARDs in Japan, including methotrexate, which is indispensable in current RA treatment; salazosulfapyridine and bucillamine; tacrolimus, which is recently increasing in use; and iguratimod, which became available in 2012.
24384824 Intra articular injection with corticosteroids in patients with recent onset rheumatoid ar 2014 Feb To investigate the association between intra-articular (IA) large joint corticosteroid injections and clinical outcomes in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We compared pain (visual analog scale (VAS)), the Disease Activity Score (44 joints) (DAS), and swollen and tender joint counts before and after IA injection. Using linear mixed models (LMM), the DAS and the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score over time were compared in IA injected versus noninjected patients. In year 1, 93 joints were injected in 44 patients treated with initial methotrexate monotherapy and 16 in patients treated with initial combination therapy (p < 0.01). Three months later, swelling and tenderness were resolved in 58-50 % of the injected joints; but within 12 months after the injection, swelling recurred in 14 % and tenderness in 41 % of the injected joints. Mean (SD) DAS decreased from 4.0 (1.4) before to 3.2 (1.2) 3 months after injection (p < 0.01) and VAS for pain from 49 (26) to 40 (27) (p < 0.01). LMM showed a higher DAS and HAQ in patients injected in year 0-1 compared to those not injected, but no difference in subsequent years, and similar treatment adjustments. Eight-year radiographs showed similar damage in injected joints (17 %) and noninjected joints (14 %). IA corticosteroid injections are associated with symptom relief, sometimes only temporarily, in 50 % of cases. Initially DAS significantly improved, but over time DAS and HAQ were similar in injected versus non-injected patients. After 8 years there was no difference in joint damage.
25046458 Cutaneous erosions: a herald for impending pancytopenia in methotrexate toxicity. 2014 Jul 15 Psoriatic plaque erosion is a rare toxic side effect of low-dose methotrexate (LDMTX) that has been reported during the treatment of psoriasis and described as a herald for impending pancytopenia. Fatalities from this have rarely been reported. Even rarer is methotrexate (MTX)-induced erosions of clinically normal skin in patients without a history of psoriasis. We report 3 rare presentations of MTX-induced cutaneous erosions, 2 fatalities occurring with MTX-induced psoriatic plaque erosions, and the sixth reported case of MTX-induced erosions with no prior history of psoriasis. Each were elderly patients on proton pump inhibitors with a history of chronic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use. They all presented with acute onset of erosions after a recent change in their MTX dose. Pancytopenia followed in each case. Physicians' awareness of the sequelae in MTX-induced cutaneous erosions is imperative so MTX can be discontinued and treatment instituted to prevent fatal bone marrow suppression.
23348607 Tofacitinib (CP-690,550) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving methotrexate: twe 2013 Mar OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this 24-month phase III study was to examine structural preservation with tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX). Data from a planned 12-month interim analysis are reported. METHODS: In this double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study, patients receiving background MTX were randomized 4:4:1:1 to tofacitinib at 5 mg twice daily, tofacitinib at 10 mg twice daily, placebo to tofacitinib at 5 mg twice daily, and placebo to tofacitinib at 10 mg twice daily. At month 3, nonresponder placebo-treated patients were advanced in a blinded manner to receive tofacitinib as indicated above; remaining placebo-treated patients were advanced at 6 months. Four primary efficacy end points were all analyzed in a step-down procedure. RESULTS: At month 6, response rates according to the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria for tofacitinib at 5 mg and 10 mg twice daily were higher than those for placebo (51.5% and 61.8%, respectively, versus 25.3%; both P < 0.0001). At month 6, least squares mean (LSM) changes in total modified Sharp/van der Heijde score for tofacitinib at 5 mg and 10 mg twice daily were 0.12 and 0.06, respectively, versus 0.47 for placebo (P = 0.0792 and P ≤ 0.05, respectively). At month 3, LSM changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index score for tofacitinib at 5 mg and 10 mg twice daily were -0.40 (significance not declared due to step-down procedure) and -0.54 (P < 0.0001), respectively, versus -0.15 for placebo. At month 6, rates of remission (defined as a value <2.6 for the 4-variable Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate) for tofacitinib at 5 mg and 10 mg twice daily were 7.2% (significance not declared due to step-down procedure) and 16.0% (P < 0.0001), respectively, versus 1.6% for placebo. The safety profile was consistent with findings in previous studies. CONCLUSION: Data from this 12-month interim analysis demonstrate that tofacitinib inhibits progression of structural damage and improves disease activity in patients with RA who are receiving MTX.
