Browse

Search for: rheumatoid arthritis    methotrexate    autoimmune disease    biomarker    gene expression    GWAS    HLA genes    non-HLA genes   

ID PMID Title PublicationDate abstract
30243781 Adverse consequences of low-dose methotrexate medication errors: data from French poison c 2019 May OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study are to carefully describe the context of methotrexate medication errors, to details medical consequences and management approaches, and to determine the rate of fatal outcome. METHODS: Data on methotrexate medication errors were obtained from the French network of poison control and pharmacovigilance centres, which collected and documented reported drug-induced adverse effects. Cases were included if the intake was more than 2-fold the intended weekly dose or a weekly cumulative dose ≥ 30 mg and a follow-up of at least 4 days after the last dose. Data were analysed for demographics, treatment indication, prescribed dose, drug interactions, clinical complications and medical outcomes. RESULTS: Seventy four patients were included. The causes of methotrexate errors resulted from an erroneous prescription renewal (23.3%), incomprehensiveness of the weekly schedule by patients or at-home caregivers (56.2%) and administration of a wrong dose by a health care professional (20.5%). Of the 70 patients who took methotrexate daily, the mean daily dose received over the whole duration of the error was 9.6 ± 4.1 mg (range 2.5-22.5) with a mean duration of the error of 11.7 ± 12.2 days (range 2 to 90). Thirteen (18%) patients remained asymptomatic and 61 (82%) developed complications of which 46 (62.2%) were severe. Nine (14.8%) patients died within 11 to 45 days after the first dosing error. Compared to patients with no or mild symptoms, those with severe symptoms were more likely to be older (75.6 ± 10.8 vs. 69.5 ± 12.9 years) and to be exposed to a higher cumulative dose (94.8 ± 46.2 vs. 68.0 ± 45.7 mg). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that dosing errors with methotrexate can be lethal and persisted despite several warnings from drug agencies. Further measures are awaited from the European Medicine Agency.
29335348 The Dorsal 4-finger Technique: A Novel Method to Examine Metacarpophalangeal Joints in Pat 2018 Mar OBJECTIVE: To describe the dorsal 4-finger technique (DFFT) in examining metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and compare it to the traditional 2-finger technique (TFT) using ultrasound (US) as a gold standard. METHODS: Four rheumatologists evaluated 180 MCP joints of 18 patients with RA. All patients underwent US for greyscale (GSUS) and power Doppler US (PDUS). Agreements between rheumatologists, the 2 techniques, and US were evaluated using Cohen κ and the first-order agreement coefficient (AC1) κ methods. RESULTS: The population comprised 17 females (94.4%) with a mean (SD) age and disease duration of 56.8 (14.4) and 21.8 (12.9) years, respectively. Eight patients (44.4%) were taking methotrexate monotherapy, while 10 patients (55.6%) were receiving biologics. US evaluation revealed 69 (38.3%) and 30 (16.7%) joints exhibited synovitis grade 2-3 by GSUS and PDUS, respectively. Effusion was documented in 30 joints (16.7%). The mean intraobserver agreement using the DFFT and TFT were 80.5% and 86%, respectively. The mean interobserver agreements using the DFFT and TFT were 84% and 74%, respectively. κ agreement with US findings was similar for both techniques in tender joints but was higher for the DFFT in nontender joints (0.33 vs 0.07, p = 0.015 for GSUS) and (0.48 vs 0.11, p = 0.002 for PDUS). The DFFT had a higher sensitivity in detecting ballottement by GSUS (0.47 vs 0.2, p < 0.001) and PDUS (0.60 vs 0.27, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The DFFT is a novel, reproducible, and reliable method to examine MCP joints, and it has a better correlation with US than the traditional TFT.
