Browse

Search for: rheumatoid arthritis    methotrexate    autoimmune disease    biomarker    gene expression    GWAS    HLA genes    non-HLA genes   

ID PMID Title PublicationDate abstract
19024068 [Aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma in 3 patients with rheumatoid arthritis: discontinue the 2008 Oct 25 3 female patients who were being treated with methotrexate developed a non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The first patient, 67 years old, presented with an enlarged thyroid gland. The cytological punction was inconclusive and an open biopsy revealed a B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, which was localised. A week before the biopsy the methotrexate was discontinued. The patient herself reported that the swelling of her thyroid gland was diminished after cessation of methotrexate. The lymphoma showed a complete remission without chemotherapy being given. The second patient, a 78-year-old woman, developed a non-Hodgkin lymphoma in one of her tonsils that showed a partial remission after withdrawal of the methotrexate therapy. The third patient, a 66-year-old woman, presented herself with a pulmonary non-Hodgkin lymphoma. In this patient withdrawal of the methotrexate resulted in a complete remission of the non-Hodgkin lymphoma as well. Although no epidemiological study has shown an increased risk of lymphoproliferative disorders during the use of methotrexate, these spontaneous remissions suggest an aetiological link. If a non-Hodgkin lymphoma develops in a patient being treated with methotrexate then the therapy should be discontinued and chemotherapy should not be given straightaway.
18986481 Generalized pustulosis induced by adalimumab in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis - a th 2008 Nov Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors such as adalimumab are increasingly used in the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis. In Europe, this group of drugs also has been approved for therapy of moderate to severe psoriasis recently. With increased application of adalimumab, the possible adverse effects occurring in the course of treatment steadily gained more attention. Among these, infection and localized skin eruptions are the most common. Usually, the cutaneous symptoms rapidly resolve after discontinuation of the drug. Here, however, we report on a woman with rheumatoid arthritis who developed a therapy-refractory, generalized pustular rash during treatment with adalimumab. After different unsuccessful therapeutic attempts, only a combined treatment with prednisone, methotrexate, and cyclosporinee eventually led to marked improvement. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on a generalized, therapy-resistant pustulosis as an adverse effect of adalimumab.
16287919 Influence of methotrexate, TNF blockers and prednisolone on antibody responses to pneumoco 2006 Jan OBJECTIVE: To compare antibody responses to 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine (Pneumovax) in controls and patients with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with TNF blockers, methotrexate (MTX) or a combination of both. METHODS: Patients with RA (n = 149) and healthy controls (n = 47) were vaccinated. Treatment with TNF blockers (etanercept or infliximab) and MTX was given to 50 patients, and 62 patients were treated with TNF blockers alone or with other DMARDs. MTX alone was given to 37 patients. Concentrations of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against pneumococcal capsular polysaccharides 23F and 6B were measured by enzyme-linked immunoassay before and 4-6 weeks after vaccination. An immune response was defined as a twofold or higher increase in antibody concentration following vaccination. RESULTS: Prevaccination antibody levels for both 23F and 6B were similar in the patient groups. Antibody concentrations after vaccination increased significantly in all groups. Patients treated with TNF blockers without MTX showed better immune responses than those treated with TNF blockers in combination with MTX (P = 0.037 for 23F and P = 0.004 for 6B) or MTX alone (P<0.001 for both 23F and 6B). RA patients given MTX alone had the lowest immune responses. Prednisolone treatment did not influence the responses. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with TNF blockers and controls showed similar responses to vaccination. In contrast, patients treated with MTX had reduced responses regardless of anti-TNF treatment. The findings do not argue against the use of pneumococcal vaccination in RA patients undergoing treatment with TNF blockers.
18176989 Rituximab therapy in rheumatoid arthritis in daily practice. 2008 Jan OBJECTIVE: Rituximab has been shown to be effective in refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in randomized controlled trials, allowing approval by health agencies. Our aim was to assess in routine care the effects of rituximab in patients with RA who had experienced an inadequate response to anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) agents or had a contraindication to these drugs. METHODS: An observational retrospective study was conducted. Rituximab (1000 mg intravenous infusion on Days 1 and 15) was administered with concomitant methotrexate therapy. Responses defined according to the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR criteria) were assessed at Week 24. RESULTS: Fifty patients were included: 30 had inadequate response to anti-TNF-alpha and 20 had contraindication to anti-TNF-a drugs. EULAR response was observed in 82%, good response in 36% (including remission in 12%), moderate response in 46%, and no response in 18%. One infusion-related reaction and 2 pulmonary infections occurred. Eleven of the 50 patients (22%) experienced flare and received retreatment with rituximab at 6 months. Thirty additional patients had flare after 6 months and the median delay for retreatment among the 41 responders was 9 (range 6 24) months. No difference regarding efficacy or tolerance of rituximab was observed according to previous inadequate response or contraindication to anti-TNF. CONCLUSION: A single cycle of rituximab, in combination with continued methotrexate, provided significant improvement in disease activity at Week 24, with good tolerance, in patients with severe and active RA despite anti-TNF-alpha agents and/or with contraindication to these drugs, in this daily practice study.
