Search for: rheumatoid arthritis methotrexate autoimmune disease biomarker gene expression GWAS HLA genes non-HLA genes
ID | PMID | Title | PublicationDate | abstract |
---|---|---|---|---|
15829574 | Effectiveness of systematic monitoring of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity in daily p | 2005 Sep | OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of standardised monitoring using the disease activity index DAS28 versus usual care on disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) prescription and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: A 24 week cluster randomised trial. Rheumatology outpatient centres were randomised to systematic monitoring of disease activity using the DAS28 (12 centres, 205 patients) or usual care (12 centres, 179 patients). The aim for the DAS group was to reach a DAS28 score of < or =3.2 by changes in DMARD treatment, at the discretion of the rheumatologist and the patient. RESULTS: At baseline, disease activity was the same in both groups, with an overall mean (SD) DAS28 of 4.5 (1.2); 13% of the patients had a DAS28 of < or =3.2. At 24 weeks, 31% of patients in the DAS group had a DAS28 < or =3.2, while in the usual care centres this was 16% (p = 0.028). DMARDs were changed on average in 18% of visits in the DAS centres; in the 12 usual care centres they were changed on 8% of the visits (p = 0.013). The doses of methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and corticosteroids appeared to be higher in the DAS centres than in the usual care centres, but the differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: In daily practice, systematic monitoring of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis may lead to more changes in DMARD treatment, resulting in a larger number of patients with low disease activity. | |
16200612 | Reduction of the efficacy of methotrexate by the use of folic acid: post hoc analysis from | 2005 Oct | OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of folic acid on the efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at 12 months in 2 phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of leflunomide in which MTX was used as a comparator. METHODS: Analyses were restricted to patients randomized to receive MTX who had rheumatoid factor data. The US study recruited 482 patients with active RA; 179 received at least 1 dose of MTX, and all were mandated to receive 1 mg of oral folic acid once or twice daily. The multinational European study recruited 999 patients with active RA; 489 received at least 1 dose of MTX, and oral folic acid was not required, although 50 received folate after developing an adverse event. Because of similar entry criteria for both studies, the data for patients with available primary outcome data at week 52 were pooled (n = 668), and the patients were grouped by folic acid use (n = 225) and nonuse (n = 443). To account for the significant between-study differences in the MTX groups, baseline covariates were adjusted using propensity scores so that folic acid users could be matched with nonusers. This allowed for a comparison of differences in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% improvement criteria at week 52. RESULTS: At study entry, non-folic acid users had a significantly lower mean body weight, shorter mean RA duration, and higher mean disease activity (measured by joint counts, patient's and physician's global assessments, and acute-phase reactant levels). The mean MTX dosage at week 52 was similar in the 2 RCTs. Using propensity score matching techniques, the proportion of patients achieving an ACR 20% response at week 52 averaged 17% higher in the non-folic acid group than in the folic acid group (range 15-21%). Similarly, the proportion of patients achieving ACR 50% and ACR 70% responses averaged 14% (range 12-16%) and 12% (range 9-14%) higher, respectively, in the non-folic acid group. Adverse events were reported in 93% of US study patients and 94% of the multinational study patients. Elevated liver transaminase levels (above the upper limit of normal) were reported in 29% of the US study patients (majority receiving folic acid) and 62% of the multinational study patients (majority not receiving folic acid). CONCLUSION: After using propensity scores to adjust for differences in the baseline characteristics of folic acid users and non-folic acid users, 9-21% fewer MTX-treated RA patients taking folic acid had ACR 20%, 50%, or 70% improvement at 52 weeks compared with those who did not receive folic acid in the 2 phase III RA clinical trials. As a post hoc analysis, the results of this data analysis should be considered "hypothesis generating" and an impetus for future studies regarding the effects of folic acid on the efficacy of MTX in RA. | |
