Browse

Search for: rheumatoid arthritis    methotrexate    autoimmune disease    biomarker    gene expression    GWAS    HLA genes    non-HLA genes   

ID PMID Title PublicationDate abstract
19292064 [Isoniazid prophylaxis for pulmonary tuberculosis in Chinese patients with rheumatoid arth 2009 Jan OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of Isoniazid prophylaxis (INHP) for tuberculosis in Chinese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who receive long-term Methotrexate (MTX) therapy. METHODS: Two hundred and one (201) patients with RA were randomized to initial treatment with either MTX/Isoniazid (INH) [MTX, 0.1-0.3 mg/(kg x week), maximal 20 mg/week; INH, 5 mg/(kg x d), max 300 mg/d] or MTX alone [0.1-0.3 mg/(kg x week), maximal 20 mg/week]. The doses of MTX remained the same after 6-month INH treatment. All patients were followed up for 36 months, the incidence of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) was investigated, while the toxicity of INH and MTX were assessed. RESULTS: There were 77 patients completed INHP. Two withdrew due to unwilling to participate. Treatment was discontinued in 4 cases (4.9%) owing to toxicity: increasing ALT/AST in two (2.5%), decrease of white blood cell (WBC) in one (1.2%) and anaphylaxis in one (1.2%). In control group, 5 patients withdrew for personal reasons. The incidence of adverse effect due to MTX in this group was 6.2%: Hepatotoxicity appeared in 4 patients (3.5%) and decrease of WBC was seen in 3 (2.7%). Nine patients (8.5%) developed TB in control group, and 1 patient (1.3%) developed TB 14 months after INH treatment. The risk of TB infection in control group was 6 times more than that in INHP group (chi2 = 4.47, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: INHP is safe and effective to prevent TB in RA patients treated with MTX.
20436072 Methotrexate drug interactions in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic revi 2010 Jul OBJECTIVE: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) often have comorbidities that require multiple medications. Several of these medications may alter the efficacy or increase the toxicity of methotrexate (MTX). The purpose of our study was to determine which drugs used in combination with MTX (excluding disease modifying antirheumatic drugs, folic and folinic acid, corticosteroids, and biologic agents) enhance side effects or toxicity of MTX or lower its efficacy. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed with Medline, Embase, Cochrane Register and Database, and abstracts from the 2006/2007 annual congresses of the American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism. A manual search of the citation lists of retrieved publications was performed. RESULTS: Of the 1172 articles identified, 67 were included: 21 pharmacokinetics studies, 5 observational studies, and 78 case reports. Most medications do not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics profile of MTX. Among the clinical studies, cytopenia and elevation of liver enzymes were the main reported toxicities. The use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) was mentioned as a risk factor for developing cytopenia in one observational study and in 17 case reports. Thirty case reports of cytopenia were attributed to the use of concomitant nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, including acetylsalicylic acid. Two studies described mild abnormalities of liver enzymes with the use of isoniazid, and one study with the use of high-dose ASA. CONCLUSION: Based on the published literature, MTX has limited drug interactions, with the exception of TMP-SMX and high-dose ASA, which can exacerbate toxicity of MTX. The clinical significance of these interactions has not been substantiated by extensive clinical observations.
