Search for: rheumatoid arthritis methotrexate autoimmune disease biomarker gene expression GWAS HLA genes non-HLA genes
| ID | PMID | Title | PublicationDate | abstract |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12972472 | Survival and effectiveness of leflunomide compared with methotrexate and sulfasalazine in | 2003 Oct | OBJECTIVE: To determine the survival and clinical effectiveness of leflunomide (LEF) compared with methotrexate (MTX) and sulfasalazine (SSZ) for RA in an observational study. METHODS: An observational database of 1088 patients and 5141 patient years of DMARD treatment (2680 courses) from two academic hospitals was filtered for treatment with LEF, MTX, and SSZ. LEF treatment groups were matched for patients' age, baseline ESR, number of previous DMARDs, and hospital cohort with MTX and SSZ treatment groups. For these treatments, Kaplan-Meier analyses of time until the drug was discontinued (drug "survival"), and the effectiveness and safety of continuation of treatment, were performed. The change in disease activity markers (CRP, ESR) was compared between the groups. RESULTS: The median dose during the study increased from 10 to 15 mg MTX/week and from 1.5 to 2.0 g SSZ/day. Matched survival analysis showed better retention rates for MTX (mean (SEM) survival 28 (1) months) than for LEF (20 (1) months; p=0.001), whereas retention rates of SSZ (23 (1) months) were similar to those of LEF (p=NS). Treatments were stopped earlier because of adverse events (AEs, 3 months) than because of ineffectiveness (IE, 10 months; p<0.001). LEF and MTX were less likely to be stopped because of AEs than SSZ. LEF courses were stopped earlier for AEs (p<0.001) than MTX. CONCLUSIONS: Current dosing strategies should be re-evaluated, and coping strategies for common AEs should be investigated. This will be necessary to achieve better drug retention of LEF. At present, MTX continues to be the most effective drug in clinical practice. | |
| 15589425 | Emerging biological therapies in rheumatoid arthritis. | 2004 Nov | The introduction of TNFalpha inhibitors has radically changed the management of patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or spondyloarthropathy. However, among patients with RA unresponsive to methotrexate, only two-thirds respond to TNFalpha inhibitors. Fortunately, more than 5 years after infliximab was introduced on the market, preliminary evidence that emerging biological agents are effective is beginning to accumulate, generating new hope for patients who fail to respond to TNFalpha inhibitors. These novel biological therapies grew out of original pathophysiological hypotheses, a fact that vividly illustrates the importance of basic pathophysiological research for developing new medications. This review provides detailed information on three biological therapies whose efficacy in RA was demonstrated in recently published randomized placebo-controlled trials: a monoclonal antibody to the IL-6 receptor (MRA), CTLA4-Ig (abatacept), and a monoclonal B-cell-specific antibody to CD20 (rituximab). Good risk/benefit ratios seem to be achieved with MRA alone or with abatacept or rituximab combined with methotrexate. However, as yet, no radiographic data are available for these treatments. One of the challenges for the future is to identify ingenious combinations of biological therapies capable of improving the quality and duration of responses without exacerbating side effects. | |
| 12595631 | The cost-effectiveness of infliximab (Remicade) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis i | 2003 Feb | OBJECTIVE: The cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of infliximab (Remicade) treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was estimated on the basis of a clinical trial comparing infliximab plus methotrexate with methotrexate alone in 428 patients with advanced disease [Anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor Trial in Rheumatoid Arthritis with Concomitant Therapy (ATTRACT)]. METHODS: The effect of infliximab on disease progression and related costs and utilities was estimated using two disease progression models based on epidemiological cohorts followed for up to 15 yr in Sweden and the UK. The clinical trial data were used directly in the model and extrapolated to 10 yr using a cohort from the epidemiological studies matched for gender, age, time since onset of RA and disease severity. RESULTS: One to two years of treatment with infliximab treatment reduced direct and indirect resource consumption in both countries, thereby partly offsetting the treatment cost. In the base case, including both direct and indirect costs, the cost per QALY gained was SEK 32 000 (euro 3440) in Sweden and GBP 21 600 (euro 34 800) for 1 yr of treatment. The respective QALY gains were 0.248 and 0.298. With 2 yr of treatment, the costs per QALY gained were SEK 150 000 (euro 16 100) and GBP 29 900 (euro;48 200). CONCLUSIONS: Although 1-2 yr of treatment with infliximab will lead to savings in both direct and indirect costs, these will not offset the drug cost. However, the cost-effectiveness ratios remain within the usual range for treatments to be recommended for use. | |
