Browse

Search for: rheumatoid arthritis    methotrexate    autoimmune disease    biomarker    gene expression    GWAS    HLA genes    non-HLA genes   

ID PMID Title PublicationDate abstract
24528797 Oropharyngeal carcinoma arising after methotrexate and etanercept therapy for rheumatoid a 2014 Mar Etanercept is an anti-tumor necrosis factor α receptor agent used to treat inflammatory conditions. Previous reports described rapid development of skin squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) after etanercept use. This report describes a novel case of oropharyngeal SCC associated with the use of etanercept. A 45-year-old man with rheumatoid arthritis developed oropharyngeal pain within 2 months after the start of etanercept therapy and was diagnosed with tonsillar carcinoma. This patient had other exposures that increase the risk of oropharyngeal cancer, such as tobacco and alcohol use. However, owing to the timing of onset of his initial symptoms, etanercept should be considered as a possible factor in the etiology or progression of his tumor, especially in the context of reported skin SCC after etanercept therapy in patients at risk for SCC. Clinicians should be alert to signs of malignancy in patients on etanercept, particularly those at high risk for skin or head and neck cancers.
24326008 Key findings towards optimising adalimumab treatment: the concentration-effect curve. 2015 Mar OBJECTIVE: To determine a concentration-effect curve of adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients taking into account the effect of methotrexate (MTX) on concentration and effect and to identify a therapeutic range for adalimumab concentrations. METHODS: In a prospective observational cohort study, 221 consecutive patients with RA were treated with 40 mg adalimumab subcutaneously every other week. The relationship between adalimumab trough level and clinical efficacy after 28 weeks of follow-up was determined in a concentration-effect curve. A receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) curve established a therapeutic cut-off concentration. The effect of MTX on adalimumab trough levels was shown by dividing patients that are and are not concomitantly using MTX in the concentration-effect curve and a concentration table. RESULTS: Clinical efficacy improved with increasing adalimumab concentration and reached a maximum (mean disease activity score in 28 joints improvement of 2) with levels between 5-8 μg/mL. Levels exceeding 8 μg/mL were illustrated to have no additional beneficial effect on disease activity. The ROC curve showed an area under the curve of 0.695 (95% CI 0.626 to 0.764) for European League Against Rheumatism response and adalimumab levels: good responders versus non-responders and moderate responders. A cut-off of 5 μg/mL had a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 43%. Adalimumab levels are influenced by concomitant MTX use: patients on adalimumab monotherapy had a median adalimumab level of 4.1 μg/mL (IQR 1.3-7.7), whereas patients concomitantly taking MTX had a median level of 7.4 μg/mL (IQR 5.3-10.6, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab trough levels in a range of 5-8 μg/mL are sufficient to reach adequate clinical response. These levels are influenced substantially by concomitant MTX use.
25431052 Safety and efficacy of baricitinib at 24 weeks in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who 2015 Feb OBJECTIVES: To investigate baricitinib (LY3009104, formerly INCB028050), a novel, oral inhibitor of JAK1/JAK2 in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite treatment with methotrexate. METHODS: In this phase IIb study, 301 patients were randomised 2:1:1:1:1 to receive once daily doses of placebo or 1, 2, 4 or 8 mg baricitinib for 12 weeks. Patients assigned to 2, 4 and 8 mg baricitinib continued blinded treatment for an additional 12 weeks. Patients assigned to placebo or 1 mg baricitinib were reassigned to 2 mg twice daily or 4 mg once daily baricitinib between weeks 12-24. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients in the combined 4 and 8 mg groups achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response versus placebo at week 12. RESULTS: Significantly more patients in the combined baricitinib 4 and 8 mg groups compared with placebo achieved an ACR20 response at week 12 (76% vs 41%, p<0.001). At week 12, significant differences versus placebo were also observed in patients achieving ACR50, ACR70 and remission as measured by Disease Activity Score for 28-joint counts, Clinical Disease Activity Index and Simplified Disease Activity Index. Patients receiving 2, 4, or 8 mg baricitinib maintained or improved in all measures through 24 weeks. Similar proportions of patients experienced at least one adverse event in the placebo and baricitinib groups. Serious infections developed in three patients receiving baricitinib. No cases of tuberculosis, herpes zoster, opportunistic infections or deaths were reported. Dose-dependent decreases in haemoglobin were observed with baricitinib. CONCLUSIONS: Baricitinib improved the signs and symptoms of RA in methotrexate inadequate responders with active disease. Baricitinib was well tolerated with no unexpected safety findings through week 24. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01185353.