20404044 Evidence for the hypothesis that 10-formyldihydrofolate is the in vivo substrate for amino 2010 Mar We postulate that 10-formyl-7,8-dihydrofolate (10-HCO-H(2)folate), not 10-formyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolate (10-HCO-H(4)folate), is the predominant in vivo substrate for mammalian aminoimidazolecarboxamide ribotide (AICAR) transformylase, an enzyme in purine nucleotide biosynthesis de novo, which introduces carbon 2 (C(2)) into the purine ring. 10-HCO-H(2)folate exists in vivo as labeled 10-formyl-folic acid (10-HCO-folic acid: an oxidation product of 10-HCO-H(4)folate and 10-HCO-H(2)folate) and is found after doses of labeled folic acid in humans or laboratory animals. The bioactivity of the unnatural isomer, [6R]-5-formyltetrahydrofolate, in humans is explained by its in vivo conversion to 10-HCO-H(2)folate. The structure and active site of AICAR transformylase are not consistent with other enzymes that utilize 10-HCO-H(4)folate. Because 10-HCO-H(4)folate is rapidly oxidized in vitro to 10-HCO-H(2)folate by cytochrome C alone and in mitochondria, it is hypothesized that this process takes place in vivo. In vitro data indicate that 10-HCO-H(2)folate is kinetically preferred over 10-HCO-H(4)folate by AICAR transformylase and that this enzyme may not have access to sufficient supplies of 10-HCO-H(4)folate. Methotrexate blockage of the AICAR transformylase process in patients with rheumatoid arthritis suggests that dihydrofolate (H(2)folate) reductase is involved and is consistent with H(2)folate and 10-HCO-H(2)folate being the product and substrate for AICAR transformylase. The labeling of purine C(2) by an oral dose of [6RS]-5-H[(13)C]O-H(4)folate in a human subject is consistent with 10-H[(13)C]O-H(2)folate formation from unnatural isomer, [6R]-5-H[(13)C]O-H(4)folate, and it being a substrate for AICAR transformylase. In vitro exchange reactions of purine C(2) using H(4)folate coenzymes are not duplicated in vivo and is consistent with H(2)folate coenzymes being used in vivo by AICAR transformylase.
20444749 Golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy: 52-we 2010 Jun OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of golimumab to 52 weeks in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo plus methotrexate (group 1), golimumab 100 mg plus placebo (group 2), golimumab 50 mg plus methotrexate (group 3) and golimumab 100 mg plus methotrexate (group 4). At week 16, patients in groups 1, 2 and 3 who had less than 20% improvement in tender and swollen joints entered early escape. At week 24, patients in group 1 who had not entered early escape crossed over to 50 mg golimumab plus methotrexate. RESULTS: At week 16, 31%, 27% and 17% of patients in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively, entered early escape. At week 52, 44%, 45%, 64% and 58% of patients in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively, achieved 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria; and 34%, 31%, 42% and 53%, respectively, achieved low disease activity (< or = 3.2) according to the 28-joint disease activity score. Patients in group 4 appeared to have an increased risk of serious adverse events and serious infections. CONCLUSION: The results of various outcome measures showed that the response rates achieved by patients receiving golimumab to 24 weeks were sustained to 52 weeks. The safety profile appeared to be consistent with the known safety profile of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors.
19922018 Effect of etanercept on serum levels of soluble cell adhesion molecules (sICAM-1, sVCAM-1, 2009 Nov OBJECTIVE: Endothelium and adhesion molecules are engaged in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study was undertaken to analyse the effect of etanercept on the levels of soluble cell adhesion molecules (sCAMs) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in patients with active RA. METHODS: Patients were receiving 50 mg/week of subcutaneous etanercept and 10-25 mg/week of methotrexate (MTX). Serum levels of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), E-selectin (sE-selectin), and VEGF were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 18 RA patients (prior to injection) at 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. RESULTS: A decrease in serum levels of sICAM-1 (p<0.001), sVCAM-1 (p<0.01), sE-selectin (p<0.01), and VEGF (p<0.001) was observed in RA patients after 3 months of treatment with etanercept. Six months of therapy with etanercept prolonged the suppression of serum sICAM-1 (p<0.01) and even more remarkably diminished sVCAM-1, sE-selectin, and VEGF (in all cases p<0.001) concentrations as compared to baseline (month 0). Treatment also effectively diminished sICAM-1, sVCAM-1, and VEGF levels at months 9 and 12 (in all cases p<0.001), and less significantly sE-selectin (p<0.05 at month 9 and p<0.01 at month 12). The Disease Activity Score including a 28-joint count (DAS28) measured at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months decreased significantly compared to baseline (in all cases p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that, besides a rapid suppression of disease activity, serum sCAM and VEGF concentrations are downregulated following anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) therapy combined with MTX. Prolonged treatment with etanercept sustained or even more remarkably diminished the sCAM and VEGF serum concentrations.
