Search for: rheumatoid arthritis methotrexate autoimmune disease biomarker gene expression GWAS HLA genes non-HLA genes
| ID | PMID | Title | PublicationDate | abstract |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10686712 | [Secondary amyloidosis in rheumatoid arthritis. A clinical study of 29 patients]. | 1999 Dec | BACKGROUND: To study the clinical features, outcome and response to therapy in 29 cases of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with secondary amyloidosis (AA). PATIENTS AND METHOD: Twenty-nine patients with RA and AA who were diagnosed during 11 years. RESULTS: The mean age and the mean duration of RA were 63 +/- 12 years and 15 +/- 7 years respectively. The most common initial clinical feature was renal involvement (83%). Nineteen patients were treated with methotrexate. The mean survival time was 42 +/- 8 months. Eleven patients (38%) have deceased. CONCLUSION: Our data confirms that AA in RA is a serious complication with a bleak prognosis. A normal renal function is a good prognosis indicator. | |
| 10568423 | Elevation of serum hepatic aminotransferases during treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with | 1999 | Sixty-six rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients were analyzed retrospectively to assess the incidence and risk factors for elevation of serum hepatic aminotransferases during methotrexate (MTX) therapy. The effect of folate supplementation on serum ALT and RA activity was evaluated prospectively in 14 patients who showed a sustained high serum level of ALT. The frequency of elevation of serum AST or ALT was 4-5 times greater than in patients taking other DMARDs. Multivariate linear regression analysis demonstrated that elevation of ALT was independently associated with sex (female), obesity, baseline ALT, MTX dose, and gastrointestinal side effects. Folate supplementation caused ALT levels to decrease in all patients within 3 months. Eleven patients showed no change of RA activity, but 3 patients dropped out of the study because of the exacerbation of RA. These results suggest that careful monitoring of serum hepatic aminotransferases is necessary in patients with predisposing factors, especially those receiving more than 0.15 mg/kg of MTX weekly. Folate supplementation can reverse the sustained elevation of ALT, but might cause exacerbation of RA in some patients. | |
| 10776690 | Influence of cyclosporin A on radiological progression in early rheumatoid arthritis patie | 2000 | The aim of this study was to evaluate whether cyclosporin A (CsA) influences the radiological disease progression in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in comparison with other disease-modifying drugs (DMARDs). A total of 103 early RA patients, without prior use of DMARDs, were randomized to receive CsA (3 mg/kg per day) or methotrexate (MTX) (0.15 mg/kg per week). In addition, all patients received prednisone (7.5 mg/day). After 42 months of treatment, pairs of hand and wrist radiographs of 41 patients treated with CsA and 42 treated with MTX were evaluated blindly and separately by two investigators, using reference radiographs for scoring. A scale scoring similar to Larsen's standard radiographs with minor modifications was used. The studied radiographs were obtained at the beginning and 42 months after therapy in both groups. Patients in both groups responded beneficially to the above treatment regimens. In the CsA group, 37 patients (71 %) remained radiographically stable and 4 worsened, while in the MTX group 39 patients (76%) remained stable and 3 deteriorated. No significant radiological worsening was found in the CsA-treated patients as compared to those treated with MTX. Early immuno-intervention in RA patients appears to be crucial for the future development of joint damage: CsA can delay radiological disease progression and may inhibit joint damage deterioration in early RA patients. | |
| 9214427 | The AIMS2-SF: a short form of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2. French Quality of | 1997 Jul | OBJECTIVE: To develop a short form of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 (AIMS2) questionnaire, preserving content validity as the priority criterion. METHODS: A 2-step reduction procedure was used: 1) Delphi technique, with 1 panel of patients and 1 panel of experts each selecting 1 set of items independently; and 2) nominal group technique, where members of both panels reached consensus on the final selection of items, using information derived from item analysis. Psychometric properties of the AIMS2-Short Form (AIMS2-SF) and AIMS2 were compared using data from a cohort of 127 rheumatoid arthritis patients who completed the AIMS2 twice prior to the initiation of methotrexate (MTX) treatment and 3 months post-initiation of MTX treatment. RESULTS: The 2 panels reached consensus on a 26-item AIMS2-SF (54.4% reduction from the AIMS2). Factor analysis showed preservation of the 5-component structure. Convergent validity (Physical and Symptom components with clinical variables: r = 0.24-0.59), test-retest reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.7), and sensitivity to change at 3 months (standardized response mean 0.36-0.8, except Social Interaction component [0.08]) were very close to the values for the original AIMS2. CONCLUSION: The AIMS2-SF is a shorter version of the AIMS2 (i.e., available in 2-page format) and has psychometric properties similar to those of the AIMS2. | |
