Browse

Search for: rheumatoid arthritis    methotrexate    autoimmune disease    biomarker    gene expression    GWAS    HLA genes    non-HLA genes   

ID PMID Title PublicationDate abstract
33210624 Adverse Events Profile of Low-dose Methotrexate in Nepalese Patients with Rheumatoid Arthr 2020 Nov 13 BACKGROUND: Methotrexate is considered as the anchor drug for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. However, various adverse effects limit its use leading to frequent discontinuation of treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the common adverse effects of methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted at National Center for Rheumatic Diseases from June 2018 to May 2019 among patients with rheumatoid arthritis using methotrexate monotherapy. Laboratory tests like liver function tests, renal function tests, complete blood count, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate were done at baseline and every 3 months. Data on patients' comorbidities, disease activity and side effects of drug were collected on every follow- up. Statistical analysis was carried out with the help of SPSS 23.0. RESULTS: Out of 232 patients experiencing at least one adverse effect while on methotrexate monotherapy, 87.5% were female and mean age was 46.9±10.8 years. The mean dose of methotrexate was 16.6 ± 3.9 mg/week with the most frequently used dose of 20mg/week. Among the variety of adverse reaction observed, the most common was transaminitis (75.0%) with approximately 50.0% as isolated liver function abnormality, followed by nausea (19.4%), anorexia (12.9%), leukopenia (12.5%), oral ulcer (8.2%) and psychological intolerance (4.7%). Multiple regression analysis showed significant predictive value of body mass index for transaminitis (p-value 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Asymptomatic liver function test derangement was the most frequent adverse-effect of methotrexate observed, whereas nausea and anorexia were the most common patient reported events. The frequent dose associated with side-effects in Nepalese patients was around 20mg/week.
33333119 Rational design of metal-organic frameworks to deliver methotrexate for targeted rheumatoi 2021 Feb 10 Methotrexate (MTX) has been used as an anchor drug for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), while the patients with chronic MTX administration suffer from severe side-effects. To this end, targeted delivery of MTX by nanomedicine has attracted great interest. In this work, we aimed to employ metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) as nanocarrier to deliver MTX by virtue of its facile and green preparation and exceptionally high drug loading. While MTX could be easily and effectively loaded via different MOF construction strategies, such as direct coordination, physical encapsulation, and covalent conjugation, we found that most of the MTX loading MOFs showed premature and burst drug release, attributable to the unstable coordination between MTX and metals. To address this issue, we rationally designed the MOFs by conjugating MTX with tannic acid (TA) at 2:1 M ratio and then coordinating with ferric ion (Fe(3+)), followed by surface modification of hyaluronic acid (HA). The resulting MOFs achieved ultra-high drug loading (45%) and sustained drug release, and could selectively recognize the diseased cells for anti-inflammatory effect. The in vivo therapeutic evaluation suggested that the MOFs could enhance the anti-rheumatic activity of MTX while minimizing its toxic effects by targeted drug delivery, resulting in improved therapeutic index. This work provides a biocompatible nano-platform to deliver MTX for RA treatment, and importantly, calls for special attention to the gap between MOFs design and their biological applications, and the gap needs to be filled by careful evaluation of in vivo stability and burst drug release.
32896266 Biological and targeted-synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs with concomitant 2021 Jul OBJECTIVES: To determine the real-life efficacy, safety, and drug-retention rates of leflunomide (LEF) or methotrexate (MTX) as a synthetic DMARD used in combination with biological DMARDs for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: The TReasure database is a web-based, prospective, observational cohort of RA and spondyloarthritis patients from 17 centres in different regions of Turkey and data entry was enabled since December 2017. Until May 2019, 2556 RA patients on biologic treatment were recorded. Demographic and RA-related data of 1526 patient either received LEF or MTX were compared, efficacy of both drugs compared by RA-disease activity composite indices. Reasons fordrug discontinuation also recorded. Drug retention rates were compared with Kaplan-Meier curves (log-rank test). RESULTS: Of 2556 RA patients 1526 (59.7%) were receiving concomitant LEF (n=646, 42.3%; median follow up 35 months) or concomitant MTX (n=880, 57.3%; median follow-up 32 months) at the time of initiation to their first bDMARDs. The LEF group were older and had longer disease duration, proportion of females and seropositive patients was higher in this group. In the LEF group, non-anti-TNF agents were used in higher rate. Remission rates, changes in composite indices and rate of comorbidities and adverse events were similar in both groups. The retention rate of LEF + non-anti-TNF b/tsDMARDs was higher compared to MTX + anti-TNF bDMARDs (p=0.002, log-rank). Rates of adverse events were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: LEF in combination with either anti-TNF or non-anti-TNF drugs appears as an effective and safe therapeutic option at least as MTX.