20079321 [Adalimumab plus methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a multi-center ra 2009 Nov OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab plus methotrexate (MTX) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: This is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, and placebo-controlled clinical study, included a total of 302 cases of active rheumatoid arthritis, randomized into three groups of observation: 40 mg adalimumab (121 cases), 80 mg adalimumab (121 cases), or placebo (60 cases). Upon enrollment, all subjects had been previously treated with MTX for at least 3 months, and their doses of drug had remained stable for at least 28 days. The double-blind phase lasted for 12 weeks, during which the subjects were administered with adalimumab or placebo subcutaneously every other week. Then the subjects entered into another 12 weeks of open-label study, which included subcutaneous injection of 40 mg adalimumab every other week. In both the double-blind and the open-label periods, all subjects were maintained concomitantly with MTX that had already been used before this study. The primary efficacy variables were evaluated on basis of American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20 response rate at week 12. The secondary efficacy variables included: ACR20 response rate at week 24; ACR50 and ACR70 response rates at weeks 12 and 24; and changes at weeks 12 and 24 compared with baseline observations for tender and swollen joint counts, as well as the assessment of pain with visual analog scale (VAS), the physician's and the patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS), and the analysis on health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) and health related quality of life (HRQL) measured by Short Form-36 (SF-36); The safety variables mainly included adverse events (AE). RESULT: During the double-blind period, subjects treated with 40 mg of adalimumab, 57.0% achieved ACR20 response at week 12 (P = 0.004 versus placebo), and subjects treated with 80 mg of adalimumab, 51.2% achieved ACR20 response at week 12 (P = 0.026 versus placebo), and only 35.0% of subjects treated with placebo achieved ACR20 response at week 12. On the other hand, 32.2% of subjects receiving 40 mg of adalimumab achieved ACR50 response (P = 0.009 versus placebo), and 15.7% achieved ACR70 response (P = 0.007 versus placebo) at week 12. Subjects treated with 40 mg of adalimumab got a better result versus placebo at week 12 for tender joint count, swollen joint count, and improvement in C-reactive protein; and subjects treated with 80 mg of adalimumab were also seen an amelioration versus placebo at week 12 for swollen joint count, and improvement in C-reactive protein; all of these findings were statistically significant in differences. During the open-label period all subjects received 40 mg of adalimumab, and response rates for ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 in the two treatment groups of 40 mg and 80 mg adalimumab were maintained or improved from week 12 to week 24 (being 73.1%, 40.3% and 17.6% respectively for 40 mg group; 71.1%, 39.5% and 17.5% respectively for 80 mg group); while response in the original placebo group (being 67.8%, 44.1% and 18.6%) increased during the 12-week open-label period to match that of the original adalimumab treatment groups. While for changes in tender and swollen joint counts, VAS, HAQ, SF-36, a significant improvement was seen at week 24 when compared with baseline and week 12 values. Throughout the double-blind and open-label period, adverse events reported in >/= 5% of subjects at least possibly associated with the study drug were upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis, and injection site itching, mostly being mild to moderate in severity. There were 3 cases of tuberculosis reported during this study. And 3 cases of serious adverse event (SAE) were reported among the adalimumab subjects during the double-blind period, which were determined as unrelated or probably unrelated to the study drug. And 8 cases (2.7%) of SAE were seen among the adalimumab subjects during the open-label period, 3 of which were at least possibly unrelated with the study drug. All SAEs reported were consistent to those seen in other adalimumab trials. No other unexpected safety signals were reported. CONCLUSION: Adalimumab plus MTX is better than single MTX in efficacy for the treatment of RA. Being generally safe and well tolerated, adalimumab plus MTX can significantly increase the response rate, continuously reduce the arthritic signs, symptoms and the inflammatory factors in patients, and also be helpful for reducing disabilities and improving the global quality of life for the patients.
