Browse

Search for: rheumatoid arthritis    methotrexate    autoimmune disease    biomarker    gene expression    GWAS    HLA genes    non-HLA genes   

ID PMID Title PublicationDate abstract
21735288 [Is methotrexate nephrotoxic? Dose-dependency, comorbidities and comedication]. 2011 Sep Methotrexate (MTX) in low-doses is an important component of anti-inflammatory therapy of rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory joint diseases. In contrast to high-dose administration of MTX in oncology, which can lead to direct tubulus toxicity and subsequent renal failure, renal side-effects are a rare exception for low-dose MTX. The biggest problem under low-dose MTX is that an already limited renal function due to comorbidities or an increasing, sometimes clinically insufficiently monitored renal insufficiency due to comedications, such as non-steroidal antirheumatics (NSAR) and antibiotics, leads to a reduced excretion of MTX and therefore to an accumulation in serum. This is primarily accompanied by gastrointestinal mucositis and bone marrow depression. For this reason low-dose MTX should never be administered once the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is less than <30 ml/min and only 50% of the original dosage should be administered if the GFR is between 30 and 60 ml/min.
21960560 A mixed treatment comparison of the efficacy of anti-TNF agents in rheumatoid arthritis fo 2012 Feb BACKGROUND: A number of tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα) antagonists (anti-TNFα) are available to treat rheumatoid arthritis. All of these have demonstrated considerable efficacy in placebo controlled trials, but few head-to-head comparisons exist to date. This work's objective is to estimate the relative efficacy among licensed anti-TNFs in patients who have had an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX). Different outcome measures are used to highlight the advantages of continuous measures in such analyses. METHODS: A systematic review identified randomised controlled trials comparing the efficacy of licensed anti-TNFα agents with placebo at 24 weeks in patients who have had an inadequate response to MTX. Relative efficacy was estimated using Bayesian mixed treatment comparison (MTC) models. Three different outcome measures were used: RR of achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 and ACR50 response and the percentage improvement in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score. RESULTS: 16 published trials were included in the analysis. All anti-TNFs show considerably improved efficacy over placebo. The MTC results also provide evidence of some differences in efficacy of the TNFα antagonists. Etanercept appears superior to infliximab and golimumab, and certolizumab to infliximab and adalimumab. ACR results indicate improved efficacy of certolizumab over golimumab. On HAQ analysis, adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept and golimumab appear superior to infliximab, and etanercept shows improved efficacy compared with adalimumab. CONCLUSIONS: There are differences in efficacy among the TNFα antagonists. In a MTC, a continuous outcome measure has more strength to detect such differences than a binomial outcome measure because of its enhanced sensitivity to change.
22785189 Nocardia neocaledoniensis [corrected] as a cause of skin and soft tissue infection. 2012 Sep Nocardia neocaledoniensis was introduced as a new environmental species of Nocardia in 2004. We present the first case of human skin and soft tissue infection caused by this species in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis receiving prednisone and methotrexate therapy.