33028756 Multidisciplinary Approach to Prevent de novo Hepatitis B in Patients with Rheumatoid Arth 2020 Oct The reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is currently a social problem. Our hospital has established a project team, which consisted of medical staff including doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and technicians, to prevent HBV reactivation and subsequent de novo hepatitis B in 2015. To verify the usefulness of the team, we aimed to examine the implementation rate of HBV screening tests in patients with RA in 2011, 2015, and 2018. We also examined the rate of HBV infection, as well as the rate of HBV reactivation during the course. In this study, medical records of patients who visited our hospital in 2011, 2015, and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. HBV screening was completed when hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb), and hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) were all examined. The prevalence of patients who completed HBV screening dramatically increased from 2.4% in 2011 to 79.1% in 2015 and 86.9% in 2018. Patients who completed the screening had significantly higher rates of liver dysfunction, methotrexate use, and use of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs than those who did not. Of the 767 patients who completed HBV screening in 2018, 157 patients (20.5%) had previously resolved HBV infection (HBsAg-negative but HBsAb- and/or HBcAb-positive). During a mean follow-up of 41.0 months, reactivation of HBV was observed in 10 out of the 157 patients (6.4%); however, none developed de novo hepatitis B. In conclusion, our multidisciplinary approach to prevent de novo hepatitis B is considered useful.
31691828 The effect of methotrexate on tumour necrosis factor concentrations in etanercept-treated 2020 Jul 1 OBJECTIVES: Recently, we demonstrated that early low concentrations of circulating, adalimumab-bound TNF in RA patients treated with adalimumab was associated with future anti-drug antibody formation. Furthermore, low TNF was associated with less frequent baseline MTX use. This is remarkable, because of the anti-inflammatory effects of MTX and a potential inhibiting effect on cytokine production. We hypothesized an indirect effect of non-MTX use on low TNF concentrations via immunogenicity. To investigate the effect of MTX on TNF concentrations independent of anti-drug antibody formation, we measured TNF in RA patients treated with etanercept, a drug with low immunogenicity. METHODS: TNF was quantified in 186 consecutive etanercept-treated RA patients at baseline and at weeks 4, 16 and 28. The dynamics of TNF during etanercept treatment were compared with dynamics recently published for adalimumab. RESULTS: We demonstrated that TNF concentrations at week 4 did not associate with baseline MTX or remission after 28 weeks. Furthermore, median (interquartile range) TNF increased from <112 (<112-<112) pg/ml at baseline to 548 (344-688) pg/ml at week 4 and remained stable at week 16 and 28 [598 (442-756) and 568 (444-755) pg/ml, respectively]. CONCLUSION: Circulating TNF did not associate with MTX usage in etanercept-treated patients. This implies that MTX does not have a direct effect on TNF concentrations in circulation and that the association between early low TNF and non-use of MTX for adalimumab is thus most likely due to anti-drug antibody formation.
