Browse

Search for: rheumatoid arthritis    methotrexate    autoimmune disease    biomarker    gene expression    GWAS    HLA genes    non-HLA genes   

ID PMID Title PublicationDate abstract
24599922 What drives the comparative effectiveness of biologics vs. methotrexate in rheumatoid arth 2014 Jul OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore which clinical factors and patient characteristics are associated with the magnitude of comparative efficacy between biologics vs. MTX in RA patients with inadequate response to MTX. METHODS: We included randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of a biologic plus MTX vs. MTX alone. We examined several clinical factors and patient characteristics potentially associated with magnitude of response, measured as ACR20 (20% improvement in ACR criteria) and ACR50 (16-26 weeks). We employed meta-regression for formal estimates and statistical significance of effect modification. We produced regression and forest plots to further inspect potential associations. RESULTS: For ACR50, a 1-year increment on the average patient disease duration was statistically significantly associated with a 16% relative increase in the pooled odds ratio (OR) estimate (P = 0.003). A 1-year increment in patient age and a 1 mg/week increment in MTX dose were marginally statistically significantly associated with a 9% (P = 0.056) and 22% (P = 0.092) relative increase in the OR. For ACR20, the average number of swollen and tender joints was marginally statistically associated with a 3% relative decrease. The associations for age and MTX dose appeared to be partly driven by significant negative associations between these two factors and the control group response. CONCLUSION: Our analyses identified key variables associated with the magnitude of comparative effects for ACR outcomes. Our findings provide valuable insights for future trial designs and systematic reviews as well as decision-making and clinical practice.
24612941 Methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis: optimizing therapy among different formulations. Cur 2014 Mar 1 BACKGROUND: Methotrexate (MTX) is currently considered the drug of choice, among the disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) because of its favorable risk/benefit ratio, good safety profile, and low costs. Despite MTX's widespread use and large experience accumulated over the many years since its introduction into clinical practice, specific guidelines have not been published. OBJECTIVE: We report here the available research regarding the optimal dosage and route of MTX administration. METHODS: MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for articles published between 1990 and 2013, using terms related to RA and MTX. The search was conducted by using both MeSH terms and free text. The references of the retrieved studies were also screened manually for additional articles. RESULTS: For the treatment of rheumatic diseases, the antimetabolite drug MTX can be administered weekly by different routes: oral, subcutaneous, or intramuscular. One of the goals of treatment is to minimize acute and chronic toxicity. A starting dose of 15 mg/week orally, escalating to 25 to 30 mg/week or the highest tolerable dose (with a subsequent switch to parenteral administration in cases of insufficient response), seems to be the optimal evidence-based strategy for MTX treatment of RA. Oral MTX is widely preferred because of its low costs and patient preferences; the bioavailability of parenteral MTX is higher, however. This is supported by data from observational studies, in which patients switching from parenteral to oral MTX at an equal dose had disease exacerbations. In several trials, the subcutaneous formulation of MTX was considered, by both physicians and patients, to be more advantageous in terms of discomfort and compliance. In addition, a significant proportion of patients reported that this formulation led to greater independence, with a resulting improvement in quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Although MTX treatment can be initiated by using the oral administration route, parenteral administration of MTX is indicated in those patients with poor compliance toward the oral form. The subcutaneous route seems to be more effective than the oral route for MTX administration based on the results of several studies, and this route may be preferred because of better usability and absence of pain at the infusion site.
23394392 Methotrexate pharmacogenetics in rheumatoid arthritis: a status report. 2013 Feb Methotrexate (MTX), an antifolate drug, is the first-line disease-modifying agent for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) worldwide. MTX has excellent long-term efficacy, tolerability and safety. Early initiation of MTX in patients with RA controls joint destruction and slows progression of disease. However, the clinical response to MTX and frequency of adverse effects from the drug exhibit marked interpatient variability. Over the past decade, there has been a quest to identify genetic markers that reliably predict MTX efficacy and toxicity and help optimize MTX therapy in RA; that is, the field of MTX pharmacogenetics. This review will summarize key pharmacogenetic studies examining SNPs in the genes encoding enzymes in the MTX cellular pathway and their association with MTX response in RA. As evident from this review, MTX pharmacogenetics in RA remains a muddled field, mostly due to inconsistent results from several small underpowered studies.