| 12899643 | T-cell-activation inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis. | 2003 | As rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disabling disease and a cure is not available, optimisation of therapeutic strategies is mandatory. Within recent years many new details of the inflammatory cascade(s) have been elaborated, leading to new therapeutic options such as neutralisation of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha). T-cell inhibition is another new approach to the treatment of RA. However, it is important to note two points: first, the role of T lymphocytes in the initiation and/or perpetuation of RA is still debated controversially. Second, there are few truly T-cell-specific agents that have proven to be effective and are established in the treatment of inflammatory disorders. Leflunomide may be considered one such agent; another in development is the fusion protein CTLA4-Ig. From a clinical perspective, studies demonstrating efficacy of these agents might represent the strongest support for a role of T cells in RA. In addition to leflunomide and CTLA4-Ig, therapeutic agents with activity against T cells, including anti-CD4 antibodies, cyclosporin, tacrolimus and T-cell receptor (TCR)-Vbeta-chain vaccination strategies, have been studied in patients with RA. Combination therapies including any of these T-cell-activation inhibitors with non-T-cell-specific agents such as methotrexate, antimalarials or anti-TNFalpha biologicals may prove the most effective strategies in controlling this complex disease. | |
| 12086555 | Anakinra treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. | 2002 Jul | OBJECTIVE: To summarize the safety data arising from clinical trials of anakinra, a human recombinant form of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) developed for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). DATA SOURCES: Primary articles and abstracts identified through the National Library of Medicine's PubMed database (1982-2001) and secondary sources. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All the articles and abstracts identified from the data sources were evaluated and all information deemed relevant was included in this review. DATA SYNTHESIS: Overall, anakinra was shown in 4 trials to be efficacious as monotherapy or combination therapy, compared with placebo, for the treatment of active RA. The magnitude of clinical improvement tended to increase with increasing doses of anakinra. In monotherapy trials, the primary adverse event was injection-site reactions, which usually were mild and transient. In com bination therapy (anakinra plus methotrexate), the frequency and severity of adverse events were similar to those seen in the monotherapy trials. CONCLUSIONS: The use of anakinra in patients with RA inhibits disease activity with a favorable tolerability profile. | |
| 15146408 | Markers for type II collagen breakdown predict the effect of disease-modifying treatment o | 2004 May | OBJECTIVE: To investigate in a randomized clinical trial setting with an aggressive combination-therapy arm and a mild-monotherapy arm, whether therapy-induced changes in urinary C-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I) and type II collagen (CTX-II) predict 5-year radiographic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Patients had participated in the COBRA (Combinatietherapie Bij Reumatoïde Artritis) trial comparing aggressive step-down combination therapy (the COBRA regimen, including temporary high-dose prednisolone, temporary low-dose methotrexate, and sulfasalazine [SSZ]) and mild monotherapy (SSZ). Urinary CTX-I and CTX-II levels were measured at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after initiation of treatment. Radiographs were scored according to the modified Sharp/van der Heijde method (mean of 2 independent readers who were aware of the sequence). Individual long-term radiographic progression was estimated, using baseline radiographs and all radiographs obtained during the followup period, by simple linear regression analysis (curve fitting). RESULTS: Both COBRA therapy and SSZ monotherapy produced a significant decrease in urinary CTX-I and CTX-II levels at 3 months, and this decrease was amplified at 6 months. COBRA therapy suppressed CTX-II (change from baseline levels -36% and -43% at 3 and 6 months, respectively), but not CTX-I, significantly better than did SSZ (-17% and -21% at 3 and 6 months, respectively) at 3 and 6 months. The magnitude of the decrease in urinary CTX-II levels at 3 months significantly predicted long-term (5-year) radiographic