29151519 Tofacitinib Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Direct Comparison Study between Biologic-n 2018 Mar 1 Objective This study was designed to directly compare the outcomes of tofacitinib therapy for methotrexate-refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA) between biologic-naïve patients and patients who had experienced an inadequate response to biological agents. Methods We prospectively enrolled and followed 113 patients who had a high or moderate clinical disease activity index (CDAI) (36 biologic-naïve patients and 77 biologic-experienced patients). Patients received 5 mg of tofacitinib twice daily. Effectiveness and adverse events were examined at month 6 of treatment. Results At month 6, 65 patients (57.5%) reached CDAI50, which is defined as achieving ≥50% improvement. The number of previous biological agents was twice as high in CDAI50 non-responders as in responders (2.2 versus 1.1, p<0.001), but there was no significant difference in the type of previous agents or the reason for discontinuation. According to a multivariate logistic regression analysis, the previous use of biological agents [odds ratio (OR) 4.48, p=0.002] and the concurrent use of prednisolone (OR 2.40, p=0.047) were associated with a failure to achieve a CDAI 50 response. Biologic-naïve patients were more likely to achieve CDAI50 than biologic-experienced patients (80.6% versus 46.8%, p=0.001). Mean CDAI values were higher in biologic-experienced patients (11.4 versus 4.8, p=0.001), and remission rates were higher in biologic-naïve patients (41.7% versus 11.7%, p=0.001). Biologic-naïve patients more rapidly achieved remission. Rates of discontinuation resulting from adverse events were similar in both groups. Conclusion Although tofacitinib can provide an effective treatment option for intractable RA patients, its impact on outcomes is lower in patients with previous biologic failure.
29229311 An extra priming dose of hepatitis A vaccine to adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis a 2018 Jan BACKGROUND: Previous studies have indicated that a pre-travel single dose of hepatitis A vaccine is not sufficient as protection against hepatitis A in immunocompromised travelers. We evaluated if an extra dose of hepatitis A vaccine given shortly prior to traveling ensures seroconversion. METHOD: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 69, median age = 55 years) treated with Tumor Necrosis Factor inhibitor(TNFi) and/or Methotrexate (MTX) were immunized with two doses of hepatitis A vaccine, either as double dose or four weeks apart, followed by a booster dose at six months. Furthermore, 48 healthy individuals, median age = 60 years were immunized with two doses, six months apart. Anti-hepatitis A antibodies were measured at 0, 1, 2, 6, 7 and 12 months. RESULTS: Two months after the initial vaccination, 88% of the RA patients had protective antibodies, compared to 85% of the healthy individuals. There was no significant difference between the two vaccine schedules. At twelve months, 99% of RA patients and 100% of healthy individuals had seroprotective antibodies. CONCLUSION: An extra priming dos of hepatitis A vaccine prior to traveling offered an acceptable protection in individuals treated with TNFi and/or MTX. This constitutes an attractive pre-travel solution to this vulnerable group of patients.
28585869 Postmarketing surveillance evaluating the safety and effectiveness of golimumab in Japanes 2018 Jan OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the real-world safety and effectiveness of golimumab (GLM) in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: A postmarketing surveillance of 5154 patients was conducted with a follow-up duration of at least 24 weeks. Patients were divided into four groups based on the initial treatment: 50 mg or 100 mg of GLM with concomitant use of methotrexate (MTX) and 50 mg or 100 mg of GLM monotherapy. Patient characteristics at baseline, safety and effectiveness were assessed for each group. RESULTS: Over 70% of patients received 50 mg of GLM with concomitant MTX, and approximately, 20% received monotherapy. The incidence rate of adverse events was 45.40 per 100 patient-years. The incidence of adverse events including serious adverse events was comparable across all groups. The proportion of patients showing remission or low disease activity increased from 13.69% to 46.21% at the final evaluation, and no differences were observed in the percentage of remission across the four groups. Concomitant MTX use was associated with higher probability of continuing therapy. CONCLUSIONS: GLM showed effectiveness in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients with an acceptable safety profile.