16343832 Iatrogenically-related, fatal methotrexate intoxication: a series of four cases. 2006 Jan 27 Since the early eighties, the folic antagonist methotrexate (MTX) has been used in long-term treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Because of the high toxic potential clinical and laboratory controls at regular intervals and patient education in order to avoid misadventure is of overriding importance. We present four cases of fatal MTX intoxication due to medical malpractice from the Tübingen Institute of Forensic Medicine autopsy material, which show the severe consequences of MTX overdose. It becomes evident that among non-rheumatologists there still is need for information about toxicity and dose limitation in MTX low-dose treatment.
16464988 Efficacy and safety of combination etanercept and methotrexate versus etanercept alone in 2006 Nov OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of etanercept (ETN) monotherapy compared with combination ETN and methotrexate (MTX) treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had an inadequate response to MTX monotherapy. (The response was defined by the presence of Disease Activity Score-28 joint count (DAS28) >or=3.2 or a combination of >or=5 swollen joints, >or=5 painful joints and erythrocyte sedimentation rate >or=10 mm/h.) METHODS: Patients with active rheumatoid arthritis taking MTX >or=12.5 mg/week for >or=3 months were included in this 16 week, randomised, open-label study. Patients were randomly assigned to either ETN (25 mg subcutaneous injection twice weekly) added to the baseline dose of MTX or ETN monotherapy. RESULTS: 315 patients were randomised to ETN (n = 160) or ETN plus MTX (n = 155). The primary end point, DAS28 (4) improvement of >1.2 units, was achieved by 72.8% and 75.2% of patients treated with ETN and those treated with ETN plus MTX, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.658) between the two groups. The European League Against Rheumatism response criteria of good or moderate response was attained by 80.0% of patients in the ETN group and by 82.4% of patients in the ETN plus MTX group. American College of Rheumatology 20%, 50% and 70% response rates achieved by both groups were also similar: 71.0% v 67.1%, 41.9% v 40.1% and 17.4% v 18.4%, respectively. The rates of adverse and serious adverse events were similar between the treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Both the addition of ETN to MTX and the substitution of ETN for MTX in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had an inadequate response to MTX resulted in substantial improvements in clinical signs and symptoms and were generally well-tolerated treatment strategies for improving clinical signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis.
18485021 Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis treated with inflixim 2008 Jul Infliximab is a tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha blocking drug classified as a biological response modifier. It has been suggested that the risk of malignancies, especially lymphomas, is increased in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with anti-TNF-alpha antibody therapy. We present a case of malignant lymphoma during the treatment of RA with infliximab and methotrexate.
17057043 Abatacept. 2006 Nov 1 PURPOSE: The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, indications, clinical efficacy, adverse effects, drug interactions, dosing, and administration of abatacept are discussed. SUMMARY: Abatacept is the first drug in a new class of agents known as selective costimulator modulators. Abatacept has been shown to decrease tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, which is important to the inflammatory response. Abatacept inhibits T-cell function but does not deplete T cells. Activated T cells are important in the inflammatory cascade, ultimately leading to joint inflammation and irreversible structural damage. In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, there is chronic inflammation of the synovial tissue lining the joint capsule. Abatacept is indicated for reducing the signs and symptoms of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis in adult patients who have had an inadequate response to at least one disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. Studies in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis have evaluated abatacept in patients with an inadequate response to either methotrexate or TNF-alpha blocking agents. One trial showed that abatacept produced a favorable six-month clinical response in patients who had previously failed to respond to anti-TNF-alpha therapy. In a study of concurrent abatacept and methotrexate therapy, the addition of abatacept produced favorable outcomes in patients who were not adequately responding to methotrexate alone. CONCLUSION: Abatacept, a newly approved agent for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, has shown promising results in patients who have had an inadequate response to other treatment modalities. Abatacept therapy should be reserved for patients who have failed other time-tested treatment modalities, including TNF-alpha antagonists. Results from ongoing postmarketing studies will help determine abatacept's place in therapy.