| 9818648 | Effect of low dose methotrexate on markers of bone metabolism in patients with rheumatoid | 1998 Nov | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate markers of bone metabolism in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the effect of weekly low dose methotrexate (MTX) on bone turnover. METHODS: Forty-two menstruating female patients recently diagnosed to have RA (mean age 35.4 years, mean disease duration 1.03 years) were enrolled in this study. Disease activity was assessed by Ritchie articular index, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP); laboratory tests were done for deoxypyridinoline and bone alkaline phosphatase. Drug therapy was started in the form of a weekly MTX dose (range 10-15 mg). Patients were reassessed after 3 and 9 months for the same variables. No patient received steroids before or during the course of the study. RESULTS: Thirty patients continued the study until 9 months. The mean value for deoxypyridinoline and bone alkaline phosphatase on entry were 8.4 and 12.5; mean values of Ritchie articular index and ESR were initially 10.1 and 59 mm, respectively. In patients with active RA deoxypyridinoline was significantly high (p < 0.01), while bone alkaline phosphatase was negatively correlated (p < 0.01). At 3 months deoxypyridinoline levels had fallen to 6.2, while bone alkaline phosphatase had risen to 18.8. At 9 months there was significantly reduced deoxypyridinoline, to 5.5 (p < 0.001), while bone alkaline phosphatase had risen significantly to 30 (p < 0.001) compared with pre-MTX assessment. CONCLUSION: In patients with RA bone metabolism is affected. In active disease, there was decreased bone formation, while bone resorption was increased. The therapy of weekly low dose MTX had improved bone resorption, suggesting that in patients with RA MTX might have a bone protective effect by controlling disease activity. | |
| 9844762 | Cyclosporine A in the treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis. A prospective, randomized 2 | 1998 Nov | OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy, tolerability and safety of cyclosporine A (CSA) in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS: Patients with an early diagnosis of RA, a disease duration of less than 3 years, and without prior disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment were studied. They randomly received oral CSA (3 mg/kg/day) or oral methotrexate (MTX) (0.15 mg/kg/week). In addition, all patients in both groups received oral prednisone (7.5 mg/day). RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were assigned to the CSA group and 51 to the MTX group. After 24 months of treatment, 48 patients from the CSA group and 48 from the MTX group showed significant clinical improvement. This was evaluated by the duration of morning stiffness, grip strength, the total joint count, joint swelling, and joint tenderness and pain, compared to pre-treatment values. The clinical improvement was also associated with a significant decrease in ESR and CRP values in both groups. No significant radiological deterioration was observed in the CSA patients compared to those treated with MTX after 24 months. Four patients from the CSA group dropped out of the study, two because of a synovitis flare, one because of severe hypertrichosis and one because of severe gingival hyperplasia. Three patients from the MTX group withdrew, one because of disease flare-up and two because of gastrointestinal disturbances. CONCLUSION: Early immunointervention in RA patients appears to be crucial to limit the development of joint damage. Cyclosporine A appears to be effective, well tolerated and safe in the long-term treatment of RA and can therefore be used as a first immunomodulatory drug in the armamentarium for the treatment of RA. | |