29361199 Mavrilimumab, a Fully Human Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Receptor α M 2018 May OBJECTIVE: Mavrilimumab, a human monoclonal antibody, targets granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor α. We undertook to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of mavrilimumab in rheumatoid arthritis patients in 2 phase IIb studies (1071 and 1107) and in 1 open-label extension study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01712399). METHODS: In study 1071, patients with an inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) received mavrilimumab (30, 100, or 150 mg) or placebo every other week plus methotrexate. In study 1107, patients with an inadequate response to anti-tumor necrosis factor agents and/or DMARDs received 100 mg mavrilimumab every other week or 50 mg golimumab every 4 weeks plus methotrexate. Patients entering the open-label extension study received 100 mg mavrilimumab every other week plus methotrexate. Long-term safety and efficacy of mavrilimumab were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 442 patients received mavrilimumab (14 of 245 patients from study 1071, 9 of 70 patients from study 1107, and 52 of 397 patients from the open-label extension study discontinued mavrilimumab treatment throughout the studies). The cumulative safety exposure was 899 patient-years; the median duration of mavrilimumab treatment was 2.5 years (range 0.1-3.3 years). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were nasopharyngitis (n = 69; 7.68 per 100 patient-years) and bronchitis (n = 51; 5.68 per 100 patient-years). At weeks 74 and 104, 3.5% and 6.2% of patients, respectively, demonstrated reduction in forced expiratory volume in 1 second, while 2.9% and 3.4% of patients, respectively, demonstrated reduction in forced vital capacity (>20% reduction from baseline to <80% predicted). Most pulmonary changes were transient and only infrequently associated with AEs. Mavrilimumab at 100 mg every other week demonstrated sustained efficacy; at week 122, 65.0% of patients achieved a Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the C-reactive protein level (DAS28-CRP) of <3.2, and 40.6% of patients achieved a DAS28-CRP of <2.6. CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment with mavrilimumab maintained response and was well-tolerated with no increased incidence of treatment-emergent AEs. Safety data were comparable with those from both phase IIb qualifying studies.
32254955 Targeted hexagonal Pd nanosheet combination therapy for rheumatoid arthritis via the photo 2019 Jan 7 Methotrexate (MTX) is a drug that is used for the clinical treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a stubborn disease caused by over-immunization. However, the toxicity that arises as a result of poor selectivity to inflammatory cells severely limits the application of MTX. Therefore, new therapeutic strategies are needed for treating RA. Here, we describe the design and synthesis of a nanotherapy agent, Pd-Cys@MTX@RGD, which can target inflammatory cells and control MTX release. The novel hexagonal palladium (Pd) nanosheets were used as a near-infrared (NIR) photothermal agent modified with arginine-glycineaspartic acid (RGD) peptides on the surface to enhance the ability of the nanosheet targeting of inflammatory cells. In subsequent experiments, the Pd-Cys@MTX@RGD nanosheets were observed to greatly reduce the toxicity of MTX, showing controlled MTX release under irradiation of 808 nm (0.3 W cm(-2)). Moreover, taking advantage of the fact that MTX can be combined with multiple therapeutic methods, the photothermal therapy (PTT) of Pd nanosheets provided a compensatory effect to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of MTX. Under combination therapy, Pd-Cys@MTX@RGD was shown to effectively inhibit the inflammatory response induced by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and IL-1β. And, in vivo, multifunctional Pd-Cys@MTX@RGD effectively inhibited the symptoms of RA by inhibiting the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α,COX-2). We hope that the construction of nanomaterials can add potential value to the design of chemical drugs and therapeutic strategies for RA.