23932312 Effect of tocilizumab combined with methotrexate on circulating biomarkers of synovium, ca 2014 Feb OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effects of tocilizumab (TCZ) on joint tissue remodeling in patients with moderate to severely active RA by measuring tissue-specific biomarker. METHODS: The LITHE biomarker study (n = 740) was a phase III study of 4- and 8-mg/kg TCZ in combination with MTX. Early response was evaluated at week 16 as ±20% improvement in swollen/tender joint counts; and ACR50 was evaluated at week 52. Biomarkers (tissue inflammation: C3M, CRPM, and VICM; cartilage degradation: C2M; and bone turnover: CTx and osteocalcin) were tested in serum from baseline, week 4, 16, 24, and 52, and dose-dependent effect was investigated. Patients were divided into the following three groups: early non-responders (ENR), ACR50 responders, and non-responders; their biomarker profiles were compared. RESULTS: At week 52, CRP was inhibited to 4% and 40% of baseline by TCZ8 and TCZ4, respectively. CRPM (63%), C2M (84%), C3M (69%), and VICM (42%) were significantly (p < 0.05) reduced by TCZ8, but not by TCZ4. MMP3 and osteocalcin changed to <58% and >111%, respectively, in response to TCZ. CTx was not changed significantly. ENRs had significantly less inhibition of CRPM (p < 0.05), C2M (p < 0.01), and C3M (p < 0.01) compared to early responders. There was a significant difference in the C2M, C3M, and CRPM profiles of the ENRs, non-responders, and responders. ACR50 responders had significantly inhibited levels (p < 0.001), irrespective of dose. CONCLUSIONS: TCZ8 strongly inhibited the biomarkers of joint tissue remodeling suggesting that TCZ actively suppresses key pathobiological processes at the site of inflammation in RA patients. The differences in biomarkers' profiles of responders and non-responders indicate that specific responder profiles exist.
24339699 A clinical trial and extension study of infliximab in Korean patients with active rheumato 2013 Dec Currently, infliximab is given for disease control for active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients despite methotrexate treatment. However, the efficacy and safety of infliximab in Korean patients has not been assessed appropriately. Therefore, we performed placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study and extension study. One-hundred forty-three patients with active RA were randomized to receive placebo or infliximab 3 mg/kg intravenously at week 0, 2, 6, 14, and 22 with methotrexate maintenance. Primary endpoint was American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) at 30 week. After the clinical trial, patients on placebo (Group 1) and patients on infliximab who showed ACR20 response (Group 2) were treated with infliximab through another 84 week for evaluation of safety. During clinical trial, patients in infliximab group showed higher ACR20 at week 30 than patients in placebo group (50.1% vs 30.6%, P=0.014). A total of 92 patients participated in the extension study. The maintenance rate of infliximab was 62.0% at 84 weeks of extension study. The overall rate of adverse events was not different between Group 1 and Group 2. In Korean patients with active RA despite methotrexate treatment, infliximab in combination with methotrexate is effective and the long-term treatment with infliximab is well tolerated. (ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT00202852, NCT00732875).