21328299 Certolizumab pegol (CDP870) for rheumatoid arthritis in adults. 2011 Feb 16 BACKGROUND: TNF-alpha inhibitors have been shown to reduce the risk of joint damage and improve physical function and quality of life in people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This is the first Cochrane review of certolizumab pegol, a new TNF-alpha inhibitor. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of certolizumab pegol (CDP870) in patients with RA who have not responded well to conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2009, Issue 3),  MEDLINE (1966 to November 2009), EMBASE (1966 to November 2009), Scopus (January 2004 to November 2009), TOXLINE (until November 2009), Web of Knowledge (until November 2009); websites of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA) (until November 2009), and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials that compared certolizumab pegol with any other agent including placebo or methotrexate (MTX) in adult RA patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite current or prior treatment with conventional DMARDs, such as methotrexate (MTX). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed search results, trial quality and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: Five trials were included. We included in the analysis 2394 people for effectiveness and 2094 people for safety. The duration of follow-up was from 12 to 52 weeks, and the range of doses of certolizumab pegol were from 50 to 400 mg subcutaneously (sc). In three trials the control was placebo plus methotrexate (MTX) and in two trials it was just placebo. Significant improvements were observed at 24 weeks with the approved dose of 200 mg certolizumab pegol: American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50% improvement: risk ratio (RR) 6.01 (95% CI 3.84 to 9.40) with an absolute benefit of 29% (95% CI 25% to 34%), number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) of 4 (3 to 5) and the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) mean difference (MD) - 0.39 (95% CI -0.45 to -0.32) (scale 0 to 3). At 52 weeks the results were quite similar: ACR 50% improvement RR 5.27 (95% CI 3.19 to 8.71), HAQ mean difference (MD) - 0.42 (95% CI -0.52 to -0.32). Serious adverse events were more frequent for certolizumab pegol 200 mg, Peto OR 2.02 (95% CI 1.24 to 3.30). The most common adverse events with certolizumab pegol 200 mg were: upper respiratory tract infections, Peto OR 2.21 (95% CI 1.15 to 4.25); hypertension, Peto OR 2.81 (95% CI 1.38 to 5.75); and nasopharyngitis, Peto OR 2.71 (95% CI 1.30 to 5.66). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: With an overall high grade of evidence this review revealed an improvement of clinical results (ACR50, 28 joint disease activity score (DAS-28) remission and HAQ scores) with certolizumab pegol. Adverse events were more frequent with certolizumab; there was a statistically significant increase in the number of serious adverse events, infections and hypertension.
21125264 Power estimation using a population pharmacokinetics model with optimal design by clinical 2011 Mar OBJECTIVES: The aim of this article was to determine the power for pharmacokinetic interaction investigations using population a pharmacokinetic modelling approach with optimal sampling designs and clinical trial simulations. METHODS: A clinical trial simulation approach was proposed to estimate the power for pharmacokinetic effects in drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies. This approach consisted of: (1) population pharmacokinetic (PK) model(s) was characterised for the drug(s) studied; (2) D-optimal design strategy was applied based on these model(s) to determine optimal sampling times for DDI investigation; (3) clinical trial simulations under particular study designs, for example a randomised parallel design, were used to evaluate the sample size needed for studying PK interaction. The approach was described using an example investigating the impact of a new anti-inflammatory drug on methotrexate (MTX) exposure in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. RESULTS: The power for evaluating PK interaction largely depended on the interindividual variability (IIV) in PK parameters. Residual variability was also influential to a lesser degree in the sample size determination using the proposed approach. It required 40-60 participants for scenarios where IIV was relatively low in order to achieve 90% power. However, a sample size of 80 individuals was required to reach 90% power where both IIV and residual variances were high. Under the same IIV assumptions, the proposed approach in general required a smaller sample size compared with the standard noncompartmental analysis method with intensive blood samples to attain the target power. When IIV was low, the difference in the power between the two approaches was relatively small. CONCLUSIONS: Population PK modelling with optimal design and clinical trial simulation to determine sample size when designing drug-drug interaction studies was efficient and cost effective.
21894773 [A case of Mycobacterium avium pleuritis and pneumothorax in a rheumatoid arthritis patien 2011 Aug A 70-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis received treatment with corticosteroids and methotrexate for 4 years, followed by an additional TNF-alpha antagonist (infliximab) for about 3 years. She presented with a several-week history of persistent cough, and CT images of the lung showed a thin-walled cavitary lesion abutting the pleural surface of the left upper lobe. While we investigated the cause of this lesion, we admitted her because of acute chest pain. Chest radiography demonstrated moderate left-sided pneumothorax with pleural effusion. After further investigation, we suspected that her pneumothorax and pleuritis had been caused by a ruptured cavitary lesion arising from a Mycobacterium avium infection. Despite multi-drug therapy, chest tube drainage and surgical pulmorrhaphy her pleural complications were intractable. This is a rare case of pneumothorax and pleuritis caused by Mycobacterium avium infection induced by a TNF-alpha antagonist. Physicians should be aware of nontuberculous mycobacterial infections in patients treated with TNF-alpha antagonists.