| 9914314 | Effects of long-term administration of methotrexate on bone mineral density in rheumatoid | 1999 Feb | Because previous studies of high-dose methotrexate usage have demonstrated an effect on bone formation and resorption, this study was done to determine whether long-term, low-dose use of methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis causes bone loss. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and hip was measured in 10 Caucasian postmenopausal women who had never received methotrexate and 10 Caucasian postmenopausal women who had received the drug for 3 or more years. There were no significant differences in BMD at the lumbar spine (L2-L4) between patients who had used long-term methotrexate compared with patients never treated with methotrexate (1.08 +/- 0.08 g/cm2 versus 0.98 +/- 0.14 g/cm2, respectively; P = 0.08). Similarly, there were no significant differences in BMD at the femoral neck between methotrexate users and nonusers (0.81 +/- 0.08 g/cm2 versus 0.76 +/- 0.15 g/cm2, respectively; P = 0.42). These results suggest that long-term low-dose methotrexate treatment for rheumatoid arthritis is not associated with accelerated bone loss. | |
| 9793383 | [Necrotizing keratitis in chronic polyarthritis. Combined immunosuppressive and surgical t | 1998 Sep | INTRODUCTION: Areactive forms of keratitis in patients with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis are inflammations threatening the visual acuity and integrity of the eye. They commonly occur in a rheumatologically inactive interval and have a poor prognosis. A retrospective evaluation of medicamentous and surgical strategies for a curative therapy with optical rehabilitation is necessary to optimise the treatment of patients with necrotic sclerokeratitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 27 eyes of 22 patients (14 women and 8 men, ranging in age at the time of operation from 40 to 88 years; mean 68.7 years) with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis and secondary Sjögren's syndrome were reviewed retrospectively. There were 17 eyes with necrotic keratitis and 9 eyes with necrotic sclerokeratitis. In one eye, necrotic sclerokeratitis with bacterial transmigrating keratitis and hypopyon occurred. OPERATIONS: In 8 cases we performed a perforating mini-keratoplasty, in 16 cases a tectonic and optical perforating keratoplasty, in 3 cases a tectonic sclerokeratoplasty, in 9 patients a combined keratoplasty and cataract extraction with posterior chamber lens implantation and in 1 case a partial conjunctival plasty. Follow-up ranged from 7 months to 4 years (average 2.8 years). RESULTS: In all eyes, a sufficient tectonic and primary curative effect was achieved only under cyclophosphamide immunosuppression. In 3 cases, a rekeratoplasty had to be performed because of recurrent keratitis after changing the systemic cyclophosphamide therapy to methotrexate, glucocorticosteroids or non-steroid antiphlogistic agents. Visual acuity outcome was depending on the eccentricity of the keratoplasty and earlier affections of the eye. Postoperatively, the visual acuity improved in 23 eyes. In 3 cases, no change of visual acuity was achieved. Visual acuity deteriorated in one case from counting fingers to hand motions. Peri- and postoperative complications during the follow-up period were corneal infiltration around sutures in 4 eyes, graft rejecting reactions in 3 cases, and sicca syndrome in 6 cases. CONCLUSIONS: The intensive cooperation of ophthalmologists and rheumatologists enables the successful treatment of apparently hopeless situations in necrotic sclerokeratitis in patients with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis. The rate of complications under an immunosuppressive therapy with cyclophosphamide was found at average 2.8 years follow-up to be low. The indication for the combined therapy depends on the ophthalmological findings; rheumatologists and ophthalmologists should decide on the appropriate dosage for the systemic cyclophosphamide therapy. Topical glucocorticosteroid therapy alone is contra-indicated. | |
| 11111818 | Immunoadsorption for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: final results of a randomized | 2000 Oct | A double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled study was conducted to determine the efficacy of a promising immunoadsorption treatment device containing staphylococcal protein A (Prosorba Immunoadsorption Column, Cypress Bioscience, Inc., San Diego, CA, U.S.A.) in patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Eligibility criteria required adult RA patients who had failed either methotrexate or 2 other disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) and who had predefined active disease. All disease-modifying agents were discontinued at least 30 days prior to entry. Patients received 12 weekly procedures after being randomized to the active treatment arm or to the sham treatment arm (apheresis only). Evaluations were double-blinded and