31996367 Pragmatic randomised controlled trial of very early etanercept and MTX versus MTX with del 2020 Apr OBJECTIVES: We sought to confirm in very early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA) a much greater superiority (30%) of first-line etanercept+methotrexate (ETN+MTX) over treat-to-target MTX (MTX-TT) than previously reported in ERA (14%); and explore whether ETN following initial MTX secures a comparable response to first-line ETN+MTX. METHODS: Pragmatic, open-label, randomised controlled trial of treatment-naïve ERA (≤12 months symptom), Disease Activity Score 28 joint (DAS28)-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) ≥3.2, rheumatoid factor (RF)+/-anticitrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA) positive or ultrasound power Doppler (PD) if RF and ACPA negative. Subjects were randomised 1:1 to ETN+MTX; or MTX-TT, escalated to ETN if week 24 DAS28-ESR ≥2.6 and intramuscular corticosteroid at protocolised time points. Primary endpoint of week 48 DAS28ESR remission with clinical and imaging secondary endpoints. RESULTS: We randomised 120 patients, 60 to each arm (71% female, 73% RF/84% ACPA positive, median (IQR) symptom duration 20.3 (13.1, 30.8) weeks; mean (SD) DAS28 5.1 (1.1)). Remission rates with ETN+MTX and MTX-TT, respectively, were 38% vs 33% at week 24; 52% vs 38% at week 48 (ORs 1.6, 95% CI 0.8 to 3.5, p=0.211). Greater, sustained DAS28-ESR remission observed with ETN+MTX versus MTX-TT (42% and 27%, respectively; p=0.035). PD was fully suppressed by week 48 in over 90% in each arm. Planned exploratory analysis revealed OR 2.84, 95% CI 0.8 to 9.6) of achieving remission after 24 weeks of ETN administered first line compared with administered post-MTX. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with remission rates typically reported with first-line tumour necrosis factor inhabitor+MTX versus MTX-TT, we did not demonstrate a larger effect in very ERA. Neither strategy conferred remission in the majority of patients although ultrasound confirmed local inflammation suppression. Poorer ETN response following failure of MTX-TT is also suggested. Trial registration number NCT02433184.
32088801 Treatment strategies are more important than drugs in the management of rheumatoid arthrit 2020 Apr The treatment of inflammatory arthritides has been changed dramatically in the past two decades with the introduction of the biological (b) disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) as well as the targeting synthetic (ts) DMARDs that can be used as monotherapy or in combination with conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs. The concept of treat to target (T2T) and tight control monitoring of disease activity represents a therapeutic paradigm of modern rheumatology. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), this treatment approach has proven to be effective in many clinical trials and is now a well-established approach. The most common treatment strategies rely on the combination of csDMARDs (mainly methotrexate, sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine). This comes from different studies which compare the outcomes of combination therapies versus csDMARD monotherapy or versus methotrexate plus biologics in early RA patients. Here, we review the literature of the most important T2T studies for RA patients. The results showed that a tight control strategy appears to be more important than a specific drug to control RA. T2T approach aiming for remission or low disease activity can be achieved in early RA patients using less expensive drugs in comparison to newer drugs and this may need to be recognised in the future recommendations for the management of RA. KEY POINTS: • Tight-control and treat-to-target (T2T) strategies are the cornerstone in achieving remission or low disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) • A plethora of clinical trials has confirmed the efficacy of csDMARDs when the tight-control and T2T strategies are applied • T2T and tight-control strategies are a less expensive option in comparison to newer drugs and may be recognised in the future recommendations for the management of RA. • Treatment decisions and strategies are more important than just the drugs.
32732353 Identifying the preferable rheumatoid arthritis subgroups for intervention with the anti-R 2020 Jul OBJECTIVES: To clarify which rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients benefit most from the anti-receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand antibody denosumab to reduce the progression of joint destruction. METHODS: We pooled patient data from the 12-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled DRIVE (phase II) and DESIRABLE (phase III) studies. In DRIVE, concomitant treatment was limited to methotrexate, salazosulfapyridine and bucillamine. In DESIRABLE, patients could receive any disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. RA patients were randomised to denosumab 60 mg every 6 months (Q6M), every 3 months (Q3M) or placebo. Efficacy was assessed by van der Heijde-modified total Sharp score (mTSS), bone erosion score (ES) and joint space narrowing score (JSNS). Change in mTSS was assessed in subgroups stratified by risk factors for radiographic damage if the interaction factor was significant. RESULTS: The pooled analysis included 909 patients. Denosumab reduced worsening of mTSS (mean (SD)) at 12 months in the Q6M (0.88 (3.30), p=0.0024) and Q3M (0.66 (2.16), p=0.0002) groups versus placebo (1.50 (3.73)). This reduction in mTSS progression was due to the change in ES (Q6M, 0.44 (1.89), p=0.0006; Q3M, 0.20 (0.86), p<0.0001) versus placebo (0.98 (2.54)); no effect was observed on JSNS. Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies, glucocorticoid use and baseline ES showed a significant interaction. Denosumab was particularly effective in patients who were anti-CCP antibody positive (p<0.05). Changes in mTSS versus placebo were observed in all denosumab dose groups, regardless of glucocorticoid use and baseline ES. CONCLUSIONS: Denosumab broadly reduced the progression of joint destruction in RA patients with risk factors for radiographic damage such as especially anti-CCP antibody positivity.