24012043 Comparative cancer risk associated with methotrexate, other non-biologic and biologic dise 2014 Feb OBJECTIVE: There is little information comparing the potential risk of cancer across conventional and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methotrexate has not been the focus of most contemporary pharmacoepidemiologic studies of cancer. METHODS: We conducted a comparative effectiveness study with cancer as the outcome. A large observational cohort of RA was followed up from 2001 to 2010. Reports of any cancer prompted a confirmation process that included adjudication of the primary cancer records. We used a propensity score (PS) with relevant covariates and cohort trimming to improve the balance between DMARD cohorts. Cox proportional hazard regression models were constructed to estimate the risk of cancer with various DMARDs, all compared with methotrexate. RESULTS: We identified 6806 DMARD courses for analysis (1566 methotrexate; 904 nbDMARDs; 3761 TNF antagonists; 408 abatacept; and 167 rituximab). Non-biologic DMARDs (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.05-0.65) and TNF antagonists (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.05-0.65) were associated with a reduced adjusted risk of cancer compared with methotrexate. Abatacept (HR 1.55, 95% CI 0.40-5.97) and rituximab (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.07-2.60) were similar in risk of cancer with methotrexate. These results were robust to sensitivity analyses. After controlling for DMARD exposures, risk factors for cancer included male gender, age, and alcohol consumption. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer risk was elevated for methotrexate users compared with nbDMARDs and TNF antagonists.
23918037 Long-term safety and efficacy of certolizumab pegol in combination with methotrexate in th 2014 Dec OBJECTIVES: To examine the safety and efficacy of 5-year administration of certolizumab pegol (CZP)+methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Eligible patients from the Rheumatoid Arthritis Prevention of Structural Damage (RAPID)1 randomised controlled trial (RCT) were treated in open-label extension (OLE) with CZP 400 mg every other week (Q2W), reduced to 200 mg Q2W after ≥6 months, +MTX. Combined safety data from RCT and OLE are presented from initiation of CZP treatment to 12 wks post last visit in patients receiving ≥1 dose of CZP (Safety population, N=958). Efficacy data are presented to start of first site closure (wk 256 of CZP treatment: 52 wks in RCT+204 wks in OLE) for all patients randomised to receive CZP (intent-to-treat (ITT) population, N=783) and CZP patients who completed the 52 wk RCT and enrolled into OLE (wk 52 CZP completers, N=508). Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)), American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR) 20/50/70, Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and patient retention (Kaplan-Meier analysis) were assessed. RESULTS: Overall event rate per 100 patient-years (ER) of adverse events (AEs) was 290.4, most frequently: urinary tract infections (ER=7.9), nasopharyngitis (ER=7.3) and upper respiratory tract infections (ER=7.3). ER of serious AEs was 20.3 (infections=5.9, malignancies=1.2). 21 patients (2.2%) experienced an AE resulting in death (incidence rate=0.6). At wk 256 of treatment, 55.3% of the CZP ITT population were estimated to remain on treatment (68.7% if solely withdrawals due to AE or lack of efficacy were considered). In wk 52 CZP completers and CZP ITT population, DAS28 (ESR) remission rates and improvements from baseline were sustained to wk 256. CONCLUSIONS: CZP+MTX treatment provided a favourable risk-benefit profile over 5 years in patients with active RA. No new safety signals were identified.
