Browse

Search for: rheumatoid arthritis    methotrexate    autoimmune disease    biomarker    gene expression    GWAS    HLA genes    non-HLA genes   

ID PMID Title PublicationDate abstract
14983105 How aggressive should initial therapy for rheumatoid arthritis be? Factors associated with 2004 May OBJECTIVE: To determine what baseline factors might be associated with response to an initial mild treatment regimen in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Open label 2-yr study of 111 consecutive patients with early RA of duration less than 1 yr. None of the patients had previously received disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). All patients were assigned to receive hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) at enrollment, and could also take non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and prednisone. At any point during follow-up, patients not fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 criteria for improvement and/or who were taking prednisone > 10 mg/day were considered treatment failures and therapy changed to methotrexate (MTX), 7.5-20 mg/week. Clinical, laboratory and immunogenetic factors potentially predictive of treatment assignment at month 24 were evaluated. RESULTS: After 24 months of follow-up, a majority of patients (56/94) were either still on solo DMARD therapy with HCQ (n = 49) or off DMARD therapy with controlled/quiescent disease (n = 4), and 38 patients were taking MTX (including 11 in combination with other DMARDs). At month 24, all but 9 patients met ACR50 criteria for treatment response. Features present at enrollment which were predictors of MTX therapy at month 24 were high pain score, baseline rheumatoid factor titre > 1:40, higher number of swollen joints, and poor patient global assessment. The presence of HLA-C7xx at enrollment was also predictive of need for MTX therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that even milder treatment with HCQ is greatly beneficial in patients with early RA. There continue to be very few consistently reliable predictors of treatment needs in patients with this disease.
14963199 Folate supplementation and methotrexate treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: a review. 2004 Mar OBJECTIVES: The folate antagonist methotrexate (MTX) has become established as the most commonly used disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but is commonly discontinued due to adverse effects. Adverse effects are thought to be mediated via folate antagonism. In this paper we summarize the current data on the use of folates as a supplement to MTX use in RA for the prevention of adverse effects and as a potential modulator of cardiovascular risk, and propose guidelines for standard practice. METHODS: A Medline search was performed using the search terms "methotrexate", "folic acid", "folinic acid", "folate" and "homocysteine". Literature relevant to the use of folates as a supplement to MTX in the treatment of RA was reviewed and other papers referred to as references were explored. RESULTS: The use of supplemental folates, including folic and folinic acid, in RA patients treated with MTX has been shown to improve continuation rates by reducing the incidence of liver function test abnormalities and gastrointestinal intolerance. Folate supplements do not appear to significantly reduce the effectiveness of MTX in the treatment of RA. Furthermore, supplemental folic acid offsets the elevation in plasma homocysteine associated with the use of MTX. This may in turn reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease, which is over-represented amongst patients with RA, and for which hyperhomocysteinaemia is now recognized as an independent risk factor. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that folic acid supplements be prescribed routinely to all patients receiving MTX for the treatment of RA. We recommend a pragmatic dosing schedule of 5 mg of oral folic acid given on the morning following the day of MTX administration.
12924103 [Methotrexate therapy in rheumatologic diseases--an update]. 2003 This article summarizes the recent literature on low-dose methotrexate in the rheumatologic illnesses. It reviews the efficacy of these agents, the use of combination therapy, and the importance of early treatment with this disease modifying antirheumatic drug. The anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects as well as the toxicity of the drug in rheumatoid arthritis and other diseases are further defined.
11925909 [A case of rheumatoid arthritis complicated with a pneumonitis during concomitant treatmen 2002 Feb A 70-year-old female was diagnosed as having rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in 1971, which was then treated with steroid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. In 1999, after total replacement of her knee joint, 4 mg of methotrexate (MTX) per week was administered. Two months after the MTX administration, 200 mg of bucillamine per day was administered. On May 10, 2001, the patient was rushed to the hospital due to fever and difficulty in breathing. Chest X-ray and computed tomography (CT) revealed shadows of ground-glass-like opacity occurring sporadically in many places in the upper lung field bilaterally and interstitial shadows mainly on the lateral side of the lower lung field bilaterally. Instead of MTX and bucillamine, which were withheld, an MTX antagonist was administered and oxygen-supported therapy was performed; consequently, the patient recovered without the need to increase the amount of steroid. The percentage of lymphocytes in the broncholaveolar lavage fluid increased to 72%, and the CD4/CD8 ratio to 3.13. The level of serum KL-6 increased while that of serum SP-D returned to the normal level at different time. Following MTX and bucillamine administration, shadows of ground-glass-like opacity occurred sporadically in many places in the upper lung field bilaterally, which is not usually observed. It is suggested that such an unusual pulmonary disorder occurred due to concomitant use of drugs or other factors.