20473756 The efficacy and safety of rituximab for the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis: a s 2011 Nov The aims of this study were to assess the efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The authors surveyed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the efficacy of rituximab in disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) (including methotrexate [MTX]) or tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-blocker-resistant or intolerant patients with active RA using Medline, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and manual searches. Meta-analysis of RCTs was performed to determine the treatment efficacy and safety outcomes of rituximab (1 course, consisting of two infusions of 1,000 mg each) concomitant with MTX. The three RCTs included 938 DMARD or TNF-blocker-resistant or intolerant RA patients. Follow-up periods ranged from 24 to 48 weeks. American College of Rheumatology response (ACR) 20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates were significantly higher for the rituximab plus MTX than for placebo controls (primary efficacy outcome, ACR50; risk ratio [RR] 3.648, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.478-5.369, P < 0.001). For those treated with rituximab, the incidence adverse events of all systems were not higher than in those treated with placebo (RR 1.062, 95% CI 0.912-1.236, P = 0.438). With respect to the number of patients that experienced at least one serious adverse event, no significant difference was observed between patients treated with rituximab and placebo (RR 0.855, 95% CI 0.622-1.174, P = 0.333). A single course of rituximab with concomitant MTX therapy was found to be effective in DMARD or TNF-blocker-resistant or intolerant patients with active RA.
21097801 Indirect comparisons of the efficacy of biological antirheumatic agents in rheumatoid arth 2011 Feb BACKGROUND: The availability of increasing numbers of biological agents for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) offers several therapeutic options. While all biologicals have proven effective in trials, very limited direct comparisons are available. The objective of the present work was to compare the efficacy of biologicals (anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents, rituximab, abatacept, tocilizumab) in patients with RA with active disease and (i) an inadequate response (IR) to methotrexate (IR-MTX), (ii) an IR to anti-TNF agents (IR-anti-TNFs) using indirect comparisons. METHODS: Randomised clinical trials were identified examining the efficacy of a biological agent in RA at 6 months in patients with an IR-MTX or with an IR-anti-TNF. To compare the relative efficacy of biologicals, adjusted indirect comparison meta-analytic methods to estimate the ORs of achieving a 50% improvement according to American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR50) response at 6 months were used. RESULTS: A total of 18 published trials and 1 abstract were included in the analyses. In IR-MTX, anti-TNFs had the same probability of reaching an ACR50 compared to 'non-anti-TNF biologicals' taken together (OR 1.30, 95 % CI 0.91 to 1.86). However, when compared to specific biological agents, anti-TNFs demonstrated a higher probability of reaching an ACR50 than abatacept (OR 1.52, 95 % CI 1.0 to 2.28), but not in comparison to rituximab and tocilizumab. In IR-anti-TNF, no significant differences existed between rituximab, tocilizumab, abatacept and golimumab. [corrected] CONCLUSIONS: In a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials of patients with IR-MTX, anti-TNFs demonstrated a higher probability of achieving an ACR50 response than abatacept. In IR-anti-TNF, no difference was found between rituximab, tocimizumab, abatacept and golimumab.
22044941 Patterns of interaction between genetic and nongenetic attributes and methotrexate efficac 2012 Jan OBJECTIVE: The contribution of low-penetrance single nucleotide polymorphisms to methotrexate efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is inconsistent between studies. We sought to elucidate architecture of methotrexate response in three cohorts of patients with RA treated with methotrexate. METHODS: Single nucleotide polymorphism frequencies in genes from folate, purine, and pyrimidine pathways were measured to develop a model of gene-gene interactions using multifactor dimensionality reduction in 439 patients who received methotrexate in the USA and The Netherlands. A third cohort of 530 patients with RA from Sweden was used to replicate the findings. Methotrexate efficacy was assessed using the European League Against Rheumatism criteria in the majority of patients. RESULTS: Nonlinear patterns of gene-gene interactions between variants in aminoimidazole carboxamide ribonucleotide transformylase (C347G), reduced-folate carrier (G80A) and inosine-triphosphate pyrophosphatase (C94A) revealed a predisposing genetic attribute significantly associated with methotrexate response in the USA and Dutch cohorts [odds ratio (OR)=2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.9-4.2; P<0.001]. Although the finding was not replicated in the Swedish cohort (OR=0.9; 95% CI: 0.64-1.37; P=0.74) a multifactor dimensionality reduction analysis superimposing the predisposing genetic attribute with patient's age, sex, and anticitrullinated peptide antibodies positivity (ACPA) revealed a pattern of interaction significant in all three cohorts (OR=2.2, 95% CI: 1.6-2.9; P<0.01). The selective advantage toward response in the presence of the predisposing genetic attribute was lost in females and ACPA-positive patients, whereas older and male ACPA-negative patients tended to exhibit a greater likelihood of response in the absence of the predisposing genetic attribute. CONCLUSION: Gene-gene interactions together with nongenetic attributes may contribute to methotrexate efficacy in RA.