23723317 Evaluation of low-dose rituximab for the retreatment of patients with active rheumatoid ar 2014 Aug BACKGROUND: The licensed dose of rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is two doses of 1000 mg given 2 weeks apart. A lower dose has never been specifically studied in patients with an inadequate response to anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of rituximab repeat treatment with two doses (1000 mg×1 and 1000 mg×2) following initial treatment with 1000 mg×2. METHODS: We set up an open-label, prospective, multicentre, non-inferiority study comprising a non-controlled period (24 weeks) followed by a randomised controlled period (weeks 24-104) in patients with RA and an inadequate response to anti-TNF agents. All patients received one course of rituximab (1000 mg×2) with methotrexate. At week 24, patients achieving a EULAR response (moderate or good) were randomised to rituximab retreatment at 1000 mg×1 (Arm A) or 1000 mg×2 (Arm B). The primary objective measure was disease activity in 28 joints C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) area under the curve (AUC) over 104 weeks with a non-inferiority margin defined by 20% (444) of the mean DAS28-CRP AUC (mean±SD 2218±967) of the reference data. RESULTS: The intent-to-treat and per-protocol (PP) populations comprised 143 (A/B: 70/73) and 100 (A/B: 51/49) patients, respectively. The adjusted mean difference in DAS28-CRP AUC (PP) was 51.4 (95% CI -131.2 to 234), demonstrating non-inferiority between arms A and B. The overall rituximab safety profile was similar with both retreatment regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Following a clinical response to a first course of rituximab in RA at the licensed dose of 1000 mg×2, retreatment with rituximab at 1000 mg×1 results in efficacy outcomes that are non-inferior to those achieved with retreatment at 1000 mg×2. CLINICALTRIALSGOV REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01126541.
23483363 A population pharmacokinetic model for low-dose methotrexate and its polyglutamated metabo 2013 Jun BACKGROUND: Measurement of intracellular concentrations of methotrexate (MTX) and its polyglutamated metabolites (MTXGlu(2-5)) in red blood cells (RBCs) has been suggested as a potential means of monitoring low-dose MTX treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, a possible correlation between RBC MTX and MTXGlu2-5 concentrations and clinical outcomes of MTX treatment in RA is debated. A better understanding of the dose-concentration-time relationship of MTX and MTXGlu(2-5) in RBCs by population pharmacokinetic modelling is desirable and will facilitate assessing a potential RBC concentration-effect relationship in the future. AIM: The purpose of this analysis was to describe the pharmacokinetics of MTX and MTXGlu(2-5) in RBCs. Secondary objectives included investigation of deglutamation reactions and the loss of MTX and MTXGlu(2-5) from the RBC. METHODS: A model was developed using NONMEM(®) version 7.2 based on RBC data obtained from 48 patients with RA receiving once-weekly low-dose MTX treatment. This model was linked to a fixed two-compartment model that was used to describe the pharmacokinetics of MTX in the plasma. A series of five compartments were used to describe the intracellular pharmacokinetics of MTX and MTXGlu(2-5) in RBCs. Biologically plausible covariates were tested for a significant effect on MTX plasma clearance and the intracellular volume of distribution of all MTX species in RBCs ([Formula: see text]). The developed model was used to test hypotheses related to the enzymatic deglutamation of MTXGlu(2-5) and potential loss of MTXGlu(2-5) from RBCs. RESULTS: The final RBC pharmacokinetic model required the intracellular volumes of distribution for the parent and metabolites to be set to the value estimated for the parent drug MTX alone, and the rate constants describing the polyglutamation steps were fixed at literature values. Significant covariates included effect of body surface area-adjusted estimated glomerular filtration rate on renal plasma clearance and effect of allometrically scaled total body weight with a fixed exponent of 0.75 on non-renal plasma clearance of MTX. The only significant covariate with an effect on [Formula: see text] was mean corpuscular volume (MCV). The model supported single deglutamation steps and a single mechanism of MTX and MTXGlu(2-5) loss from RBCs. CONCLUSIONS: The developed model enabled acceptable description of the intracellular kinetics of MTX and MTXGlu(2-5) in RBCs. In the future it can form the basis of a full pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model to assess the time-RBC concentration-effect relationship of low-dose MTX treatment in RA.