15499697 Adalimumab: new preparation. Rheumatoid arthritis: no therapeutic advance. 2004 Oct (1) There is no agreed treatment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in whom first-line options, including methotrexate, have failed. Recent slow-acting antirheumatic drugs have not been compared with one another, but they seem to have similar risk-benefit ratios. Etanercept, a TNF-alpha antagonist, is the most convenient to use. (2) Adalimumab is the third TNF-alpha antagonist to be marketed in France for use in rheumatoid arthritis, after etanercept and infliximab. (3) The clinical evaluation dossier mentions no data from comparative trials with other slow-acting antirheumatic drugs used in refractory rheumatoid arthritis. (4) Placebo-controlled trials show that adalimumab alone has very modest efficacy. The best results are obtained when adalimumab is combined with methotrexate. On the basis of the least demanding criterion (ACR 20%), about two-third of patients are improved by this combination. (5) Clinical trials show that it is pointless to continue treatment with adalimumab for more than three months if efficacy is inadequate. (6) Adalimumab, like other TNF-alpha antagonists, can have potentially serious adverse effects, linked mainly to its immunosuppressive action. Opportunistic infections and cases of tuberculosis have been reported, even during short treatment periods. Many questions remain regarding long-term treatment effects, such as the risk of lymphoma, autoimmune disorders, and onset or aggravation of demyelinising diseases. (7) Adalimumab is given once every two weeks, subcutaneously, while etanercept 25 mg is given as two subcutaneous injections per week, and infliximab is given as an intravenous infusion every 8 weeks. (8) In practice, for patients with rheumatoid arthritis who do not respond to methotrexate and to other classical slow-acting antirheumatic drugs, etanercept is the best choice among recent slow-acting antirheumatic drugs.
12176803 Etanercept, infliximab, and leflunomide in established rheumatoid arthritis: clinical expe 2002 Sep OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of prospectively monitoring treatment efficacy and tolerability of infliximab, etanercept, and leflunomide over a two year period in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical practice using a structured protocol. METHODS: All patients with RA at seven centres in southern Sweden, for whom at least two disease modifying antirheumatic drugs, including methotrexate, had failed or not been tolerated, who started treatment with either infliximab, etanercept, or leflunomide were included. They were evaluated at predefined times using a standardised protocol including items required for evaluating response to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) or EULAR criteria. All adverse events were recorded using World Health Organisation terminology. Concomitant treatment and survival while receiving a drug were recorded. RESULTS: During the study 166 patients were treated with etanercept, 135 with infliximab, and 103 with leflunomide. Treatment response as determined by the ACR and EULAR response criteria was similar for the tumour necrosis factor (TNF) blockers. The TNF blockers performed significantly better than leflunomide both as determined by the response criteria and by survival on drug analysis. Thus 79% and 75% continued to receive etanercept or infliximab compared with 22% of patients who started leflunomide after 20 months. The spectrum of side effects did not differ from those previously reported in the clinical trials. The initial two year experience of a protocol for postmarketing surveillance of etanercept, infliximab, and leflunomide shows that a structured protocol with central data handling can be used in clinical practice for documenting the performance of newly introduced drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy data for the TNF blockers comply with results in clinical trials, whereas leflunomide appeared to perform worse than in clinical trials. Prolonged monitoring is required to identify possible rare side effects.
11932879 Step-down approach using either cyclosporin A or methotrexate as maintenance therapy in ea 2002 Feb OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and outcome of the step-down approach using either cyclosporin A (CSA) or methotrexate (MTX) as maintenance therapy following 6 months treatment with these 2 agents in combination in early, nonerosive rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Fifty-seven patients younger than 65 years with early, nonerosive RA were first treated with CSA and MTX in combination for 6 months. They were then randomly stepped down to single-agent maintenance treatment for another 18 months. Safety, clinical efficacy, survival on treatment, and radiographic progression were evaluated. RESULTS: When being treated with combination therapy, 7 of the 57 patients (12.3%) withdrew because of adverse events. Of the remaining 50 patients, 42 (84.0%) were American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% responders, 30 (60.0%) were ACR 50% responders, and 23 (46.0%) were ACR 70% responders. At month 6, 22 patients were randomized to CSA and 27 to MTX. During this trial period, the treatment was discontinued by 16 patients taking CSA (mainly because of loss of efficacy) and by 4 taking MTX. At month 24, the probability (+/- SEM) of survival on treatment was 0.273 +/- 0.09 for CSA and 0.852 +/- 0.07 for MTX. Of the 6 CSA patients who completed the trial, 4 (66.7%) were ACR 20% responders, and 3 (50%) were both ACR 50% and ACR 70% responders. Of the 23 completers in the MTX arm, 21 (91.3%) were ACR 20% responders, 18 (78.3%) were ACR 50%, and 10 (43.5%) were ACR 70% responders. The treatment was not responsible for severe adverse events. Radiography showed a slow progression in the damage score and number of eroded joints in both treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Stepping down to single agent maintenance therapy following 6 months of combination treatment with CSA and MTX in early RA was only successful with MTX. Because this treatment did not prevent some radiographic progression, other approaches (e.g., step-up approach) may be more appropriate in early RA.