23406946 Joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis: assessment of a new scoring method. 2013 Feb 13 INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess a novel approach for the quantification of finger joint space narrowing and joint destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) focusing on the peripheral hand articulations. METHODS: A total of 280 patients with verified RA underwent computerized semi-automated measurements of joint space distance at the finger articulations based on radiographs. The Z-Score, which can differentiate between joint space alterations caused by RA versus age/gender-related changes, was calculated as a comparative parameter. The severity of joint space narrowing was also quantified by the Sharp Score. Sensitivity and specificity of the Z-Score (based on joint space widths differentiated for each peripheral finger joint) were evaluated to reveal the potential for the occurrence of erosions. Additionally, the potential of the Z-Score regarding the differentiation of therapeutic effects on joint space widths in patients under a therapy of methotrexate versus leflunomide was performed. RESULTS: The Z-Scores of finger articulations in patients with RA were generally decreased. Metacarpal-phalangeal (MCP) joint articulations showed a continuous significant decline of -1.65±0.30 standard deviations dependent on the Sharp Score. The proximal-interphalangeal joints also revealed a significant reduction of the Z-Score (-0.96±0.31 standard deviations). The sensitivity and specificity of MCP joint space distance for the detection of erosions were 85.4% versus 55.2%. The Sharp Score for joint space narrowing was not able to detect different treatments, whereas an accentuated stabilization of joint space narrowing could be identified for the Z-Score of the MCP joints in patients treated with leflunomide and methotrexate. CONCLUSION: The Z-Scoring method based on computer-aided analysis of joint space widths was able to reliably quantify severity-dependent joint space narrowing in RA patients. In the future, calculation of a Z-Score based on gender-specific and age-specific reference data shows the potential for a surrogate marker of RA progression that comprehends the early identification of patients with RA, and in particular those with erosive course of the disease, enabling a timely therapeutic strategy for cartilage protection.
25228430 The past versus the present, 1980-2004: reduction of mean initial low-dose, long-term gluc 2015 Quantitative observations are presented concerning treatment with glucocorticoids of 308 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at a weekly academic rheumatology setting over 25 years from 1980 to 2004. A database of all visits included medications and multidimensional health assessment questionnaire scores for physical function, pain and routine assessment of patient index data (RAPID3; and a surrogate RAPID3-EST), completed by each patient at each visit in routine care. Over the 5-year periods of 1980-1984, 1985-1989, 1990-1994, 1995-1999 and 2000-2004, the mean initial prednisone daily dose declined from 10.3 to 6.5, 5.1, 4.1 and 3.6 mg/day, as initial doses were >5 mg/day in 49, 16, 7, 7 and 3% of patients, 5 mg/day in 51, 80, 70, 26 and 10%, and <5 mg/day in 0, 4, 23, 67 and 86%. Reduction of prednisone doses in the respective five-year periods was accompanied by increased and earlier use of methotrexate as the first disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) in 10, 26, 57, 71 and 78%, and methotrexate treatment in 10, 26, 74, 82 and 92% of patients within the first year of disease. Higher methotrexate doses in the respective five-year periods were used after 1990, along with lower prednisone doses. Most patients were treated indefinitely with both low-dose prednisone and methotrexate; 80% continued both medications for more than 5 years. The primary adverse events were skin-thinning and bruising. New hypertension, diabetes and cataracts were seen in fewer than 10% of patients. While efficacy and safety cannot be analyzed definitively from observational data, the data suggest that many patients with RA might be treated effectively with weekly low-dose methotrexate along with initial and long-term, low-dose prednisone of <5 mg/day.
23152085 Triple DMARD combination for rheumatoid arthritis resistant to methotrexate and steroid co 2013 Jun The mainstay of RA treatment is the disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, and triple DMARD combination is now known to be better than monotherapies. Our aim in this trial was to report our clinical experience with triple DMARD therapy for resistant rheumatoid arthritis. Data of 140 patients with RA resistant to methotrexate and steroid combination were evaluated retrospectively. One hundred and nineteen (85 %) were female, and the median age at diagnosis was 56 (29-82) years. The median time between the diagnosis and beginning of triple therapy was 45.5 (6-564) months. Fifty-two (37.1 %) patients (group 1) on triple therapy protocol achieved remission, but the others (88; 62.9 %) (group 2) did not. The mean DAS28 scores for the study group before triple DMARD therapy and after 12 months under triple DMARD therapy were 4.93 and 3.24, respectively. The DAS28 scores after 12 months for groups 1 and 2 were 2.57 and 3.64. The median follow-up period for patients in group 1 was 60 months (23-118), and the mean DAS28 score at the time of the analysis for group 1 was 2.36. Triple DMARD combination may save one-third of the MTX-resistant RA patients from the serious side effects and the cost of anti-TNF.