19404945 The good initial response to therapy with a combination of traditional disease-modifying a 2009 May OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the evolution of functional and clinical outcomes over 11 years in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) initially treated with a combination of 3 disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or with a single DMARD. METHODS: A cohort of 199 patients with early active RA were initially randomized to receive treatment with a combination of methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and hydroxychloroquine with prednisolone or treatment with a single DMARD (initially, sulfasalazine) with or without prednisolone. After 2 years, the drug treatment strategy became unrestricted, but still targeted remission. At 11 years, function was assessed with the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and clinical outcomes were assessed with the modified Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) measure and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for remission. RESULTS: At 11 years, 138 patients were assessed (68 in the combination-DMARD group and 70 in the single-DMARD group). The mean+/-SD HAQ scores were 0.34+/-0.54 in the combination-DMARD group and 0.38+/-0.58 in the single-DMARD group (P=0.88). Modified MDA was achieved by 63% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 51, 77) and by 43% (95% CI 32, 55) (P=0.016) of the combination-DMARD group and the single-DMARD group, respectively, and ACR remission by 37% (95% CI 26, 49) and by 19% (95% CI 11, 29) (P=0.017), respectively. CONCLUSION: Initial therapy with a combination of DMARDs in early RA results in higher rates of patients achieving modified MDA and strict ACR remission even over the long term than initial single-DMARD therapy. Targeting remission with tight clinical controls results in good functional and clinical outcomes in most RA patients.
20334454 Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab for the 2010 Apr STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of using the anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-alpha) drugs adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 randomized, placebo-controlled trials (eight adalimumab, seven infliximab, six etanercept). PATIENTS: Adults with rheumatoid arthritis who received adalimumab (1524 patients), infliximab (1116 patients), etanercept (1029 patients), or placebo (2834 patients) with or without concomitant methotrexate in all groups. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A literature search of several databases from January 1995-December 2008 was performed. There were no restrictions based on language or date of publication, and low-quality studies (based on Jadad score) were excluded. American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% improvement criteria (ACR20), 50% improvement criteria (ACR50), and 70% improvement criteria (ACR70) were used to compare treatment efficacy. Safety was compared based on frequency of serious adverse events, serious infections, malignancy, and death. Withdrawals due to adverse events and lack of efficacy were also evaluated. With short-term treatment (12-30 wks), etanercept demonstrated the highest risk ratios (RRs) for reaching ACR20 and ACR50: 2.94 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.27-3.81) and 5.28 (95% CI 3.12-8.92), respectively. Adalimumab demonstrated the highest RR for achieving ACR70 (5.36, 95% CI 3.76- 7.64). Over a long-term treatment course (1-3 yrs), adalimumab demonstrated the highest RRs (95% CIs) for these parameters: 1.85 (1.07-3.19), 2.80 (1.16-6.77), and 3.23 (1.37-7.61) for ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70, respectively. No statistically significant differences were noted in the safety of any of the three drugs compared with placebo. Infliximab had the highest RRs for withdrawing from the study due to lack of efficacy (2.05, 95% CI 1.33-3.16) and adverse events (0.41, 95% CI 0.18-0.95). CONCLUSION: With short-term treatment, etanercept and adalimumab had higher efficacy results; with long-term treatment, adalimumab appeared to be the most effective. Clinicians should be aware that each of the three drugs has different rates of efficacy and different safety considerations that must be taken into account when selecting the best treatment for an individual with rheumatoid arthritis.
19585384 Rituximab therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis refractory or with contraindicatio 2009 OBJECTIVES: To describe the effects of rituximab therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in routine clinical practice in Finland. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively from patient records in five rheumatology clinics in Finland. All RA patients treated during 2005-2008 (n = 81) were included. Information on disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), DMARD combinations, and biologics prior to rituximab use was collected as well as treatment responses after initiating rituximab therapy. The Disease Activity Score using 28 joint counts (DAS28) was used to determine disease activity and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) responses. RESULTS: Mean disease duration was 14 (range 0-47) years and the median number of prior DMARDs and biologics used were 7 (1-12) and 2 (0-4), respectively. Efficacy analysis was performed on 57 patients with available DAS28 data at treatment onset and follow-up visits. Median DAS28 declined from 6.07 (3.19-7.70) to 3.99 (1.53-6.55) by the first rituximab treatment course. Altogether 77% of the patients achieved a EULAR response, 26% with a good response including 18% with remission. Furthermore, the patients treated concomitantly with DMARDs other than methotrexate (MTX) achieved a EULAR response slightly more often than the patients on MTX (85% vs. 70%) only. A second course of rituximab was given to 48% of the patients on an average of 9 months after initial therapy, with the median DAS28 score declining further to 3.49 (0.1-5.74). Safety and tolerability assessment of the 81 patients indicates rituximab to be well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Rituximab can effectively control disease activity in patients with active disease and poor response to previous therapies, in combination with MTX but also with other DMARDs.