progression (beta = 0.48 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.13, 0.83]). This effect was independent of the change in disease activity and inflammation indices at 3 months. Patients whose CTX-II levels were normalized (<150 ng/mmoles of urinary creatinine) at 3 months had a significantly higher chance of radiographic stability (no progression over 5 years) than did patients whose CTX-II levels were increased both at baseline and at 3 months (odds ratio 4.5 [95% CI 1.5, 13]). CONCLUSION: The individual CTX-II response measured after 3 months of therapy in patients with active RA who had increased CTX-II levels at baseline independently predicts long-term radiographic progression. Urinary CTX-II levels may be used as early markers of treatment efficacy in patients with RA. | |
| 15330726 | Cost-effectiveness of TNF-alpha-blocking agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. | 2004 Sep | The current literature covering cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses of biological treatments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are reviewed in order to discuss options and limitations for future application of these highly priced drugs in routine clinical practice. The cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios of the studies analysed are converted into the corresponding Euros of the publication year. Etanercept treatment achieved a cost-effectiveness ratio of 44,300 Euros (2002)/ACR 20 (20% response according to American College of Rheumatology criteria) and 43,100 Euros (2002)/ACR 70WR (ACR 70 weighted response) compared with sulfasalazine and methotrexate, respectively, in methotrexate-naive RA. In methotrexate-resistant RA, the combination of etanercept and methotrexate is compared to a combination therapy of methotrexate, sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine revealing costs of 46,100 Euros (2000)/ACR 20, and 37,700 Euros/ACR 70WR. The cost-utility ratios for infliximab treatment range from 16,000 Euros to almost 166,000/QALY (quality adjusted life-year) gained, the studies investigating etanercept treatment show a ratio of approximately 25,000 Euros and 120,000/QALY gained. No substantial differences of cost-utilities of infliximab and etanercept were found. The administration of these drugs as third-line therapy is regarded cost-effective compared to other well-accepted therapies with comparable cost-utility ratios of < 50,000 Euros/QALY gained. Still, data on economic outcomes of RA trials are sparse and further cost-effectiveness and cost-utility evaluations are needed. | |
| 12904092 | Safety and efficacy of disease-modifying antirheumatic agents in rheumatoid arthritis and | 2003 Jul | The definition of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) has changed dramatically over the last decade. Current expectations of efficacy now include amelioration of signs and symptoms of disease activity as well as slowing, if not complete cessation, of disease progression as evidenced by Xray progression and significant improvement of patient function. Rheumatologists assess the safety profile of these agents more critically in an attempt to increase the risk:benefit profile. Traditional agents, such as methotrexate (MTX), sulfasalazine and leflunomide have provided patients with substantial relief of symptoms and some decrease of X-ray progression but have been hampered by the frequent occurrence of significant adverse events (AEs) and inability to maintain benefit for a prolonged period of time. With the increased understanding of the basic mechanism of the disease process, there has been the introduction of four biological disease-modifying agents introduced into clinical practice which have substantially increased the risk:benefit ratio for patients with various rheumatic diseases. | |
| 11961174 | Drug survival, efficacy and toxicity of monotherapy with a fully human anti-tumour necrosi | 2002 Apr | OBJECTIVES: To compare the 48-week drug survival, efficacy and toxicity of monotherapy with a fully human anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) monoclonal antibody (moAb) and methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active long-standing rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Secondary aims were to identify potential predictors for clinical response. METHODS: Patients with RA, enrolled in phase I trials with a human anti-TNF-alpha moAb and followed for at least 48 weeks at our centre, were compared with patients receiving MTX monotherapy without folate supplementation. The first 6 weeks of anti-TNF therapy were placebo-controlled and followed by an open-label study. Patients treated with MTX participated in a 48-week, double-blind, phase III study of MTX alone vs MTX with folate supplementation, which was co-ordinated by our department. The studies with anti-TNF-alpha and MTX were performed in the same period and had very similar inclusion, exclusion, response and stop criteria. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients treated with anti-TNF-alpha moAb were compared with 137 receiving MTX monotherapy. At baseline, patients in the anti-TNF-alpha group had a longer disease duration (median 108 vs 50 months, P=0.0001) and a more protracted history of second-line anti-rheumatic drugs than those treated with MTX (median 4 vs 1, P=0.0001). The 48-week dropout rate was lower among patients treated with anti-TNF (23 vs 45% in the MTX group, P<0.005). Proportional hazard analysis showed a significantly lower dropout risk among anti-TNF-treated patients [relative risk (95% confidence interval): 0.28 (0.12-0.6) uncorrected and 0.17 (0.06-0.45) corrected for confounders). The 48-week area under the curve for the disease activity score (DAS) was smaller in the anti-TNF-alpha group than in the MTX group (P=0.005). The percentage of responders was higher in the anti-TNF-alpha group over the whole study period. The median percentage of visits in which a patient fulfilled the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria was 83% in the anti-TNF-alpha group vs 40% in the MTX group (P=0.0001). Clinical and demographic characteristics were, in general, poor predictors for response to therapy at week 48. The clinical response after the first anti-TNF-alpha dose tended to increase the chance of prolonged efficacy of this approach [relative risk (95% confidence interval): 2 (0.75-6.0)]. The previous number of second-line drugs was the only predictive variable for response to MTX to which it was inversely related [relative risk (95% confidence interval): -0.71 (-0.57 to -0.88)]. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with active, long-standing RA, blocking TNF-alpha is more effective and better tolerated than MTX monotherapy. An early response increases the chance of a sustained effect of anti-TNF-alpha. In contrast to MTX, the response to anti-TNF-alpha is not affected by previous disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug history. | |
| 14614165 | Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis by selective inhibition of T-cell activation with fusion | 2003 Nov 13 | BACKGROUND: Effective new therapies are needed for rheumatoid arthritis. Current therapies target the products of activated macrophages; however, T cells also have an important role in rheumatoid arthritis. A fusion protein--cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4-IgG1 (CTLA4Ig)--is the first in a new class of drugs known as costimulation blockers being evaluated for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. CTLA4Ig binds to CD80 and CD86 on antigen-presenting cells, blocking the engagement of CD28 on T cells and preventing T-cell activation. A preliminary study showed that CTLA4Ig may be effective for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy to receive 2 mg of CTLA4Ig per kilogram of body weight (105 patients), 10 mg of CTLA4Ig per kilogram (115 patients), or placebo (119 patients) for six months. All patients also received methotrexate therapy during the study. The clinical response was assessed at six months with use of the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), which define the response according to its extent: 20 percent (ACR 20), 50 percent (ACR 50), or 70 percent (ACR 70). Additional end points included measures of the health-related quality of life. RESULTS: Patients treated with 10 mg of CTLA4Ig per kilogram were more likely to have an ACR 20 than were patients who received placebo (60 percent vs. 35 percent, P<0.001). Significantly higher rates of ACR 50 and ACR 70 responses were seen in both CTLA4Ig groups than in the placebo group. The group given 10 mg of CTLA4Ig per kilogram had clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements in all eight subscales of the Medical Outcomes 36-Item Short-Form General Health Survey. CTLA4Ig was well tolerated, with an overall safety profile similar to that of placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who were receiving methotrexate, treatment with CTLA4Ig significantly improved the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis and the health-related quality of life. CTLA4Ig is a promising new therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. | |