16447238 Risk genotypes in folate-dependent enzymes and their association with methotrexate-related 2006 Feb OBJECTIVE: Methotrexate (MTX) is an antifolate agent that is often associated with toxicity. This study investigated whether risk genotypes for folate-dependent enzymes are associated with the toxicity of MTX in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Blood was collected for analysis in a muticenter, cross-sectional study of RA patients who had been receiving MTX for at least 1 month prior to enrollment, and side effects occurring at the time of a single study visit were recorded. Low-penetrance risk genotypes in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677TT, thymidylate synthase (TSER) *2/*2 (variable number of tandem repeats), amino imidazole ribonucleotide transformylase (ATIC) 347GG, and serine hydroxymethyltransferase (SHMT1) 1420CC were measured and summed to constitute the toxicogenetic index specific to each patient. Statistical analyses consisted of logistic regression models with clustered-center effects, and associations with risk genotypes were expressed as adjusted odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS: Among 214 patients enrolled at 4 study sites, a total of 67 patients (31%) presented with a side effect (gastrointestinal event, headache, lethargy, alopecia, cough, or dyspnea). Risk genotypes associated with side effects in the central nervous system were MTHFR 677TT (OR 3.3, P < 0.01) and SHMT1 1420CC (OR 2.4, P < 0.05). ATIC 347GG was associated with gastrointestinal side effects (OR 3.0, P < 0.01), while TSER*2/*2 (OR 5.4, P < 0.01) and SHMT1 1420CC (OR 3.2, P < 0.01) were associated with alopecia. The toxicogenetic index ranged from 0 to 3 (median 1). An index of 3 was associated with an approximately 7-fold higher likelihood of having a side effect compared with an index of 0 (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that a composite index of the cumulative risk genotypes in folate-dependent enzymes may be an effective means of profiling RA patients who develop side effects to MTX.
18759293 Ocrelizumab, a humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of patients with 2008 Sep OBJECTIVE: Ocrelizumab, a humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, was studied in a first-in-human trial in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients receiving concomitant methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: The ACTION trial was a combined phase I/II study of placebo plus MTX versus ocrelizumab plus MTX in 237 RA patients (intent-to-treat population). During phase I, 45 patients were treated with 1 of 5 escalating doses of study drug (infusions on days 1 and 15, 10-1,000 mg per each infusion). An additional 192 patients were randomized during phase II. Eligible patients had active disease, an inadequate response to treatment with at least MTX, rheumatoid factor positivity, and elevated levels of acute-phase reactants. The total study duration was 72 weeks. B cell pharmacodynamics over time was investigated. RESULTS: Baseline demographics were similar among the treatment groups. Based on the entire 72-week data set, the incidence of serious adverse events in the ocrelizumab-treated patients was 17.9%, as compared with 14.6% in placebo-treated patients. The incidence of serious infections was 2.0% in all ocrelizumab-treated patients and 4.9% in placebo-treated patients. Infusion-associated adverse events were mostly grade 1 or grade 2 and were more frequent around the time of the first infusion. No serious infusion-associated adverse events were reported in the ocrelizumab group. Evidence of clinical activity was observed at all doses evaluated. Peripheral B cell depletion after infusion was rapid at all doses, with earlier repletion of B cells at doses of 10 mg and 50 mg. Human anti-human antibodies were detected in 19% and 10%, respectively, of those receiving 10 mg and 50 mg of ocrelizumab, compared with 0-5% of those receiving 200, 500, and 1,000 mg. CONCLUSION: Ocrelizumab therapy in combination with MTX was well tolerated. Doses of 200 mg (2 infusions) and higher showed better clinical responses, better reduction of C-reactive protein levels, and very low immunogenicity.