24941177 Tofacitinib versus methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. 2014 Jun 19 BACKGROUND: Methotrexate is the most frequently used first-line antirheumatic drug. We report the findings of a phase 3 study of monotherapy with tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, as compared with methotrexate monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had not previously received methotrexate or therapeutic doses of methotrexate. METHODS: We randomly assigned 958 patients to receive 5 mg or 10 mg of tofacitinib twice daily or methotrexate at a dose that was incrementally increased to 20 mg per week over 8 weeks; 956 patients received a study drug. The coprimary end points at month 6 were the mean change from baseline in the van der Heijde modified total Sharp score (which ranges from 0 to 448, with higher scores indicating greater structural joint damage) and the proportion of patients with an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 70 response (≥70% reduction in the number of both tender and swollen joints and ≥70% improvement in three of five other criteria: the patient's assessment of pain, level of disability, C-reactive protein level or erythrocyte sedimentation rate, global assessment of disease by the patient, and global assessment of disease by the physician). RESULTS: Mean changes in the modified total Sharp score from baseline to month 6 were significantly smaller in the tofacitinib groups than in the methotrexate group, but changes were modest in all three groups (0.2 points in the 5-mg tofacitinib group and <0.1 point in the 10-mg tofacitinib group, as compared with 0.8 points in the methotrexate group [P<0.001 for both comparisons]). Among the patients receiving tofacitinib, 25.5% in the 5-mg group and 37.7% in the 10-mg group had an ACR 70 response at month 6, as compared with 12.0% of patients in the methotrexate group (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Herpes zoster developed in 31 of 770 patients who received tofacitinib (4.0%) and in 2 of 186 patients who received methotrexate (1.1%). Confirmed cases of cancer (including three cases of lymphoma) developed in 5 patients who received tofacitinib and in 1 patient who received methotrexate. Tofacitinib was associated with increases in creatinine levels and in low-density and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who had not previously received methotrexate or therapeutic doses of methotrexate, tofacitinib monotherapy was superior to methotrexate in reducing signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis and inhibiting the progression of structural joint damage. The benefits of tofacitinib need to be considered in the context of the risks of adverse events. (Funded by Pfizer; ORAL Start ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01039688.).
23908446 Safety and effectiveness of 6 months' etanercept monotherapy and combination therapy in Ja 2013 Oct OBJECTIVE: To assess real-world safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of etanercept monotherapy, etanercept plus methotrexate (MTX), or etanercept plus other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite previous treatment with DMARD. METHODS: In this 24-week, all-cases postmarketing surveillance study, adverse events (AE) were coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. Effectiveness was assessed every 4 weeks using the 28-joint Disease Activity Score and the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria. RESULTS: Of 13,861 patients (81% women) in the analysis, 3616, 2506, and 7739, respectively, were classified into etanercept monotherapy (ETN-mono), etanercept plus DMARD other than MTX (ETN + DMARD), and etanercept plus MTX (ETN + MTX) groups. Rates of AE and serious AE (SAE) in the ETN + MTX group were lower than in other groups. Risk of SAE or serious infections was not significantly increased with higher versus lower MTX doses at baseline or with concomitant use of salazosulfapyridine or bucillamine in ETN + DMARD versus ETN-mono groups. A greater likelihood of achieving clinical remission was seen with ETN + MTX versus ETN-mono (OR 1.36; 95% CI, 1.16-1.60; p < 0.001). Higher MTX dose at baseline was associated with a higher remission rate (> 8 mg vs 0 to ≤ 4 mg, OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.07-2.00, p = 0.016; 6 to ≤ 8 mg vs 0 to ≤ 4 mg, OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.01-1.60, p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: Combination therapies with etanercept plus MTX or other DMARD were reasonably well tolerated, and ETN + MTX at higher doses was more effective than ETN-mono in Japanese patients with RA.
23007924 Association of rheumatoid arthritis risk alleles with response to anti-TNF biologics: resu 2013 Apr In this study, we investigated whether genetic variants known to be related with susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are also associated with response to therapy with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biologics; 233 patients enrolled in the Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America (CORRONA) RA registry were studied. Findings were combined with results from an international collaborative study (N = 1,283) in a meta-analysis (N = 1,516). Multivariate models investigating the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and change in RA disease activity were adjusted for age, gender, concomitant methotrexate, and baseline disease activity. In the CORRONA cohort, nominal associations with disease activity improvement were observed for the rs1980422 SNP of the CD28 gene in multivariate models (coefficient -0.377, p = 0.005) but were not significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons (q = 0.10). In the meta-analysis, the only SNP with nominal associations with change in DAS28 was the rs2812378 SNP of the CCL21 gene (coefficient 1.9195, p = 0.0068). This association was not significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons (q = 0.143). We conclude that the established RA risk alleles studied were not significantly associated with response to anti-TNF biologics in the CORRONA cohort or the meta-analysis.
