Browse

Search for: rheumatoid arthritis    methotrexate    autoimmune disease    biomarker    gene expression    GWAS    HLA genes    non-HLA genes   

ID PMID Title PublicationDate abstract
25367713 Evaluating drug-free remission with abatacept in early rheumatoid arthritis: results from 2015 Jan OBJECTIVES: To evaluate clinical remission with subcutaneous abatacept plus methotrexate (MTX) and abatacept monotherapy at 12 months in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and maintenance of remission following the rapid withdrawal of all RA treatment. METHODS: In the Assessing Very Early Rheumatoid arthritis Treatment phase 3b trial, patients with early active RA were randomised to double-blind, weekly, subcutaneous abatacept 125 mg plus MTX, abatacept 125 mg monotherapy, or MTX for 12 months. Patients with low disease activity (Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 (C reactive protein (CRP)) <3.2) at month 12 entered a 12-month period of withdrawal of all RA therapy. The coprimary endpoints were the proportion of patients with DAS28 (CRP) <2.6 at month 12 and both months 12 and 18, for abatacept plus MTX versus MTX. RESULTS: Patients had <2 years of RA symptoms, DAS28 (CRP) ≥3.2, anticitrullinated peptide-2 antibody positivity and 95.2% were rheumatoid factor positive. For abatacept plus MTX versus MTX, DAS28 (CRP) <2.6 was achieved in 60.9% versus 45.2% (p=0.010) at 12 months, and following treatment withdrawal, in 14.8% versus 7.8% (p=0.045) at both 12 and 18 months. DAS28 (CRP) <2.6 was achieved for abatacept monotherapy in 42.5% (month 12) and 12.4% (both months 12 and 18). Both abatacept arms had a safety profile comparable with MTX alone. CONCLUSIONS: Abatacept plus MTX demonstrated robust efficacy compared with MTX alone in early RA, with a good safety profile. The achievement of sustained remission following withdrawal of all RA therapy suggests an effect of abatacept's mechanism on autoimmune processes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01142726.
25491492 Tocilizumab for treating rheumatoid arthritis: an evaluation of pharmacokinetics/pharmacod 2015 Feb INTRODUCTION: Dysregulated overproduction of IL-6 has important roles in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Tocilizumab (TCZ) is the only approved biologic agent inhibiting the IL-6 pathway for RA treatment, and is the focus of this review. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes the pharmacologic characteristics, clinical efficacy and safety profile of TCZ therapy in RA patients. The data reviewed were based mainly on Phase III randomized clinical trials and the literature until 2014 regarding TCZ in RA treatment. EXPERT OPINION: Being a first-line biologic agent for RA, TCZ is especially suitable for RA patients who have shown an inadequate response to TNF-α inhibitors or who cannot tolerate methotrexate. In view of its advantage in suppressing acute-phase reactions and as the only approved inhibitor of IL-6 signaling, TCZ might be particularly effective for RA patients with a high systemic inflammatory response, anemia, AA amyloidosis and other diseases mediated by IL-6. Being able to identify reliable predictors of response to TCZ, and finding more effective new biologic and treatment options, will reduce the number of patients who fail to respond to TCZ.
20379839 Precore mutant hepatitis B virus-associated fulminant hepatitis during infliximab therapy 2013 Mar A 73-year-old female, who suffered from rheumatoid arthritis for 10 years, developed precore mutant hepatitis B virus-associated fulminant hepatitis after 1 year of infliximab therapy and subsequent methotrexate withdrawal. We emphasize the importance of preemptive antiviral therapy before starting infliximab administration and withdrawing immunosuppressive drugs.
24382277 The role of bromocriptine in the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. 2013 Dec AIM: We decided to determine the effectiveness of oral bromocriptine in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are in methotrexate (MTX) therapy. METHODS: Patients receiving stable doses of MTX were randomized to one of two groups and received 3 months of double-blind bromocriptine (5 mg/day) or matching placebo. The moderate and major outcome measures were the proportion of patients with > 0.6 and > 1.2 improvement in RA based on the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at 3 months. Safety measures included adverse events and laboratory assessments. RESULTS: On a background treatment of MTX, the percentage of patients with moderate and major DAS28 responses at 3 months in the bromocriptine group (73.8%/59.5%) was not significantly different from placebo (63.1%/31.6%). Side effects were typically mild and included mild nausea and sleep disturbance; we did not have any adverse events resulting in discontinuation of the study drug. CONCLUSION: In patients with active RA receiving stable doses of MTX, bromocriptine showed non-significant improvement in efficiency outcomes compared to placebo.