22294633 PAR(2) expression in peripheral blood monocytes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. 2012 Jun OBJECTIVES: Proteinase-activated receptor 2 (PAR(2)) is a G protein-coupled receptor activated by serine proteinases with proinflammatory activity. A study was undertaken to investigate the presence and functional significance of PAR(2) expression on rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-derived leucocyte subsets. METHODS: Venous blood was obtained from patients with RA and osteoarthritis (OA) as well as healthy control subjects. Surface expression of PAR(2) on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was analysed by flow cytometry and interleukin 6 (IL-6) generation by ELISA. RESULTS: Patients with RA had elevated but variable surface expression of PAR(2) on CD14+ monocytes compared with control subjects (median (1st to 3rd quartiles) 1.76% (0.86-4.10%) vs 0.06% (0.03-0.81%), p<0.0001). CD3+ T cells showed a similar pattern with significantly higher PAR(2) expression in patients with RA compared with controls (3.05% (0.36-11.82%) vs 0.08% (0.02-0.28%), p<0.0001). For both subsets, PAR(2) expression was significantly higher (p<0.00001) in patients with high levels of disease activity: PAR(2) expression for both CD14+ and CD3+ cells correlated to C reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Furthermore, in a cohort of patients with newly diagnosed RA, elevated PAR(2) expression in both CD14+ and CD3+ cells was significantly reduced 3 months after methotrexate or sulfasalazine treatment and this reduction correlated significantly with the reduction in the 28-joint Disease Activity Scale score (p<0.05). PAR(2) expression on cells from patients with OA was low, similar to levels seen in control subjects. Generation of IL-6 by monocytes in response to a selective PAR(2) agonist was significantly greater in patients with RA than in patients with OA and control subjects (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These findings are consistent with a pathogenic role for PAR(2) in RA.
22251436 Maraviroc, a chemokine receptor-5 antagonist, fails to demonstrate efficacy in the treatme 2012 Jan 17 INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine whether maraviroc, a human CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) antagonist, is safe and effective in the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients on background methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: This phase IIa study comprised two distinct components: an open-label safety study of the pharmacokinetics (PK) of MTX in the presence of maraviroc, and a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept (POC) component. In the PK component, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive maraviroc 150 or 300 mg twice daily (BID) for four weeks. In the POC component, patients were randomized 2:1 to receive maraviroc 300 mg BID or placebo for 12 weeks. Patients were not eligible for inclusion in both components. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were treated in the safety/PK component. Maraviroc was well tolerated and there was no evidence of drug-drug interaction with MTX. One hundred ten patients were treated in the POC component. The study was terminated after the planned interim futility analysis due to lack of efficacy, at which time 59 patients (38 maraviroc; 21 placebo) had completed their week 12 visit. There was no significant difference in the number of ACR20 responders between the maraviroc (23.7%) and placebo (23.8%) groups (treatment difference -0.13%; 90% CI -20.45, 17.70; P = 0.504). The most common all-causality treatment-emergent adverse events in the maraviroc group were constipation (7.8%), nausea (5.2%), and fatigue (3.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Maraviroc was generally well tolerated over 12 weeks; however, selective antagonism of CCR5 with maraviroc 300 mg BID failed to improve signs and symptoms in patients with active RA on background MTX. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00427934.