24955803 Tuberculosis of the tongue in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis treated with methotrexat 2014 Jun In recent years Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha (TNF alfa) inhibitors have been highly effective in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, patients receiving these inhibitors have an increased risk of developing tuberculosis (TB). We describe a rare case of tuberculosis of the tongue in an RA patient treated with methotrexate (MTX) and the TNF alfa inhibitor adalimumab (ADA) for the previous six years. Pretreatment tuberculin skin test (TST) was negative. The patient was admitted to our division complaining of a sore throat for months. Clinical examination revealed a swollen non-healing ulcer at the base of the tongue, which was suspected to be a squamous cell carcinoma. Histopathological assessment unexpectedly revealed a chronic granulomatous inflammation compatible with tuberculosis. TST was strongly positive and the T Spot TB test was also reactive. MTX and ADA were discontinued and the patient received antituberculous treatment with complete healing of the lesion. After three months our patient had a worsening RA that was treated with MTX and rituximab with no TB related adverse events. This case highlights the importance of considering tuberculosis in the differential diagnosis of ulcerative lesions of the oral cavity, especially in immunocompromised patients treated with TNF alfa inhibitors. Rituximab can be a valid alternative therapy in such patients.
24433430 ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative rheumatoid arthritis differ in their requirements for comb 2014 Jan 16 INTRODUCTION: UK guidelines recommend that all early active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients are offered combination disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and short-term corticosteroids. Anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-positive and ACPA-negative RA may differ in their treatment responses. We used data from a randomized controlled trial - the Combination Anti-Rheumatic Drugs in Early RA (CARDERA) trial - to examine whether responses to intensive combination treatments in early RA differ by ACPA status. METHODS: The CARDERA trial randomized 467 early active RA patients to receive: (1) methotrexate, (2) methotrexate/ciclosporin, (3) methotrexate/prednisolone or (4) methotrexate/ciclosporin/prednisolone in a factorial-design. Patients were assessed every six months for two years. In this analysis we evaluated 431 patients with available ACPA status. To minimize multiple testing we used a mixed-effects repeated measures ANOVA model to test for an interaction between ACPA and treatment on mean changes from baseline for each outcome (Larsen, disease activity scores on a 28-joint count (DAS28), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), EuroQol, SF-36 physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores). When a significant interaction was present, mean changes in outcomes were compared by treatment group at each time point using t-tests stratified by ACPA status. Odds ratios (ORs) for the onset of new erosions with treatment were calculated stratified by ACPA. RESULTS: ACPA status influenced the need for combination treatments to reduce radiological progression. ACPA-positive patients had significant reductions in Larsen score progression with all treatments. ACPA-positive patients receiving triple therapy had the greatest benefits: two-year mean Larsen score increases comprised 3.66 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.27 to 5.05) with triple therapy and 9.58 (95% CI 6.76 to 12.39) with monotherapy; OR for new erosions with triple therapy versus monotherapy was 0.32 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.72; P = 0.003). ACPA-negative patients had minimal radiological progression irrespective of treatment. Corticosteroid's impact on improving DAS28/PCS scores was confined to ACPA-positive RA. CONCLUSIONS: ACPA status influences the need for combination DMARDs and high-dose tapering corticosteroids in early RA. In CARDERA, combination therapy was only required to prevent radiological progression in ACPA-positive patients; corticosteroids only provided significant disease activity and physical health improvements in ACPA-positive disease. This suggests ACPA is an important biomarker for guiding treatment decisions in early RA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN32484878.
23816503 Mesangial immunoglobulin (Ig)A glomerulonephritis in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis t 2013 Dec We report observations of a 47-year-old seropositive woman with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) suffering from mesangial immunoglobulin (Ig)A glomerulonephritis (GN) after initiation of abatacept, a selective T-cell co-stimulation modulator cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4)-Ig. She was initially treated by corticosteroids, followed by methotrexate associated with a TNF inhibitor (adalimumab then switched to etanercept), finally switched to abatacept monotherapy, after secondary failure of these two forms of TNF inhibitors. Due to a progressively increased hematuria and proteinuria after abatacept therapy initiation, a renal biopsy was performed highlighting GN with mesangial IgA deposits, with necrosis and extracapillary crescent formations. IgA GN as a possible adverse event to abatacept was considered. Abatacept was stopped and a treatment by corticosteroids was initiated. Proteinuria decreased a couple of months after abatacept interruption. The short term between abatacept induction and IgA GN onset, as well as GN improvement since abatacept discontinuation, lend weight to the argument that CTLA4-Ig may play a crucial role in IgA GN pathogenesis. The possibility of a drug postponed adverse event justifies a long-term renal surveillance in RA patients treated by abatacept.