| 14730599 | Impact of initial aggressive drug treatment with a combination of disease-modifying antirh | 2004 Jan | OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of therapy with a combination of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) versus therapy with a single DMARD in the prevention of work disability in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In the Finnish Rheumatoid Arthritis Combination Therapy trial, 195 patients with recent-onset RA were randomly assigned to receive either combination therapy with DMARDs (sulfasalazine, methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine) plus prednisolone or single therapy with a DMARD with or without prednisolone. After 2 years, the drug treatment strategy was no longer restricted. At baseline, 162 patients (80 in the combination-treatment group and 82 in the single-treatment group) were still working or at least available for work. After 5 years of followup, data on all sick leave and retirement were obtained from social insurance registers or case records. The main outcome for each patient was the cumulative duration of all sick leaves and RA-related disability pensions, divided by the observation period during which the patient was not retired because of another disease or because of age. RESULTS: The cumulative duration of work disability per patient-observation year was significantly lower in those randomized to combination therapy than in those randomized to single therapy: median 12.4 days (interquartile range [IQR] 0-54) versus 32.2 days (IQR 6-293) (P = 0.008, sex- and age-adjusted P = 0.009). This was mainly due to the difference in sick leaves (i.e., work disability periods | |
| 12808231 | The induction of apoptosis by methotrexate in activated lymphocytes as indicated by fluore | 2003 Apr | The objectives of this study were to test the in vitro response of healthy non-activated, activated, and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) lymphocytes to methotrexate (MTX), and design an in vitro model for predicting the efficiency of MTX treatment for RA patients. Considering the RA profile of clonal-expanded CD4(+) T cells, phytohemagglutinin-activated mononuclear cells taken from healthy donors were incubated with different concentrations of MTX. The MTX-immunosuppressive effect was tested by fluorescence intensity measurements, including PI assay and annexin V assay. For simple detection, we used the Individual Cell Scanner (IC-S), which enables the measurement of early events in individual cells. Healthy mononuclear cells (MNC), and MNC derived from RA patients, were tested by the IC-S while utilizing fluorescence polarization (FP) measurements of fluorescein diacetate (FDA) as an established marker of activation or suppression. In healthy activated MNC, we found that MTX, through its early incubation period, interferes with the activation signal obtained by PHA and exerts an apoptotic signal, which is noted by increases in the FP. Comparing our model to six long-standing RA patients and five newly-diagnosed patients revealed significant differences in the FP measurements, including fluorescence depolarization as an early established measurement of lymphocyte activation, and hyperpolarization as a measurement of an early immunosuppressive effect. We conclude that MTX, an effective therapy for RA patients, could easily be tested by fluorescence polarization measurements of FDA before (or during) clinical use in order to predict its efficiency on a specific RA patient. Moreover, the FP measurements can be used for the diagnosis, and making timing and dosage decisions. | |
| 12886966 | Methotrexate pneumonitis in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis. | 2003 Jun | Methotrexate pneumonitis is an unpredictable and life-threatening side effect of methotrexate therapy. Early diagnosis, cessation of methotrexate, and treatment with corticosteroids and/or cyclophosphamide are important in the management of patients with methotrexate pneumonitis. Methotrexate pneumonitis has not been reported in patients of Chinese ethnicity. We report a case of methotrexate pneumonitis in a Taiwan patient with rheumatoid arthritis who presented with acute nonproductive cough, dyspnea, fever, severe hypoxemia, and rapid progression to respiratory failure. Chest roentgenogram demonstrated bilateral diffuse interstitial and alveolar infiltration. Thoracoscopic biopsy with wedge resection of the upper lobe of the right lung was performed and the histologic findings of the biopsy specimen were consistent with bronchiolitis obliterans with organizing pneumonia. Rapid improvement of methotrexate pneumonitis was achieved after pulse therapies of methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide and daily use of prednisolone. | |