21722499 Greater remission rates in patients with early versus long-standing disease in biologic-na 2011 May OBJECTIVES: Current aim of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment is to achieve remission in as many patients as possible. Rates of remission and clinical outcomes after treatment with abatacept in biologic-naive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with early disease and an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) versus patients with ≥ 10 years of disease were assessed. METHODS: Data from two trials assessing the efficacy of abatacept in MTX inadequate responders were pooled for this exploratory post hoc analysis. Patients with disease duration of ≤ 2 years at baseline (early disease), originally assigned to an abatacept approximately 10 mg/kg treatment arm and entered into a long-term extension (LTE), were compared with patients with ≥ 10 years of disease (long-standing RA). Remission, DAS28-CRP, ACR 70 responses and the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3), improvement in physical function as measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI). RESULTS: Twenty-three percent of these patients (n=108) had early disease. A higher percentage of patients with early disease achieved DAS28-CRP remission versus patients with long-standing disease (35.2% vs. 19.4% at year 1, p<0.01; 46.0% vs. 30.9% at year 3, p<0.05). In addition, a higher percentage of the subgroup with early RA achieved ACR70 responses. More patients with early RA had a meaningful improvement in their HAQ-DI (75.2% vs. 60.4%; p<0.05) and RAPID3 scores at one year (mean changes from baseline of -9.6 vs. -8.1; p=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: These data provide additional support for the possible use of abatacept in biologic-naive patients who have had inadequate response to MTX, earlier in their disease course.
22806421 Long-term therapeutic effects and safety of tacrolimus added to methotrexate in patients w 2013 Apr To assess the long-term safety and efficacy of tacrolimus (TAC) used in combination with oral methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) whose disease remains active despite treatment with MTX alone. The clinical courses of 24 RA patients who received TAC added to MTX from a single center were analyzed retrospectively. The disease activity was evaluated by the DAS28-ESR(3) every 12 months after the addition of TAC, and side effects were evaluated for 3 years. At 3 years after starting the treatment, TAC was still being used by 19 patients (79 %). The causes of discontinuation were an inadequate response (3 cases), oral ulcers and elevation of creatinine (1 case), and worsening of interstitial pneumonia (1 case). No death was registered. The DAS28-ESR(3) was decreased from 4.81 to 3.41 after 3 years of treatment. The doses of prednisolone were decreased from 5.1 mg/day to 3.2 mg/day after 3 years. In patients whose active RA persists despite treatment with MTX, TAC in combination with MTX is safe and well tolerated and provided clinical benefit for a long time in this single-center retrospective study. Further studies are required to confirm the safety and efficacy of this combination therapy.
21617554 Double-blind, randomized, controlled, pilot study comparing classic ayurvedic medicine, me 2011 Jun OBJECTIVE: To compare classic Ayurveda, methotrexate (MTX), and their combination in a double-blind, randomized, double-dummy, pilot trial in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for 36 weeks. METHODS: Forty-three seropositive RA patients by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria with disease duration of less than 7 years were assigned to the following treatment groups: MTX plus Ayurvedic placebo (n = 14), Ayurveda plus MTX placebo (n = 12), or Ayurveda plus MTX (n = 17). Outcomes included the Disease Activity Score (DAS28-CRP), ACR20/50/70, and Health Assessment Questionnaire--Disability Index. All measures were obtained every 12 weeks for 36 weeks. Analyses included descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, χ², or Student t test. The unique features of this study included the development of placebos for each Ayurvedic pharmacological dosage form and individualization of Ayurvedic therapy. RESULTS: All groups were comparable at baseline in demographics and disease characteristics. There were no statistically significant differences among the 3 groups on the efficacy measures. ACR20 results were MTX 86%, Ayurveda 100%, and combination 82%, and DAS28-CRP response were MTX -2.4, Ayurveda -1.7, and combination -2.4. Differences in adverse events among groups were also not statistically significant, although the MTX groups experienced more adverse event (MTX 174, Ayurveda 112, combination 176). No deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In this first-ever, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study comparing Ayurveda, MTX, and their combination, all 3 treatments were approximately equivalent in efficacy, within the limits of a pilot study. Adverse events were numerically fewer in the Ayurveda-only group. This study demonstrates that double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized studies are possible when testing individualized classic Ayurvedic versus allopathic treatment in ways acceptable to western standards and to Ayurvedic physicians. It also justifies the need for larger studies.