16240851 | [Tumour necrosis factor antagonists: infliximab, adalimumab and etanercept]. | 2005 Oct 8 | Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) a has been identified through basic research as a molecule that has a central role in the regulation of many autoimmune chronic inflammatory diseases. Experimental and clinical research with TNF antagonists has validated this observation. At this time, TNF blockade is indicated for rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriasis. Recent clinical study with this type of molecularly targeted intervention has determined that chronic inflammatory diseases can share some pathophysiological mechanisms, while others are more specific for certain diseases. Therefore, TNF appears to play a central role in multiple forms of inflammation, but the underlying pathogenic mechanism remains intact during TNF blockade. For this reason, there is much interest in studies of combination therapy in which TNF antagonists are added to other treatments, such as methotrexate. Anti-TNF therapy is expensive; therefore, treatment strategies are needed that are affordable and provide optimal care for groups of patients that do not adequately respond to conventional therapy. | |
16906380 | Infectious myositis involving the piriformis in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis. | 2006 | A 49-year-old Japanese woman treated with oral corticosteroids, methotrexate, and infliximab for malignant rheumatoid arthritis was admitted because of fever and low back pain. The white blood cell count and C-reactive protein concentration were elevated. Lumbar and pelvic computed tomography showed enlargement of the piriformis muscle including a hypodense area consistent with gas formation. The patient was treated successfully for infectious myositis with intravenous antibiotics. | |
16385520 | The PREMIER study: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial of combination t | 2006 Jan | OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of adalimumab plus methotrexate (MTX) versus MTX monotherapy or adalimumab monotherapy in patients with early, aggressive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had not previously received MTX treatment. METHODS: This was a 2-year, multicenter, double-blind, active comparator-controlled study of 799 RA patients with active disease of < 3 years' duration who had never been treated with MTX. Treatments included adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously every other week plus oral MTX, adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously every other week, or weekly oral MTX. Co-primary end points at year 1 were American College of Rheumatology 50% improvement (ACR50) and mean change from baseline in the modified total Sharp score. RESULTS: Combination therapy was superior to both MTX and adalimumab monotherapy in all outcomes measured. At year 1, more patients receiving combination therapy exhibited an ACR50 response (62%) than did patients who received MTX or adalimumab monotherapy (46% and 41%, respectively; both P < 0.001). Similar superiority of combination therapy was seen in ACR20, ACR70, and ACR90 response rates at 1 and 2 years. There was significantly less radiographic progression (P < or = 0.002) among patients in the combination treatment arm at both year 1 and year 2 (1.3 and 1.9 Sharp units, respectively) than in patients in the MTX arm (5.7 and 10.4 Sharp units) or the adalimumab arm (3.0 and 5.5 Sharp units). After 2 years of treatment, 49% of patients receiving combination therapy exhibited disease remission (28-joint Disease Activity Score <2.6), and 49% exhibited a major clinical response (ACR70 response for at least 6 continuous months), rates approximately twice those found among patients receiving either monotherapy. The adverse event profiles were comparable in all 3 groups. CONCLUSION: In this population of patients with early, aggressive RA, combination therapy with adalimumab plus MTX was significantly superior to either MTX alone or adalimumab alone in improving signs and symptoms of disease, inhibiting radiographic progression, and effecting clinical remission. | |
15860509 | Comparison of different definitions to classify remission and sustained remission: 1 year | 2005 Nov | OBJECTIVE: To assess methods to calculate achieving and sustaining remission in a double blind randomised trial in patients with RA who received etanercept, methotrexate, or an etanercept/methotrexate combination. METHODS: Remission was defined as DAS <1.6, DAS28 <2.6, and ACR70 response. Sustaining remission was analysed in three ways: (a) analysis of sustained DAS remission, DAS28 remission, or ACR70 response continuously for 6 months; (b) analysis of sustained remission appraised through a continuity rewarded scoring system, which is the weighted sum of all intervals in the study in which patients are in DAS or DAS28 remission; or (c) longitudinal modelling of remission odds using generalised estimating equations. RESULTS: Significantly more patients treated with the etanercept/methotrexate combination reached DAS remission (37%) than those treated with either methotrexate (14%) or etanercept (18%) alone (p<0.01). Results for DAS28 and for