occurred at baseline and periodically for 24 weeks thereafter. Primary efficacy was assessed at 7 and 8 weeks after the completion of 12 treatments (at trial Weeks 19 and 20) using the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) definition of improvement (1,2), and results from the assessments at Weeks 19 and 20 were averaged. Ninety-nine randomized patients had a mean disease duration of 15.4 years and received an average of greater than 5 DMARD regimens prior to entry. Analysis of patients who completed all treatments and follow-up indicated that 15 of 36 (41.7%) column-treated patients responded compared to 5 of 32 (15.6%) sham-treated patients (p < or = 0.003). Intent to treat analysis of all patients who were randomized in the study indicated 15 of 52 (28.9%) column-treated patients responded compared to only 5 of 47 (10.6%) patients who received sham treatments (p = .005). Common adverse events (AEs) included joint pain, fatigue, joint swelling, and hypotension. Central line usage was clearly associated with significant AEs during this trial and is not recommended. Hemoglobin, hematocrit, and mean corpuscular volume values decreased similarly in both treatment arms, attributed to phlebotomy for laboratory and scientific studies and to small, repetitive (normal) apheresis losses. Other AEs such as nausea, rash, pruritus, flushing, and fever occurred in 1 to 6% of treatments in each arm (NS). There was no significant increase in AEs in column-treated patients compared to sham-treated patients. Protein A immunoadsorption was proven to be a new therapeutic alternative in patients with severe, refractory disease. | |
| 10332970 | Predicting the short term direct medical costs incurred by patients with rheumatoid arthri | 1999 May | OBJECTIVE: With increasing interest in revising the mechanisms of health care funding, the ability to anticipate patients' medical expenditures as well as to identify potentially modifiable predictors would be informative for health care providers, payers, and policy makers. METHODS: Eight hundred fifty-eight patients with rheumatoid arthritis from 2 Canadian centers reported semi-annually on their health services utilization and health status for up to 12 years. Annual direct costs were calculated using 1994 Canadian prices. Regression models for the variation in total direct costs and the individual resource components (i.e., physicians, tests, medications, acute and non-acute hospital care) were estimated using previous values of age, sex, disease duration, education, methotrexate availability, employment status, global well being, pain, duration of morning stiffness, and functional disability as predictor variables. The models were developed using all available data except the last 2 observations (i.e., data collected on the last 2 self-report questionnaires) from each patient, which were reserved for model validation. The predictive abilities of the models were assessed by comparing the most recent costs with those predicted by the model using values of the predictor variables from the previous time period. Further, to assess whether the models conferred any advantage over cost estimates based only on previous costs, most recent observed costs were also compared with costs observed in the preceding time period. RESULTS: Self-reported indices of either global well being, pain, or functional disability predicted total direct costs as well as the costs of the 5 individual resource components. Being younger, female, disabled from the work force, having shorter disease duration, and receiving more formal education also predicted higher costs in at least on health resource category. However, being older predicted higher acute and non-acute care hospital costs. Regression models incorporating longitudinal data did not perform better than average costs in the preceding time period in predicting future short term costs. CONCLUSION: Global well being, pain, functional disability, and previous costs are the most important predictors of short term direct medical costs. Although we have demonstrated that regression models do not perform better than previous costs in predicting future short term costs, previous costs are a much less informative predictor than health status variables. Variables such as functional disability and pain identify potentially modifiable disease features and suggest interventions that may improve patient well being and reduce costs. | |