30220237 Clinical effectiveness and long-term retention of abatacept in elderly rheumatoid arthriti 2019 Nov Objective: To study the clinical effectiveness and long-term retention rate of abatacept (ABA) in elderly rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in daily clinical practice.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed using data from a multicenter registry. Our study population comprised 500 consecutive RA patients treated with ABA. We compared clinical effectiveness and ABA retention rates between the Young (≤62 years), Middle (62 to 72 years), and Elderly (≥72 years) groups. We also performed separate examinations to identify predictive factors for ABA discontinuation in those with versus those without concomitant methotrexate (MTX) treatment.Results: Mean age was 52.7 years in the Young group, 67.7 years in the Middle group, and 78.1 years in the Elderly group. No significant group-dependent differences were found in mean DAS28 score, categorical distribution of DAS28, and EULAR response rate across the 52 weeks. The ABA retention rates at three years as determined by the Kaplan-Meier method were similar in all three groups. Patient age was not a significant predictor of ABA discontinuation due to adverse events in patients with concomitant MTX; however, it was found to be a significant predictor for those who did not use MTX (Cox hazard model).Conclusion: ABA would be a reasonable treatment option for elderly RA patients from the viewpoints of both clinical effectiveness and long-term retention. However, physicians should watch carefully for any serious adverse reactions in elderly RA patients with intolerance to MTX.
29636089 Comparison of the impact of Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F and Methotrexate treatment on ra 2018 Apr 10 BACKGROUND: Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F (TwHF) alone or in combination with methotrexate (MTX) has been shown to be more effective than MTX monotherapy in controlling the manifestations in subjects with disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-naïve active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over a 6-month period. The long-term impact of these therapies on disease activity and radiographic progression in RA has not been examined. METHODS: Patients with DMARD-naïve RA enrolled in the "Comparison of Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F with methotrexate in the Treatment of Active Rheumatoid Arthritis" (TRIFRA) study were randomly allocated into three arms with TwHF or MTX or the two in combination. Clinical indexes and radiographic data at baseline and year 2 was collected and compared using an intent-to-treat (ITT) and a per-protocol (PP) analysis. Two radiologists blinded to the treatment scored the images independently. RESULTS: Of 207 subjects 109 completed the 2-year follow up. The number of subjects withdrawing from the study and the number adhering to the initial regimens were similar among the three groups (p > = 0.05). In the ITT analysis, proportions of patients reaching American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response criteria were 46.4%, 58.0% and 50.7% in the MTX, TwHF and MTX + TwHF groups (TwHF vs MTX monotherapy, p = 0.004). Similar patterns were found in ACR20, ACR70, Clinical Disease Activity Index good responses, European League Against Rheumatism good response, remission rate and low disease activity rate at year 2. The results of the PP analysis agreed with those in the ITT analysis. The changes in total Sharp scores and joint erosion and joint space narrowing during the 2 years were associated with changes in disease activity measured by the 28-joint count Disease Activity Score and were comparable among the three groups (p > 0.05). Adverse events were similar in the three treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: During the 2-year therapy period, TwHF monotherapy was not inferior to MTX monotherapy in controlling disease activity and retarding radiological progression in patients with active RA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This is a follow-up study. Original trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01613079 . Registered on 4 June 2012.
29907672 Sex-associated Treatment Differences and Their Outcomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results f 2018 Oct OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in initial treatment and treatment response in male and female patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in daily clinical practice. METHODS: The proportion of patients with RA starting different antirheumatic treatments (disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; DMARD) and the response to treatment were compared in the international, observational METEOR register. All visits from start of the first DMARD until the first DMARD switch or the end of followup were selected. The effect of sex on time to switch from first to second treatment was calculated using Cox regression. Linear mixed model analyses were performed to assess whether men and women responded differently to treatments, as measured by Disease Activity Score (DAS) or Health Assessment Questionnaire. RESULTS: Women (n = 4393) more often started treatment with hydroxychloroquine, as monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate (MTX) or a glucocorticoid, and men (n = 1142) more often started treatment with MTX and/or sulfasalazine. Time to switch DMARD was shorter for women than for men. Women had a statistically significantly higher DAS over time than men (DAS improvement per year β -0.69, 95% CI -0.75 to -0.62 for men and -0.58, 95% CI -0.62 to -0.55 for women). Subanalyses per DMARD group showed for the conventional synthetic DMARD combination therapy a slightly greater decrease in DAS over time in men (-0.89, 95% CI -1.07 to -0.71) compared to women (-0.59, 95% CI -0.67 to -0.51), but these difference between the sexes were clinically negligible. CONCLUSION: This worldwide observational study suggests that in daily practice, men and women with RA are prescribed different initial treatments, but there were no differences in response to treatment between the sexes.