23950185 Five-year favorable outcome of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis in the 2000s: data 2013 Oct OBJECTIVE: To report the 5-year outcome of a large prospective cohort of patients with very early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to identify factors predictive of outcome. METHODS: Patients were recruited if they had early arthritis of < 6 months' duration, had a high probability of developing RA, and had never been prescribed disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) or steroids. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors that predict outcome. RESULTS: We included 813 patients from December 2002 to April 2005. Age was 48.1 ± 12.6 years, delay before referral 103.1 ± 52.4 days, 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) 5.1 ± 1.3, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) 1.0 ± 0.7; 45.8% and 38.7% had rheumatoid factor or antibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP), respectively; 22% had hand or foot erosions; 78.5% fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria for RA at baseline and 93.8% during followup. At 5 years, 573 patients were evaluated. The outcome was mild for most patients: disease activity (median DAS28 = 2.5) and HAQ disability (median 0.3) were well controlled over time; 50.6% achieved DAS28 remission and 64.7% low disease activity. Radiographic progression was low (2.9 Sharp unit/year) and only a few patients required joint surgery. Nevertheless, some patients developed new comorbidities. During the 5 years, 82.7% of patients had received at least 1 DMARD (methotrexate, 65.9%), 18.3% a biological DMARD, and about 60% prednisone at least once. Anti-CCP was the best predictor of remaining in the cohort for 5 years, of prescription of synthetic or biologic DMARD, and of radiographic progression. CONCLUSION: The 5-year outcome of an early RA cohort in the 2000s was described. Anti-CCP was a robust predictor of outcome. The generally good 5-year outcome could be related to early referral and early effective treatment, key processes in the management of early RA in daily practice.
24460872 Kinase inhibitors: the next generation of therapies in the treatment of rheumatoid arthrit 2014 May Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can be the source of significant pain and functional limitation. The past 20 years have seen a transition in treatment goals away from mere pain management toward disease modification through the suppression of autoimmunity. Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, such as methotrexate and biologic agents, impair disease progression and joint destruction. However, despite these achievements, a substantial subset of RA patients does not respond to or cannot tolerate current treatments for RA. Scientific insight into the cellular pathways of inflammation has revealed new therapeutic targets for the treatment of autoimmune diseases like RA. Attention has focused on pathways mediated by Janus kinase (JAK), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk). This review article summarizes the evidence supporting the use of various kinase inhibitors, including the newly approved JAK inhibitor tofacitinib, in the treatment of RA.
24354889 Relationship between inflammation and infliximab pharmacokinetics in rheumatoid arthritis. 2014 Jul AIMS: Infliximab, an anti-tumour necrosis factor-α monoclonal antibody, is indicated in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Our objective was to evaluate the influence of the sources of infliximab pharmacokinetic variability in RA. METHODS: Eighty-four patients treated with infliximab for RA were included in a prospective noncomparative study. They were analysed between two consecutive infliximab infusions. Infliximab concentrations were measured before the infusion, 2 h, 1 and 4 weeks after the infusion and immediately before the next infusion. Infliximab concentrations were described using a two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model. RESULTS: The mean (interindividual standard deviation) estimated central volume of distribution was 2.3 l (36%) and systemic clearance was 0.019 l h(-1) (37%). The central volume of distribution increased with bodyweight; it was doubled between 50 and 90 kg. Systemic clearance increased with pre-infusion C-reactive protein concentration by 20%, varying from 3 to 14 mg l(-) 1, and was decreased by 30% when methotrexate was coadministered. CONCLUSIONS: The influence of methotrexate and inflammation on infliximab clearance suggests that individual adjustment of infliximab doses according to disease activity may be useful in RA.
