Browse

Search for: rheumatoid arthritis    methotrexate    autoimmune disease    biomarker    gene expression    GWAS    HLA genes    non-HLA genes   

ID PMID Title PublicationDate abstract
21424533 Studies of the efficacy and safety of methotrexate at dosages over 8 mg/week using the IOR 2011 Dec The maximum dosage of methotrexate (MTX) for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) formally approved in Japan is 8 mg/week. We intended to examine the efficacy and safety of MTX at dosages over 8 mg/week in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients using the large Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA) cohort database. Among 9,122 patients registered in the IORRA database from the October 2000 survey to the October 2007 survey, 5,201 patients who had been treated with MTX were selected. We attempted to overcome the drawbacks innate to nonrandomized studies by using longitudinal analyses and multifactorial logistic regression analyses. Cross-sectional analysis of data obtained from the October 2007 survey indicated that dosages of MTX higher than 8 mg/week were used in 27.5% of patients treated with MTX. Longitudinal analyses based on data from three consecutive phases showed that final Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) values were significantly lower [n = 260, mean difference 0.563, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.438-0.688, P < 2.2 × 10(-22), two-sided paired t test] than initial values when MTX was increased from 8 mg/week or lower to over 8 mg/week. In addition, longitudinal analyses based on data from two consecutive phases indicated decreases in DAS28 values of 0.26 ± 1.04 (n = 690, P = 6.78 × 10(-11), two-sided paired t test) when MTX dosages were increased from 8 mg/week or lower to over 8 mg/week, compared with decreases of 0.07 ± 0.89 (n = 2,125, P = 0.000307) when the dosage was maintained at 8 mg/week. The decreases in DAS28 values were significantly larger in the former than the latter (P = 2.27 × 10(-6), two-sided unpaired t test). Concerning safety of MTX at dosages over 8 mg/week, we performed logistic regression analysis in which the objective variable was the existence or nonexistence of self-reported side-effects and the explanatory variable was the MTX dosage in the former phase, with adjustments made for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), steroid administration, folic acid administration, concomitant pulmonary diseases, and renal dysfunction. The results indicated that MTX dosages over 8 mg/week did not have any association with either severe or severe + moderate side-effects. These data regarding both efficacy and safety of MTX at dosages over 8 mg/week in Japanese RA patients would provide the basis for use of the drug at dosages currently not formally approved by the Japanese government.
22589265 Timing and magnitude of initial change in disease activity score 28 predicts the likelihoo 2012 Jul OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between timing and magnitude of Disease Activity Score [DAS28(ESR)] nonresponse (DAS28 improvement thresholds not reached) during the first 12 weeks of treatment with certolizumab pegol (CZP) plus methotrexate, and the likelihood of achieving low disease activity (LDA) at 1 year in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: In a post-hoc analysis of the RAPID 1 study, patients achieving LDA [DAS28(ESR) ≤ 3.2] at Year 1 were assessed according to DAS28 nonresponse at various timepoints within the first 12 weeks. RESULTS: Seven-hundred eighty-three patients were included (CZP 200 mg, n = 393; CZP 400 mg, n = 390). A total of 86.9% of patients in the CZP 200 mg group had a DAS28 improvement of ≥ 1.2 by Week 12. Of the 13.1% of patients with DAS28 improvement < 1.2 by Week 12, only 2.0% had LDA at Year 1. Failure to achieve LDA at Year 1 depended on timing of nonresponse - 22.3%, 8.4%, and 2.0% of patients with DAS28 improvement < 1.2 by Weeks 1, 6, and 12, respectively, had LDA at Year 1 - and magnitude of initial lack of DAS28 improvement; for example, compared with the patients with DAS28 < 1.2 improvement, fewer patients with DAS28 < 0.6 had LDA at Year 1 (17.4%, 2.4%, and 0.0% at Weeks 1, 6, and 12, respectively). CONCLUSION: Failure to achieve improvement in DAS28 within the first 12 weeks of therapy was predictive of a low probability of achieving LDA at Year 1. Moreover, the accuracy of the prediction was found to be strongly dependent on the magnitude and timing of the lack of the response. (Clinical Trial Registration Nos. NCT00152386 and NCT00175877).