23212593 JAK inhibitor tofacitinib for treating rheumatoid arthritis: from basic to clinical. 2013 May Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a representative autoimmune disease characterized by chronic and destructive inflammatory synovitis. The multiple cytokines play pivotal roles in RA pathogenesis by inducing intracellular signaling, and members of the Janus kinase (JAK) family are essential for such signal transduction. An orally available JAK3 inhibitor, tofacitinib, has been applied for RA, with satisfactory effects and acceptable safety in multiple clinical examinations. From phase 2 dose-finding studies, tofacitinib 5 mg and 10 mg twice a day appear suitable for further evaluation. Subsequently, multiple phase 3 studies were carried out, and tofacitinib with or without methotrexate (MTX) is efficacious and has a manageable safety profile in active RA patients who are MTX naïve or show inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX-IR), disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD)-IR, or tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-inhibitor-IR. The common adverse events were infections, such as nasopharyngitis; increases in cholesterol, transaminase, and creatinine; and decreases in neutrophil counts. Although the mode of action of tofacitinib remains unclear, we clarified that the inhibitory effects of tofacitinib could be mediated through suppression of interleukin (IL)-17 and interferon (IFN)-γ production and proliferation of CD4(+) T cells in the inflamed synovium. Taken together, an orally available kinase inhibitor tofacitinib targeting JAK-mediated signals would be expected to be a new option for RA treatment.
22684431 Phase II dose-response study of abatacept in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arth 2013 Mar OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the response to abatacept at doses of 2 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg compared to placebo in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate clinical response to methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: In this multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, dose-response study, 195 Japanese patients with active RA with an inadequate response to MTX were randomized 1:1:1 to receive 10 mg/kg or 2 mg/kg abatacept plus MTX, or placebo plus MTX, for 24 weeks. RESULTS: Abatacept demonstrated a dose-response relationship when given at 2 and 10 mg/kg. Based on the American College of Rheumatology criteria (20, 50, and 70 %), the responses to 10 mg/kg abatacept were significantly greater than those to placebo at week 24 (p < 0.001). Smaller yet statistically significant responses were also seen in the 2 mg/kg abatacept group. Overall rates of adverse events, serious adverse events, and treatment discontinuations because of adverse events were comparable in all three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Abatacept (2 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg) showed a dose-response relationship in Japanese patients with active RA with an inadequate clinical response to MTX. Administration of abatacept in combination with MTX for 24 weeks was well tolerated.
25102861 Importance of methotrexate therapy concomitant with tocilizumab treatment in achieving bet 2015 Jan OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify the effects of concomitant use of MTX and baseline characteristics for remission in the treatment of RA with tocilizumab (TCZ) in daily clinical practice. METHODS: A total of 240 RA patients who received TCZ were selected from the multicentre Tsurumai Biologics Communication Registry. Predictive baseline factors for remission [28-item DAS (DAS28) < 2.6] at 52 weeks were determined by logistic regression analysis. To confirm whether the associations varied by the level of baseline disease activity, we also assessed the model including the interaction term (each baseline variable × DAS28). RESULTS: In total, 49.3% of the study participants used MTX with TCZ. Even after controlling for the baseline DAS28, shorter disease duration (≤3 year) [odds ratio (OR) 3.58 (95% CI 1.81, 7.07)], less structural damage [Steinbroker stage ≤II, OR 2.33 (95% CI 1.32, 4.12)] and concomitant prednisolone use [OR 0.38 (95% CI 0.21, 0.68)] showed significant predictive values for remission. Concomitant MTX use failed to show a significant association with remission, whereas a significant interaction was observed among concomitant MTX use × DAS28 (P = 0.006). In patients with high baseline disease activity (DAS28 > 5.1), concomitant MTX use was associated with increased odds for remission [adjusted OR for all baseline variables 2.54 (95% CI 1.11, 5.83)], while no association was indicated between them in patients with low to moderate baseline disease activity (DAS28 ≤ 5.1). CONCLUSION: Concomitant MTX use is an important component of TCZ treatment for RA patients with high disease activity.