32552859 Methotrexate-loaded multifunctional nanoparticles with near-infrared irradiation for the t 2020 Jun 18 BACKGROUNDS: Despite the advances of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) therapeutics, several patients do not receive adequate treatment due to the toxicity and/or insufficient response of drugs. The aim of this study is to design photothermally controlled drug release from multifunctional nanoparticles (MNPs) at a near-infrared (NIR) irradiated site to improve therapeutic efficacy for RA and reduce side effects. METHODS: Au film was deposited onto methotrexate (MTX)-loaded poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles, resulting in MTX-loaded MNPs. The synergistic effects of MTX-loaded MNPs with NIR irradiation were investigated using RA fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLSs) and collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) mice. RESULTS: Upon NIR irradiation, NIR resonance of the Au half-shell generated heat locally, accelerating MTX release from PLGA nanoparticles. In vivo NIR images of MTX-loaded MNPs indicated effective delivery of the MNPs to the inflamed joints. Moreover, in collagen-induced arthritis mice, MTX-loaded MNPs containing 1/1400 of MTX solution (repeated-dose administration) had therapeutic effects comparable to conventional treatment with MTX solution. In vitro experiments showed higher therapeutic efficacy of MTX-loaded MNPs with NIR irradiation than that of chemotherapy alone. CONCLUSIONS: A combination therapy of MTX-loaded MNP and NIR irradiation showed durable and good treatment efficacy for the suppression of arthritis in a single administration of small dose of MTX. Our results demonstrate that the treatment modality using drug-loaded MNP with NIR irradiation may be a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of RA and allow in vivo NIR optical imaging.
31522319 Clinico-genetic model to predict methotrexate intolerance in rheumatoid arthritis. 2020 Jan INTRODUCTION: Methotrexate is the gold-standard DMARD in rheumatoid arthritis but is often associated with "mild" adverse effects like intolerance or laboratory abnormalities. Although non-life threatening, they are responsible for drug discontinuation in 17-50%. There is limited data on clinical and genetic markers that predict their occurrence. METHODS: This prospective study enrolled patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. They were started on methotrexate at a weekly dose of 15 mg, escalated gradually to reach 25 mg which was continued till the end of the study. Intolerance (symptomatic adverse effects) was ascertained by a questionnaire at 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks. Laboratory testing for occurrence of cytopenia and/or transaminitis was done at the same study visits. Seven SNPs in four genes involved in methotrexate handling were genotyped using real-time polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: This study included 110 patients with rheumatoid arthritis who received methotrexate for 24 weeks; the final mean weekly methotrexate dose was 22.0 ± 4.0 mg. Methotrexate intolerance occurred in 40 (37%), common being nausea (and vomiting) in 29 and anxiety (and dizziness) in 9. It was associated with lower BMI at baseline (21.5 ± 3.7, 23.8 ± 4.6 kg/m(2), p = 0.01). FPGS rs10106 was significantly associated with intolerance with an allelic odds ratio (95% CI) of 2.02 (1.14-3.57) and the recessive genetic model (AA+AG versus GG) with an odds ratio of 3.8 (95% CI 1.5-9.6, p = 0.004). A model including both BMI and FPGS rs10106 could modestly predict methotrexate intolerance with an accuracy of 66.3%. CONCLUSIONS: A clinical-genetic model including BMI and SNP FPGS 10101 was found to have a modest prediction ability for methotrexate intolerance.Key Points• Methotrexate intolerance (symptomatic adverse effects) was common and occurred in 37% patients over 6 months.• SNP FPGS rs10106 and low body mass index were associated with methotrexate intolerance.• Clinico-genetic model had a modest ability of 66% for predicting intolerance.