21593236 Distinct effects of anti-tumor necrosis factor combined therapy on TH1/TH2 balance in rheu 2011 Jul The immune balance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a disease characterized by TH1 dominance, treated by the preferred combined anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) and methotrexate (MTX) therapy was evaluated by assessing the chemokine and cytokine receptors as well as apoptosis induction. A meta-analysis of combined therapy by TNF blockers and MTX in 15 RA patients, MTX monotherapy in 20 RA patients, and 11 diagnosed but untreated RA patients was performed by assessing several immune markers in the whole lymphocyte population, as well as in specific CD4 cells, by both flow cytometry and image analysis. A significant downregulation of CXCR3 and IL-12 receptors (both TH1 markers) and a significant increase in the chemokine receptor CCR4 and, to a lesser extent, IL-4R (both TH2 markers) were found; a particularly marked increase was found in patients treated by combined therapy. This phenomenon was pronounced in CD4 cells and was accompanied by a high proportion of apoptotic cells. The therapeutic effect of MTX and TNF blockers may be due to apoptosis induction in lymphocytes infiltrating from the inflammation site and restoring the TH1/TH2 balance.
21956234 Heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine elicits similar antibody response as standard 2 2011 Dec The objectives of the study were to compare antibody response in immunosuppressed patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after vaccination with heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) to that of RA patients and healthy controls vaccinated with 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) and to study the impact of disease and/or treatment characteristics and type of vaccine on antibody response following pneumococcal vaccination in patients with RA. In total, 253 RA patients treated with methotrexate (MTX), anti-TNF blockers as monotherapy or anti-TNF + MTX were vaccinated with a single dose (0.5 ml) of PCV7. In addition, 149 RA patients receiving corresponding treatments and 47 healthy controls were vaccinated with a single dose (0.5 ml) of PPV23. Serotype-specific IgG to 23F and 6B were measured at vaccination and 4-6 weeks after vaccination using ELISA. Antibody response ratio (ARR), i.e. ratio between post-/prevaccination antibody levels, was compared between corresponding treatment groups. Differences in ARR were analysed using analysis of variance. Positive antibody response (posAR) was defined as equal to or greater than twofold increase in prevaccination antibody levels. Possible predictors of posAR were analysed using logistic regression model. Corresponding RA treatment groups showed similar ARR and posAR for both serotypes regardless of vaccine type. Higher age at vaccination and concomitant MTX were identified as predictors of impaired posAR for both serotypes tested, whereas type of vaccine did not influence posAR significantly. PCV7 elicits similar antibody response as PPV23 in patients with RA receiving immunosuppressive treatment. In RA patients, higher age and MTX treatment but not type of vaccine predicted impaired posAR.
20952478 Rheumatoid arthritis disease-modifying antirheumatic drug intervention and utilization stu 2011 Jan OBJECTIVE: to report the rates of serious adverse events (SAE), serious infectious events (SIE), and events of medical interest (EMI) in patients receiving etanercept; to identify the risk factors for SAE, SIE, and EMI; and to report time to switching from etanercept therapy, reasons for switching, and time to restarting treatment with etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in US clinical practice. METHODS: adults ≥ 18 years of age who fulfilled the 1987 American Rheumatism Association criteria for RA were eligible for enrollment in 2 prospective, 5-year, multicenter, observational registries. RADIUS 1 (Rheumatoid Arthritis DMARD Intervention and Utilization Study) enrolled patients with RA who required a change in treatment [either an addition or a switch of a biologic or nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)]. In RADIUS 2, patients with RA were required to start etanercept therapy at entry. Patients were seen at a frequency determined by their rheumatologist. RADIUS 1 and RADIUS 2 were registered under the US National Institutes of Health ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT00116714 and NCT00116727, respectively. RESULTS: in these patients, SAE, SIE, and EMI occurred at rates comparable to those seen in clinical trials. No unexpected safety signals were observed. Rates for SAE, SIE, and EMI in etanercept-treated patients were comparable to rates observed in patients receiving methotrexate monotherapy and did not increase with greater exposure to etanercept therapy. CONCLUSION: the RADIUS registries provide a better understanding of the safety of etanercept in patients with RA in the US practice setting.