23316080 Adalimumab, a human anti-TNF monoclonal antibody, outcome study for the prevention of join 2014 Mar OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab+methotrexate (MTX) in Japanese patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had not previously received MTX or biologics. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study evaluated adalimumab 40 mg every other week+MTX 6-8 mg every week versus MTX 6-8 mg every week alone for 26 weeks in patients with RA (≤2-year duration). The primary endpoint was inhibition of radiographic progression (change (Δ) from baseline in modified total Sharp score (mTSS)) at week 26. RESULTS: A total of 171 patients received adalimumab+MTX (mean dose, 6.2±0.8 mg/week) and 163 patients received MTX alone (mean dose, 6.6±0.6 mg/week, p<0.001). The mean RA duration was 0.3 years and 315 (94.3%) had high disease activity (DAS28>5.1). Adalimumab+MTX significantly inhibited radiographic progression at week 26 versus MTX alone (ΔmTSS, 1.5±6.1 vs 2.4±3.2, respectively; p<0.001). Significantly more patients in the adalimumab+MTX group (62.0%) did not show radiographic progression (ΔmTSS≤0.5) versus the MTX alone group (35.4%; p<0.001). Patients treated with adalimumab+MTX were significantly more likely to achieve American College of Rheumatology responses and achieve clinical remission, using various definitions, at 26 weeks versus MTX alone. Combination therapy was well tolerated, and no new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab in combination with low-dose MTX was well tolerated and efficacious in suppressing radiographic progression and improving clinical outcomes in Japanese patients with early RA and high disease activity.
24263145 Periodontitis and etanercept discontinuation risk in anti-tumor necrosis factor-naive rheu 2013 Dec OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the association between periodontitis (PD) and etanercept (ETN) discontinuation in anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF)-naive patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: This retrospective nationwide population-based cohort study identified 3359 anti-TNF-naive patients with RA (age at diagnosis ≥16 years) in whom ETN treatment was initiated using administrative data. We identified PD exposure within 5 years before ETN initiation and during ETN treatment. Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess ETN discontinuation risk associated with PD within 5 years before ETN initiation, shown as hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Stratified analyses were performed on the basis of PD during ETN treatment to avoid violating the Cox regression assumptions. RESULTS: Patients with PD history during the 5 years before ENT initiation had a higher risk of ETN discontinuation compared with those without such history; the hazard ratios of ETN discontinuation were 1.27 (95% CI, 1.01-1.60) and 1.17 (95% CI, 1.06-1.30) among patients with and without PD during ETN treatment, respectively. Other risk factors included age older than 65 years and daily prednisolone dose greater than 10 mg/d within 1 year before ETN initiation. Concomitant methotrexate, leflunomide, salazopyrin, or hydroxychloroquine administration had a protective effect on ETN discontinuation in patients without PD during ETN treatment, but the protective effect by leflunomide, salazopyrin, and hydroxychloroquine was attenuated in patients with PD during ETN treatment (P for interaction <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A PD history within 5 years before ETN administration was associated with increased ETN discontinuation risk in anti-TNF-naive patients with RA.
24811465 Nasal type extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma diagnosed in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis 2014 Jan Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients have increased risk of lymphoma which seems associated mainly with high inflammatory state and disease activity, but also with immunosuppressive agents or Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. Many case reports describe lymphoproliferative lesions arising during methotrexate therapy, often EBV positive with possible regression after methotrexate withdrawal. The authors report the case of an 85-year-old patient with erosive and seronegative RA, in remission under methotrexate who developed a midfacial destructive lesion with epistaxis and local inflammatory signs. The magnetic resonance imaging showed a large nasal septum defect. Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies titres and angiotensin converting enzyme were normal. Biopsies of the lesion identified a NK/ T nasal type lymphoma. EBV latent membrane protein research on the lesion was negative. Polymerase chain reaction analysis of the bone marrow aspirate showed EBV DNA positivity. Withdrawal of methotrexate was performed without tumour regression. The authors described the single case of a patient with RA in stable remission under methotrexate who presented a rare type of lymphoma, a nasal type NK/T. EBV active replication was found in the bone marrow.