15940552 Have traditional DMARDs had their day? Effectiveness of parenteral gold compared to biolog 2005 Jun This review tries to answer the question of whether in the face of the recently introduced biologics conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) can still be recommended in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We start with an overview of the oldest conventional DMARD, injectable gold (Au), which was introduced in the treatment of RA in the 1920s. The effect of gold is directed at a number of different sites of the immune system. A significant improvement of clinical and biochemical disease activity parameters as well as an inhibition of X-ray progression has been shown in many studies. Head-to-head comparisons between gold and high-dose methotrexate (MTX) demonstrated no significant difference but some advantages for gold. Since trials comparing biologics with gold will never be performed, an indirect comparison was done by analyzing the results of trials with gold with those with biologics. Conclusions from such comparisons have to be drawn with caution especially since the methodology for performing trials has changed with time. We selected four trials with gold (two open, one placebo-controlled, and one comparison with MTX) and five trials with biologics (three placebo-controlled, one dose escalation study, and one comparison with MTX). In all these trials baseline data regarding swollen joint count (SJC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were roughly comparable and, with the exception of interleukin (IL)-1 RA, demonstrated a similar improvement of over 50% already after 6 months [with faster onset with tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha blockade]. American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response data were not available for the older gold trials. European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria could be calculated for the Au/MTX trial and were-for these compounds-only slightly inferior to the results with adalimumab. X-ray response is especially difficult to compare across studies. Although an inhibition with Au and MTX could be demonstrated, this occurred-similar to corticosteroid treatment-earlier and more pronounced with TNF-alpha blockers. We confirm the statement of Weinblatt that the most modern DMARDs do not appear to be much better than the oldest one indicating that conventional DMARDs are not outdated. Therefore, a sufficient trial of conventional DMARDs should precede the introduction of treatment with the very expensive biologics.
12935395 Leflunomide, a new disease-modifying drug for treating active rheumatoid arthritis in meth 2003 Aug OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of leflunomide in comparison with methotrexate (MTX) on patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in China. METHODS: Five hundred and sixty-six patients with active rheumatoid arthritis were randomly assigned to receive leflunomide at 20 mg once daily or MTX at 15 mg once weekly in a controlled trial. Five hundred and four patients completed the 12-week treatment and some patients continued the treatment for 24 weeks. RESULTS: Both leflunomide and MTX could improve the symptoms, signs, and joint function, but there were no changes in X-ray observations of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. In the leflunomide group, the overall rates of effectiveness at 12 weeks and 24 weeks were 86.94% and 92.31% respectively; the rates of remarkable improvement were 64.95% and 79.81% respectively. In the MTX group, the overall rates of effectiveness at 12 weeks and 24 weeks were 84.04% and 83.15% respectively; the rates of remarkable improvement were 56.81% and 75.28% respectively. According to intent-to-treat analysis, the ACR 20% response rates at 12 weeks and 24 weeks in the leflunomide group were 62.54% and 67.18% respectively, compared with 60.08% and 61.32% respectively in MTX group. No statistical differences were shown in the efficacy between the two groups (P > 0.05). The adverse events in the leflunomide group were gastrointestinal symptoms, skin rash, alopecia, nervous system symptoms, decreased leukocyte count, and elevation of alanine aminotransferase (ALT). Most of these side effects were mild and transient. The incidence of adverse events in the leflunomide group was 16.84%, significantly lower than that in MTX group (28.17%, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Leflunomide is effective in the treatment of RA with less adverse events than MTX. Its efficacy is similar to MTX, but the incidence of adverse events and the rate of withdrawal due to adverse events were lower in the leflunomide group than in MTX group.