24344160 Golimumab 3-year safety update: an analysis of pooled data from the long-term extensions o 2015 Mar OBJECTIVE: To assess pooled golimumab safety up to year 3 of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) trials. METHODS: Golimumab 50 and 100 mg, administered subcutaneously (SC) every 4 weeks (q4wk), were assessed in patients with active RA (methotrexate-naïve, methotrexate-experienced and anti-TNF (tumour necrosis factor)-experienced), PsA or AS, despite conventional therapy. Placebo control continued up to week (wk) 24 (wk 52, methotrexate-naïve), with early escape at wk 16 (wk 28, methotrexate-naïve); subsequently, all patients received golimumab 50 or 100 mg q4wk. After the blinded controlled period, golimumab doses could be adjusted per investigator discretion. Pooled safety analyses reported herein include data from placebo-controlled and uncontrolled study periods up to wk 160. Determinations of incidences/100 patient-years (pt-yrs) for rare events also included RA patients from a phase IIb trial. RESULTS: Across five phase III trials of SC golimumab, 639 patients received placebo and 2226 received golimumab 50 mg (n=1249) and/or 100 mg (n=1501) up to wk 160 (patients may be included in more than one group because non-responders were allowed early escape); 1179 patients were treated for ≥156 weeks. For placebo, golimumab 50 mg and golimumab 100 mg, respective adverse event incidences/100 pt-yrs (95% CIs) up to wk 160 were: 0.28 (0.01 to 1.56), 0.30 (0.12 to 0.62), 0.41 (0.23 to 0.69) for death; 5.31 (3.20 to 8.30), 3.03 (2.36 to 3.82), 5.09 (4.36 to 5.90) for serious infection; 0.00 (0.00 to 0.84), 0.17 (0.05 to 0.44), 0.35 (0.18 to 0.62) for tuberculosis; 0.00 (0.00 to 0.84), 0.13 (0.03 to 0.38), 0.24 (0.10 to 0.46) for opportunistic infection; 0.00 (0.00 to 0.84), 0.00 (0.00 to 0.13), 0.12 (0.03 to 0.30) for demyelination; and 0.00 (0.00 to 0.84), 0.04 (0.00 to 0.24), 0.18 (0.06 to 0.38) for lymphoma. CONCLUSIONS: SC golimumab safety up to 3 years remained consistent with that of other TNF antagonists. Golimumab 100 mg showed numerically higher incidences of serious infections, demyelinating events and lymphoma than 50 mg; safety follow-up up to year 5 continues.
25398374 The JAK inhibitor tofacitinib suppresses synovial JAK1-STAT signalling in rheumatoid arthr 2015 Jun OBJECTIVE: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The pathways affected by tofacitinib and the effects on gene expression in situ are unknown. Therefore, tofacitinib effects on synovial pathobiology were investigated. METHODS: A randomised, double-blind, phase II serial synovial biopsy study (A3921073; NCT00976599) in patients with RA with an inadequate methotrexate response. Patients on background methotrexate received tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily or placebo for 28 days. Synovial biopsies were performed on Days -7 and 28 and analysed by immunoassay or quantitative PCR. Clinical response was determined by disease activity score and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response on Day 28 in A3921073, and at Month 3 in a long-term extension study (A3921024; NCT00413699). RESULTS: Tofacitinib exposure led to EULAR moderate to good responses (11/14 patients), while placebo was ineffective (1/14 patients) on Day 28. Tofacitinib treatment significantly reduced synovial mRNA expression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1 and MMP-3 (p<0.05) and chemokines CCL2, CXCL10 and CXCL13 (p<0.05). No overall changes were observed in synovial inflammation score or the presence of T cells, B cells or macrophages. Changes in synovial phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) and STAT3 strongly correlated with 4-month clinical responses (p<0.002). Tofacitinib significantly decreased plasma CXCL10 (p<0.005) at Day 28 compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Tofacitinib reduces metalloproteinase and interferon-regulated gene expression in rheumatoid synovium, and clinical improvement correlates with reductions in STAT1 and STAT3 phosphorylation. JAK1-mediated interferon and interleukin-6 signalling likely play a key role in the synovial response. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00976599.
25437024 How well do patients understand written instructions?: health literacy assessment in rural 2014 Nov The aim of this study was to assess health literacy (word recognition and comprehension) in patients at a rural rheumatology practice and to compare this to health literacy levels in patients from an urban rheumatology practice.Inclusion criteria for this cross-sectional study were as follows: ≥18-year-old patients at a rural rheumatology practice (Mid-North Coast Arthritis Clinic, Coffs Harbour, Australia) and an urban Sydney rheumatology practice (Combined Rheumatology Practice, Kogarah, Australia). Exclusion criteria were as follows: ill-health precluding participation; poor vision/hearing, non-English primary language. Word recognition was assessed using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM). Comprehension was assessed using the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA). Practical comprehension and numeracy were assessed by asking patients to follow prescribing instructions for 5 common rheumatology medications.At the rural practice (Mid-North Coast Arthritis Clinic), 124/160 patients agreed to participate (F:M 83:41, mean age 60.3 ± 12.2) whereas the corresponding number at the urban practice (Combined Rheumatology Practice) was 99/119 (F:M 69:30, mean age 60.7 ± 17.5). Urban patients were more likely to be born overseas, speak another language at home, and be employed. There was no difference in REALM or TOFHLA scores between the 2 sites, and so data were pooled. REALM scores indicated 15% (33/223) of patients had a reading level ≤Grade 8 whereas 8% (18/223) had marginal or inadequate functional health literacy as assessed by the TOFHLA. Dosing instructions for ibuprofen and methotrexate were incorrectly understood by 32% (72/223) and 21% (46/223) of patients, respectively.Up to 15% of rural and urban patients had low health literacy and <1/3 of patients incorrectly followed dosing instructions for common rheumatology drugs.There was no significant difference in word recognition, functional health literacy, and numeracy between rural and urban rheumatology patients.