18807725 [Clinical randomized study of bee-sting therapy for rheumatoid arthritis]. 2008 Jun OBJECTIVE: To observe the clinical effect of bee-sting (venom) therapy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: One hundred RA patients were randomly divided into medication (control) group and bee-venom group, with 50 cases in each. Patients of control group were treated with oral administration of Methotrexate (MTX, 7.5 mg/w), Sulfasalazine (0.5 g,t. i.d.), Meloxicam (Mobic,7. 5 mg, b. i. d.); and those of bee-venom group treated with Bee-sting of Ashi-points and the above-mentioned Western medicines. Ashi-points were selected according to the position of RA and used as the main acupoints, supplemented with other acupoints according to syndrome differentiation. The treatment was given once every other day and all the treatments lasted for 3 months. RESULTS: Compared with pre-treatment, scores of joint swelling degree, joint activity, pain, and pressing pain, joint-swelling number, grasp force, 15 m-walking duration, morning stiff duration in bee-venom group and medication group were improved significantly (P<0.05, 0.01). Comparison between two groups showed that after the therapy, scores of joint swelling, pain and pressing pain, joint-swelling number and morning stiff duration, and the doses of the administered MTX and Mobic in bee-venom group were all significantly lower than those in medication group (P<0.05, 0.01); whereas the grasp force in been-venom group was markedly higher than that in medication group (P<0.05). In addition, the relapse rate of bee-venom group was obviously lower than that of medication group (P<0.05; 12% vs 32%). CONCLUSION: Combined application of bee-venom therapy and medication is superior to simple use of medication in relieving RA, and when bee-sting therapy used, the commonly-taken doses of western medicines may be reduced, and the relapse rate gets lower.
16906370 Acceptability and usefulness of mizoribine in the management of rheumatoid arthritis in me 2006 This report documents the results of a study performed to examine clinical use of mizoribine (MZR), using data from a large-scale prospective cohort study, IORRA (Institute of Rheumatology Rheumatoid Arthritis). The number of patients with RA entered in this study from October 2000 through October 2003 was 6238. Three hundred and six patients (4.9%) received MZR therapy. Mizoribine users who were taking methotrexate (MTX) (MTX-MZR group, n = 94) and over 70 years of age (elderly group, n = 45) were collected. Cumulative retention rates of MZR were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Median drug survival of MZR was 28 months for the poor responders to MTX and 43 months for the poor responders to MZR, with no significant difference between these groups. Cumulative retention rate of MZR in the elderly group did not show a significant difference compared to that in patients aged under 70 years. Ten patients (10.6%) in the MTX-MZR group and 10 patients (22.2%) in the elderly group experienced adverse effects of MZR. None of these adverse effects was serious. This study indicated that, although MZR has not been frequently prescribed for RA patients, it may be useful and relatively safe for patients who are poor responders to MTX as an additional regimen to MTX therapy as well as for elderly patients.
17080518 An index of patient reported outcomes (PRO-Index) discriminates effectively between active 2006 Nov OBJECTIVE: To analyze 2 indices composed of the 3 patient reported outcomes (PRO) in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Data Set--physical function, pain, and global estimate--without joint count or laboratory data, for capacities to distinguish active from control treatments in 4 pivotal clinical trials. METHODS: Data from 4 clinical trials involving adalimumab, in combination with methotrexate or other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) or as monotherapy, versus control treatment were made available to analyze properties of various indices. A categorical PRO-Index M was defined as "majority" improvement in 2 of the 3 PRO measures at 20%, 50%, and 70% levels; results were evaluated to analyze agreement with ACR20, ACR50, ACR70 responses and an "all Core Data Set measures" index based on 4 of the 7 measures having such levels of improvement. A continuous PRO-Index C was defined as the median or 2nd highest of 3 percentage differences from baseline to endpoint; results were evaluated to analyze agreement with a continuous ACR-N, "all Core Data Set measures" index, and Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28). RESULTS: All indices distinguished active versus control treatment at similar levels, including PRO-Index M versus ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 responses, and PRO-Index C versus DAS28. CONCLUSION: PRO indices based only on patient questionnaire data, without joint counts or laboratory tests, may be useful quantitative measures of therapeutic efficacy for use in standard rheumatology clinical care.
17909386 Assessment of adherence to and persistence on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD 2007 Oct OBJECTIVE: Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are efficacious for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, measurements of relative effectiveness, including treatment adherence and persistence, are lacking. We evaluated adherence and persistence during new episodes of use of traditional and biologic DMARDs. METHODS: Using Tennessee Medicaid databases (1995-2004), we assembled a retrospective cohort of patients diagnosed with RA, and identified new episodes of use for 12 DMARD regimens. We evaluated persistence through survival analyses, and adherence within episodes through the medication possession ratio. A risk score was included in the analyses to account for measured confounders. RESULTS: We identified 14,932 patients with RA; 6018 patients had 10,547 episodes of new use of DMARDs. Considering methotrexate as the reference and after adjustment for measured confounders, episodes of new use of sulfasalazine [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.59; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.47-1.72] and infliximab alone (aHR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.09-1.73) were more likely to be discontinued; and new episodes of etanercept (aHR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.73-0.92) and methotrexate + adalimumab (aHR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.48-0.84) were less likely to be discontinued. Compared with methotrexate, adherence was higher for leflunomide, infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab and lower for sulfasalazine and all combined therapies. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an approach to assess persistence on and adherence to the most common DMARD therapies. In this large cohort, persistence and adherence to leflunomide and most biologic DMARD therapies were at least comparable to methotrexate. Adherence was lower for sulfasalazine and all combined therapies.