30289287 A randomized double-blind parallel-group phase III study to compare the efficacy and safet 2019 Nov Objectives: This study aimed to demonstrate the equivalence of NI-071, an infliximab biosimilar (BS), and the infliximab reference product (RP) for treating Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) refractory to methotrexate.Methods: In this multicenter two-period phase III study, patients were treated with BS or RP for 30 weeks (Period I) in a randomized double-blind manner and then with BS for the following 24 weeks (Period II). The efficacy and safety of BS and RP were compared.Results: The disease activity score in 28-joint count based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein and the American College of Rheumatology 20/50/70-based efficacy profiles of BS were similar to those of RP during Period I (30 weeks) including evaluations at week 14, a critical time point. BS efficacy was maintained throughout the 54-week study period. BS efficacy profile matched the RP profile until week 54 after the drug switch from RP to BS at week 30. The safety profiles of BS and RP were comparable and the long-term safety of BS was confirmed.Conclusion: BS demonstrated equivalent efficacy and safety to RP at treatment weeks 14 and 30, and long-term safety until week 54 in Japanese RA patients.
30429434 Methotrexate-associated Lymphoproliferative Disorder of the Stomach Presumed to Be Mucosa- 2018 The number of patients with methotrexate-associated lymphoproliferative disorder (MTX-LPD) is increasing. We describe a case of MTX-LPD of the stomach. After treatment with methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis, the patient developed left cervical lymphadenopathy and an ulcerative lesion in the stomach, which was presumed to be a mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. However, we suspected MTX-LPD, based on the clinical course and the positivity of in situ hybridization for the detection of the Epstein-Barr encoding region. After the cessation of MTX, the left cervical lymphadenopathy and the gastric lesion disappeared. This is first report of gastric MTX-LPD that was presumed to be MALT lymphoma.
29369319 Endogenous sialic acid-engineered micelles: a multifunctional platform for on-demand metho 2018 Feb 8 Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients have suffered from the current drug therapeutic regimen because of its high toxicity and the absence of bone regeneration for existing erosion, seriously affecting the quality of life. Herein, a sialic acid-dextran-octadecanoic acid (SA-Dex-OA) conjugate was synthesized to form micelles with a 55.06 μg mL(-1) critical micelle concentration. The obtained micelles can encapsulate a disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, methotrexate (MTX), with 4.28% (w/w) drug content, featuring sustained drug release behavior over 48 h. In vitro and in vivo studies showed that SA-Dex-OA micelles significantly improved accumulation and transportation through a combination of SA and E-selectin receptors in inflamed cells and arthritic paws highly expressing E-selectin. MTX-loaded SA-Dex-OA micelles not only significantly inhibited the inflammatory response, but also diminished the adverse effects of MTX, as reflected by the reduced alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, creatinine, and urea nitrogen levels. Most importantly, the bone mineral density in rats treated with MTX-loaded SA-Dex-OA micelles was significantly higher as compared to in those treated with free MTX and Dex-OA/MTX micelles (increasing from 391.4 to 417.4 to 492.7 mg cc(-1)), benefiting from the effects of endogenous sialic acid in promoting MC3T3-E1 cell differentiation and mineralization. It is anticipated that SA-based micelles with bone repair activities have great potential for RA treatment and other metabolic bone diseases with serious bone erosion.