32996385 Comparing Medical Utilization and Cost Outcomes in Oral Versus Injectable Immunotherapy Us 2020 Oct BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and psoriasis (PSO) are immune-mediated systemic, chronic inflammatory conditions. Moderate to severe disease is treated with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) such as methotrexate, sulfasalazine, or leflunomide. If a patient does not respond to these firstline treatments, then tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) or non-TNFi immunotherapy agents are administered via infusion, injection, or taken orally. Although the effectiveness of established infusion, injection, and newer oral therapies are known, the relative effectiveness among the routes of administration is not well understood. OBJECTIVE: To compare drug use, health care resource utilization, and costs among patients who are treatment-naive to oral immunotherapy and injectable biologic immunotherapy. METHODS: This retrospective observational study used claims data from a large U.S. health plan to identify new users of oral and injectable immunotherapy, diagnosed with a joint (RA or PsA), skin (PSO), or joint and skin condition from July 1, 2014, to June 30, 2017. The index date was the first claim for an oral or injectable medication. Medicaid, Medicare Advantage, and commercial plan patients aged 19-89 years with continuous enrollment 6 months before and 12 months after the index date were included in the study. Outcomes were adjusted using propensity score by inverse probability of treatment weighting. Treatment discontinuation, switching, health care resource utilization, and costs were measured during the post-index period. RESULTS: Oral versus injectable users with joint (n = 458 vs. 3,875), skin (n = 265 vs. 951), or joint and skin (n = 171 vs. 805) conditions were identified. For drug utilization outcomes, no differences in discontinuation rates were observed between oral and injectable groups for any of the cohorts. However, those in skin and joint and skin cohorts had higher rates of switching to other immunotherapies in patients initiated on orals compared with injectables. Health care resource utilization outcomes were mixed. While mean outpatient and physician office visits were significantly higher in oral compared with injectable groups across all 3 cohorts, no differences were observed for inpatient stays. Total costs (medical plus pharmacy) were lower for oral groups across all 3 cohorts. Pharmacy costs were lower for oral groups, but medical costs were higher for oral groups across all 3 cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first population-level study at a route-of-administration level, which compared switching, health care resource utilization, and costs across several conditions. Switching drugs was more likely in the oral group, which may indicate lower effectiveness or tolerability of oral immunotherapies relative to injectables. Health care resource utilization was higher in the oral group, but total costs were lower, which was likely driven by the lower costs of oral drugs. DISCLOSURES: This study was a Humana internal study, and all authors were at the time employees of Humana and used Humana resources. The authors have no conflicts of interest or financial interests to disclose that relate to the research described in this study. This study was presented as a podium and poster presentation at the AMCP Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy Annual Meeting; April 23-26, 2018; Boston, MA.
32236929 [German guidelines for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with disease modifying anti- 2020 Apr The new guidelines for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs are based on a systematic literature research and consensus process. They define the current standard of the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Although they are related to the current European guidelines, in some points they are more detailed and place further emphasis.Every patient suffering from active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is to be treated with a DMARD, but Methotrexate initially remains the first resort therapeutic measure. Treatment shall comply with the "treat-to-target" principle. The therapeutic aim in this is remission, if attainable, or at least a low disease activity. Remission here is defined as a Simplified Disease Activity Score (SDAI) of ≤ 3,3 or as meeting the so called Boolean definition. A first evaluation of response is due after 12 weeks. By that time, there should be a measurable response, defined as an improvement of at least 50 % of the Composite Score, as e. g. of DAS28. If no improvement has been achieved, treatment shall be continued with either a second DMARD strategy with conventionally synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) or an alternative with biological or targeted synthetic (b or ts) DMARD - depending on whether there are risk factors for a severe disease progression. Glucocorticoids are given initially, however they should be tapered and stopped after 3-6 months or at least reduced to a maximal dose of 5 mg/d prednisone. Both a change within b and tsDMARD as well as therapeutic de-escalation are possible measures in the further course of treatment.