21378570 Methotrexate versus leflunomide in rheumatoid arthritis: what is new in 2011? 2011 May PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the recent efficacy and safety data comparing methotrexate (MTX) and leflunomide (LEF) monotherapy, in combination with biologic therapies and in combination with each other. RECENT FINDINGS: MTX is the 'anchor drug' in all rheumatoid arthritis treatment strategies. Patients with contraindications to or intolerance of this drug pose a challenge to the treating physician. Recent studies have re-examined LEF as an alternative to MTX and demonstrated comparable clinical and radiographic efficacy both as monotherapy and in combination with certain biologic agents (tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and rituximab). Safety data, however, are less conclusive. Though some studies have shown greater withdrawal rates with LEF, the incidence of infection and elevated transaminases have been comparable. There are few new data examining the previously demonstrated added benefit of combination MTX+LEF over either alone. The safety profile of this combination, however, has been re-examined in several studies, with conflicting results. Although two meta-analyses and two small retrospective studies have demonstrated a safety profile similar to that of MTX monotherapy, data from a large population study suggested a greater degree of hepatotoxicity with combination. SUMMARY: LEF offers an alternative with comparable efficacy to MTX as both monotherapy and, as preliminary data suggest, in combination with certain biologics agents. Addition of LEF to MTX in rheumatoid arthritis patients who have failed MTX monotherapy has added therapeutic benefit. Safety data on LEF compared to MTX are less conclusive. All patients on LEF, and particularly those on combined LEF+MTX, should be monitored closely for hepatotoxicity.
21440623 In vitro risk assessment of AZD9056 perpetrating a transporter-mediated drug-drug interact 2011 May 18 Methotrexate is the most commonly used drug to treat rheumatoid arthritis. Since clinical efficacy studies in rheumatoid arthritis are conducted on a background of methotrexate therapy, it is necessary to assess the potential of rheumatoid arthritis candidate drugs to perpetrate a drug-drug interaction (DDI) with methotrexate during development. Consequently, we need to identify the regulatory in vitro studies required to facilitate this assessment. We therefore reviewed the literature to ascertain the methotrexate disposition pathways implicated with known DDIs. Experiments were conducted to confirm that methotrexate was identified as a substrate for these pathways in our laboratory. The literature indicated active renal elimination (mediated by the human transporters OAT1, OAT3, MRP2 and BCRP) to be the principal pathway for methotrexate DDI risk. With the exception of MRP2, methotrexate was confirmed as a substrate of these transporters using oocyte and membrane vesicle test systems. A rheumatoid arthritis candidate drug (AZD9056) and sulfasalazine were subsequently assessed as inhibitors of OAT1, OAT3 and BCRP to determine their DDI potential towards methotrexate. AZD9056 was neither an inhibitor of OAT1 nor OAT3 and did not inhibit their transport of methotrexate. AZD9056 was an inhibitor of BCRP and weakly inhibited BCRP-mediated transport of methotrexate (IC(50)=92μM). Sulfasalazine inhibited methotrexate transport mediated by all transporters studied (IC(50)<5μM). Subsequent assessment of the in vitro data using [I]/IC(50) ratios indicated that both AZD9056 and sulfasalazine were unlikely to cause a DDI with methotrexate in vivo. In conclusion, to support rheumatoid arthritis drug development it is proposed that regulatory in vitro studies for OAT1, OAT3 and BCRP inhibition be routinely conducted to assess the potential for a transporter-mediated DDI with methotrexate in vivo.