| 15077292 | Comparison of ultrasonographic assessment of synovitis and joint vascularity with radiogra | 2004 Apr | OBJECTIVE: To investigate sensitive ultrasonographic imaging methods for detection of synovial thickness and vascularity to discriminate between patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving infliximab + methotrexate (MTX) versus placebo + MTX over 18 weeks, and to compare the relationship between synovial thickening and vascularity at baseline and radiologic damage to joints of the hands and feet at 54 weeks. METHODS: Patients with early RA (duration <3 years) receiving stable dosages of MTX were randomly assigned to receive blinded infusions of 5 mg/kg infliximab (n = 12) or placebo (n = 12) at weeks 0, 2, 6, and then every 8 weeks until week 46. At baseline and week 18, clinical assessments were performed, and metacarpophalangeal joints were assessed by high-frequency ultrasonography and power Doppler ultrasonography measurements. Radiographs of the hands and feet taken at baseline and at 54 weeks were evaluated using the van der Heijde modification of the Sharp method (vdH-Sharp score). RESULTS: Using changes in the total vdH-Sharp score over 54 weeks and changes in synovial thickening and joint vascularity at 18 weeks, we were able to distinguish those patients receiving infusions of infliximab + MTX from those receiving placebo + MTX. Sonographic measurements of synovial thickening and vascularity at baseline in the placebo + MTX group demonstrated clear relationships with the magnitude of radiologic joint damage at week 54. Infliximab + MTX treatment abolished these relationships. CONCLUSION: The delay or reversal of inflammatory and joint-destructive mechanisms in patients with early RA was already apparent following 18 weeks of treatment with infliximab + MTX and was reflected in radiologic changes at 54 weeks. | |
| 15552520 | Benefit and risk of methotrexate treatment in rheumatoid arthritis. | 2004 Sep | This is a literature review on the efficacy and toxicity of low dose weekly methotrexate treatment in rheumatoid arthritis. Personal recommendations on dosing and monitoring (of) the drug are given. | |
| 12236619 | Examining the efficacy of biologic therapy: are there real differences? | 2002 Sep | Biologic therapy with anakinra, etanercept, and infliximab effectively reduced the signs and symptoms of active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in randomized controlled trials. Clinical efficacy was determined by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria. In patients failing previous disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy, both anakinra and etanercept were significantly more effective than placebo. In patients with inadequate responses to methotrexate (MTX), addition of anakinra, etanercept, or infliximab to stable MTX therapy was significantly more effective than MTX alone. Etanercept has also shown efficacy in early stage, methotrexate-naive patients. Comparisons of the efficacy of these biologics across clinical studies are problematic due to differences in study design, study conduct, and patient populations. Moreover, ACR response rates do not allow comparisons of agents that each achieve these responses relative to placebo. Until comparative clinical studies are conducted, in which 2 biologics are evaluated using the same protocol and patient population, the only conclusion that can be reached from published studies is whether an individual biologic agent is safe and effective. All 3 biologics - anakinra, etanercept, and inflixmab - are effective. | |
| 12209504 | Efficacy of selective B cell blockade in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: evidence f | 2002 Aug | OBJECTIVE: The pathogenetic role of B cells in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is under debate, but it is currently believed to be marginal. The availability of selective anti-B cell treatment provides a unique opportunity to clarify this issue. This study was undertaken to investigate the effects of B cell blockade in the treatment of refractory RA, and to evaluate the implications with regard to the role of B cells in the disease. METHODS: Five female patients with active, evolving erosive RA were treated with rituximab, an anti-CD20 chimeric monoclonal antibody. All 5 patients had been nonresponders to combination therapy with methotrexate plus cyclosporin A. Two of the 5 had also failed to respond to anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha therapy. All of these treatments were discontinued 1 month before institution of anti-CD20 therapy. RESULTS: Marked clinical improvement was observed in 2 patients (American College of Rheumatology 70% response [ACR70] and ACR50, respectively), starting at the end of the second month after institution of anti-CD20 therapy (month 2) and lasting until month 10 in 1 patient (articular relapse) and month 12 in the other (last followup). ACR20 response was observed in 2 additional patients, lasting until month 5 and month 7, respectively (articular relapse in both). Decrease or normalization of serum C-reactive protein and rheumatoid factor levels were observed in these patients. In contrast, patient 3 had no response to the treatment. RA synovitis and evolving erosive damage were decreased in patients exhibiting a major response, as demonstrated by imaging studies. CONCLUSION: Our finding of the clinical efficacy of selective B cell blockade indicates that B cells play a critical role in rheumatoid synovitis, at least in a subset of patients. Qualitative or quantitative differences in B cell commitment in RA pathobiology might have a function in the different responses observed. | |