23268367 Tabalumab, an anti-BAFF monoclonal antibody, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis 2013 Sep 1 OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tabalumab, a monoclonal antibody that neutralises membrane-bound and soluble B-cell activating factor (BAFF), in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who showed inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. METHODS: Patients on stable methotrexate and with inadequate response to one or more TNF inhibitors were randomised to placebo (n=35), 30 mg tabalumab (n=35) or 80 mg tabalumab (n=30) given intravenously at 0, 3 and 6 weeks. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving an American College of Rheumatology 50% response (ACR50) at week 16 (all tabalumab-treated patients vs placebo). RESULTS: At week 16, no significant differences were observed in the combined tabalumab group versus placebo in ACR50 (12.7% vs 2.9%, p=0.101) or ACR20 response rates (27.0% vs 17.1%, p=0.198). However, significant differences between the combined tabalumab group and placebo were observed at earlier time points for ACR20, ACR50 and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28)-C-reactive protein (CRP) reduction. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were similar with 30 mg tabalumab (65.7%), 80 mg tabalumab (76.7%) and placebo (71.4%), although certain events occurred more often with tabalumab than placebo (eg, infection, anaemia and gastrointestinal events). Serious AEs occurred in two (6.7%) patients receiving 80 mg tabalumab and three (8.6%) receiving placebo, with one serious infection in the placebo group. Initial increases in total and mature B cells were followed by progressive decreases, despite declines in serum tabalumab. CONCLUSIONS: At week 16, the primary end point was not achieved, but an indication of efficacy was observed at earlier time points. Safety findings for tabalumab were consistent with other biological RA therapies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00689728.
24345416 Prevalence of methotrexate intolerance in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. 2013 INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of gastrointestinal and behavioural symptoms occurring before (anticipatory/associative) and after methotrexate (MTX) administration, termed MTX intolerance, in rheumatoid (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Methotrexate Intolerance Severity Score (MISS), previously validated in juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients, was used to determine MTX intolerance prevalence in 291 RA/PsA patients. The MISS consisted of four domains: abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and behavioural symptoms, occurring upon, prior to (anticipatory) and when thinking of MTX (associative). MTX intolerance was defined as ≥6 on the MISS with ≥1 point on anticipatory and/or associative and/or behavioural items. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients (42.3%) experienced at least one gastrointestinal adverse effect. The prevalence of MTX intolerance was 11%. MTX intolerance prevalence was higher in patients on parenteral (20.6%) than on oral MTX (6.2%) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Besides well-known gastrointestinal symptoms after MTX, RA and PsA patients experienced these symptoms also before MTX intake. RA and PsA patients on MTX should be closely monitored with the MISS for early detection of MTX intolerance, in order to intervene timely and avoid discontinuation of an effective treatment.
25047498 Systematic review of tofacitinib: a new drug for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. 2014 Jul 1 PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to review and summarize the efficacy and safety of use of tofacitinib for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify English-language articles published through May 2013 within PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library reporting results from Phase II and Phase III tofacitinib randomized clinical trials. Tofacitinib must have been used as monotherapy or in combination therapy with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in the treatment of RA. Study outcomes had to include at least 1 of the following: American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% response rates; tender/swollen joint count; health assessment questionnaire of disability; radiographic outcomes; and drug persistence. FINDINGS: Eight studies (4 Phase II and 4 Phase III trials) were included in the review. Patients with active RA and who were nonresponders to a biologic agent or the nonbiologic DMARD methotrexate were included in these studies. The results of the Phase II trials show that tofacitinib at doses ≥3 mg BID was efficacious among the nonresponders. The results of the Phase III trials, comparing tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg with placebo, show that tofacitinib led to a significant improvement in ACR20 response (P < 0.0001), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (P < 0.0001) scores, and ACR50 response (P < 0.0001) after 3 months. The efficacy of tofacitinib was numerically similar to adalimumab. The most common adverse events were infections, infestations, increases in LDL-C and HDL-C levels, and a decrease in neutrophil counts. IMPLICATIONS: Tofacitinib is an efficacious drug for the management of moderate to severe RA among patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. Long-term studies can help in understanding the risk/benefit profile of tofacitinib.