24721419 Effects of a biologic agent in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis after treatment for met 2014 Apr 11 BACKGROUND: Several studies have suggested an increased risk of malignant tumor in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. It has been also reported that rheumatoid arthritis patients have a high incidence of lymphoma compared with the general population, and that patients receiving methotrexate, which is the anchor drug for rheumatoid arthritis treatment, can develop lymphoproliferative disease. Nevertheless, management of rheumatoid arthritis after treatment for methotrexate-associated lymphoma has not been fully investigated. We here report a patient with rheumatoid arthritis who developed malignant lymphoma associated with methotrexate therapy. Moreover, we describe the use of a biologic agent for a rheumatoid arthritis patient after treatment for lymphoma associated with methotrexate. CASE PRESENTATION: A 60-year-old Japanese man with a 20-year history of rheumatoid arthritis was admitted to our hospital with a left inguinal tumor. Open biopsy was performed and a biopsy specimen revealed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. As our patient had received methotrexate for 4 years, we diagnosed the lymphoproliferative disease as being methotrexate-related. This lymphoma was not associated with Epstein- Barr virus by Epstein-Barr virus-encoded ribonucleic acid in-situ hybridization, but this patient was an Epstein-Barr virus carrier, regarding serological testing. The lymphoma went into complete remission after 6 courses of rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone/prednisolone therapy. Two years later, however, rheumatoid arthritis activity gradually increased and was not controlled with salazosulfapyridine. Etanercept was administered in view of its possible effect on B-cells, and this reduced the level of disease activity without recurrence of lymphoma. CONCLUSION: The management of rheumatoid arthritis after treatment for methotrexate-associated lymphoma has not been fully investigated yet. Etanercept appeared to be safe because of its B-cell effect, but further observation is necessary to make a firm conclusion. Further accumulation of cases is needed to clarify which biologics are safe and effective for treatment of methotrexate-associated B-cell lymphoma.
24788619 Randomised comparison of initial triple DMARD therapy with methotrexate monotherapy in com 2014 Jul OBJECTIVES: To compare 1-year clinical efficacy of (1) initial triple disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy (iTDT) with initial methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy (iMM) and (2) different glucocorticoid (GC) bridging therapies: oral versus a single intramuscular injection in early rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: In a single-blinded randomised clinical trial patients were randomised into three arms: (A) iTDT (methotrexate+sulfasalazine+hydroxychloroquine) with GCs intramuscularly; (B) iTDT with an oral GC tapering scheme and (C) MTX with oral GCs similar to B. Primary outcomes were (1) area under the curve (AUC) of Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and Disease Activity Score (DAS) and (2) the proportion of patients with radiographic progression. RESULTS: 281 patients were randomly assigned to arms A (n=91), B (n=93) or C (n=97). The AUC DAS and HAQ were respectively -2.39 (95% CI -4.77 to -0.00) and -1.67 (95% CI -3.35 to 0.02) lower in patients receiving iTDT than in those receiving iMM. After 3 months, treatment failure occurred less often in the iTDT group, resulting in 40% fewer treatment intensifications. The difference in treatment intensifications between the arms required to maintain the predefined treatment goal remained over time. No differences were seen between the two GC bridging therapies. Respectively 21%, 24% and 23% of patients in arms A, B and C had radiographic progression after 1 year. Patients receiving iTDT had more adjustments of their medication owing to adverse events than those receiving iMM. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment goals are attained more quickly and maintained with fewer treatment intensifications with iTDT than with iMM. However, no difference in radiographic progression is seen. Both GC bridging therapies are equally effective and, therefore, both can be used. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN26791028.
22971639 A single nucleotide polymorphism of reduced folate carrier 1 predicts methotrexate efficac 2013   Methotrexate (MTX) exhibits large inter-individual and inter-ethnic differences in the dose required for its anti-rheumatic effect. To maintain low disease activity, patients may require increased MTX doses or co-administration of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). The availability of a marker predicting the effect of MTX will make it possible to increase the MTX dose and prescribe bDMARDs to patients at an early stage. To establish individualized medication for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), we investigated genetic polymorphisms of the folate pathway in Japanese RA patients. Eighty-nine patients were treated with MTX alone (MTX group). MTX and bDMARDs were co-administered to 81 patients because of insufficient MTX efficacy (MTX + bDMARDs group); an equally stable therapeutic effect was achieved in both groups. Polymorphism analyses using bDMARD co-treatment as the objective variable revealed a significant association between age and the G80A polymorphism of the reduced folate carrier 1 gene (RFC1) as an explanatory variable. Compared to patients with the A allele, patients with the G allele may have less intracellular MTX uptake and, therefore, poor efficacy; a greater number of them were found to be bDMARD concomitant cases. The results of this study suggest that the RFC1 G80A polymorphism may be a useful marker for predicting MTX efficacy in Japanese patients with RA.