24503398 [The short-term efficacy and safety of methotrexate plus low dose prednisone in patients w 2013 Dec OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of methotrexate (MTX) plus low dose glucocorticoid in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from the "target control" point of view. METHODS: Patients diagnosed as RA according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2010 classification criteria were enrolled. All of the patients were prescribed with 15 mg/week MTX, 5 mg/week folic acid and prednisone (not exceeding 10 mg/day) orally. At week 0, 4, 12, disease activity and clinical efficacy were recorded. Co-primary assessment criterion was disease activity score (DAS28)-based on C-reactive protein (CRP). Secondary assessment criteria included EULAR response criteria, ACR response criteria, simplified disease activity index (SDAI) , clinical disease activity index (CDAI) . The tolerability and toxicity of MTX was recorded at week 4, 12. All patients were evaluated for the occurrence of adverse drug reactions associated with prednisone at week 12. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were enrolled in the study. At week 4 and 12, 68 and 65 patients completed regular follow-up respectively. At week 12, there were 30 (46.2%), 9 (13.8%), 26 (40.0%) patients who met DAS28-CRP remission, low disease activity, middle and high disease activity criterion respectively. Three of nine patients who grouped in low disease activity after therapy were early or intermediate patients and didn't reach the target. Thus 36(55.4%) patients met the standard of target control. The percentage of patients who met the criteria of EULAR good response, the ACR criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20) , the ACR criteria for 50% improvement (ACR50), the ACR criteria for 70% improvement (ACR70) were 29.2%, 75.4%, 69.2%, 64.6%, respectively. The proportion of patients meeting the standard of treat to target using SDAI and CDAI were 76.9%, 58.5% respectively. The rate of liver injury, abdominal pain, abdominal distention and acid reflux, nausea were 11.8%, 4.4%, 4.4%, 2.9% respectively at week 4. At week 12, 4.6% of patients reported abdominal distention. There was only one patient (1.5%) each who complained of abdominal pain, nausea, loss of hair, varicella zoster virus infection and pulmonary infection at week 12. No serious adverse event was observed during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the view of "target control", drug efficacy and safety, MTX plus low dose prednisone is still a useful therapeutic regimen for RA at present.
22739990 Induction therapy with adalimumab plus methotrexate for 24 weeks followed by methotrexate 2013 Jun OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long-term effects of induction therapy with adalimumab (ADA) plus methotrexate (MTX) in comparison with placebo (PBO) plus MTX in DMARD-naïve patients with active early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Patients with active early RA (disease duration of ≤12 months) were randomly assigned to receive 40 mg ADA subcutaneously every other week (eow) plus MTX 15 mg/week subcutaneously or PBO plus MTX subcutaneously at 15 mg/week over 24 weeks. Thereafter, all patients received MTX monotherapy up to week 48. The primary outcome was the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at week 48. Secondary outcomes included proportions of patients in remission (DAS28<2.6), ACR responses, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score and radiographic progression. RESULTS: 87 patients were assigned to ADA/MTX and 85 patients to PBO/MTX. At baseline, DAS28 was 6.2±0.8 in the ADA/MTX and 6.3±0.9 in the PBO/MTX groups. At week 24, treatment with ADA/MTX compared with PBO/MTX resulted in a greater reduction in DAS28 (3.0±1.2 vs 3.6±1.4; p=0.009) and other secondary outcomes such as DAS28 remission rate (47.9% vs 29.5%; p=0.021) and HAQ (0.49±0.6 vs 0.72±0.6; p=0.0014). At week 48, the difference in clinical outcomes between groups was not statistically significant (DAS28: 3.2±1.4 vs 3.4±1.6; p=0.41). Radiographic progression at week 48 was significantly greater in patients administered PBO/MTX (Sharp/van der Heijde score: ADA/MTX 2.6 vs PBO/MTX 6.4; p=0.03, Ratingen score: 1.7 vs 4.2; p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A greater reduction in radiographic progression after initial combination therapy with ADA and MTX was seen at week 48, even after discontinuation of ADA treatment at week 24. This sustained effect was not found at the primary endpoint (DAS28 reduction).