| 10728741 | Treatment with leflunomide slows radiographic progression of rheumatoid arthritis: results | 2000 Mar | OBJECTIVE: To determine whether treatment with leflunomide (LEF), methotrexate (MTX), or sulfasalazine (SSZ) for 6-12 months retards progression of radiographic damage and to identify clinical variables that correlate with radiographic progression. METHODS: Radiographs of the hands and feet were performed at baseline and at the end of study or early exit in 3 randomized controlled trials. Protocol US301 was a 12-month controlled trial of LEF or MTX treatment compared with placebo in 482 patients randomized in a 3:3:2 ratio. Protocol MN301 compared 6 months of LEF or SSZ treatment with placebo in 358 patients, randomized in a 3:3:2 ratio, with continued blinded treatment in the active control arms for 12 months. Protocol MN302 compared 12 months of LEF treatment with MTX in 999 patients. Radiographs were blinded for sequence and treatment and were scored for erosions and joint space narrowing. All analyses were by intent-to-treat. Sensitivity analyses were performed to account for missing data. RESULTS: LEF, MTX, and SSZ treatment resulted in statistically significantly less radiographic progression compared with placebo at 6 and 12 months: for protocol US301, LEF versus placebo P = 0.0007 and MTX versus placebo P = 0.0196; for protocol MN301, LEF versus placebo P = 0.0004 and SSZ versus placebo P = 0.0484. The effect of LEF treatment was similar to that of MTX and SSZ. CONCLUSION: These are the first 6- and 12-month randomized placebo- and active drug-controlled trials to demonstrate retardation of radiographic progression by a new disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD), LEF, as well as 2 commonly used DMARDs, MTX and SSZ. | |
| 10524687 | The Prosorba column for treatment of refractory rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, double | 1999 Oct | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Prosorba column as a treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients with active and treatment-resistant (refractory) disease. METHODS: A sham-controlled, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial of Prosorba versus sham apheresis was performed in patients with RA who had failed to respond to treatment with methotrexate or at least 2 other second-line drugs. Patients received 12 weekly treatments with Prosorba or sham apheresis, with efficacy evaluated 7-8 weeks after treatment ended. Patients were characterized as responders if they experienced improvement according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria at the efficacy time point. A data safety monitoring board (DSMB) evaluated interim analyses for the possibility of early completion of the trial. RESULTS: Patients in the trial had RA for an average of 15.5 years (range 1.7-50.6) and had failed an average of 4.2 second-line drug treatments prior to entry. After the completion of treatment of 91 randomized patients, the DSMB stopped the trial early due to successful outcomes. Of the 47 patients in the Prosorba arm, 31.9% experienced ACR-defined improvement versus 11.4% of the 44 patients in the sham-treated arm (P = 0.019 after adjustment for interim analysis). When results from 8 additional patients, who had completed blinded treatments at the time of DSMB action, were added to the analysis (n = 99), results were unchanged. The most common adverse events were a short-term flare in joint pain and swelling following treatment, a side effect that occurred in most subjects at least once in both treatment arms. Other side effects, although common, occurred equally as frequently in both treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Apheresis with the Prosorba column is an efficacious treatment for RA in patients with active disease who have failed other treatments. | |
| 10971781 | Leflunomide and rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of effectiveness, safety and cos | 2000 Aug | OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness, safety and cost implications of leflunomide treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN: Systematic review. SETTING: Four trials retrieved from Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Econlit, HMIC (Dhdata), HMIC (Helmis), HMIC (King's Fund Database) and Best Evidence3. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy measures (including tender joint counts, swollen joint counts, assessment of functioning, Health Assessment Questionnaire, Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire, pain (visual analogue scale), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, C-reactive Protein), radiological progression and treatment adverse events. RESULTS: Leflunomide therapy was demonstrated to be significantly superior to placebo in relation to the efficacy outcome measures and it slowed the radiological progression of patients' disease in three studies. Treatment success and duration of sustained response were also significantly superior than on placebo, as were quality of life measures. Leflunomide treatment