24647977 The effect of leflunomide on the eye dryness in secondary Sjögren's syndrome associated w 2014 Jul The aim of this work was to clarify the effect of leflunomide (LEF) on the eye dryness in patients with secondary Sjögren's syndrome associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA-sSS) and in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Seventy-five female patients, 45 with RA-sSS (group A) and 30 with RA (group B), taking methotrexate at a dose of 20 mg/week for more than 6 months were enrolled in this study. They all had a loading dose of leflunomide then were maintained at a dose of 20 mg/day in addition to methotrexate for another 3 months. The modified disease activity score (DAS28) was calculated and modified Schirmer's-I test was performed. Assessment of disease parameters was done to all patients before and after 3 months of taking LEF. The mean modified Schirmer's-I test showed a significant decrease after 3 months of taking LEF in group A (3 ± 1.6 before versus 1.9 ± 1.6 after 3 months, P < 0.001), while this difference was non-significant in group B (21.3 ± 10 versus 19.9 ± 11). One patient (group A) developed peripheral ulcerative keratitis (PUK) with exacerbation of disease activity (DAS-28 = 6.9) that improved by taking corticosteroids. Three patients (group A) had aggravation of punctate keratocojunctivitis sicca with punctate erosions without PUK. The condition improved dramatically by stopping LEF and using topical lubricants. We report in this study a significant deterioration of the eye dryness in patients with sSS-RA after 3 months of receiving LEF inspite of the significant improvement of their DAS28. This finding was not clearly detected in RA patients. Close monitoring of eye dryness changes by special tests in patients using LEF is recommended, especially in cases with sSS-RA having very low baseline values.
25137158 [Cost-minimization analysis of subcutaneous abatacept in the treatment of rheumatoid arthr 2014 Jul 1 OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost of treating rheumatoid arthritis patients that have failed an initial treatment with methotrexate, with subcutaneous abatacept versus other first-line biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. METHOD: Subcutaneous abatacept was considered comparable to intravenous abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab and tocilizumab, based on indirect comparison using mixed treatment analysis. A cost-minimization analysis was therefore considered appropriate. The Spanish Health System perspective and a 3 year time horizon were selected. Pharmaceutical and administration costs (Euros 2013) of all available first-line biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were considered. Administration costs were obtained from a local costs database. Patients were considered to have a weight of 70 kg. A 3% annual discount rate was applied. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Subcutaneous abatacept proved in the base case to be less costly than all other biologic antirrheumatic drugs (ranging from Euros -831.42 to Euros -9,741.69 versus infliximab and tocilizumab, respectively). Subcutaneous abatacept was associated with a cost of Euros 10,760.41 per patient during the first year of treatment and Euros 10,261.29 in subsequent years. The total 3-year cost of subcutaneous abatacept was Euros 29,953.89 per patient. Sensitivity analyses proved the model to be robust. Subcutaneous abatacept remained cost-saving in 100% of probabilistic sensitivity analysis simulations versus adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept and golimumab, in more than 99.6% versus intravenous abatacept and tocilizumab and in 62.3% versus infliximab. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with subcutaneous abatacept is cost-saving versus intravenous abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab and tocilizumab in the management of rheumatoid arthritis patients initiating treatment with biological antirheumatic drugs.
25216562 Tocilizumab treatment safety in rheumatoid arthritis in a patient with multiple sclerosis: 2014 Sep 12 BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis is a relatively rare disease, and complications of multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis are much rarer. Since anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy increases exacerbations of multiple sclerosis, complications of demyelinating diseases contraindicate anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy. There have been few reports of anti-interleukin-6 receptor therapy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis complicated with multiple sclerosis. CASE PRESENTATION: A 53-year-old Japanese woman with multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis was admitted to our hospital because her rheumatoid arthritis was uncontrolled with oral methotrexate, tacrolimus, and prednisolone. She had developed multiple sclerosis when she was 25 years old and was treated with glucocorticoid therapy. Her multiple sclerosis was in remission for more than 9 years. Because anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy can exacerbate demyelinating disease, the anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody tocilizumab was started at 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks. At the second administration of tocilizumab, complete remission was achieved. She has remained in remission with tocilizumab without recurrence of multiple sclerosis for more than 5 years. CONCLUSION: Anti-interleukin-6 therapy was safely used in this patient with rheumatoid arthritis without exacerbations of multiple sclerosis.