21149498 Predictors of response to methotrexate in early DMARD naive rheumatoid arthritis: results 2011 Mar OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of response to methotrexate (MTX) in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In the SWEFOT trial, patients with RA with symptom duration <1 year started MTX monotherapy (20 mg/weekly) and 405/487 continued until the 3-4- month visit. The primary outcome measure was the DAS28-based European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria. Multivariate logistic regression was used to study the association between response and the following baseline characteristics: gender, age, symptom duration, cigarette smoking habits, autoantibody status, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score, concurrent prednisolone and treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Secondary response and remission measures were the American College of Rheumatology and the Simple Disease Activity Index and Clinical Disease Activity Index (SDAI/CDAI)-derived criteria. RESULTS: After 3-4 months of MTX treatment, the frequency of EULAR good/moderate/no response was 34%/41%/25%, respectively. Parameters associated with a decreased likelihood of EULAR response were female gender (adjusted OR (adj OR) 0.50, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.81), symptom duration (adj OR per month increase 0.93, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.99), current smoking (adj OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.63) and higher HAQ (adj OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.80). Parameters associated with an increased likelihood of EULAR response were higher age (adj OR per 10-year increase 1.30, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.51) and prednisolone treatment (adj OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.43 to 5.63). The findings were similar when patients on prednisolone were excluded and other response criteria tested, although current smoking was the only significant predictor using all response criteria, while HAQ was the only significant predictor of all the remission criteria used. A matrix showed up to ninefold differences between subgroups stratified by the main predictors. CONCLUSION: Current smoking, female sex, longer symptom duration and younger age predict a worse response to MTX in patients with new-onset RA. TrialRegNo NCT00764725.
22104048 Abatacept mechanism of action: concordance with its clinical profile. 2012 Mar The double and simultaneous molecular interaction between antigen-presentig cells (APC) and T lymphocytes is essential for the optimal activation of the immunological response and requires the participation of two membrane receptor groups. Abatacept is a fusion protein that selectively modulates one of these two ways, by binding to CD80 and CD86 receptors on APC. In this way, the drug inhibits T cell activation, selectively blocking the specific interaction of CD80/CD86 receptors to CD28 and, therefore, inhibiting T cell proliferation and B cell immunological response. This pharmacological action results in the normalization of inflammatory mediators in rheumatoid arthritis patients and in a safe and efficacious clinical response. Abatacept in combination with methotrexate prevents the progression of joint damage and improves physical function in rheumatoid arthritis patients.
22730366 Efficacy and safety of secukinumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a phase II, dose 2013 Jun OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of secukinumab, a fully human monoclonal anti-interleukin-17A antibody, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Patients (n=237) with inadequate response to methotrexate were randomly assigned to receive monthly subcutaneous injections of secukinumab 25 mg, 75 mg, 150 mg, 300 mg or placebo. The primary endpoint was the American College of Rheumatology 20% response (ACR20) at week 16. RESULTS: Demographics and baseline characteristics were comparable across all treatment groups. The primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved: the proportion of ACR20 responders at week 16 with secukinumab 25-300 mg was 36.0-53.7% versus placebo (34%). Disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28)-C-reactive protein (CRP) was a secondary endpoint and clinically relevant decreases with secukinumab 75-300 mg were reported versus placebo. Serum high sensitivity CRP levels at week 16 were significantly reduced with secukinumab 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg doses versus placebo. The safety profile of secukinumab was consistent with that seen with other biological agents. Most adverse events (AE) were mild to moderate in severity. Infections were slightly more frequent with secukinumab than placebo. Six serious AE were reported: secukinumab 75 mg (one), secukinumab 300 mg (four) and placebo (one). CONCLUSIONS: ACR20 response rates differed between secukinumab 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg doses and placebo; however, the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved. Greater decreases in DAS28 were observed with secukinumab 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg than placebo. There were no unexpected safety signals and no specific organ-related toxicities. Further trials with secukinumab in the treatment of RA are warranted.
21720103 [Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with mizoribine and methotrexate for rheumatoi 2011 Background. MZB is a purine analog, and is used as a disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD). We conducted an open label uncontrolled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with methotrexate (MTX) and mizoribine (MZB). Methods. Thirty one RA patients (9 males, 22 females, 68±12 year-old) who fulfilled ACR criteria of RA and did not show sufficient clinical response to MTX were included. MZB (150 mg/day, once a day) were added to MTX. DAS28-CRP was measured at day 0 and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the treatment. Adverse events were recorded. Results. Overall DAS28-CRP was significantly decreased from 4.4±1.0 to 3.1±1.3 at 3 months (p<0.01), 2.7±0.68 at 6 months (p<0.01), 2.4±1.4 at 12 months (p<0.01). Seventeen patients (55%) achieved significant improvement of DAS28-CRP. Number of swollen joints of responders before the treatment was significantly fewer than that of non-responders. Improvement of DAS28-CRP was significantly different between the responders (0.91±0.74) and non-responders (0.18±0.66) at 1 month (p<0.01). Nine patients (29%) could achieve remission Four patients experienced adverse events. Conclusions. MTX and MZB combination therapy was effective and relatively safety.