32822057 Dose tapering of biologic agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritis-results from a coho 2021 Mar OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of demographic and clinical factors with the clinical decision of tapering biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in daily practice. METHODS: All RA patients receiving bDMARDs were documented by 14 rheumatologists when presenting in 9 specialized private practices. Statistical analyses employed multivariable logistic models for dose reduction with the covariates age, gender, disease duration until bDMARD start, smoking status, disease activity, comorbidity, functional capacity, radiographic damage, concomitant methotrexate (MTX) treatment, rheumatoid factor positivity, and glucocorticoid use. In the multivariable model (MVM), missing values were imputed. RESULTS: Data of 586 RA patients on bDMARD treatment were available, 171 of which (29%) received a reduced dose. The highest rates of patients with dose reduction were seen for rituximab (67%) and infliximab (50%). The degree of dose reduction was most prominent for rituximab (57%). In the MVM, 6/11 covariates were significantly associated with dose reduction: age (odds ratio (OR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.05; P = 0.002), time between disease onset and bDMARD start (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.06; P = 0.015), DAS 28 < 2.6 (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.01-2.37; P = 0.045), MTX therapy (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.03-2.25; P = 0.036), comorbidity (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.01-1.42; P = 0.036), and glucocorticoid dose (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.76-0.89; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: DAS 28 remission, concomitant MTX, and lower glucocorticoid doses were positively associated with dose tapering of bDMARDs in RA patients. While this could be expected, the reason for the association with age, comorbidity, and the time between disease onset and bDMARD start is less clear. Key points • In rheumatology practice, tapering of biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs is feasible in nearly 30% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. • The degree of dose reduction may exceed 50% of the recommended dose. • In a multivariable model, concomitant methotrexate is positively associated with dose tapering of biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs.
32216829 Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of the proposed biosimilar ABP 710 with inflixima 2020 Mar 26 BACKGROUND: ABP 710 is being developed as a biosimilar to infliximab reference product (RP). Analytical similarity and pharmacokinetic equivalence between the two have been previously demonstrated. Here we report results from a comparative clinical study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of ABP 710 relative to the RP in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 50-week equivalence study, patients with moderate to severe active RA despite methotrexate received 3-mg/kg infusions of ABP 710 or RP at predetermined intervals based on initial randomization and then with re-randomization at week 22. The primary endpoint was response difference (RD) of ACR20 at week 22, with clinical equivalence evaluated based on 90% CI of - 15%, 15%. Secondary endpoints included Disease Activity Score 28-joint count C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 across time, as well as safety and immunogenicity assessments. RESULTS: A total of 558 patients were randomized for the initial treatment (ABP 710 n = 279; RP n = 279). The estimated RD of ACR20 at week 22 was 9.37% with 90% CI (2.67%, 15.96%). The lower bound was within the pre-specified criteria, thus confirming non-inferiority; the upper bound exceeded the pre-specified criteria by 0.96% such that superiority could not be ruled out statistically. In a post hoc analysis with adjustment for random imbalance in baseline factors, the CI of RD was narrowed (0.75%, 13.62%). Changes from baseline in DAS28-CRP as well as ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates across time and hybrid ACR evaluations were similar for the initial and initial/re-randomized treatment groups. Adverse events and incidence of anti-drug antibodies were similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: These efficacy and safety results support similarity with no clinically meaningful differences between ABP 710 and infliximab RP. Although we were unable to statistically confirm non-superiority, post hoc analysis was supportive of non-superiority. DAS28-CRP, ACR20, ACR50, ACR70, and hybrid ACR evaluations over the entire study were consistently comparable as were safety and immunogenicity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT02937701. Registered August 30, 2016.
32896703 A systematic review on the effect of DMARDs on fertility in rheumatoid arthritis. 2020 Oct INTRODUCTION: Drug therapy could alter fertility in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We aimed to perform a systematic review to evaluate if Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy influences fertility as this is an important point to consider in shared decision making on RA therapy. METHODS: A search was conducted at 18/10/2019 in EMBASE, PubMed (including MEDLINE) and the Web of Science Core Collection. Our inclusion criteria were studies involving women or men diagnosed with RA, older than 18 years and on DMARD therapy, with as outcome a fertility parameter. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, case reports, case series and animal studies were excluded. Studies not in English or Dutch or published before 2004 were excluded. Quality appraisal was performed by the CASP systematic review checklist. RESULTS: After duplicate removal, 9030 references were identified. After title/abstract screening, 82 articles remained. After full text screening, 4 articles could be retained. No studies were found through backward snowballing. Only studies involving women could be retained. The included studies investigated the effect of methotrexate, certolizumab pegol, etanercept and sulfasalazine on fertility. No detrimental effects of these DMARDs on time-to-pregnancy, anti-Müllerian hormone serum level or presence of a history of infertility, were reported. CONCLUSION: This systematic review underlines the gap in knowledge regarding the effect of DMARDs on fertility in women and especially men with RA. DMARD treatment, contrary to general belief, seemed to have no harmful effect on fertility, possibly because it resulted in better controlled disease activity. More research is needed to improve guidance for patients with RA with a child wish.