23011680 Are changes in bone mineral density different between groups of early rheumatoid arthritis 2013 Apr Addition of 10 mg prednisone daily to a methotrexate-based tight control strategy does not lead to bone loss in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients receiving preventive treatment for osteoporosis. A small increase in lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) during the first year of treatment was recorded, regardless of use of glucocorticoids. INTRODUCTION: This study aims to describe effects on BMD of treatment according to EULAR guidelines with a methotrexate-based tight control strategy including 10 mg prednisone daily versus the same strategy without prednisone in early RA patients who received preventive therapy for osteoporosis. METHODS: Early RA patients were included in the CAMERA-II trial: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind 2-year trial, in which effects of addition of 10 mg prednisone daily to a methotrexate-based tight control strategy were studied. All patients received calcium, vitamin D and bisphosphonates. Disease activity was assessed every 4 weeks. Radiographs of hands and feet and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of lumbar spine and left hip were performed at baseline and after 1 and 2 years of treatment. RESULTS: BMD increased significantly over time in both treatment groups at the lumbar spine with a mean of 2.6% during the first year (p<0.001), but not at the hip; at none of the time points did BMD differ significantly between the prednisone and placebo group. Higher age and lower weight at baseline and higher disease activity scores during the trial, but not glucocorticoid therapy, were associated with lower BMD at both the lumbar spine and the hip in mixed-model analyses. CONCLUSION: Addition of 10 mg prednisone daily to a methotrexate-based tight control strategy does not lead to bone loss in early RA patients on bisphosphonates. A small increase in lumbar BMD during the first year of treatment was found, regardless of use of glucocorticoids.
22004230 Leflunomide in clinical practice. A retrospective observational study on use of leflunomid 2011 Oct AIM: The aim was to study the side-effect profile and the survival characteristics of leflunomide used in a regional patient population in New Zealand (NZ). METHOD:   Patients were identified using special authority forms (SAFs) that had been prospectively filed from January 2001 to June 2007. Statistical analysis of survival data was done using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method. RESULTS: Of 110 patients identified on SAFs, only 90 were suitable for analysis. The percentage of women and men were 74% and 26%, respectively. Their mean age was 55.58 years ± 13.44. Their diagnoses were rheumatoid arthritis 75%, psoriatic arthritis 15%, others 10%. Their mean disease duration was 11.31 years ± 8.93. The mean number of concomitant disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs used was 1.95. These were methotrexate (MTX) in 48, hydroxychloroquine in 29, prednisone in 30 and sulfasalazine in 27. Thirty-two of 90 (35.5%) discontinued treatment, 12 (13.3%) of these were in the first 6 months. The mean time to discontinuation was 14.2 months. Twenty-three of 32 discontinuations were for side-effects. The incidence of side-effects were similar to those of an earlier 2-year NZ study, and better than other earlier studies. Leflunomide survival using the KM method at 5 years was 57%, higher than suggested by previous leflunomide studies and this compares well with MTX studies. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests a better side-effect profile and a better drug survival for leflunomide than suggested by previous studies with survival comparable to that of MTX.
22588312 Elevation of KL-6 serum levels in clinical trials of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in p 2013 Mar OBJECTIVE: The associations between elevated levels of serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors were investigated in five Japanese clinical trials. METHODS: Percentages and incidence rates were calculated for elevated serum KL-6 levels. Adverse events associated with elevated levels of serum KL-6 were investigated. RESULTS: In RISING, a clinical trial for infliximab, 15.6 % of the enrolled patients met criterion B (KL-6 ≥500 U/ml and >1.5-fold increase over the baseline value) by week 54. In HIKARI, 7.8 % of the certolizumab pegol (CZP) group and 0 % of the placebo group met criterion B during the double-blind (DB) period (p = 0.003). In J-RAPID, 8.4 % of the methotrexate (MTX) + CZP and 3.9 % of the MTX + placebo groups met criterion B during the DB period. In GO-MONO, 1.8 % of the golimumab (GLM) and 1.3 % of the placebo groups met criterion B during the DB period. In GO-FORTH, 7.1 % of the MTX + GLM and 0 % of the MTX + placebo groups met criteron B during the DB period (p = 0.017). No adverse events accompanied the elevation of serum KL-6 levels in 95.7 % of these patients. CONCLUSION: Serum KL-6 levels may increase during anti-TNF therapy without significant clinical events. In these patients, continuing treatment with TNF inhibitors under careful observation is a reasonable option.