21557526 Patterns of medication use during pregnancy in rheumatoid arthritis. 2011 May OBJECTIVE: To characterize therapies prescribed during pregnancy to women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We conducted a cohort study of women with RA with pregnancies using health care utilization data from 2002-2008. We examined the distribution of RA drugs by therapeutic classes, including nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)/coxibs, glucocorticoids, nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and biologic DMARDs, during 90-day pregnancy trimesters and the 180 days prior to pregnancy. Drugs were characterized according to the Food and Drug Administration risk classification system. Differences in exposure by period were determined by chi-square tests. RESULTS: A total of 393 pregnancies were identified among 34,169 women with RA. Seventy-two percent of pregnancies ended in a delivery. Approximately 24% of women with RA received a DMARD during preconception. At any point during pregnancy, 23% of women with deliveries were dispensed ≥1 DMARD and the proportion of use declined from the first to the third trimester (P = 0.03). Similar to DMARD therapy, use of NSAIDs/coxibs and exposure to category D/X medications were significantly lower compared to prepregnancy use (P < 0.05). In contrast, more women were prescribed glucocorticoids during pregnancy than before pregnancy. Use of biologics occurred in 12.5% of pregnancies. Compared to women with deliveries, women who experienced abortions were more frequently exposed to NSAIDs/coxibs (P < 0.05). Dispensing of category D/X medications was also higher in women with spontaneous abortions and primarily involved methotrexate (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Approximately 24% of women with RA received a DMARD in the 180 days before conception, and the proportion dropped during pregnancy. Glucocorticoid use remained high throughout pregnancy. Our results suggest that continued efforts directed at counseling women and their physicians about the potential risks/benefits of RA therapies during pregnancy are warranted.
21975788 Combination therapy for pain management in inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis, a 2011 Oct 5 BACKGROUND: Despite optimal therapy with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, many people with inflammatory arthritis (IA) continue to have persistent pain that may require additional therapy. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and safety of combination pain therapy for people with IA (rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and other spondyloarthritis (SpA)). We planned to assess differences in effects between patients on background disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy and patients on no background therapy in subgroup analyses. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library); MEDLINE; and EMBASE. We did not impose any date or language restrictions in the search. We also handsearched conference proceedings of the American College of Rheumatology and the European League against Rheumatism (2008-10). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and controlled clinical trials (RCTs and CCTs) assessing combination therapy (at least two drugs from the following classes: analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids, opioid-like drugs and neuromodulators (antidepressants, anticonvulsants and muscle relaxants)) compared with monotherapy, for adults with IA (RA, AS, PsA and other SpA). We speficically excluded studies that did not report pain or studies without a standardised pain scale as an outcome measure. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-three trials (total of 912 patients) met the inclusion criteria (22 in RA; one in a mixed population of RA and osteoarthritis); all except one were published before 1990. Most study populations were not taking DMARDs (e.g. methotrexate, sulphasalazine, hydroxychloroquine and leflunomide) and all studies were performed prior to the introduction of biologic therapies (e.g. etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab). All trials were at high risk of bias, heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis, and we were only able to report a general description of results.The majority (18 studies, 78%) found no differences between the combination and monotherapy treatments they studied, while five (22%) reported conflicting results, favouring either the combination or monotherapy arms.From the 12 trials on NSAID + analgesic vs NSAID, nine reported no significant difference between the interventions, while three did: in two, the combination therapy achieved better pain control; and the third trial compared combination therapy with two different dosages of monotherapy (NSAID alone) and reported that a high dose phenylbutazone was superior to combination therapy (paracetamol + aspirin), which was superior to low dose phenylbutazone.From the five studies on the combination of two NSAIDS vs one NSAID, four reported no significant differences between interventions, and one reported significantly better pain control with combination therapy.The single trial comparing a combination of opioid + neuromodulator vs opioid reported better pain control with monotherapy.The remaining trials (NSAID + neuromodulator vs NSAID (3 trials); opioid + NSAID vs NSAID (1 trial); and opioid + analgesic vs analgesic (1 trial)) found no significant difference between combination therapy and monotherapy.Information regarding withdrawals due to inadequate analgesia and safety was incompletely reported, but in general there were no differences between combination therapy and monotherapy.No data were available that addressed the value of combination pain therapy or monotherapy for people with IA who have optimal disease suppression. There were no studies that included patients with AS, PsA or SpA. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on 23 trials, all at high risk of bias, there is insufficient evidence to establish the value of combination therapy over monotherapy for people with IA. Importantly, there are no studies addressing the value of combination therapy for patients with IA who have persistent pain despite optimal disease suppression. Well designed trials are needed to address this question.