23292520 A predictive model for remission and low disease activity in patients with established rhe 2013 May The objective of this study was to identify predictors for remission or low disease activity (LDA) in established rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at 12 months of anti-TNF-α therapy. We have performed a prospective observational study in 90 consecutive patients with active RA receiving TNF-α inhibitors. Baseline and standard assessments were done every 3 months, including individual parameters (clinical and biological) and composite activity scores (28-joint disease activity score, DAS28). The primary outcome measure was DAS28-based EULAR response criteria. The multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the association between disease activity and several RA baseline characteristics. Of the RA, 78.8 % was classified as good responders based on the EULAR-DAS28 criteria, 44.4 % RA achieving remission (DAS28 ≤ 2.6) and 34.4 %, LDA (DAS28 ≤ 3.2). Parameters associated with an increased likelihood of remission and LDA were initial DAS28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate ≤ 7 (odds ratio (OR) 3.3, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.03-5.81; OR 1.8, 95 % CI 1.09-6.68), Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index ≤  2 (OR 7.0, 95 % CI 1.56-31.91; OR 1.3, 95 % CI 1.03-5.79), C-reactive protein level ≤ 20 mg/l (OR 1.5, 95 % CI 0.29-8.22; OR 0.5, 95 % CI0.08-2.97), rheumatoid factor ≤ 20 IU/ml (OR 18.9, 95 % CI 10.79-38.36; OR 32.9, 95 % CI 4.03-269), anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies ≤ 40 IU/ml (OR 3.5, 95 % CI 0.67-18.19; OR 1.2, 95 % CI 1.02-1.59), concurrent prednisolone (OR 0.2, 95 % CI 0.05-0.36; OR 0.2, 95 % CI 0.06-0.63), methotrexate or leflunomide (OR 1.6, 95 % CI 1.2-13.53; OR 2.9, 95 % CI 1.20-4.36). A predictive matrix for remission and LDA in established active RA patients receiving TNF-α inhibitors was proposed. Further studies are necessary to confirm the value of such matrix in particular RA settings, leading to optimization of the use of anti-TNF-α therapy.
23415134 Efficacy of the switch to modified-release prednisone in rheumatoid arthritis patients tre 2013 Jul OBJECTIVES: In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), low-dose glucocorticoids (GCs) demonstrate disease-modifying potential when added to DMARDs. Modified-release (MR) prednisone taken at bedtime (released 2am) is more effective than immediate-release (IR) GC taken in the morning. METHODS: In an open-label observational study, 950 RA outpatients (mean age 57 ± 13 years; 75% females) treated with GCs and DMARDs (83.7% methotrexate, 10.5% leflunomide; 15.8% biologics) were switched from IR-prednisone or 6-methyl (6M)-prednisolone to low-dose MR-prednisone and followed for 4 months. Morning stiffness duration (MS), pain intensity (numerical rating scale [NRS], 0-10), patient and physician global assessment (GA, 0-10 scale) and disease activity score (DAS28) were assessed at baseline, 2 and 4 months. RESULTS: 513 patients were switched to MR-prednisone from IR-prednisone (9.4±5.4 mg) and 437 from 6M-prednisolone (6.7±3.7 mg). Among 920 patients (96.8%) completing 4-months' MR-prednisone treatment, MS decreased from 58±37 min at T1 to 32±24 min at endpoint (p<0.001); NRS pain intensity reduced from 5.4±1.8 to 3.5±1.4 (p<0.001), and patient and physician GA scores improved from 5.4±1.7 to 3.5±1.4 and 5.1±1.7 to 3.3±1.4, respectively (p<0.001). DAS28 score decreased from 4.2±1.4 to 3.3±1.2 (p<0.001). Mean daily MR-prednisone dosage decreased from 8.2mg to 6.7mg between baseline and endpoint and significantly higher improvements in MS, NRS pain and GA scores were seen in patients switched from 6M-prednisolone versus IR-prednisone. MR-prednisone was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Switching GC-treated RA patients to low-dose MR-prednisone significantly improved outcomes over 4 months.