29426578 TGF-β signalling defect is linked to low CD39 expression on regulatory T cells and methot 2018 Jun Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune arthropathy characterized by chronic articular inflammation. Methotrexate (MTX) remains the first-line therapy for RA and its anti-inflammatory effect is associated with the maintenance of high levels of extracellular adenosine (ADO). Nonetheless, up to 40% of RA patients are resistant to MTX treatment and this is linked to a reduction of CD39 expression, an ectoenzyme involved in the generation of extracellular ADO by ATP metabolism, on circulating regulatory T cells (Tregs). However, the mechanism mediating the reduction of CD39 expression on Tregs is unknown. Here we demonstrated that the impairment in TGF-β signalling lead to the reduction of CD39 expression on Tregs that accounts for MTX resistance. TGF-β increases CD39 expression on Tregs via the activation of TGFBRII/TGFBRI, SMAD2 and the transcription factor CREB, which is activated in a p38-dependent manner and induces CD39 expression by promoting ENTPD1 gene transcription. Importantly, unresponsive patients to MTX (UR-MTX) show reduced expression of TGFBR2 and CREB1 and decreased levels of p-SMAD2 and p-CREB in Tregs compared to MTX-responsive patients (R-MTX). Furthermore, RA patients carrying at least one mutant allele for rs1431131 (AT or AA) of the TGFBR2 gene are significantly (p = 0.0006) associated with UR-MTX. Therefore, we have uncovered a molecular mechanism for the reduced CD39 expression on Tregs, and revealed potential targets for therapeutic intervention for MTX resistance.
29329602 Abatacept used in combination with non-methotrexate disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2018 Jan 2 BACKGROUND: Methotrexate (MTX) remains the anchor drug in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment, but is poorly tolerated or contraindicated in some patients. There is a wealth of data supporting the use of abatacept in combination with MTX, but data on alternative conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) combinations with abatacept are scarce. METHODS: In this post-hoc exploratory analysis, efficacy and safety data were extracted from abatacept RA studies in which combination with csDMARDs other than MTX was permitted: three interventional trials (ATTAIN, ASSURE, and ARRIVE) and one real-world study (ACTION). Patients with moderate-to-severe RA received abatacept in combination with MTX, hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, azathioprine, or leflunomide for 6 months to 2 years according to the study design. Change from baseline in physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI); all studies) and 28-joint Disease Activity Score (C-reactive protein) (DAS28 (CRP); ATTAIN, ARRIVE, and ACTION), American College of Rheumatology response rates (ATTAIN), and safety were assessed for individual and pooled csDMARD combinations for each trial. A meta-analysis was also performed on pooled data for HAQ-DI and DAS28 (CRP) across interventional trials. RESULTS: Across all four studies, 731 patients received abatacept plus one non-MTX csDMARD (hydroxychloroquine n = 152; sulfasalazine n = 123; azathioprine n = 59; and leflunomide n = 397) and 2382 patients received abatacept plus MTX. Mean changes from baseline in HAQ-DI scores for abatacept plus MTX (all csDMARDs pooled) vs abatacept plus a non-MTX csDMARD were -0.54 vs -0.44 (ATTAIN), -0.43 vs -0.43 (ASSURE), and -0.39 vs -0.36 (ARRIVE). Mean changes from baseline in DAS28 (CRP) and ACR response rates were also similar with abatacept plus MTX or non-MTX csDMARDs. Data for individual non-MTX csDMARDs (pooled across studies) and real-world data were consistent with these findings. Rates of treatment-related adverse events and serious adverse events, respectively, for abatacept plus one non-MTX csDMARD vs abatacept plus MTX were 35.7% vs 41.7% and 2.4% vs 2.3% (ATTAIN), 58.0% vs 55.9% and 4.2% vs 1.7% (ASSURE), and 38.1% vs 44.3% and 0.6% vs 2.9% (ARRIVE). CONCLUSIONS: Abatacept in combination with non-MTX csDMARDs is clinically effective and well tolerated in patients with moderate-to-severe RA, providing similar benefits to those seen with abatacept plus MTX. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00048581 . Registered 2 November 2002. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00048932 . Registered 11 November 2002. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00124982 . Registered 30 June 2005. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02109666 . Registered 8 April 2014.