23155221 Heart failure risk among patients with rheumatoid arthritis starting a TNF antagonist. 2013 Nov BACKGROUND: While heart failure (HF) is associated with elevations in tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α, several trials of TNF antagonists showed no benefit and possibly worsening of disease in those with known severe HF. We studied the risk of new or recurrent HF among a group of patients receiving these agents to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We used data from four different US healthcare programmes. Subjects with RA receiving methotrexate were eligible to enter the study cohort if they added or switched to a TNF antagonist or another non-biological disease modifying antirheumatic drug (nbDMARD). These groups were compared in Cox regression models stratified by propensity score decile and adjusted for oral glucocorticoid dosage, prior HF hospitalisations, and the use of loop diuretics. RESULTS: We compared 8656 new users of a nbDMARD with 11 587 new users of a TNF antagonist with similar baseline covariates. The HR for the TNF antagonists compared with nbDMARD was 0.85 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.14). The HR was also not elevated in subjects with a history of HF. But, it was elevated prior to 2002 (HR 2.17, 95% CI 0.45 to 10.50, test for interaction p=0.036). Oral glucocorticoids were associated with a dose-related gradient of HF risk: compared with no use, 1≤5 mg HR 1.30 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.85), ≥5 mg HR 1.54 (95% CI 1.09 to 2.19). CONCLUSIONS: TNF antagonists were not associated with a risk of HF hospital admissions compared with nbDMARDs in this RA population.
22272322 Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of existing TNF blocking ag 2012 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Five-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-blockers (infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol and golimumab) are available for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Only few clinical trials compare one TNF-blocker to another. Hence, a systematic review is required to indirectly compare the substances. The aim of our study is to estimate the efficacy and the safety of TNF-blockers in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and indirectly compare all five currently available blockers by combining the results from included randomized clinical trials (RCT). METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted using databases including: MEDLINE, SCOPUS (including EMBASE), Cochrane library and electronic search alerts. Only articles reporting double-blind RCTs of TNF-blockers vs. placebo, with or without concomitant methotrexate (MTX), in treatment of RA were selected. Data collected were information of patients, interventions, controls, outcomes, study methods and eventual sources of bias. RESULTS: Forty-one articles reporting on 26 RCTs were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Five RCTs studied infliximab, seven etanercept, eight adalimumab, three golimumab and three certolizumab. TNF-blockers were more efficacious than placebo at all time points but were comparable to MTX. TNF-blocker and MTX combination was superior to either MTX or TNF-blocker alone. Increasing doses did not improve the efficacy. TNF-blockers were relatively safe compared to either MTX or placebo. CONCLUSIONS: No single substance clearly rose above others in efficacy, but the results of the safety analyses suggest that etanercept might be the safest alternative. Interestingly, MTX performs nearly identically considering both efficacy and safety aspects with a margin of costs.