the ACR70 response were similar. Agreement between DAS remission and DAS28 remission was good, but agreement between either of these and the ACR70 response was less. Patients in DAS or DAS28 remission had a lower level of disease activity (fewer active joints, lower ESR) than those achieving ACR70 response; the converse was seen using pain VAS. The three methods were comparable for sustainability of remission and showed significant advantage for combination therapy, which increased the number and durability of remission periods. CONCLUSIONS: DAS and DAS28 remission results were similar for assessing achieving and sustaining remission in RA, frequently differing from patients classified as ACR70 responders. The three methods of examining duration of remission produced comparable results. | |
17037405 | [Gastropleural fistula due to perforated gastric ulcer]. | 2006 Sep | A 65-year-old woman, who had been taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), prednisolone and methotrexate for rheumatiod arthritis, was admitted to our hospital with a sudden onset of left-back and chest pain and breathlessness. A chest radiograph and computed tomography revealed a left-side pneumothorax and pleural effusion. Chest tube was inserted for drainage and the fluid was formed to contain food residuum. Contrast radiography demonstrated escape of soluble contrast medium into the left pleural space. A thoracotomy and transdiaphragmatic revealed a gastropleural fistula. It was repaired and the gastric origin was resected. Pathologic evaluation revealed evidence of chronic peptic ulceration, but no malignant change. Gastropleural fistula due to peptic ulcer without esophageal herniation, malignancy, or traumatic injury is extremely unusual. The cause of the focal adhesion of the gastric ulcer and diaphragm, fistula formation was not certain but was probably related to the ingestion of NSAIDs in combination with prednisolone and other immunosuppressive agents. Although gastropleural fistula is rare, the prognosis in such patients related to early diagnosis and surgical intervention, emphasizing the importance of including this condition when making a differential diagnosis. | |
16583466 | A phase I study assessing the safety, clinical response, and pharmacokinetics of an experi | 2006 May | OBJECTIVE: To assess safety, clinical response, and pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous (SC) and intramuscular (IM) doses of an experimental formulation of infliximab [including experimental SC doses following administration of commercially-formulated intravenous (IV) infliximab] in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) refractory to methotrexate. METHODS: In this randomized, open-label, 3-stage design, 43 subjects were enrolled in 7 dose groups. In Stage I, 15 subjects received single SC doses of 0.5, 1.5, or 3.0 mg/kg. In Stage II, 21 subjects received one of 3 regimens: 100 mg SC every 2 weeks (3 injections); 3 mg/kg commercially-formulated IV infliximab every 2 weeks (2 infusions) followed by 100 mg SC every 2 weeks (3 injections); or 100 mg IM every 2 weeks (3 injections). In Stage III, 7 subjects received 100 mg SC every 4 weeks (3 injections). RESULTS: No treatment-related serious adverse events were observed, and there were no serious injection site reactions. A low-titer infliximab antibody response was detected in 27% of subjects receiving single SC doses, 5% receiving multiple SC doses, and 43% receiving IM doses. SC administration yielded roughly dose-proportional increases in Cmax and AUC. American College of Rheumatology 20% response (ACR20) was achieved 2 weeks after the last injection by 86.7% of subjects receiving single SC doses, 85.7% receiving SC doses every 2 weeks, 85.7% receiving both IV and SC doses, 57.1% receiving multiple IM doses, and 80.0% receiving SC doses every 4 weeks. CONCLUSION: SC and IM treatment with this experimental infliximab formulation was well tolerated and was associated with a favorable ACR response. | |
16639484 | [A comparison between the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and the Disease Activit | 2006 Jan | OBJECTIVE: To compare the SDAI values to DAS28 scores in RA patients undergoing different DMARD regimens. METHODS: The SDAI is an unweighted numerical sum of five outcome parameters: tender and swollen joint count (based on 28-joint assessment), patient and physician global assessment of disease activity (visual analogue scale: 0-10 cm) and level of C-reactive protein (mg/dl). 80 patients (F/M 68/12; age between 20-68 years, median 52) with active rheumatoid arthritis were prospectively enrolled in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups according to the therapeutic regimens: group I: Methotrexate (MTX) 15 mg/weekly + salazopyrin 2 g/daily; group II: MTX 15 mg/weekly + infliximab 3 mg/Kg at time 0, 2, 4 and every 8 weeks; group III: MTX 15 mg/weekly + etanercept 25 mg/twice weekly; group IV: MTX 15 mg/weekly + adalimumab 40 mg/every other week. SDAI and DAS28 were determined at baseline and after 6 months in each patient. Mean changes in SDAI values were compared to those detected in DAS 28 at baseline and after 6 months. RESULTS: SDAI and DAS 28 were found to be significantly correlated at baseline. Moreover, changes in SDAI over time paralleled those in DAS, and were found to be significantly correlated. CONCLUSIONS: SDAI is a valid measure of response to treatment in RA patients undergoing different therapeutic regimens. | |