14760791 Effect of repeated infliximab therapy on serum matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibi 2004 Feb OBJECTIVE: Matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) are involved in the articular tissue destruction processes in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We investigated the effects of multiple infusions of infliximab, a chimeric anti-tumor necrosis factor-a (anti-TNF-a) antibody, on concentrations of serum MMP and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMP) in patients with active RA. METHODS: Patients with RA were scheduled to receive 9 infusions of infliximab (3 mg/kg) at Weeks 0, 2, 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter. The therapy was combined with methotrexate (MTX) (7.5-20 mg/week). Serum concentrations of interstitial collagenase (MMP-1), stromelysin-1 (MMP-3), gelatinase B (MMP-9), TIMP-1, and TIMP-2 were measured by ELISA prior to infusion at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14, 38, and 62. RESULTS: The initial infusion of infliximab downregulated serum levels of MMP-1 (p < 0.001), MMP-3 (p < 0.001), MMP-9 (p < 0.001), TIMP-1 (p < 0.01), and TIMP-2 (p < 0.05). The second drug administration caused even more remarkable reduction of measured MMP (p < 0.001 in all cases) but not of TIMP levels. These changes were accompanied by decreased ratios of measured MMP to TIMP. Further infliximab therapy also significantly suppressed serum MMP levels, but was less effective. Before the first infliximab infusion serum concentrations of MMP and TIMP correlated with markers of RA activity such as the Disease Activity Score and C-reactive protein levels. After further drug administrations such associations, although less significant, were also noted. CONCLUSION: Anti-TNF-a antibody therapy combined with MTX resulted in rapid clinical improvement and reduced serum MMP concentrations in patients with RA. Further infusions of infliximab maintained the decrease of MMP, although to a lesser extent than the first and second doses.
14561908 Methotrexate-induced pulmonary injury: serial CT findings. 2003 Oct We describe serial computed tomographic (CT) findings of methotrexate (MTX)-induced pulmonary injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cases of 8 patients (3 men and 5 women; mean age 58.6 years, range 16 to 75 years) of clinically diagnosed MTX-induced pulmonary injury were reviewed. Six patients had rheumatoid arthritis, 1 had lupus erythematosus profundus, and 1 had juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. CT findings on admission and at follow-up were evaluated. RESULTS: The most common CT features were diffuse and patchy bilateral ground-glass opacity with (n = 3) or without reticulation (n = 4) and consolidation (n = 1). These opacities showed no predilection for any particular lung zone in 6 patients but did show dependent predilection in 1 patient and upper lobe predilection in 1. Diffuse centrilobular ill-defined nodules were noted in 1 patient, which disappeared on follow-up. During the average post-treatment follow-up period of 31.0 days (range 3 to 76 days), the opacities quickly improved after treatment in 6 patients; however, in 2 patients with pre-existing interstitial pneumonitis the opacities were refractory. CONCLUSION: CT features of MTX-induced pulmonary injury were variable and included diffuse parenchymal opacification, reticular opacities, and centrilobular nodules. These opacities usually responded quickly to treatment; however, those patients with lung fibrosis at presentation may have worse prognosis.
15457444 Polyglutamation of methotrexate with common polymorphisms in reduced folate carrier, amino 2004 Sep OBJECTIVE: Methotrexate (MTX) enters cells through the reduced folate carrier (RFC-1) and exerts part of its effects through polyglutamation to MTX polyglutamates (MTXPGs) and inhibition of 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide transformylase (ATIC) and thymidylate synthase (TS). We investigated the contribution of common genetic polymorphisms in RFC-1 (G80A), ATIC (C347G), and TS (28-bp tandem repeats located in the TS enhancer region [TSER*2/*3]) and of MTXPGs to the effect of MTX in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: The study was cross-sectional. All patients received MTX for at least 3 months. The numbers of tender and swollen joints, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for the physician's global assessment of disease activity, and the modified Health Assessment Questionnaire scores were collected. Using the VAS score for the physician's assessment of patient's response to MTX, the population of patients was dichotomized into responders to MTX (VAS score < or =2 cm) and nonresponders to MTX (VAS score >2 cm). A pharmacogenetic index was calculated as the sum of homozygous variant genotypes (RFC-1 AA + ATIC 347GG + TSER *2/*2) carried by the patients. MTXPG concentrations were measured in red blood cells (RBCs) by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: The dose of MTX was not associated with the effects of MTX (P > 0.05). In contrast, increased RBC long-chain MTXPG concentrations (median 40 nmoles/liter; range <5-131 nmoles/liter) and an increased pharmacogenetic index were associated with a lower number of tender and swollen joints (P < 0.05) and a lower score for the physician's global assessment of disease activity (P < or = 0.001). Patients with RBC MTXPG levels of >60 nmoles/liter and carriers of a homozygous variant genotype were 14.0-fold (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 3.6-53.8) and 3.7-fold (95% CI 1.7-9.1), respectively, more likely to have a good response to MTX (P
12610315 Methotrexate: first-line or second-line immunomodulator? 2003 Mar Methotrexate is established as an effective treatment for inducing remission or preventing relapse in Crohn's disease. This review discusses the mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics and clinical trials as well as considering the comparative efficacy between thiopurines and methotrexate. Comparisons are made with the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Its role in ulcerative colitis and potential toxicity are addressed. At present, the role of methotrexate is in the treatment of active or relapsing Crohn's disease for patients who are refractory to, or intolerant of, azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine.