24988902 Comparative efficacy of biologics as monotherapy and in combination with methotrexate on p 2014 Jul 3 OBJECTIVE: To compare biologics as monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in terms of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in RA patients with an inadequate response to conventional DMARDs (DMARD-IR). METHODS: With a systematic literature review 17 RCTs were identified that evaluated adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, abatacept, anakinra or tocilizumab. Treatment effects in terms of pain (0-100 mm), patient's global assessment of disease activity (PGA; 0-100 mm), Health Assessment-Questionnaire (HAQ) disability index (DI; 0-3), and the physical component summary (PCS) of the SF36 Health Survey (0-100) at 24 weeks were combined by means of Bayesian network meta-analyses. RESULTS: With tocilizumab monotherapy, greater improvements in pain (difference = -11.1; (95% Credible Interval -21.3, -0.1)) and PGA (-10.3 (-20.4, 0.8)) were observed than with aTNF monotherapy. Tocilizumab was at least as efficacious as aTNF in HAQ-DI improvements (-0.16; (-0.37, 0.05)). aTNF + MTX (-17.9 (-23.1, -13.0) & -19.1 (-24.2, -14.4)), abatacept + MTX (-23.0 (-47.3, 1. 5) & -13.6 (-28.4, 2.0)) and tocilizumab + MTX (-16.0 (-26.3, -6.3) & -15.1 (-25.1, -5.7)) showed comparable reductions in pain and PGA relative to MTX. Efficacy of anakinra + MTX was much smaller as compared to other biologics. The greatest improvements in HAQ-DI relative to MTX were observed with aTNF + MTX (-0.30 (-0.37, -0.22)) and tocilizumab + MTX (-0.27 (-0.42, -0.12)), followed by abatacept + MTX (-0.21 (-0.37, -0.05)) and anakinra + MTX (-0.11 (-0.26, 0.05)). The improvements in SF36-PCS with abatacept + MTX, aTNF + MTX and tocilizumab + MTX were comparable. There is a >90% probability that aTNF + MTX results in a greater improvement in pain (-12.4), PGA (-16.1) and HAQ-DI (-0.21) than aTNF as monotherapy. Efficacy of tocilizumab + MTX showed comparable improvements in PROs as tocilizumab monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a network meta-analysis involving indirect comparison of trial findings, the following observations were made for DMARD-IR patients. In monotherapy, tocilizumab was associated with a greater improvement in pain and self-reported disease activity than aTNF, and was at least as efficacious regarding functional ability. The improvements in PROs with aTNF, abatacept and tocilizumab in combination with MTX were comparable. Improvements in PROs with tocilizumab as monotherapy were similar to that of tocilizumab + MTX, whereas aTNF as monotherapy was likely to be less efficacious than aTNF + MTX.
23782588 Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tocilizumab after subcutaneous administration in 2013 Aug OBJECTIVES: To investigate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab 162 mg weekly (QW) or every other week (Q2W) in rheumatoid arthritis patients on methotrexate. METHODS: This was a multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel group study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive tocilizumab 162 mg subcutaneously QW or Q2W for 12 weeks. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic measurements were taken from baseline through to treatment end. Efficacy was assessed at baseline and Q4W thereafter. Safety and tolerability were monitored. RESULTS: 29 patients received tocilizumab treatment for 12 weeks. After final QW and Q2W dosing, mean ± SD for Cmax, Cmin and AUC0-168h/0-336h was 39.4 ± 18.1 and 10.7 ± 6.6 μg/ml, 27.9 ± 14.7 and 2.3 ± 3.2 μg/ml and 5,505 ± 2,632 and 2,332 ± 1,696 μg×h/ml. Median tmax was 2 - 3 days. Mean soluble interleukin-6 receptor (sIL-6R) complex concentration increased within 1 week and plateaued (670 ± 211 (QW); 387 ± 194 ng/ml (Q2W)) by final dosing; median C-reactive protein (CRP) levels decreased to below upper limit of normal after first and third doses; mean ± SD (range) reduction in Disease Activity Score using 28 joints at Week 12 was similar between groups (-2.5 ± 1.2 (-4 to -1); -3.1 ± 1.1 (-5 to -2)). Patients experiencing ≥ 1 adverse event were comparable between groups (71% vs. 80%). CONCLUSIONS: Greater tocilizumab exposure and sIL-6R elevation and more rapid CRP level normalization occurred with QW than with Q2W dosing. Both regimens demonstrated clinical benefit and were well tolerated.
22895833 Twenty-four-week clinical results of adalimumab therapy in Japanese patients with rheumato 2013 May OBJECTIVE: We evaluated patient drug adherence to and efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) based on data collected from approximately 200 patients to retrospectively examine the best use of ADA in Japanese patients with longstanding rheumatoid arthritis (RA) managed in daily practice. METHODS: For explorative comparisons, patients were stratified by prior use or no use of biologics (Bio-naïve vs. Bio-switch) and concomitant use (+) or no use (-) of methotrexate (MTX) into four subgroups. The primary efficacy endpoint was extent of improvement in the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) from baseline to 24 weeks assessed as European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) good response. Secondary endpoints included ADA treatment continuation as represented by Kaplan-Meier survival curves and percentages of patients achieving remission as defined by DAS28-ESR <2.6. RESULTS: Overall, mean DAS28-ESR significantly decreased from 5.6 ± 1.2 at baseline to 4.1 ± 1.7 at week 24 (p < 0.0001), and >30 % of patients achieved EULAR good response. Subgroup analyses indicated that patients in the Bio-naïve and MTX (+) subgroup showed the highest EULAR good response rate of 37.3 % at week 24. The three most commonly reported adverse events (AEs) were skin allergies such as injection-site reactions, infections, and respiratory disorders such as interstitial lung lesions and organizing pneumonia. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, ADA therapy resulted in significant clinical response in established Japanese patients with RA treated in daily practice. It also demonstrated generally good safety and tolerability. It was suggested that the best use of ADA may be in biologically naïve patients with concomitant administration of MTX.