16536638 | Long-term experience with etanercept in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in elderly a | 2006 | BACKGROUND: The impact of long-term therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in elderly (> or = 65 years of age) and younger (< 65 years of age) patients, especially on patient-reported outcomes, has not been well studied. We evaluated patient-reported outcomes in elderly patients treated with etanercept, in contrast to outcomes in younger patients, using data from multiple controlled and open-label extension studies of patients with early RA (ERA; < or = 3 years) and late RA (LRA; disease-modifying antirheumatic drug [DMARD]-refractory RA). METHODS: This post hoc analysis included adult patients with RA enrolled in controlled, double-blind studies (up to 2 years) and subsequent open-label extension studies (up to 4 years). Patients were evaluated according to age at baseline of the original study. Patients may have received etanercept, placebo or methotrexate during the blinded treatment phases, but all patients had been receiving etanercept 25 mg twice weekly for at least 4 years. Both ERA and LRA extension studies are ongoing. Patient-reported outcome assessments included improvement in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), proportions of patients achieving an improvement in HAQ-DI > or = 0.22 points, patients exhibiting worsening of HAQ-DI and patients achieving an HAQ-DI score of 0. RESULTS: Elderly patients, with either ERA or LRA, had significantly worse baseline mean HAQ-DI scores than younger patients (p < 0.05, Student's t-test) in most studies, indicating greater disability. Improvement in HAQ-DI was greatest during the first 3 months after starting etanercept treatment in the controlled phase and appeared to be sustained over 3-6 months in patients with early or DMARD-refractory RA. Across the various controlled trials, mean improvements from baseline in HAQ-DI ranged from 0.39 to 0.92 points in elderly patients and from 0.57 to 1.00 points in younger patients. Patients with ERA and LRA, regardless of age group, maintained their improvement in HAQ-DI throughout the open-label extension trials for up to a total of 6 years of etanercept therapy. Change from baseline in HAQ-DI was moderately correlated with 28-joint Disease Activity Score within each age group across the multiple trials. CONCLUSION: Both elderly and younger patients with RA treated with etanercept exhibited similar and rapid improvements in functional status during controlled studies, and these improvements were sustained during open-label extension trials. | |
16736520 | Comparison of the response to infliximab or etanercept monotherapy with the response to co | 2006 Jun | OBJECTIVE: To compare outcome at 6 months in unselected "real-world" patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with etanercept or infliximab as either monotherapy, cotherapy with methotrexate (MTX), or cotherapy with another disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD). METHODS: A total of 2,711 subjects starting treatment with their first biologic agent (1,453 infliximab and 1,258 etanercept) were followed up for 6 months. Outcome was assessed using the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria. Ordinal regression was used to model the response in the MTX and other DMARD cotherapy groups relative to the monotherapy group separately for the 2 anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents, after adjusting for baseline differences. RESULTS: Etanercept-treated patients had an increased likelihood of achieving a higher EULAR response category with cotherapy with MTX (odds ratio [OR] 2.0, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.5-2.7) and with another DMARD (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.9-1.6) as compared with monotherapy. For infliximab-treated patients, the likelihoods were 1.4 (95% CI 0.9-2.0) for MTX and 1.3 (95% CI 0.8-2.1) for other DMARDs versus monotherapy. Cotherapy with MTX or another DMARD produced significantly higher rates of remission with etanercept (12% and 11%, respectively) as compared with etanercept monotherapy (5%). Infliximab-treated patients showed similar remission rates in the MTX and other DMARD cotherapy groups (8% and 5%, respectively) as in the monotherapy group (7%). CONCLUSION: In this study of real-world patients, the use of MTX and, to a lesser extent, other DMARDs as cotherapy with etanercept was associated with a higher likelihood of response. Although the infliximab guidelines suggest that MTX be used as cotherapy, in clinical practice, both monotherapy and cotherapy with DMARDs other than MTX are used. These data suggest that either of the latter strategies may be useful in patients who are intolerant to MTX. | |