20194448 Efficacy and safety of retreatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with previous ina 2010 May OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of 1 versus 2 courses of rituximab over 48 weeks in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Adult patients taking methotrexate with a previous inadequate response to > or = 1 tumor necrosis factor inhibitor received 1 course of open-label rituximab (2 x 1000 mg IV) at baseline. From Week 24, patients were randomized to receive an additional course of retreatment with rituximab or placebo. Efficacy responses at Week 48 relative to baseline were assessed. RESULTS: Of 559 patients who received the open-label first course of rituximab, 475 patients were randomized to a second course (rituximab retreatment: n = 318, placebo retreatment: n = 157). Relative to baseline, patients who took rituximab during retreatment had significantly improved efficacy at Week 48 compared to patients who took a placebo during retreatment [American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) criteria, 54% vs 45%, p = 0.02; change in Disease Activity Score-28 mean -1.9 vs -1.5, p = 0.006]. Differences in efficacy between groups were first observed following Weeks 28-32. Worsening of most components of the ACR core set occurred in the placebo-retreated patients with relative maintenance of these measures in rituximab-retreated patients. Randomized patients who had achieved week 24 ACR responses following the first course had greater odds of losing response if retreated with placebo (odds ratios for ACR20, ACR50, ACR70: 2.09, 2.03, and 4.09, respectively). Following retreatment, the proportion of patients experiencing any adverse events (AE), serious AE, infections, and serious infections were comparable between the rituximab and placebo retreatment groups. CONCLUSION: Two courses of rituximab about 6 months apart resulted in improved and sustained efficacy at 1 year, compared with 1 course, with a similar safety profile.
18945303 Effect of folic or folinic acid supplementation on methotrexate-associated safety and effi 2009 Mar BACKGROUND: Methotrexate is a folic acid antagonist widely used for the treatment of inflammatory disorders for more than 50 years. Methotrexate is a standard systemic therapy for severe psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis. Folic acid supplementation has been advocated to limit the toxicity of methotrexate on blood cells, gastrointestinal tract and liver. However, there is still controversy regarding the usefulness of folic acid supplementation. OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the evidence for the efficacy of folic acid supplementation in patients treated with methotrexate for inflammatory diseases. We also investigated whether folic acid supplementation may decrease the efficacy of methotrexate. METHODS: Cochrane and MEDLINE databases were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials in patients treated with methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis or psoriasis with or without arthritis were included. Study selection, assessment of methodological quality, data extraction and analysis were carried out by two independent researchers. We selected double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trials. Analysis was performed for each subgroup of side-effects: gastrointestinal, mucocutaneous, haematological and hepatic. RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria, with a total sample of 648 patients. There were 257 patients in the placebo group, 198 patients treated with folic acid, and 193 patients treated with folinic acid. The statistical analysis showed a significant reduction of 35.8% of hepatic side-effects induced by methotrexate for patients with supplementation with folic or folinic acid (95% confidence interval -0.467 to -0.248). There was no statistical difference for mucocutaneous and gastrointestinal side-effects although there was a trend in favour of supplementation. The effect of supplementation on haematological side-effects could not be assessed accurately due to a low incidence of these events in the population studied. We were unable to analyse the effect of supplementation on the effectiveness of methotrexate, as markers of activity used in each study were not comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Supplementation with folic acid is an effective measure to reduce hepatic adverse effects associated with methotrexate treatment. There is no difference between folinic acid and folic acid, but the lower cost of the latter promotes its use.