30599401 Inhibition of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) in patients with early rheumatoid ar 2019 Feb OBJECTIVE: Dicckopf-1 (Dkk-1) is a potent inhibitor of the Wnt canonical pathway. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Dkk-1 is upregulated by tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF). Certolizumab pegol (CMZ) is a biologic TNF-inhibitor (TNFi) effective in RA and slows radiographic progression. Data on the immediate effects (≤1-8 weeks) of TNFi on Wnt modulators are lacking. This study investigated the acute influence of TNFi treatment on Wnt modulators (Dkk-1 and sclerostin) and bone turnover markers (BTM), including intact N-terminal propeptide of collagen type I (PINP) and C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I). METHODS: This longitudinal, uncontrolled study involved female RA patients with inadequate response to conventional methotrexate who underwent treatment with CMZ. ESR, Dkk-1, sclerostin, BTM, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and 25OH-vitamin D levels were evaluated at baseline, week 1, week 4, and week 8. Radiographs of the hands and feet were obtained at baseline and the total and erosion scores were assessed using the Simple Erosion Narrowing Score method (SENS). RESULTS: Seventeen patients were enrolled. Dkk-1 and CTX-I significantly decreased after one week of treatment with CMZ (-49.1 ± 17.1% and -25.0 ± 20.6%, respectively, p < 0.01), whereas PINP increased (+43.2 ± 31.5%, p < 0.01). These changes persisted at week 4 and 8. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that TNF-alpha inhibition with CMZ promptly results in a rapid decline of serum Dkk-1 levels, alongside decreased bone resorption and increased bone formation.
29477401 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Abatacept Compared with Adalimumab on Background Methotrexa 2018 Feb OBJECTIVES: To assess cost effectiveness of abatacept versus adalimumab, each administered with methotrexate, in treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) stratified according to baseline anticitrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) levels (marker of poor prognosis in RA). METHODS: A payer-perspective cost-effectiveness model simulated disease progression in patients with RA who had previously failed conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and were starting biologic therapy. Patients commenced treatment with abatacept or adalimumab plus methotrexate and were evaluated after 6 months. Therapy continuation was based on the European League Against Rheumatism treatment response; disease progression was based on the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index score. These score changes were used to estimate health state utilities and direct medical costs. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost per QALY gained were calculated by baseline ACPA groups (Q1, 28-234 AU/ml; Q2, 235-609 AU/ml; Q3, 613-1045 AU/ml; and Q4, 1060-4894 AU/ml). Scenario analysis and one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to evaluate robustness of model assumptions. RESULTS: Abatacept resulted in QALY gain versus adalimumab in ACPA Q1, Q3, and Q4; between-treatment difference (difference: Q1, -0.115 Q2, -0.009 Q3, 0.045; and Q4, 0.279). Total lifetime discounted cost was higher for abatacept versus adalimumab in most quartiles (Q2, £77,612 vs. £77,546; Q3, £74,441 vs. £73,263; and Q4, £78,428 vs. £76,696) because of longer time on treatment. Incremental cost per QALY for abatacept (vs. adalimumab) was the lowest in the high ACPA titer group (Q4, £6200/QALY), followed by the next lowest titer group (Q3, £26,272/QALY). CONCLUSIONS: Abatacept is a cost effective alternative to adalimumab in patients with RA with high ACPA levels.