16499162 | [Adverse events in rheumatoid arthritis patient with etanercept therapy: the appearance of | 2005 Nov | Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease of unknown origin that predominantly involves synovial tissue. RA affects 0.5-1% of the global population, with females affected more frequently than males. Patients receiving standard care for RA have significantly better status in 2000 than in 1985, associated with aggressive treatment strategies, prior to the introduction of biologic agents. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) decrease clinical signs and symptoms in RA. Methotrexate, leflunomide and biological agents are analyzed. Glucocorticoids have long been recognized to have beneficial effects in RA. Rickets and osteomalacia are metabolic bone diseases due to a mineralization defect as principal pathophysiology. The Authors present a case report on a female patient with RA in treatment con etanercept and with osteomalacia (secondary?). | |
16609887 | Protective effects of thymoquinone and methotrexate on the renal injury in collagen-induce | 2006 Nov | The goal of this investigation was to study the protective effects of thymoquinone (TQ) and methotrexate (MTX) on collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) in rats. On day 0 under ether anesthesia, the experimental groups were immunized with 0.5 mg native chick collagen II (CII) solubilized in 0.1 M acetic acid and emulsified in Freund's incomplete adjuvant. Control rats were gavaged with vehicle, whereas CII was administered intradermally. In addition, arthritis treated with TQ group received TQ (10 mg kg(-1) bw by gavage once a week for 3 weeks starting on day 0); and arthritis treated with MTX group received MTX (MTX was suspended in corn oil and administered by gavage at 1 mg kg (-1) bw once a week for 3 weeks starting on day 0). A significant decrease in the incidence and severity of arthritis by clinical and radiographic assessments was found in recipients of therapy, compared with that of controls. The MTX treatment significantly (P<0.01) decreased the elevated serum NO, urea and creatinine in arthritic rats. Likewise, TQ treatment was also able to reduce significantly (P<0.05) serum NO, urea and creatinine levels, but to lesser extent than MTX. The histopathologic abnormalities are consistent with the hydropic epithelial cell degenerations and moderate tubular dilatation in the some proximal and distal tubules. The severity of the degenerative changes in most of the shrunken glomerules and vascular congestion were also observed in arthritic animals. Preventive treatment of TQ and especially MTX significantly inhibited kidney dysfunction and this histopathologic alterations. These studies indicate that TQ can be used similar to MTX as a safe and effective therapy for CIA and may be useful in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. | |
15738628 | [Examination of the escape phenomenon in disease modifying antirheumatic drugs]. | 2005 Mar | Although disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the selection of agents in the case of relapse (escape phenomenon) lacks clear-cut standards. Therefore we investigated the rate and conditions of escape as well as the agents used after escapes had occurred. Outpatients of the Matsubara Mayflower Hospital with a history of DMARD administration during the 4 years prior to May 2003 were studied. Those receiving salazosulfapyridine (SASP) had a high escape rate and those receiving methotrexate (MTX) and bucillamine (BC) had a low rate. The continuous duration of administration was long for MTX and BC, but short for sodium aurothiomalate (GST). BC and Actarit (AR) gradually elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). In patients receiving SASP and MTX, a high level of CRP and high ESR was seen 2 months prior to the occurrence of escape and remained unchanged after escape. With respect to the agents used after escape, SASP and BC were substituted with other DMARDs. A combination with other DMARDs was usually administered to patients who had been receiving MTX. Taken together, the present results clarified the characteristics of DMARD escape and will contribute to the appropriate pharmacotherapy for RA. | |