20112368 The selective estrogen receptor alpha agonist Org 37663 induces estrogenic effects but lac 2010 Feb OBJECTIVE: Multiple lines of evidence suggest that sex hormones may play a role in the pathogenesis or clinical expression of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Studies on the effects of exogenous estrogens in RA patients have yielded contradictory results. We undertook this study to determine the effects of the selective estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) agonist Org 37663 in patients with RA, in terms of both its estrogenic effects and its ability to ameliorate disease activity. METHODS: A 10-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, dose-finding, proof-of-concept trial was initiated to obtain data on the efficacy and safety of Org 37663 in postmenopausal female patients with RA who were receiving background treatment with either methotrexate or sulfasalazine. Patients were randomized to receive placebo or Org 37663 at doses of 4 mg/day, 15 mg/day, or 50 mg/week. The primary efficacy variable was the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28). RESULTS: Org 37663 induced a clear biologic, estrogenic response in several organ systems, including a dose-related increase in levels of sex hormone binding globulin. However, the DAS28 decreased similarly for all treatment groups including placebo, indicating lack of clinical efficacy of Org 37663 in this trial. CONCLUSION: The observed lack of clinical benefit in RA patients treated with an ERalpha agonist, in association with a clear biologic response to the study drug, provides evidence that a biologically relevant ERalpha-mediated estrogenic effect is not associated with a clinically relevant effect on RA symptoms and signs.
19951408 A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled phase III clinical trial of chicken ty 2009 INTRODUCTION: Chicken type II collagen (CCII) is a protein extracted from the cartilage of chicken breast and exhibits intriguing possibilities for the treatment of autoimmune diseases by inducing oral tolerance. A 24-week, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, methotrexate (MTX)-controlled study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CCII in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Five hundred three RA patients were included in the study. Patients received either 0.1 mg daily of CCII (n = 326) or 10 mg once a week of MTX (n = 177) for 24 weeks. Each patient was evaluated for pain, morning stiffness, tender joint count, swollen joint count, health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), assessments by investigator and patient, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) by using the standard tools at baseline (week 0) and at weeks 12 and 24. Additionally, rheumatoid factor (RF) was evaluated at weeks 0 and 24. Measurement of a battery of biochemical parameters in serum, hematological parameters, and urine analysis was performed to evaluate the safety of CCII. RESULTS: Four hundred fifty-four patients (94.43%) completed the 24-week follow-up. In both groups, there were decreases in pain, morning stiffness, tender joint count, swollen joint count, HAQ, and assessments by investigator and patient, and all differences were statistically significant. In the MTX group, ESR and CRP decreased. RF did not change in either group. At 24 weeks, 41.55% of patients in the CCII group and 57.86% in the MTX group met the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR-20) and 16.89% and 30.82%, respectively, met the ACR 50% improvement criteria (ACR-50). Both response rates for ACR-20 and ACR-50 in the CCII group were lower than those of the MTX group, and this difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The DAS28 (disease activity score using 28 joint counts) values of the two treatment groups were calculated, and there was a statistically significant difference between the two treatment groups (P < 0.05). Gastrointestinal complaints were common in both groups, but there were fewer and milder side effects in the CCII group than in the MTX group. The incidence of adverse events between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: CCII is effective in the treatment of RA and is safe for human consumption. CCII exerts its beneficial effects by controlling inflammatory responses through inducing oral tolerance in RA patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR-TRC-00000093.
19373466 Interstitial pneumonitis associated with infliximab therapy without methotrexate treatment 2009 Dec Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors are increasingly being used to treat rheumatoid arthritis. Infliximab (INF) is a TNF-α inhibitor that is usually used in combination with methotrexate (MTX). Interstitial lung disease (ILD) during combination therapy has been attributed to MTX rather than INF. However, INF-associated ILD without combination with MTX has recently been reported. We describe herein a case of severe ILD secondary to INF without MTX therapy.