was comparable to sulphasalazine and methotrexate with respect to efficacy, radiological progression and quality of life measures. The most common adverse effects leading to withdrawal from leflunomide treatment were gastrointestinal symptoms (diarrhoea and nausea), allergic reactions (rash and pruritus), alopecia, dyspepsia, hypertension and elevated transaminase levels. Weight loss and dizziness have also been reported for leflunomide therapy. Leflunomide is more expensive than most DMARDs, costing about pound400 a year more than sulphasalazine. CONCLUSION: Despite the small number of published articles relating to leflunomide treatment, the evidence suggests that leflunomide is similar in efficacy to both sulphasalazine and methotrexate, although with a differential pattern of side-effects. There is a need for further research to assess the long-term outcomes of leflunomide treatment. | |
| 10788542 | A clinical study of CPH 82 vs methotrexate in early rheumatoid arthritis. | 2000 Mar | OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of CPH 82 in comparison with methotrexate (MTX) in adult patients with early, active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to compare the tolerance and safety profiles of the two drugs. METHODS: The study was a 24-week, double-blind, randomized study in 10 centres of 100 patients with active RA, with a disease duration of less than 2 yr at the start of treatment, which consisted of either CPH 82 300 mg/day or MTX 10 mg/week. The six primary effect variables were: number of swollen joints, Ritchie's articular index, patient's pain score, patient's global score, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and C-reactive protein (CRP). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), physician's global score and the efficacy according to the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria were also analysed. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement for both drugs in all variables. Significant differences between the drugs in favour of MTX were found only in patient's pain score, CRP and ESR. By the EULAR criteria, 76% and 86% were judged to be responders in the CPH 82 and MTX groups, respectively. By the ACR criteria, the corresponding figures were 58% and 64%. The most common side-effects were gastrointestinal, which were similar in both groups. The numbers of treatment failures due to adverse events were two with CPH 82 and 14 with MTX. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical effect of CPH 82 in this study was comparable to that of MTX at a dose of 10 mg/week. Both drugs reduced acute-phase reactants, MTX more effectively than CPH 82. The safety profile of CPH 82 was more favourable than that of MTX without folic acid supplementation. | |
| 9851262 | Early effective suppression of inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis reduces radiographic p | 1998 Nov | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of early 'aggressive' drug treatment on radiographic progression in patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA), compared to conventional stepwise increasing intensity of treatment. DESIGN: Prospective follow-up study with an experimental group and a historical control group both divided into a high-risk subgroup and a low-risk subgroup, based on prognostic factors. The effect of the 'aggressive' and the conventional treatment strategy was compared between both high-risk groups; the low-risk groups, both treated according to the conventional treatment strategy, were used to ensure internal consistency between the experimental and the historical groups. PATIENTS: A total of 228 consecutive patients with recent-onset RA (complaints < 1 yr at study entry). METHODS: The 'aggressive' drug treatment consisted of institution of relatively fast-acting disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (sulphasalazine, methotrexate) immediately after diagnosis, and rapid adjustment of dosage and/or drug in the case of insufficient response as measured by a change in C-reactive protein (CRP) level. Radiographic damage was assessed according to a modified version of Sharp's method and cumulative disease activity expressed as CRP-area under the curve (CRP-AUC). The occurrence of side-effects was also evaluated. RESULTS: After 2 yr of follow-up, comparison of the two high-risk subgroups showed the radiographic progression in the 'aggressively' treated subgroup to be significantly lower than that in the control group [Sharp score: median (range) 26 (0-100) vs 35 (1-188); P = 0.03]. Cumulative CRP values were also significantly lower than in the control high-risk subgroup [CRP-AUC: median (range) 1963 (212-8515) vs 3025 (46-15 632) mg.week/1; P = 0.002). This was achieved without an increase in the occurrence of side-effects. There was no difference between the two low-risk subgroups with regard to entry characteristics, CRP-AUC values or radiological progression, indicating comparability between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Early 'aggressive' drug treatment, using sulphasalazine and/or methotrexate, aimed at reduction of the CRP level, significantly reduces the (rate of) radiographic progression in RA. | |