23645094 Leprosy in a rheumatology setting: a challenging mimic to expose. 2013 Oct Leprosy can manifest arthritis both as a complication and a comorbid disorder and can be a challenging differential diagnosis in rheumatology practice due to several common features. Uncommonly, it may present as acute severe polyarthritis with skin lesions and neurological deficit or a digital vasculitis and gangrene. We demonstrate this profile in a retrospective case series analysis of 33 patients (13 females, median age 55 years) in a community-based clinic setting over the period 1998-2012; an electronic search of case records of 41,000 patients was carried out. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) coexisted in seven patients (three lepromatous, two tuberculoid, and two polyneuritic). Serological rheumatoid factor and antinuclear antibody were often false positive. Several patients of RA were on long-term supervised methotrexate. Rheumatologists should be aware of this clinical mimic to avoid errors in diagnosis and management.
24293583 Clinical, functional, and radiographic implications of time to treatment response in patie 2014 Feb OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment recommendations suggest target attainment within the first 3 months of therapy, yet delayed clinical responses can occur. This analysis assessed the longterm clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes associated with delayed responses to methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy or to the combination of adalimumab (ADA) + MTX. METHODS: In this posthoc analysis, patients with early RA who received MTX monotherapy or ADA + MTX in the PREMIER study were categorized based on clinical responses at 3 and 6 months [American College of Rheumatology response, 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28)-C-reactive protein (CRP) improvement and targets]. "Month 3" responders met the clinical measure at both months 3 and 6, and "Month 6" responders met the clinical measure only at Month 6. The odds of achieving longterm outcomes [remission (DAS28-CRP < 2.6), normal function (Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index < 0.5), or rapid radiographic progression (Δ modified total Sharp score > 3 U/yr)] were modeled using logistic regression, including treatment, response, and interaction. RESULTS: A delayed or low-level response was associated with poorer longterm outcomes. Generally, MTX Month 6 responders demonstrated worse clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes than Month 3 MTX and Month 3 or 6 ADA + MTX responders. Although similar longterm benefit was observed for ADA + MTX responders, delayed (Month 6) responders exhibited downward trends in clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes that were comparable with those experienced by Month 3 MTX responders. CONCLUSION: Response speed and magnitude predict longterm outcomes in patients with early RA treated with MTX or ADA + MTX. MTX-treated patients failing to demonstrate a Month 3 clinical response have less-favorable outcomes than other groups, while outcomes in ADA + MTX Month 3 and Month 6 responders tended to be comparable.
23322466 Tocilizumab inhibits structural joint damage and improves physical function in patients wi 2013 Feb OBJECTIVE: To assess radiographic progression, physical function, clinical disease activity, and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) and who were treated with tocilizumab-MTX or MTX during Year 2 of a 2-year study. METHODS: During Year 1, patients were randomized to placebo-MTX, 4 mg/kg tocilizumab-MTX, or 8 mg/kg tocilizumab-MTX. During Year 2, patients continued the initial double-blind treatment or switched to open-label 8 mg/kg tocilizumab-MTX. Co-primary endpoints at Week 104 were mean change from baseline in Genant-modified Total Sharp Score (GmTSS) and adjusted mean area under the curve (AUC) for change from baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). Signs and symptoms of RA and safety were also evaluated. RESULTS: At Week 104, mean change from baseline in GmTSS was significantly lower for patients initially randomized to tocilizumab-MTX 4 mg/kg (0.58; p = 0.0025) or 8 mg/kg (0.37; p < 0.0001) than for patients initially randomized to placebo-MTX (1.96). Adjusted mean AUC of change from baseline in HAQ-DI was also significantly lower in patients initially randomized to tocilizumab-MTX 4 mg/kg (-287.5; p < 0.0001) or 8 mg/kg (-320.8; p < 0.0001) than in patients initially randomized to placebo-MTX (-139.4). Signs and symptoms of RA were maintained or showed improvement. No new safety signals were noted. CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo-MTX, tocilizumab-MTX significantly inhibited structural joint damage and improved physical function in patients with RA who previously had inadequate response to MTX. An extension of this study is continuing and will provide additional longterm efficacy and safety data. National Clinical Trials registry NCT00106535.