24088351 [Personalized drug therapy-directed clinical pharmacology research based on genetic polymo 2013 In this decade, the field of pharmacogenomics (PGx), which is related to pharmacokinetics (PK) or pharmacodynamics (PD), has attracted much attention because it may provide a possible explanation for individual differences in the clinical efficacy of drugs. For the development of personalized drug therapy, it is important to accumulate evidence from PK/PD/PGx analysis in clinical trials. Warfarin (WF) is one of the most widely prescribed anticoagulants for the prevention and treatment of venous and arterial thromboembolism. However, large interindividual and interethnic differences have been observed in the WF dose required to elicit the anticoagulant effect. We investigated the factors influencing the WF maintenance dose in Japanese patients. Our study confirmed a large interindividual variability in the WF maintenance dose that was due to a VKORC1 1639 G>A polymorphism and differences in body weight, age, and serum albumin. In addition, we found that the CYP4F2 genotype affects the plasma concentration of menaquinone-4, and that this finding was correlated with the WF sensitivity index in Japanese pediatric patients. Methotrexate (MTX) is an antifolate that is widely used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and cancer. The response to low-dose MTX demonstrated wide interpatient variability; however, the contributing factors remain unclear. We found that the frequency of the RFC1 80A allele was higher in RA patients treated with MTX alone compared with patients who received biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). This finding may support the combined use of bDMARDs and MTX. Further large-scale prospective clinical trials are required to confirm these findings.
22833377 Concomitant iguratimod therapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite stable 2013 May OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy and safety of iguratimod (T-614) in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who had inadequate response to stable background methotrexate (MTX) alone. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, controlled trial, a total of 253 patients were randomized at 2:1 ratio to either the iguratimod group or the placebo group. Iguratimod was orally administered at dosages of 25 mg/day for the first 4 weeks (25 mg once daily) and 50 mg/day for the subsequent 20 weeks (25 mg twice daily). MTX at dosage of 6 or 8 mg/week was administered to patients in both groups. RESULTS: The rate of 20 % improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at week 24 was 69.5 % in the iguratimod group compared with 30.7 % in the placebo group (P < 0.001). Significant improvements in the ACR50, ACR70, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index, Disease Activity Score 28 <3.2, and rheumatoid factor were also observed. The most commonly reported adverse events (AEs) were blood iron decrease, nasopharyngitis, and lymphocyte decrease. These AEs were mild or moderate in severity. No deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: The study results suggest that iguratimod in combination with MTX was efficacious and had a manageable safety profile.
23728635 Folic acid and folinic acid for reducing side effects in patients receiving methotrexate f 2013 May 31 BACKGROUND: Methotrexate (MTX) is a disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) used as a first line agent for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Pharmacologically, it is classified as an antimetabolite due to its antagonistic effect on folic acid metabolism. Many patients treated with MTX experience mucosal, gastrointestinal, hepatic or haematologic side effects. Supplementation with folic or folinic acid during treatment with MTX may ameliorate these side effects. OBJECTIVES: To identify trials of supplementation with folic acid or folinic acid during MTX therapy for rheumatoid arthritis and to assess the benefits and harms of folic acid and folinic acid (a) in reducing the mucosal, gastrointestinal (GI), hepatic and haematologic side effects of MTX, and (b) whether or not folic or folinic acid supplementation has any effect on MTX benefit. SEARCH METHODS: We originally performed MEDLINE searches, from January 1966 to June 1999. During the update of this review, we searched additional databases and used a sensitive search strategy designed to retrieve all trials on folic acid or folinic acid for rheumatoid arthritis from 1999 up to 2 March 2012. SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected all double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) in which adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis were treated with MTX (at a dose equal to or less than 25 mg/week) concurrently with folate supplementation. In this update of the review we only included trials using 'low dose' folic or folinic acid (a starting dose of ≤ 7 mg weekly). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted from the trials, and the trials were independently assessed for risk of bias using a predetermined set of criteria. MAIN RESULTS: Six trials with 624 patients were eligible for inclusion. Most studies had low or unclear risk of bias for key domains. The quality of the evidence was rated as 'moderate' for each outcome as assessed by GRADE, with the exception of haematologic side effects which were rated as 'low'. There was no significant heterogeneity between trials, including where folic acid and folinic acid studies were pooled.For patients supplemented with any form of exogenous folate (either folic or folinic acid) whilst on MTX therapy for rheumatoid arthritis, a 26% relative (9% absolute) risk reduction was seen for the incidence of GI side effects such as nausea, vomiting or abdominal pain (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.92; P = 0.008). Folic and folinic acid also appear to be protective against abnormal serum transaminase elevation caused by MTX, with a 76.9% relative (16% absolute) risk reduction (RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.34; P < 0.00001), as well as reducing patient withdrawal from MTX for any reason (60.8% relative (15.2% absolute) risk reduction, RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.53; P < 0.00001).We analysed the effect of folic or folinic acid on the incidence of stomatitis / mouth sores, and whilst showing a trend towards reduction in risk, the results were not statistically significant (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.06)It was not possible to draw meaningful conclusions on the effect of folic or folinic acid on haematologic side effects of methotrexate due to small numbers of events and poor reporting of this outcome in included trials.It does not appear that supplementation with either folic or folinic acid has a statistically significant effect on the efficacy of MTX in treating RA (as measured by RA disease activity parameters such as tender and swollen joint counts, or physician's global assessment scores). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The results support a protective effect of supplementation with either folic or folinic acid for patients with rheumatoid arthritis during treatment with MTX.There was a significant reduction shown in the incidence of GI side effects, hepatic dysfunction (asmeasured by elevated serum transaminase levels) as well as a significant reduction in discontinuation of MTX treatment for any reason. A trend towards a reduction in stomatitis was demonstrated however this did not reach statistical significance.This updated review with its focus on lower doses of folic acid and folinic acid and updated assessment of risk of bias aimed to give a more precise and more clinically relevant estimate of the benefit of folate supplementation for patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving methotrexate.