22098827 [Neurological adverse events under anti-TNF alpha therapy]. 2012 Jan INTRODUCTION: Anti-TNF alpha treatments are increasingly prescribed in various rheumatological or gastroenterological inflammatory diseases. Several adverse events, including neurological episodes have been reported in the literature. Relation to treatment is a major concern and guidelines for management of those patients are not available. The aim of our study is to collect and analyze neurological adverse events occurring during anti-TNF alpha therapy, and to propose guidelines for diagnosis of demyelinating-induced diseases. METHODS: All patients treated with anti-TNF alpha drug, who were addressed in our department following a neurological event, were collected. We gathered clinical data including previous neurological history and immunosuppressive treatments. Paraclinical data included brain and spinal MRI, CSF study and outcome after anti-TNF therapy was collected. RESULTS: Nine patients were included in this study. Sex ratio was eight and mean age was 49±9 years. One patient had previous history of subarachnoïdian hemorrage. All the patients previously received immunosuppressive drugs, including methotrexate (nine) and leflunomide (four). Three patients had a brain MRI before initiation of anti-TNF treatment, which was normal. Clinical episode was stroke-like in three cases, clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) in five cases, and peripheral neuropathy in one case. MRI showed lesions suggestive of demyelinating T2 hyperintensities in four cases, vascular infarcts in two cases, and non-specific T2 hyperintensities in three cases. Barkhof and Tintore criteria were fulfilled in one of the four CIS cases. CSF study was available for six patients. It was normal (four cases), showed oligoclonal bands (one case) and lymphocytic meningitis (one case). Anti-TNF alpha discontinuation was decided in five cases. Outcome was favorable for eight patients. One patient, whom MRI fulfilled Barkhof and Tintore criteria, and CSF showed oligoclonal bands, further developed relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. CONCLUSION: Our study is compatible with data found in the literature. Barkhof and Tintore criteria and CSF study are useful in clinical practice to diagnose a first demyelinating event. Standardized paraclinical neurological explorations should be proposed to physicians who are in charge of anti-TNF treated patients.
23291487 [Psoriasis-like eruption induced by adalimumab in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis : a 2012 A 72-year-old man developed arthritis of the bilateral shoulders and fingers. X-ray examination of the fingers showed periarticular osteoporosis, joint space narrowing, and cystic changes at the bone ends. Because contrast-enhanced MRI revealed synovial membrane proliferation and osteolysis, a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was made. Treatment for RA with methotrexate (4 mg/week) was initiated in December 2008. In February 2009, adalimumab administration (40 mg/2 weeks) was initiated. The RA markedly improved, and clinical remission was maintained thereafter. However, in April 2010, relatively well-delineated erythematous plaques accompanied by bullae and scales developed on the bilateral palms, toes, limbs, and the inguinal region. A diagnosis of psoriasis-like eruptions was made by skin biopsy, and adalimumab administration was discontinued. After 4 months, the eruptions improved. Psoriasis-like eruptions due to anti-TNF drugs are rarely observed, but adverse effects require caution. This case is reported along with a review of the literature.
21523344 Efficacy of vitamin D in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis receiving methotrexate 2012 Jul To determine the efficacy of oral vitamin D [25(OH)D] in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are in methotrexate (MTX) therapy, patients receiving stable doses of MTX were randomized to one of two dose groups and received 12 weeks of double-blind vitamin D[25(OH)D] (50,000 IU per week) or matching placebo. The moderate and major efficacy measure was the proportion of patients with >0.6 and >1.2 improvement in RA based on the Disease Activity Score 28(DAS 28) at 12 weeks. Safety measures included adverse events and laboratory assessments. On a background of MTX, the percentage of patients with a moderate/major DAS 28 response at week 12 in the vitamin D groups (76/44%) was not significantly different from placebo (64.6/33.4%). Adverse events were typically mild and included small hepatic enzyme elevation; we did not have any undesirable events resulting in discontinuation of study drug. In patients with active RA receiving stable doses of MTX, vitamin D showed non-significant improvement in efficacy outcomes compared to placebo.