23292482 Felty's syndrome without rheumatoid arthritis? 2013 May Felty's syndrome (FS) is characterized by neutropenia and splenomegaly in patients with seropositive (RF+, anti-CCP+) rheumatoid arthritis (RA). As a result of neutropenia, affected persons are increasingly susceptible to infections. In the majority of patients, FS appears in the course of long-standing and well-established RA. Manifestations of FS without clinical but only with laboratory features of RA are extremely rare. We present a case of severe neutropenia and mild splenomegaly in a patient with high titers of RF and anti-CCP. For 4 years, patient's neutropenia remained asymptomatic. The neutropenia reduction to agranulocytosis was followed by successful methotrexate-corticosteroid therapy. Efficacy of the standard anti-RA therapy confirmed autoimmune mechanism of the Felty's neutropenia. The most important lesion from our case is to recognize this condition in the range of autoimmune rheumatic diseases without delay. We reviewed literature with non-articular FS.
23252949 Genetic risk factors for drug-induced liver injury in rheumatoid arthritis patients using 2013 Jan Low-dose methotrexate (MTX) is part of the mainstay of rheumatoid arthritis treatment. Hepatotoxicity is among the most feared side effects of low-dose MTX and is associated with increased morbidity. At present, histological evaluation of liver biopsies is the gold standard to retrospectively diagnose MTX-induced liver damage. Genetic markers present an interesting opportunity to preemptively identify patients at risk for MTX-induced hepatotoxicity. Here, we will review the literature on candidate genetic markers for the risk of MTX-induced hepatotoxicity. These candidate genetic markers include polymorphisms in the gene encoding the enzyme MTHFR.
25244021 Effect of combination therapy on joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis: a network meta 2014 BACKGROUND: Despite significant cost differences, the comparative effect of combination treatments of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) with and without biologic agents has rarely been examined. Thus we performed a network meta-analysis on the effect of combination therapies on progression of radiographic joint erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS AND FINDINGS: The following combination drug therapies compared versus single DMARD were investigated: Double DMARD: 2 DMARDs (methotrexate, sulfasalazine, leflunomide, injectable gold, cyclosporine, chloroquine, azathioprin, penicillamin) or 1 DMARD plus low dose glucocorticoid (LDGC); triple DMARD: 3 DMARDs or 2 DMARDs plus LDGC; biologic combination: 1 DMARD plus biologic agent (tumor necrosis factor α inhibitor (TNFi) or abatacept or tocilizumab or CD20 inhibitor (CD20i)). Randomized controlled trials were identified in a search of electronic archives of biomedical literature and included in a star-shaped network meta-analysis and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement protocol. Effects are reported as standardized mean differences (SMD). The effects of data from 39 trials published in the period 1989-2012 were as follows: Double DMARD: -0.32 SMD (CI: -0.42, -0.22); triple DMARD: -0.46 SMD (CI: -0.60, -0.31); 1 DMARD plus TNFi: -0.30 SMD (CI: -0.36, -0.25); 1 DMARD plus abatacept: -0.20 SMD (CI: -0.33, -0.07); 1 DMARD plus tocilizumab: -0.34 SMD (CI: -0.48, -0.20); 1 DMARD plus CD20i: -0.32 SMD (CI: -0.40, -0.24). The indirect comparisons showed similar effects between combination treatments apart from triple DMARD being significantly better than abatacept plus methotrexate (-0.26 SMD (CI: -0.45, -0.07)) and TNFi plus methotrexate (-0.16 SMD (CI: -0.31, -0.01)). CONCLUSION: Combination treatment of a biologic agent with 1 DMARD is not superior to 2-3 DMARDs including or excluding LDGC in preventing structural joint damage. Future randomized studies of biologic agents should be compared versus a combination of DMARDs.
24624736 [A new therapeutical option for chronic inflammation in rheumatology: janus kinases inhibi 2014 Jan 22 In the last 15 years, the therapeutical options for the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases in rheumatology have increased a lot. Nevertheless, some patients do not respond or respond partially to the current therapies--including to the biologics therapy. Tofacitinib (Xeljanz) is now on the Swiss market. It inhibits the JAK pathway. Tofacitinib--as monotherapy or with methotrexate--improves the control of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In a comparative study, tofacitinib was as effective as adalimumab. Further, tofacitinib reduced structural damages in RA and is considered as an alternative, in case of non-response, to anti-TNF and probably to other biologics therapy. The side effects are upper respiratory tract and opportunist infections and tuberculosis. Blood count, lipids, kidney function, liver tests, CK and blood pressure have to be monitored.