28744796 Pharmacokinetics of ABT-122, a TNF-α- and IL-17A-Targeted Dual-Variable Domain Immunoglob 2018 May BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: ABT-122 is a dual-variable domain immunoglobulin that neutralizes both tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-17A, with the goal of achieving greater clinical efficacy than can be achieved by blocking either cytokine alone. This work characterized the pharmacokinetics of ABT-122 in healthy subjects and in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: ABT-122 pharmacokinetics was evaluated in three phase I studies. In Study 1, single intravenous (0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg) and subcutaneous (0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg) doses were evaluated in healthy subjects. In Studies 2 and 3, multiple subcutaneous doses (1 mg/kg every other week or 0.5-3 mg/kg every week) were evaluated for 8 weeks in patients with rheumatoid arthritis on stable methotrexate therapy. Pharmacokinetic data were available from 48 healthy subjects and 31 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. RESULTS: ABT-122 showed multi-exponential disposition with more than dose-proportional exposures at the 0.1-1 mg/kg doses and approximately dose-proportional exposures at doses ≥1 mg/kg. ABT-122 absolute subcutaneous bioavailability was approximately 50% with maximum serum concentrations observed 3-4 days after dosing. Steady state was achieved by week 6 of subcutaneous dosing. ABT-122 maximum serum concentration-to-trough concentration ratio was 2.6 for every other week dosing and 1.3 for every week dosing, corresponding to an effective half-life of 10-18 days. ABT-122 median area under the serum concentration-time curve accumulation ratio was 3.8-4.8 with every week dosing. Measureable antidrug antibodies were observed in all 48 subjects in Study 1 by day 15 post-dose and 19 of 31 ABT-122-treated patients in Studies 2 and 3 [median time to appearance of antidrug antibodies of 64 days (range 15-92 days)]. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in these studies and the maximum tolerated dose was not identified. CONCLUSIONS: Results from these three phase I studies supported testing ABT-122 every week and every other week regimens in phase II trials in subjects with rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis. Study 2 (EudraCT: 2012-003448-54); Study 3 (NCT01853033).
29343509 Efficacy and safety of tregalizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequat 2018 Apr OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, biological activity and safety of tregalizumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: 321 patients were randomised (1:1:1:1) to placebo or tregalizumab 25, 100 or 200 mg once-weekly subcutaneously in addition to MTX treatment. Responders at week 12 continued the same treatment, and non-responders at week 12 were escalated to the next higher tregalizumab dose level or re-randomised from placebo to active treatment. After 24 weeks, patients could continue treatment with tregalizumab for 24 weeks (extension phase). The primary endpoint was the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) response rate at week 12. Safety and biological activity were monitored through week 48. RESULTS: At week 12, ACR20 response rates were not statistically significantly different between placebo and any of the tregalizumab doses. Tregalizumab injections were well tolerated; most adverse events were mild to moderate and comparable among treatment and placebo groups. Biological activity was shown by dose-dependent CD4 downmodulation. CONCLUSION: Treatment with tregalizumab did not show significant clinical efficacy in patients with active RA compared with placebo but resulted in the expected biological effect on CD4 modulation. Tregalizumab was generally well tolerated, and no new safety findings were identified. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01999192; Results.
29051108 A Bayesian model that jointly considers comparative effectiveness research and patients' p 2018 Jan OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to estimate the preferred treatment for early rheumatoid arthritis using a novel Bayesian approach that jointly considers patients' preferences and comparative effectiveness research. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We estimated the preferred treatment using patients' preferences measured in a discrete-choice experiment to apply weights to benefit and harm outcomes from a network meta-analysis and other considerations (dosing, rare adverse events). Using Bayesian analyses, we considered the variability in patients' preferences and the imprecision in both patients' preferences and the treatment effects; all key considerations in the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. RESULTS: We estimated that most patients in our population would prefer triple therapy as initial treatment (78%) or after an inadequate response to methotrexate (62%). The probability of choosing triple therapy as initial treatment was further from 50% (the point of indifference) for more patients, making our prediction more confident, and suggesting a stronger recommendation could be made. After an inadequate response to methotrexate, the choice was more split, suggesting a decision aid may be helpful. CONCLUSION: Using a novel approach, we estimated that many patients with early rheumatoid arthritis may prefer triple therapy to other treatment options, in contrast to existing guidelines. This offers an approach that may help inform Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation treatment recommendations.