22753402 Infliximab for 6 months added on combination therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis: 2-year 2013 Jun OBJECTIVE: Early treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with combination treatment starting with methotrexate, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine and prednisolone (FIN-RACo strategy) is superior to monotherapy. A study was undertaken to determine whether infliximab (INFL) added to intensified FIN-RACo treatment for the initial 6 months improves the 2-year outcome. METHODS: 99 patients with early untreated active RA were enrolled in an investigator-initiated, randomised, double-blind, multicentre, parallel-group trial. Primary outcomes were remission and radiological changes at 2 years. All patients started with FIN-RACo. In addition, they were randomised to receive INFL or placebo (Pla) from weeks 4 to 26. RESULTS: At 24 months, 66% and 53%, respectively, of the patients in the FIN-RACo+INFL and FIN-RACo+Pla groups were in remission according to the modified American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria (p=0.19), 26% and 10% were in sustained modified ACR remission (p=0.042) and 82% in both groups were in remission by 28-joint disease activity score (not significant). Mean changes in the total Sharp-van der Heijde score were 0.2 and 1.4, respectively (p=0.0058). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with early active RA achieve clinical remission and develop negligible joint damage with the intensified FIN-RACo regimen. Adding INFL for the first 6 months delays radiological progression.
22397953 IL-6 receptor inhibition positively modulates bone balance in rheumatoid arthritis patient 2012 Oct OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in biochemical markers of bone metabolism in response to tocilizumab in patients with anti-tumor necrosis factor-refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: RADIATE was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase 3 trial. C-reactive protein, osteocalcin (OC), C-terminal telopeptides of type-I collagen (C-terminal telopeptides of type-1 collagen (CTX-I) and type-I collagen degradation product), and matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) serum levels were analyzed from 299 RA patients. Patients were randomly assigned to either tocilizumab (4 or 8 mg/kg) or placebo intravenously every 4 weeks, along with concomitant stable methotrexate (10 to 25 mg weekly) in all treatment arms. The change in biochemical markers CTX-I and OC in combination was evaluated as a measure of net bone balance, a reflection of the change in equilibrium between resorption and formation. RESULTS: Both tocilizumab doses decreased C-reactive protein levels and significantly inhibited cathepsin K-mediated bone resorption in RADIATE subjects, as measured by a decrease in CTX-I. There was a significant overall improvement in net bone balance at week 16 as measured by a decrease in the CTX-I:OC ratio (-25%, P < 0.01). Furthermore, a significant reduction in MMP-3 (43%, P < 0.001) and type-I collagen degradation product levels (18%, P < 0.001) were observed following treatment, both consistent with decreased MMP-mediated type-I collagen catabolism in joint tissue. CONCLUSIONS: In anti-tumor necrosis factor-refractory patients, tocilizumab significantly reduced the levels of biochemical markers of cathepsin K-mediated bone resorption and MMP-mediated tissue degradation and remodeling. These observations suggest that tocilizumab has a positive effect on bone balance, which could in part explain the retardation of progressive structural damage observed with tocilizumab. Clinical trial registry number: NCT00106522.
22006202 A phase IIb dose-ranging study of the oral JAK inhibitor tofacitinib (CP-690,550) versus p 2012 Apr OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 6 dosages of oral tofacitinib (CP-690,550) with placebo for the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients receiving a stable background regimen of methotrexate (MTX) who have an inadequate response to MTX monotherapy. METHODS: In this 24-week, double-blind, phase IIb study, patients with active RA (n = 507) were randomized to receive placebo or tofacitinib (20 mg/day, 1 mg twice daily, 3 mg twice daily, 5 mg twice daily, 10 mg twice daily, or 15 mg twice daily). All patients continued to receive a stable dosage of MTX. The primary end point was the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) response rate at week 12. RESULTS: At week 12, ACR20 response rates for patients receiving all tofacitinib dosages ≥3 mg twice daily (52.9% for 3 mg twice daily, 50.7% for 5 mg twice daily, 58.1% for 10 mg twice daily, 56.0% for 15 mg twice daily, and 53.8% for 20 mg/day) were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) greater than those for placebo (33.3%). Improvements were sustained at week 24 for the ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 responses, scores for the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index, the 3-variable Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the C-reactive protein level (DAS28-CRP), and a 3-variable DAS28-CRP of <2.6. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in >10% of patients in any tofacitinib group were diarrhea, upper respiratory tract infection, and headache; 21 patients (4.1%) experienced serious adverse events. Sporadic increases in transaminase levels, increases in cholesterol and serum creatinine levels, and decreases in neutrophil and hemoglobin levels were observed. CONCLUSION: In patients with active RA in whom the response to MTX has been inadequate, the addition of tofacitinib at a dosage ≥3 mg twice daily showed sustained efficacy and a manageable safety profile over 24 weeks.