20496042 Leflunomide in the treatment of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis--results of a pro 2010 Aug Leflunomide is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), however, data on its use in early RA are scarce. This study seeks to evaluate effectiveness and safety of leflunomide in the treatment of early RA in daily practice. This prospective, open-label, non-interventional, multi-center study was carried out over 24 weeks including adults with early RA (< or =1 year since diagnosis). Leflunomide treatment was according to label instructions. Three hundred thirty-four patients were included. Disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28) response (reduction in DAS28 of >1.2 or reduction of >0.6 and a DAS28 of < or =5.1) was 71.9% at week 12 and 84.6% at week 24. 25.0% of patients achieved clinical remission (DAS28 < or = 2.6). Most frequently reported adverse drug reactions (ADR) were diarrhea (3.0%), nausea (2.4%), hypertension (1.8%), and headache (1.5%). Serious ADR were reported in four patients (1.2%). Leflunomide showed the effectiveness which was to be expected from controlled studies without revealing any new or hitherto unknown side effects. Onset of action was quick and significant improvement of disease was seen after 12 weeks of therapy and at even higher rates after 24 weeks irrespective of the use of a loading dose. Interestingly, the DAS28-remission rate achieved was similar to the rate seen with methotrexate or biologic therapy in other studies.
19740904 Effectiveness and retention rates of methotrexate in psoriatic arthritis in comparison wit 2010 Apr OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness and 2-year retention rates of methotrexate (MTX) in MTX naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Data on 430 patients with PsA participating in an ongoing longitudinal observational multicentre study in Norway were analysed. 1218 MTX naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from the same study served as a reference population. Assessments included measures of disease activity (28 joint counts, acute phase reactants), health status and utility scores. Six-month effectiveness data were compared both by crude analyses and with adjustments for age, sex and the respective baseline values. Two-year drug survival was compared by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: After 6 months of MTX treatment, both patients with PsA and those with RA improved in most disease activity measures and patient reported outcomes. In the adjusted analysis, patients with PsA tended to have less improvement, but changes were in the same range as in patients with RA. Two-year retention rates of MTX therapy in patients with PsA and RA were 65% and 66%, respectively, with only minor differences in reported reasons for discontinuation. Lower age, longer disease duration and higher Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ) score and patient global assessment were independent predictors of MTX termination within the first 2 years of treatment. CONCLUSION: In this real-life study, MTX treatment was associated with improvement in disease activity and health-related quality of life in patients with PsA after 6 months of treatment. Retention rates of MTX were similar in PsA and RA.
20937671 Inhibition of joint damage and improved clinical outcomes with rituximab plus methotrexate 2011 Jan OBJECTIVES: Rituximab is an effective treatment in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The objective of the IMAGE study was to determine the efficacy of rituximab in the prevention of joint damage and its safety in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in patients initiating treatment with MTX. METHODS: In this double-blind randomised controlled phase III study, 755 MTX-naïve patients with active RA were randomly assigned to MTX alone, rituximab 2×500 mg + MTX or rituximab 2×1000 mg + MTX. The primary end point at week 52 was the change in joint damage measured using a Genant-modified Sharp score. RESULTS: 249, 249 and 250 patients were randomly assigned to MTX alone, rituximab 2×500 mg + MTX or rituximab 2×1000 mg + MTX, respectively. At week 52, treatment with rituximab 2×1000 mg + MTX compared with MTX alone was associated with a reduction in progression of joint damage (mean change in total modified Sharp score 0.359 vs 1.079; p=0.0004) and an improvement in clinical outcomes (ACR50 65% vs 42%; p<0.0001); rituximab 2×500 mg + MTX improved clinical outcomes (ACR50 59% vs 42%; p<0.0001) compared with MTX alone but did not significantly reduce the progression of joint damage. Safety outcomes were similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with rituximab 2×1000 mg in combination with MTX is an effective therapy for the treatment of patients with MTX-naïve RA. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00299104.