23979914 The Canadian methotrexate and etanercept outcome study: a randomised trial of discontinuin 2014 Dec OBJECTIVE: To determine if withdrawing methotrexate (MTX) after 6 months of combination etanercept (ETN)+MTX, in MTX-inadequate responders with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), is non-inferior to continuing ETN+MTX. METHODS: Tumour necrosis factor-inhibitor naïve RA patients with disease activity score 28 (DAS28)≥3.2, swollen joint count≥3, despite stable MTX, were treated with ETN+MTX for 6 months, followed by randomisation to either continue ETN+MTX or switch to ETN monotherapy for an additional 18 months. The primary endpoint was change in DAS28 from 6-month randomisation to 12 months. The non-inferiority margin of change in DAS28 was 0.6, with prespecified analyses (DAS28<3.2 vs DAS28≥3.2). RESULTS: 205 patients were randomised. DAS28 was stable in patients on ETN+MTX and increased slightly in patients on ETN monotherapy from 6 to 12 months. Non-inferiority was not achieved, with an adjusted difference of 0.4 (0.1 to 0.7) between the ETN and the ETN+MTX groups, for the month 6-12 change in DAS28. However, patients who achieved low disease activity (LDA; DAS28<3.2) at 6 months had a similar disease activity at 12 months, whether on monotherapy or combination therapy (DAS28 change 0.7 ETN vs 0.57 ETN+MTX, p=0.8148). Conversely, for patients who did not reach LDA at 6 months, those on ETN monotherapy had increased disease activity at 12 months, while disease activity continued to decrease for patients on combination therapy, at 12 months (DAS28 change 0.4 ETN vs -0.4 ETN+MTX, p=0.0023). CONCLUSIONS: Non-inferiority was not achieved. Withdrawing MTX after 6 months of continuation ETN+MTX in MTX inadequate responders did not yield the same degree of improvement between 6 and 12 months compared with continuing ETN+MTX. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT00654368.
23970326 Large ulceration of the oropharynx induced by methotrexate-associated lymphoproliferative 2013 We present a case of a 67-year-old Japanese man with a serious oropharyngeal ulceration that at first seemed to be destructive malignant lymphoma or oropharyngeal carcinoma. We suspected methotrexate (MTX)-associated lymphoproliferative disorder (LPD) induced by MTX treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). About 3 weeks after simple discontinuation of MTX, complete regression of the disease was observed, confirming our diagnosis.
23794171 Abatacept: a review of its use in the management of rheumatoid arthritis. 2013 Jul The biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug abatacept (Orencia) has a novel mechanism of action; its activity is mediated via the selective modulation of T cell co-stimulation. This article reviews the clinical efficacy and tolerability of intravenous and subcutaneous abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and intravenous abatacept in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), as well as summarizing its pharmacological properties. In patients with RA, the beneficial effects of intravenous or subcutaneous abatacept on signs and symptoms, disease activity, the progression of structural damage, physical function and/or health-related quality of life were seen in a number of well-designed trials, including in methotrexate-naive patients with early RA and poor prognostic factors and in patients with established RA and an inadequate response to either methotrexate or anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy. Subcutaneous abatacept plus methotrexate was also noninferior to subcutaneous adalimumab plus methotrexate in patients with active RA who were naive to biological therapy and had an inadequate response to methotrexate. In paediatric patients with JIA, intravenous abatacept improved signs and symptoms and delayed the time to flare. Abatacept was generally well tolerated in RA and JIA and was associated with low rates of immunogenicity. In conclusion, abatacept is an important option for use in the treatment of RA and JIA.