18176139 Correlations between symptoms as assessed in traditional chinese medicine (TCM) and ACR20 2007 Dec OBJECTIVE: This research was designed to explore the role of joint and nonarticular clinical manifestations traditionally evaluated in Chinese herbal medicine in predicting efficacy of treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Three hundred ninety-six patients were randomly divided to receive Western medicine (WM) therapy, 197 cases; and traditional Chinese herbal medicine (TCM), 199 cases. A complete physical examination and 18 clinical manifestations typically assessed in TCM were recorded before the randomization. The WM therapy included diclofenac extended action tablets, methotrexate, and sulfasalazine. The TCM therapy included Glucosidorum Tripterygll Totorum tablets and Yishen Juanbi tablets. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria were used for efficacy evaluation. All data were analyzed using the SPSS11.5 statistical package. RESULTS: ACR20 and 50 responses with WM treatment were higher at 24 weeks than in the TCM group. In the WM group, 89% achieved ACR20 whereas 65.8% on TCM reached this response In the WM group, efficacy was negatively related to subjective symptoms of dizziness, and positively related to joint tenderness and thirst as recorded at entry. In contrast, in the TCM group the efficacy was positively related to joint tenderness and joint pain, and negatively related to the joint stiffness and more nocturia. CONCLUSION: Symptoms including those not directly related to joints and those inquired about in TCM may have influence on the efficacy of therapy, and might merit further study to ascertain if they can be helpful to guide specific therapy.
17914133 Preliminary evidence shows that folic acid fortification of the food supply is associated 2007 Oct BACKGROUND: Fortification of the diet with folate has been used in the United States since 1997 to prevent neural tube defects in newborn babies. However, an increase in dietary folate intake could theoretically reduce the effectiveness of the anti-folate medication, methotrexate (MTX) in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other inflammatory diseases. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether dietary fortification with folic acid interferes with MTX function in patients with RA. METHODS: We computed MTX dose per patient per year for the years 1988 to 1999 and plotted these against time, comparing the overall mean MTX dose before and after 1997, when dietary fortification with folic acid was instituted in the USA. Thirty-six subjects met eligibility criteria. RESULTS: Mean annual MTX dose was stable between 1988 and 1996 (12.4 +/- 4.0mg), but then rose linearly from 1997 to 1999 (16.6 +/- 5.1 mg, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study suggests that folic acid supplementation may contribute to higher MTX dosing in patients with RA.
17520171 Pericarditis: a rare complication of methotrexate therapy. 2007 Dec Serositis is a rare complication of methotrexate (MTX) administration. We report a 60-year-old man with rheumatoid arthritis who developed pericarditis after taking his weekly MTX dose, which recurred within hours after 2 subsequent weekly MTX doses. Pericarditis has not recurred after discontinuance of MTX over 3 years ago. We conclude that he had MTX-induced pericarditis, based on the close temporal relationship between MTX ingestion and manifestations of pericarditis on three distinct occasions because of the previous reports of MTX-induced pericarditis and because pericarditis has not recurred after MTX withdrawal.