33040072 Diaphragmatic Lipoma in a Woman with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Case Report and Literature Re 2020 Oct 11 BACKGROUND A lipoma is a benign tumor made of fat tissue. Diaphragmatic lipomas are frequently reported in case studies. CASE REPORT This study presents a case of diaphragmatic lipoma in a woman with rheumatoid arthritis who was complaining of shortness of breath. A literature review of previously reported diaphragmatic lipoma cases was also carried out. In our patient, normal vital signs were detected, and laboratory results showed that antinuclear antibody, complete blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein levels were high. A high-resolution CT scan showed pulmonary nodules and an incidentally found diaphragmatic lipoma. The patient was prescribed corticosteroids, methotrexate, folic acid, and chloroquine. The 3-month follow-up visit revealed symptomatic improvements in breathing difficulties and joint attacks. CONCLUSIONS Diaphragmatic lipoma should be identified to avoid misdiagnosis. Most cases of lipoma require observation. Surgical treatment is indicated only if the mass is symptomatic, increasing in size, or of uncertain nature.
33186593 Traditional and modern management strategies for rheumatoid arthritis. 2021 Jan Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a serious disorder of the joints affecting 1 or 2% of the population aged between 20 and 50 years worldwide. RA is the foremost cause of disability in developing and Western populations. It is an autoimmune disease-causing inflammation and pain involving synovial joints. Pro-inflammatory markers, including cytokines, such as interleukin -1 (IL-1), IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) are involved in RA. RA treatment involves TNF-α blockade, B cell therapy, IL-1 and IL-6 blockade, and angiogenesis inhibition. Synthetic drugs available for the treatment of RA include disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD), such as cyclophosphamide, sulfasalazine, methotrexate, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and intramuscular gold. These agents induce adverse hepatorenal effects, hypertension, and gastric ulcers. We found that patients diagnosed with chronic pain, as in RA, and those refractory to contemporary management are most likely to seek traditional medicine. Approximately 60-90% of patients with arthritis use traditional medicines. Therefore, the efficacy and safety of these traditional medicines need to be established. The treatment for RA entails a comprehensive multidisciplinary strategy to reduce pain and inflammation and to restore the activity of joints. The potential medicinal plants exhibiting anti-arthritic and anti-rheumatic pharmacological activity are reviewed here.
31422723 Establishment of anti-C1q monoclonal antibodies to measure serum C1q levels discriminating 2020 Sep Objectives: To establish anti-C1q monoclonal antibodies which can measure serum C1q levels discriminating disease severity subsets of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) within 5 years of onset.Methods: In this multi-centre, longitudinal, observational study, 122 RA patients [102 females, baseline age 58.5 years, rheumatoid factor (RF) positivity 78.7%, serum C-reactive protein (CRP) 1.2 mg/dl, and concomitant methotrexate (MTX) 4.9 mg/week (29.5%)] within 5 years of onset (disease duration 21.0 months) were enrolled from 1985 to 2000. Patients were not treated by more than 8 mg/week of MTX or biologics which may strongly affect the course of joint destruction. Disease severity at 10-15 years of onset was classified according to the number of destructed joints of overall 68 joints on plain radiographs (36 patients were mild RA group involving only peripheral joints and 86 were severe RA group involving large axial joints). Baseline serum C1q levels were evaluated by ELISA with newly developed 4 monoclonal anti-C1q antibodies, and compared between two groups as well as conventional RA disease activity markers.Results: There were no significant differences between two groups in baseline conventional RA disease activity markers such as RF, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP, and matrix metalloproteinase-3. However, compared to mild RA group, severe RA group showed higher baseline serum C1q levels (μg/ml) evaluated by anti-C1q monoclonal antibodies of no.33 (104.8 ± 22.3 vs. 118.3 ± 19.3; p = .0024), no. 40 (102.6 ± 21.9 vs 121.2 ± 22.3; p = .000069), no. 54 (102.1 ± 22.5 vs. 119.3 ± 26.9; p = .00052), and no. 76 (105.6 ± 21.8 vs. 122.6 ± 26.4; p = .00043). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that in patients with serum C1q levels of ≥110.5 μg/ml (measured by antibody no. 40), 78.9% (75/95) belonged to severe RA group.Conclusion: Measuring serum C1q levels of RA within 5 years of onset by newly developed anti-C1q antibodies may be useful in predicting the prognosis of disease severity evaluated by the extent of joint destruction.