| 9177920 | Influence of methotrexate on radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a sixty-mon | 1997 May | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if methotrexate (MTX) can slow disease progression, as determined radiographically, in comparison to other disease modifying drugs in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pairs of hand and wrist radiographs from 30 patients treated with MTX and 30 treated with D-penicillamine (DP) were evaluated blindly and separately by two radiologists (A and B) using reference radiographs for scoring. A scale scoring similar to Larsen's standard radiographs with minor modifications was used. The radiographs studied were obtained at the beginning and 5 years after therapy in both groups. RESULTS: A significantly greater worsening was found in the DP-treated patients (p = 0.025), as compared to MTX patients. Methotrexate showed a slower rate of disease progression than DP. Furthermore, in the MTX group 15 patients remained radiographically stable, 9 worsened and 6 were healed. In contrast, in the DP group 22 patients remained radiographically stable, 8 worsened and none improved. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of radiographic progression in RA patients was lower in MTX-treated patients compared to those treated with DP. Six patients showed radiological improvement after MTX treatment. Therefore, it seems that MTX could be considered a disease modifying drug. | |
| 10890256 | Leflunomide, a novel immunomodulator for the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis. | 1999 Nov | Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic disease affecting 0.8% of the population. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs reduce the pain and inflammation of RA and improve mobility but do not slow the progression of joint damage. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), which limit potentially irreversible joint damage, may influence the course of disease progression. This review describes the recently approved DMARD leflunomide, an isoxazole-based immunomodulator. Unlike other DMARDs, leflunomide arrests the growth of activated lymphocytes by inhibiting the enzyme dihydroorotate dehydrogenase, a critical link in the production of uridine monophosphate. Leflunomide is rapidly metabolized to the active major metabolite A77 1726, which is responsible for the drug's pharmacologic activity. Leflunomide has exerted inhibitory activity in animal models of RA. Its clinical efficacy has been demonstrated in a number of controlled trials. In two multinational 52-week studies and two 24-week studies, all leflunomide-treated patients received an initial loading dose of 100 mg for 3 days, followed by 20 mg/d. The effects on the signs and symptoms of RA were evaluated using the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 responder index, tender and swollen joint counts and scores, patients' and physician's global assessments, and pain intensity index. Erosions and joint-space narrowing were assessed by radiography. Compared with placebo, leflunomide significantly improved the signs and symptoms of RA (41%-64% improvement) by ACR 20 responder criteria (P < 0.001). Leflunomide, methotrexate, and sulfasalazine were equally effective in terms of symptom outcomes. In terms of retarding the progression of disease, leflunomide was significantly superior to placebo, with no consistent difference from methotrexate or sulfasalazine. In a trial using a combination of leflunomide and methotrexate therapy, 53% of patients were responders by ACR 20 criteria. Adverse effects in RA patients receiving leflunomide included diarrhea, elevated liver enzymes, alopecia, and rash. Additional adverse events occurring with a frequency >5% included allergic reaction, asthenia, abdominal pain, back pain, and hypertension, among others. Thus leflunomide may be used in selected RA patients (ie, those starting RA therapy for the first time or failing earlier DMARD therapy). However, the product labeling requires monthly monitoring of liver enzymes until stable concentrations are reached. Other labeled warnings include a risk of immunosuppression and an increased risk of fetal death or teratogenic effects in pregnant women. Methotrexate, which is also hepatotoxic, is usually the initial DMARD recommended for use in patients with aggressive RA. | |