23044005 Does methotrexate increase the risk of varicella or herpes zoster infection in patients wi 2012 Nov OBJECTIVES: Methotrexate (MTX) has become the foundation disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) for RA. However, concern exists regarding its possible association with infectious complications including varicella zoster virus (VZV) and herpes zoster (HZ). Furthermore, no consensus exists regarding pre-MTX VZV screening or the use of VZV vaccine. METHODS: We undertook systematic literature review (SLR) investigating the relationship between the use of MTX in patients with RA and VZV and HZ infection. Additionally, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, HPA, the CDC, Rheumatology societies and WHO web sites and publications were consulted. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria comprising 29 observational studies and 6 case reports. The case reports and 13 observation studies considered the association between MTX and HZ. Three of the observational studies reported a positive association although in 5 cases, patients were concurrently treated with prednisolone. Five studies concluded that there was no association between HZ and MTX. Three studies comparing the infection rates of MTX with other RA therapies found that MTX did not result in higher HZ infection rates. Three studies examining the association between HZ and MTX treatment duration failed to show a link. CONCLUSIONS: No evidence exists to support an association between MTX and VZV infection in RA patients and the data regarding the role of MTX in HZ development is conflicting. The role of pre-MTX VZV screening is controversial and, as it may delay initiation of RA treatment, we suggest against VZV screening in this context.
22073936 Comparative effectiveness research (CER): a summary of AHRQ's CER on therapies for rheumat 2011 Nov BACKGROUND: In recent years, the U.S. government has designated funding of several large-scale initiatives for comparative effectiveness research (CER) in health care. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 apportioned more than $1 billion to support CER programs administered by the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). CER is generally defined as the undertaking of original research or systematic reviews of published literature in order to compare the benefits and risks of different approaches to preventing, diagnosing, or treating diseases. These approaches may include diagnostic tests, medications, medical devices, and surgeries. The overall goals of CER are to support informed health care decisions by patients, clinicians, payers, and policy makers and to apply its evidence to ultimately improve the quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of health care. OBJECTIVES: To (a) provide managed care professionals with general definitions of CER, specifically as it is administered by AHRQ; (b) discuss the importance of CER to clinical and managed care pharmacists; and (c) summarize key methods and findings from AHRQ's 2007 comparative effectiveness review on therapies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). SUMMARY: As supported by AHRQ, CER is conducted in order to synthesize comprehensive evidence on the comparative benefits and harms of treatment interventions. The findings from comparative effectiveness reviews can thus contribute to informing therapeutic strategies and treatment decisions. In 2007, a multitude of RA treatment options and studies motivated AHRQ to commission a systematic comparative effectiveness review. Conducted by investigators at the RTI-University of North Carolina Evidence-Based Practice Center, the review included comparisons of synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), biologic agents, synthetic DMARDs versus biologic agents, and various combination therapies. Head-to-head comparisons of synthetic DMARDs generally revealed no significant differences in long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes, or in functional capacity or health-related quality of life. Two nonrandomized prospective cohort studies and 1 open-label effectiveness trial reported no differences in ACR20 and ACR50 response rates in patients treated with the tissue necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibitors etanercept and infliximab. Comparisons of TNF-alpha inhibitors generally indicated no significant differences in rates of adverse events, including serious infections, and no increases in rates over time. In comparisons of a biologic agent combined with methotrexate versus a biologic agent alone, combination therapies were generally associated with better clinical response rates and better outcomes of functional capacity and quality of life. The most common adverse events observed in studies on biologic agents were diarrhea, headache, nausea, rhinitis, injection site reactions, and upper respiratory tract infections.