16649186 | The efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite | 2006 May | OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy and safety of different rituximab doses plus methotrexate (MTX), with or without glucocorticoids, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) resistant to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including biologic agents. METHODS: A total of 465 patients were randomized into 9 treatment groups: 3 rituximab groups (placebo [n = 149], 500 mg [n = 124], or 1,000 mg [n = 192] on days 1 and 15) each also taking either placebo glucocorticoids, intravenous methylprednisolone premedication, or intravenous methylprednisolone premedication plus oral prednisone for 2 weeks. All patients received MTX (10-25 mg/week); no other DMARDs were permitted. RESULTS: Significantly more patients who received 2 500-mg or 2 1,000-mg infusions of rituximab met the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (achieved an ACR20 response) at week 24 (55% and 54%, respectively) compared with placebo (28%; P < 0.0001). ACR50 responses were achieved by 33%, 34%, and 13% of patients, respectively (P < 0.001), and ACR70 responses were achieved by 13%, 20%, and 5% of patients (P < 0.05). Changes in the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (-1.79, -2.05, -0.67; P < 0.0001) and moderate to good responses on the European League Against Rheumatism criteria (P < 0.0001) reflected the ACR criteria responses. Glucocorticoids did not contribute significantly to the primary efficacy end point, ACR20 response at 24 weeks. Intravenous glucocorticoid premedication reduced the frequency and intensity of first infusion-associated events; oral glucocorticoids conferred no additional safety benefit. Rituximab was well tolerated; the type and severity of infections was similar to those for placebo. CONCLUSION: Both rituximab doses were effective and well tolerated when added to MTX therapy in patients with active RA. The primary end point (ACR20 response) was independent of glucocorticoids, although intravenous glucocorticoid premedication improved tolerability during the first rituximab infusion. | |
16859835 | Methtrexate-associated lymphoproliferative disorders. A clinicopathological study of 13 Ja | 2006 | We conducted clinicopathological and immunohistochemical analyses to investigate the prevalence of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) among 13 cases with methotrexate (MTX)-associated lymphoproliferative disorder (LPD). The subjects of this study were four men and nine women ranging in age from 53 to 78 years (mean: 63 years). All 13 patients had received low dose MTX therapy for 1-13 years before the onset of LPD (mean: 5.8 years). LPDs were found at extranodal sites in six cases, and the disease stage was advanced in seven cases. The present study confirmed certain aspects of a previous observation made in the USA, including the following findings (i) the cases commonly showed diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (n=4) and Hodgkin lymphomas (HL) (n=3), (ii) EBV-encoded small RNA (EBER) + cells were identified in seven cases (60%), which is a much higher percentage than would be expected in lymphomas occurring in a general population, and (iii) three cases of polymorphous small lymphocytic or lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate achieved spontaneous remission of LPDs after MTX withdrawal. Of seven cases of EBER + in our series, three cases were PSLLPI, and two were HL. EBER + tumor cells were detected in only two (30%) of the seven cases with non-Hodgkin lymphomas. The present study suggests that EBV- associated non-Hodgkin lymphomas comprise only a portion of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas among MTX-associated LPDs. | |
16766364 | Interleukin-1beta influences the effect of infliximab on temporomandibular joint pain in r | 2006 May | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of plasma and synovial fluid tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha), interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta), IL-6, soluble TNF receptor II (TNF-sRII), IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra), soluble IL-1 receptor II (IL-1sRII) and IL-10 on the effect of the TNFalpha antibody infliximab on temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Fifteen patients with TMJ pain taking methotrexate were included in the study. The effect of intravenous infusions of infliximab was assessed after 14 or 22 weeks. TMJ resting and movement pain was assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS) (0-100 mm) and samples of venous blood and TMJ synovial fluid were collected before and after treatment. RESULTS: The effect of infliximab on TMJ pain was influenced by pretreatment plasma levels of IL-1beta, IL-1ra, and IL-10 as well as pretreatment levels of TMJ synovial fluid IL-1sRII. High pretreatment levels of these cytokines and receptors as well as the presence of rheumatoid factor (RF) were associated with no or minor reduction in TMJ pain after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic treatment of RA with a combination of infliximab and methotrexate seems to be insufficient to alleviate TMJ pain in patients with RF or high pretreatment plasma levels of IL-1beta. | |