| 10668522 | Disease modification in rheumatoid arthritis with leflunomide. | 1999 | Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by chronic inflammation and irreversible destruction of articular cartilage and bone. Disease progression as assessed by radiographic imaging of structural joint damage is a key outcome measure in RA. Joint damage is especially rapid during early phases of RA, thus the current trend of early aggressive therapy with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Radiographic analysis of disease progression with the novel DMARD leflunomide was compared to methotrexate and sulfasalazine in two large, placebo-controlled, randomized Phase III studies (N = 580). The results as indicated by changes in x-ray scores indicate that leflunomide and both active comparators slow disease progression significantly better than placebo (P < or = 0.01). Slowing of disease progression with leflunomide was similar to sulfasalazine at 6 months but better than methotrexate (P < or = 0.049) at 12 months. These data verify the ability of leflunomide to slow disease progression and confirm its disease-modifying potential. | |
| 10589361 | Etanercept and methotrexate combination therapy. | 1999 Nov | Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) is a major proinflammatory cytokine in the rheumatoid joint. TNF activity can be neutralized by administration of a recombinant version of its soluble p75 TNF receptor linked to the Fc portion of human immunoglobulin IgG1 (etanercept). The present study examined the combination of etanercept with methotrexate (MTX) in a group of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had persistent activity despite monotherapy with MTX. The etanercept-MTX group had a significantly better outcome than the placebo-MTX group using American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. At 6 months, 71% of the patients in the etanercept-MTX group had an ACR 20% response (versus 27% in the placebo-MTX group). In the etanercept-MTX group, 39% had an ACR 50% response (versus 3% in the placebo-MTX group), and 15% in the etanercept-MTX group versus 0% in the placebo-MTX group met the robust ACR 70% response. The present study indicates that etanercept is a novel and robust drug in combination with MTX for the treatment of RA. | |
| 9803986 | The population pharmacokinetics of long-term methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. | 1998 Oct | AIMS: Methotrexate is considered by many practitioners to be the agent of choice in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The pharmacokinetics of methotrexate have been reported to exhibit significant intersubject variability. Therefore, this study was undertaken to evaluate the population pharmacokinetics of methotrexate during long-term administration in adults with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Methotrexate pharmacokinetics were evaluated in a 36 month study of 62 adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Patients received oral or intramuscular doses of methotrexate weekly with pharmacokinetic studies performed every 6 months. Data were analyzed with nonlinear mixed effects modeling. RESULTS: Three thousand two hundred and sixty post oral or intramuscular dose serum methotrexate concentrations comprising 425 individual concentration vs time profiles were modeled using NONMEM. Covariates that significantly (P < 0.005) influenced the disposition of methotrexate were age (AGE, years), body weight (BW, kg), creatinine clearance (CL(CR), 1 h(-1)), gender (GEN; 0 = male, 1 = female), dose (DOSE, micromol), and fed vs fasted state (FED; 0 = fasted, 1 = fed). The final model describing the biexponential disposition of methotrexate was clearance(CL, 1 h(-1)) = (0.0810*BW + 0.257*CL(CR))*(1-(0.167*GEN); central volume (Vc, 1) = 0.311*BW; peripheral volume (Vp, 1) = 0.469*BW-0.169*AGE; intercompartmental clearance (Q, 1 h(-1)) = 4.27*(1-0.355*GEN); oral absorption rate constant (ka(p.o.), h(-1)) = 4.70-0.0439*DOSE*(1-0.507*FED); intramuscular absorption rate constant (ka(i.m.), h(-1)) = 0.122*DOSE; relative bioavailability (F) = 93.4%; and oral absorption lag time (LAG(p.o.), min) = 13.5. Pharmacokinetic parameters (%CV) for a typical fasted male subject in this study were CL, 7.341 h(-1) (27%); Vc, 23.51 (28%); Vp, 25.31 (31%); Q, 4.25 1 h(-1) (41%); ka(p.o.), 3.67 h(-1) (77%); and ka(i.m.), 3.09 h(-1) (44%). CONCLUSIONS: The population pharmacokinetics of methotrexate in adults with rheumatoid arthritis were well described by this investigation. Substantial interpatient variability was explained by incorporating patient specific data into regression equations predicting pharmacokinetic parameters. |