19332630 Postmarketing surveillance of the safety and effectiveness of etanercept in Japan. 2009 May OBJECTIVE: Postmarketing surveillance (PMS) was conducted evaluating safety and effectiveness of etanercept (ETN; Enbrel) in Japan, following all patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during the conditional approval period of ETN. METHODS: Registration of patients from 1,334 medical sites was conducted between March 2005 and April 2007. Patients were followed for 24 weeks; data regarding patients' background, safety, and effectiveness was recorded centrally. Adverse events (AE) and adverse drug reactions (ADR) were coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. Effectiveness was measured using the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28). RESULTS: Of 14,369 patients registered, data collection and evaluation for 7,091 patients by March 2006 is reported. At least 1 AE was observed for 2,173 patients (30.6%); 60% of AE occurred within 8 weeks of starting ETN. Most frequent AE were injection site reaction (n = 377, 5.3%) and rash (n = 228, 3.2%). Serious AE occurred in 403 patients (5.7%); most frequent were pneumonia (n = 59, 0.8%) and interstitial lung disease (n = 42, 0.6%). Pneumonia was the most common specifically important ADR (n = 102, 1.4%). Mean baseline DAS28 was 6.0, which reduced to 4.4 within 4 weeks, and to 3.9 within 24 weeks. The proportion of patients having good or moderate EULAR response measured by DAS28 was 84.1% at Week 24. Effectiveness rates were more favorable in patients concomitantly using methotrexate. Good or moderate EULAR response rate among patients switched from infliximab was 84.9%. CONCLUSION: This extensive observational trial, including all patients with RA in Japan taking ETN, found ETN to be both effective and well tolerated by Japanese patients with RA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00503503.
20459619 Seven-year follow-up of infliximab therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients with severe lo 2010 INTRODUCTION: This study is based on the results from a Belgian expanded access program in which patients with active refractory and erosive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were treated with intravenous infusions of infliximab in combination with methotrexate. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the continuation rate of infliximab and its clinical effect over a 7-year period and to document the reasons for discontinuation. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2001, 511 patients with severe and refractory RA were enrolled and treated with infliximab. After 7 years, apart from routine clinical follow-up, treating rheumatologists were asked to complete a questionnaire designed specifically for the present study to evaluate the current therapy with infliximab, the level of disease activity (Disease Activity Score in 28 joints [DAS28]) and the reasons for infliximab discontinuation. RESULTS: After 7 years, 160 of 511 patients (31%) were still on infliximab treatment. The major reasons for infliximab discontinuation included lack of efficacy (104 patients), adverse events (107 patients) and elective change of therapy (70 patients). The majority of cases of treatment discontinuation for safety reasons occurred during the first 2 years. In contrast, discontinuation due to ineffectiveness showed a more constant rate over the 7-year period. Mean DAS for patients still on treatment with infliximab decreased from 5.7 (standard error [SE] 0.1) at baseline to 3.0 (SE 0.1) at year 4 and remained that low until year 7 (3.0 [SE 0.1]). Low disease activity (defined as DAS28<3.2) was present in 60.9% of patients, and 45.5% achieved remission (DAS28<2.6). DAS28 at the time of treatment discontinuation due to ineffectiveness decreased over the 7-year period from 5.6 (SE 0.3) in 2001 to 4.8 (SE 0.3) in 2008. CONCLUSIONS: This observational study revealed that patients who continue to receive infliximab experience sustained clinical benefit. The majority of safety issues occurred during the first 2 years of infliximab therapy. We observed that the DAS at the time of therapy discontinuation showed a trend to decrease over time.
19785852 [Correct use of methotrexate]. 2009 Insufficient knowledge about the correct dosage and potential implications of overdose have played an important role in recent accidents involving methotrexate (MTX). Therefore, it is important that the prescribing physician as well as the pharmacist and pharmacist's assistant have sufficient knowledge of the usual dosages, precautionary measures, side-effects, interactions and contraindications of MTX, to ensure a correct dosing regimen is prescribed. For nearly all indications, MTX is prescribed in a weekly dose of 5-30 mg and preferably in combination with 5 mg folic acid twice a week on a day that MTX is not used. The toxic dose of MTX lies very close to the effective MTX dose. It is therefore important to look out for signs of toxicity.