22661646 Intravenous golimumab is effective in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite me 2013 Mar OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the efficacy of intravenous golimumab 2 mg/kg+methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving MTX. METHODS: Patients (n=592) with active disease (≥6/66 swollen, ≥6/68 tender joints, C-reactive protein ≥1.0 mg/dl, rheumatoid factor positive and/or anticyclic citrullinated protein antibody positive at screening) despite MTX (15-25 mg/week) participated in this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Patients were randomised (2:1) to receive intravenous golimumab 2 mg/kg, or placebo infusions at weeks 0 and 4 and every (q) 8 weeks; patients continued MTX. Placebo patients with <10% improvement in combined swollen/tender joint counts at week 16 could early escape to intravenous golimumab 2 mg/kg. The primary endpoint was week 14 American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. Analyses employed non-responder imputation and last-observation-carried-forward. RESULTS: At week 14, significantly (p<0.001) larger proportions of golimumab+MTX than placebo+MTX patients achieved ACR20 response (59% vs 25%, respectively), a disease activity score of good/moderate (EULAR) response (81% vs 40%), and greater median improvement in health assessment questionnaire scores (0.500 vs 0.125). Improvements versus placebo+MTX were observed by week 2. Similar proportions of patients receiving golimumab+MTX and placebo+MTX, respectively, reported adverse events through week 16 (47% and 44%) and week 24 (53% and 49%). Serious adverse events were reported by more golimumab+MTX (4.1%) than placebo+MTX (2%) patients at week 24. CONCLUSION: The addition of intravenous golimumab rapidly and significantly improved signs and symptoms in patients with active RA despite ongoing MTX, in some patients by week 2.
25231904 Certolizumab pegol (CDP870) for rheumatoid arthritis in adults. 2014 Sep 18 BACKGROUND: Tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibitors are beneficial for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in terms of reducing the risk of joint damage, improving physical function and improving quality of life. This Cochrane review is an update of a review of the treatment of RA with certolizumab pegol that was first published in 2011. OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical benefits and harms of certolizumab pegol (CDP870) in patients with RA who have not responded well to conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2014, Issue 5), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, TOXLINE, Web of Knowledge; websites of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA); reference lists of articles; and searched http/clinicaltrials.gov. The searches were updated from 2009 (date of last search for the original review) to 5 June 2014. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials that compared certolizumab pegol with any other agent including placebo or methotrexate (MTX) in adult patients with active RA despite current or prior treatment with conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), such as MTX. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed search results, trial quality and extracted data. Disagreements were resolved by discussion or referral to a third author. MAIN RESULTS: Eleven trials were included in this update. Ten (4324 patients) were included in the pooled analysis for benefits, five more than previously, and 10 (3711 patients) in the pooled analysis for harms, four more trials (1930 patients) than previously. The duration of follow-up varied from 12 to 52 weeks and the range of doses of certolizumab pegol varied from 50 to 400 mg given subcutaneously (sc). In phase III trials, the control was placebo plus MTX in five trials and placebo in four trials. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed as low but there may have been a risk of attrition bias.Statistically significant improvements were observed at 24 weeks with the approved dose of 200 mg certolizumab pegol every other week, in 1) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50% improvement: 27% absolute improvement (95% CI 20% to 33%), NNT of 4 (95% CI 3 to 8), risk ratio (RR) 3.80 (95% CI 2.42 to 5.95); 2) the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ): -12% absolute improvement (95% CI -9% to -14%), NNT of 6 (95% CI 5 to 8), mean difference (MD) - 0.35 (95% CI -0.43 to -0.26) (scale 0 to 3); 3) Disease Activity Score (DAS) remission improvement: absolute improvement 11% (95% CI 8% to 15%), NNT of 9 (95% CI 4 to 20), RR 8.47 (95% CI 4.15-17.28); and 4) radiological changes: erosion score (ES) absolute improvement -0.29% (95% CI -0.42% to -0.17%), NNT of 6 (95% CI 4 to 10), MD -0.67 (95% CI -0.96 to -0.38) (scale 0 to 230). Serious adverse events were statistically significantly more frequent