17937473 Leflunomide-associated infections in rheumatoid arthritis. 2007 Nov OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of severe infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) prescribed leflunomide in North Canterbury, New Zealand. METHODS: A case-note audit of all Christchurch Hospital patients with RA prescribed leflunomide between 2002 and 2006 was performed. The criterion for severe infection was inpatient hospitalization. Relevant reports to the national Pharmacovigilance Centre were also examined. RESULTS: Since January 2002, 171 patients with RA have commenced taking leflunomide. Ninety-nine of 171 (57.9%) patients were also prescribed prednisone. Combination disease modifying antirheumatic drug therapy was common, with 82/171 (48.0%) taking methotrexate (MTX), 15/171 (8.8%) hydroxy-chloroquine, 11/171 (6.4%) sulfasalazine, and 8/171 (4.7%) anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy. Eleven patients developed infection requiring hospitalization while taking leflunomide including: lower respiratory tract infections (3), cellulitis (2), disseminated herpes zoster (2), probable TB liver (1), abdominal sepsis (1), mycotic aneurysm (1) and gastroenteritis (1). Nine of the 11 patients were also taking corticosteroids or corticosteroids with MTX. The 171 patients were treated for a total of 4005 months, giving an incidence for severe infection of 3.30/100 patient-years (95% CI 1.65-5.90). Patients at increased risk were those with severe disease and taking concomitant MTX and corticosteroids. The NZ Pharmacovigilance Centre has received 7 additional reports of severe infections in patients with RA taking leflunomide. Reported cases include probable pulmonary TB (1), pneumocystis pneumonia (1), other pulmonary infection (2), and septicemia (3) including a case of infective endocarditis. Four occurred in combination with MTX, one with adalimumab. All 5 patients were also taking -corticosteroids. CONCLUSION: We believe this observed rate of serious infection is acceptable in the context of optimally treating active RA. Patients with severe disease and taking combination MTX and corticosteroids are at greatest risk. In our experience, once established, infections may rapidly progress in patients with RA taking leflunomide, and early cholestyramine washout is strongly recommended.
17414533 Risk factors associated with the cumulative survival of low-dose methotrexate in 273 Japan 2007 Apr BACKGROUND: Methotrexate (MTX) has become the most commonly prescribed disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In the Western countries, the MTX dosage is safely increased to a maximum of 25 mg/wk until a significant response is observed. On the contrary, in Japan, MTX has been approved only as a second-line agent, and the approved maximum MTX dosage is only 8 mg/wk. This suboptimal dosage may affect MTX survival in Japanese RA patients. OBJECTIVES: To study risk factors associated with the cumulative survival of MTX in Japanese RA patients. METHODS: Data on 273 patients (male 44, female 229) with RA treated with MTX between January 1, 2000 and September 30, 2004 in our center were studied. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-three patients were followed for 437 person-years of MTX exposure. Mean MTX dosage was 5.5 +/- 1.9 mg/wk. The cumulative MTX survival probability after 5 years was 61.9%. Univariate Cox regression analysis showed a significant correlation between MTX survival probability and use of fewer previous DMARDs, higher dose of MTX, inclusion of folate supplementation, and shorter disease duration. In the multivariate Cox regression model, use of fewer previous DMARDs remained significantly related to MTX survival. Reasons for discontinuation included adverse effects in 34 patients (12.5%) and inefficacy in 6 patients (2.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Cumulative survival was the same or slightly better than those in reports from Western countries, with less withdrawals reported due to adverse events or inefficacy. Whether these results are due to different MTX needs in Japanese or to acceptance of less clinical efficacy will require further studies. The use of fewer previous DMARDs was associated with longer MTX survival.
18163521 Comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of subcutaneous versus oral administration 2008 Jan OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) versus oral administration of methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: MTX-naive patients with active RA (Disease Activity Score in 28 joints >or= 4) were eligible for the study if they had not previously taken biologic agents and had not taken disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for 2 weeks prior to randomization. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 15 mg/week of MTX either orally (2 7.5-mg tablets plus a dummy prefilled syringe; n=187 patients) or SC (prefilled syringe containing 10 mg/ml plus 2 dummy tablets; n=188 patients) for 24 weeks. At week 16, patients who did not meet the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20) were switched from 15 mg of oral MTX to 15 mg of SC MTX and from 15 mg of SC MTX to 20 mg of SC MTX for the remaining 8 weeks, still in a blinded manner. The primary outcome was an ACR20 response at 24 weeks. RESULTS: At week 24, significantly more patients treated with SC MTX than with oral MTX showed ACR20 (78% versus 70%) and ACR70 (41% versus 33%) responses. Patients with a disease duration >or= 12 months had even higher ACR20 response rates (89% for SC administration and 63% for oral). In 52 of the ACR20 nonresponders (14%), treatment was switched at week 16. Changing from oral to SC MTX and from 15 mg to 20 mg of SC MTX resulted in 30% and 23% ACR20 response rates, respectively, in these patients. MTX was well tolerated. The rate of adverse events was similar in all groups. CONCLUSION: This 6-month prospective, randomized, controlled trial is the first to examine oral versus SC administration of MTX. We found that SC administration was significantly more effective than oral administration of the same MTX dosage. There was no difference in tolerability.