15708884 | Treatment continuation in patients receiving biological agents or conventional DMARD thera | 2005 Sep | OBJECTIVE: To compare drug continuation rates in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who start on a biological agent and in a control group of patients with a change in disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment after previous DMARD failure. METHODS: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis enrolled in the German biologics register between May 2001 and September 2003 were included in the study. Data were available for 511 patients treated with etanercept, 343 with infliximab, 70 with anakinra, and 599 controls. Propensity scores were used to select a subsample of patients from the control group who were likely to be treated with biological agents because of their disease severity, as well as comparable infliximab and etanercept cases. RESULTS: Treatment continuation after 12 months was similar for etanercept (68.6% (95% confidence interval, 62% to 75%)) and infliximab (65.4% (58% to 73%)) but lower for anakinra (59% (41% to 77%)). Treatment continuation was more likely for patients on combinations of biological agents and DMARDs than for those on infliximab or etanercept alone. Patients treated with biological agents were more severely ill than those in the control group and had more previous DMARD failures. After adjustment for baseline differences, the continuation rates were higher in patients treated with biological agents than in comparable control patients treated with leflunomide or leflunomide/methotrexate. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment continuation of biological agents in clinical practice is less likely than in randomised clinical trials but more likely than in comparable controls treated with conventional DMARDs. | |
16440745 | [Effective treatment for a methotrexate-associated lymphoproliferative disorder with R-CHO | 2005 Jul | A 65-year-old male had a two-month history of fever and fatigue. He had been receiving low dose MTX administration for about 2 years for rheumatoid arthritis. The blood chemistry findings showed elevated liver function including lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. The quantified serum EBV-DNA level was 200 copies/105 peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Computed tomographic scan demonstrated splenomegaly and intraperitoneal mass lesions. One of the masses was biopsied. Some tumor cells showed a large Hodgkin cell-like appearance. These were CD3e-, CD20 +, CD30 +, CD15-, LMP1 +, EBNA2-, EBER-ISH + without imbalance of the kappa/lambda ratio. A diagnosis of MTX-associated B-lymphoproliferative disorder was made. Although the patient's fever subsided and the serum LDH levels were normalized after withdrawal of the MTX, the masses showed almost no change. Therefore, we administered rituximab weekly for a total of four doses, resulting in normalization of the serum EBV-DNA load and serum CD4/CD8 ratio. The masses persisted, however, so we carried out eight courses of R-CHOP therapy, which induced complete response without any episode of serious infection. | |
16232020 | Effects of perioperative antiinflammatory and immunomodulating therapy on surgical wound h | 2005 Nov | Patients with various rheumatologic and inflammatory disease states commonly require drugs known to decrease the inflammatory or autoimmune response for adequate control of their condition. Such drugs include nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors, corticosteroids, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and biologic response modifiers. These drugs affect inflammation and local immune responses, which are necessary for proper wound healing in the perioperative setting, thereby potentially resulting in undesirable postoperative complications. Such complications include wound dehiscence, infection, and impaired collagen synthesis. The end result is delayed healing of soft tissue and bone wounds. The current literature provides insight into the effect of some of these drugs on wound healing. For certain drugs, such as methotrexate, trials have been conducted in humans and direct us on what to do during the perioperative period. Whereas with other drugs, we must rely on either small-animal studies or extrapolation of data from human studies that did not specifically look at wound healing. Unfortunately, no clear consensus exists on the need and optimum time for withholding therapy before surgery. Likewise, clinicians are often uncertain of the appropriate time to resume therapy after the procedure. For those drugs with limited or no data in this setting, the use of pharmacokinetic properties and biologic effects of each drug should be considered individually. In some cases, discontinuation of therapy may be required up to 4 weeks before surgery because of the long half-lives of the drugs. In doing so, patients may experience an exacerbation or worsening of disease. Clinicians must carefully evaluate individual patient risk factors, disease severity, and the pharmacokinetics of available therapies when weighing the risks and benefits of discontinuing therapy in the perioperative setting. |