for certolizumab pegol (200 mg every other week) with an absolute rate difference of 4% (95% CI 2% to 6%), NNTH of 32 (95% CI 17 to 88), Peto odds ratio (OR) 1.77 (95% CI 1.27 to 2.46). There was a statistically significant increase in all withdrawals in the placebo groups (for all doses and all follow-ups) with an absolute rate difference of -34% (95% CI -18% to -50%), NNTH of 4 (95% CI 3 to 5), NNTH of 4 (95% CI 3 to 5), RR 0.42 (95% CI 0.36 to 0.50); and there was a statistically significant increase in all withdrawals due to adverse events in the certolizumab groups (for all doses and all follow-up) with an absolute rate difference of 2% (95% CI 1% to 3%), NNTH of 55 (95% CI 27 to 238), Peto OR 1.66 (95% CI 1.15 to 2.37).The risk of bias was low and the quality of evidence was downgraded to moderate because of high rates of dropouts (> 20%) in most of the trials. We did not find any problems with inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision or publication bias. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The results and conclusions did not change from the previous review. There is moderate-level evidence from randomised controlled trials that certolizumab pegol alone or combined with methotrexate is beneficial in the treatment of RA. Adverse events were more frequent with active treatment. We found a potential risk of serious adverse events.
23338540 Certolizumab pegol: a review of its use in the management of rheumatoid arthritis. 2013 Jan Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia(®)) is a recombinant, polyethylene glycolylated, antigen-binding fragment of a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively targets and neutralizes tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α. The drug is indicated for subcutaneous use every 2 or 4 weeks (q2w or q4w) for the treatment of adults with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The efficacy of subcutaneous certolizumab pegol in adults with active RA has been investigated in several well designed, placebo-controlled trials. In four pivotal studies of ≤52 weeks duration, patients with moderate to severe disease receiving recommended dosages of certolizumab pegol (200 mg q2w or 400 mg q4w), either as monotherapy (after failing prior disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug [DMARD] therapy) or in combination with methotrexate (after responding inadequately to methotrexate alone), experienced rapid clinical improvement, with some combination trials also demonstrating inhibition of radiographic progression. The beneficial effects of certolizumab pegol therapy were generally maintained for up to ≈5 years in clinical trial extensions in which the drug was administered at dosages of 400 mg q4w or q2w. Additional studies suggest certolizumab pegol is also effective in patients who are Asian or have low to moderate disease activity, as well as more clinically representative patient populations. The tolerability profile of certolizumab pegol was acceptable, with infections/infestations the most common adverse events. Thus, certolizumab pegol is an effective option for the management of active RA in adults, although additional long-term and comparative efficacy and tolerability data are needed to help definitively position certolizumab pegol relative to other biological DMARDs, particularly other anti-TNF agents.
24981319 Efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol without methotrexate co-administration in Japane 2014 Jul OBJECTIVE: This 24-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study (NCT00791921) investigated efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol (CZP) in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in whom methotrexate (MTX) cannot be administered. METHODS: A total of 230 patients were randomized to subcutaneous CZP 200 mg (induction dosing: 400 mg at Weeks 0, 2 and 4) or placebo every 2 weeks. RESULTS: ACR20 responses with CZP were rapid and significant versus placebo at Week 1, sustained to Week 12 (67.2% vs. 14.9%) and Week 24 (63.8% vs. 11.4%). Week 24-modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) change from baseline (CFB) was 0.48 (CZP) versus 2.45 (placebo). CZP treatment was associated with higher Week 12 ACR20 responses versus placebo (with non-MTX disease modifying antirheumatic drugs [DMARDs], 74.2% vs. 20.0%; without [monotherapy], 59.3% vs. 8.2%) and inhibition of radiographic progression at Week 24 (mTSS CFB; with non-MTX DMARDs, 0.24 vs. 1.61; monotherapy, 0.68 vs. 3.65). Incidences of serious adverse events were 11.2% (CZP) and 2.6% (placebo); one CZP patient died of dissecting aortic aneurysm. CONCLUSION: CZP treatment with and without non-MTX DMARDs in Japanese patients in whom MTX cannot be administered resulted in rapid, sustained reductions in RA signs and symptoms. Notably, CZP monotherapy showed significant inhibition of radiographic progression.