| 12966595 | The effect of ingestion of ferrous sulfate on the absorption of oral methotrexate in patie | 2003 Sep | OBJECTIVE: To investigate if ingestion of ferrous sulfate, 300 mg twice daily, will reduce the urinary excretion of unmetabolized methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who ingest 2 drugs concurrently, and determine if ferrous sulfate interferes with the absorption of oral MTX. METHODS: In this randomized double-blind placebo controlled crossover study, we compared the urinary excretion of unmetabolized MTX in 10 patients with RA who ingested 7.5 mg MTX as their weekly dose and took either ferrous sulfate 300 mg twice daily or placebo. RESULTS: Ten patients with RA taking 7.5 mg MTX orally once weekly had an average 24 h urine excretion of MTX (while taking 300 mg ferrous sulfate twice daily for one week) of 8.44 micromoles compared to 7.65 micromoles for patients taking placebo. The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.50). CONCLUSION: Our results showed no less absorption of MTX for the placebo group compared to the group that took ferrous sulfate. These results do not support the hypothesis that ferrous sulfate interferes with the absorption of oral MTX. | |
| 15338491 | Risk factors for methotrexate-induced abnormal laboratory monitoring results in patients w | 2004 Sep | OBJECTIVE: To determine risk factors for methotrexate (MTX)-induced hepatic and hematologic laboratory abnormalities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Measurements of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), white blood cell counts, and platelet counts were collected in a database of patients with RA receiving MTX from 1991 through 2002. Potential risk factors for toxicity were recorded on each patient. RESULTS: Four hundred and eighty-one patients were followed for 2,323 person-years of MTX exposure. MTX was discontinued permanently because of abnormal laboratory test results in 22 patients (4.6%), the majority of whom (17/22, 77%) had elevated AST values. The body mass index (BMI) was significantly higher in those patients where MTX was permanently discontinued than in those in whom it was not (p < 0.03). Independent predictors of a significantly higher percentage of abnormal AST values were lack of folate supplementation (p < 0.001) and untreated hyperlipidemia (p < 0.02). Of the 17 patients in whom MTX was discontinued permanently because of an elevated AST value, 11/17 (65%) had either lack of folate supplementation or untreated hyperlipidemia. Hypoalbuminemia correlated independently with an increased percentage of abnormal platelet counts (p < 0.03). CONCLUSION: Lack of folate supplementation, untreated hyperlipidemia, and elevated BMI identified patients receiving MTX at risk for transaminase elevation, and low serum albumin was a risk factor for thrombocytopenia. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease could be the underlying risk factor for transaminase elevation in patients with hyperlipidemia and obesity. | |
| 12375315 | Combination therapy with methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine for rheumatoid arthritis incr | 2002 Oct | OBJECTIVE: To examine the bioavailability of methotrexate (MTX) in the presence of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), and vice versa, to determine a possible pharmacokinetic explanation for the observation that combination treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with MTX and HCQ has been shown, clinically, to be more potent than MTX used alone. METHODS: In a randomized crossover study, 10 healthy subjects received, on each of 5 dosing occasions, MTX alone as tablets or intravenous solution, HCQ alone as a tablet or oral solution, or a coadministered dose of MTX tablets with an HCQ tablet. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was determined for each subject, on each dosing occasion, for each compound. RESULTS: The mean AUC for MTX was increased (p = 0.005) and the maximum MTX concentration (Cmax) decreased (p = 0.025) when MTX was coadministered with HCQ, compared to MTX administered alone. The time to reach Cmax for MTX administration, tmax, was also increased during the coadministration with HCQ (p = 0.072). The AUC of HCQ showed no significant difference (p = 0.957) between any of the dosing occasions. CONCLUSION: These results may explain the increased potency of the MTX-HCQ combination over MTX as a single agent and also the sustained effects of MTX when administered with HCQ. In addition, the reduced Cmax of MTX observed during the coadministration may explain diminution of acute liver adverse effects. Extra vigilance for MTX adverse effects during combination therapy with HCQ is recommended, especially if renal function is known to be decreased. |