31982664 Emergence of rheumatoid arthritis following exposure to natalizumab. 2020 May We report a patient with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, who developed rheumatoid arthritis after exposure to natalizumab. While some multiple sclerosis therapies are known to unmask autoimmune conditions, natalizumab is rarely implicated as a cause of alternative autoimmunity. This case illustrates an unusual clinical scenario which may support recent scientific work suggesting that, when natalizumab blocks T helper 1 cells from entering the central nervous system, T helper 17 cells may continue to migrate into immune-privileged spaces and cause pathologic inflammation. BRIEF BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients often suffer from concurrent autoimmune conditions, and may be at increased risk for developing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (Langer-Gould et al., 2010; Tseng et al., 2016). While alemtuzumab and rituximab are known to unmask underlying autoimmune disorders, natalizumab is not commonly associated with autoimmunity. Here, we report a patient with relapsing-remitting MS who developed acute autoimmune arthropathy following exposure to natalizumab. CASE REPORT: A 45-year-old woman with autoimmune thyroiditis presented after episodes of left arm and right leg numbness. MRI showed multiple supratentorial and spinal cord demyelinating lesions. Lumbar puncture yielded CSF with a lymphocytic pleocytosis (11 leukocytes, 97% lymphocytes), normal protein, normal glucose, elevated immunoglobulin G index (2.24), and multiple unmatched oligoclonal bands. Her initial autoimmune workup revealed elevated anti-thyroid peroxidase antibody and rheumatoid factor (22 IU/mL, reference value < 14 IU/mL). The remainder of the patient's rheumatologic evaluation was normal, including aquaporin-4 antibody, anti-nuclear antibody, complements 3 and 4, and Sjogren's antibodies. She fulfilled 2017 McDonald Criteria for multiple sclerosis, and was started on dimethyl fumarate. Three months later, she developed left foot numbness and urinary incontinence. MRI spine showed a new lesion at C7, and her therapy was escalated to natalizumab. Immediately after her initial natalizumab infusion, she experienced transient neck and shoulder pain with decreased range of motion. She had no history of arthropathy. After her second natalizumab infusion, she developed persistent shoulder and hip pain. Her arthralgias resolved after a course of oral steroids. Two weeks after her second natalizumab infusion, she was seen by a rheumatologist who noted mild synovitis of both elbows and wrists on exam, but no significant inflammation involving her shoulders, fingers, knees, ankles, or feet. This time, she had significantly elevated anticyclic citrullinated peptide IgG (> 300 U/mL, reference value < 3 U/mL) and rheumatoid factor (71 IU/mL). Based on the number of small joints involved, and her positive serology, she met 2010 American College of Rheumatology Criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. Natalizumab was discontinued, and the patient was started on methotrexate, with which her rheumatoid arthritis has been controlled for the past two years.
32973236 A prospective study of lung disease in a cohort of early rheumatoid arthritis patients. 2020 Sep 24 Lung disease is common in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The onset of lung involvement in RA is not well known. The objective is to describe the features and evolution of lung involvement in early RA, its relationship with disease activity parameters, smoking and treatments. Consecutive patients with early RA without respiratory symptoms were included and tracked for 5 years. Lung assessment included clinical, radiological and pulmonary function tests at diagnosis and during follow-up. Peripheral blood parameters (erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C reactive protein, rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated peptide autoantibodies) and scales of articular involvement, such as DAS28-CRP, were evaluated. 40 patients were included and 32 completed the 5-year follow up. 13 patients presented lung involvement in the initial 5 years after RA diagnosis, 3 of them interstitial lung disease. Significant decrease of diffusion lung transfer capacity of carbon monoxide over time was observed in six patients, 2 of them developed interstitial lung disease. DLCO decrease was correlated with higher values of CRP and ESR at diagnosis. Methotrexate was not associated with DLCO deterioration or lung disease development. Subclinical progressive lung disease correlates with RA activity parameters. Smoking status and methotrexate were not associated with development or progression of lung disease.