15046527 Adalimumab: a review of its use in rheumatoid arthritis. 2004 Adalimumab (Humira) is a recombinant, fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, thereby neutralizing the activity of the cytokine. Subcutaneous adalimumab has been investigated in well designed trials in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Patients receiving adalimumab 40mg every other week in combination with methotrexate (Anti-TNF Research Study Program of the Monoclonal Antibody Adalimumab [ARMADA] and DE019 trials) or standard antirheumatic therapy (Safety Trial of Adalimumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis [STAR] trial) for 24-52 weeks had significantly higher American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates than patients receiving placebo plus methotrexate or standard antirheumatic therapy. In ARMADA, an ACR20 response was achieved in 25%, 52%, and 67% of adalimumab plus methotrexate recipients at weeks 1, 4, and 24, respectively. In ARMADA and DE019, improvements in the individual components of the ACR response were significantly greater with adalimumab 40mg every other week plus methotrexate than with placebo plus methotrexate. Monotherapy with adalimumab 40mg every other week was associated with significantly higher ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates than placebo, as well as significantly greater improvements in the individual components of the ACR response. ACR responses were sustained with adalimumab according to the results of extension studies in which patients received adalimumab in combination with methotrexate (up to 30 months) or as monotherapy (up to 5 years). In both concomitant therapy and monotherapy trials, adalimumab was associated with significantly greater improvements from baseline in health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) measures than placebo; adalimumab also retarded the radiographic progression of structural joint damage to a significant extent compared with placebo. Adalimumab was generally well tolerated as both concomitant therapy and monotherapy. In ARMADA, there were no significant differences between adalimumab and placebo (in combination with methotrexate) in the incidence of adverse events; however, in STAR, the incidence of injection site reactions, rash, and back pain was significantly higher with adalimumab than with placebo (in combination with standard antirheumatic therapy). No cases of tuberculosis were reported in either trial.In conclusion, subcutaneous adalimumab in combination with methotrexate or standard antirheumatic therapy, or as monotherapy, is effective in the treatment of adults with active rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to DMARDs. Adalimumab has a rapid onset of action and sustained efficacy. The drug also retards the progression of structural joint damage, improves HR-QOL, and is generally well tolerated. Thus, adalimumab is a valuable new option for the treatment of DMARD-refractory adult rheumatoid arthritis.
15340661 A comparative study of etanercept plus methotrexate and methotrexate alone in Taiwanese pa 2004 Aug BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Etanercept (Enbrel), a recombinant tumor necrosis factor receptor fusion protein, has been shown to be effective in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of etanercept in combination with methotrexate (MTX) and MTX alone in Taiwanese patients with active RA. METHODS: In this double-blind study, 58 patients with active RA who were maintained on MTX therapy at a stable dose of 12.5 to 20 mg per week for 4 weeks were randomized to receive either etanercept 25 mg (n = 29) or placebo (n = 29) by subcutaneous injection twice weekly over a period of 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the reduction of tender and swollen joint counts by 20% (ACR 20), 50% (ACR 50), and 70% (ACR 70) as determined by the American College of Rheumatology criteria at the 12th week. RESULTS: The addition of etanercept to MTX resulted in a greater reduction in the number of tender (7.00 vs 2.45, p = 0.012) and swollen joints (8.55 vs 3.86, p = 0.017), and in serum levels of C-reactive protein (1.26 mg/dL vs 0.45 mg/dL, p = 0.014) compared to MTX alone after 12 weeks of therapy. In addition, the global assessment of disease activity by both physicians and patients, duration of morning stiffness, pain visual analog scale score, and Health Assessment Questionnaire were all improved by etanercept plus MTX therapy. Results for the overall improvement in disease activity assessed by ACR 20 (90% vs 34%), ACR 50 (66% vs 10%) and ACR 70 (24% vs 0%) all favored the etanercept plus MTX group. However, the adverse events were comparable between the 2 treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Etanercept in combination with MTX was well tolerated and provided significantly more clinical benefit than MTX alone in Taiwanese patients with active RA.
15150426 The role of interleukin-1 in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. 2004 Jun A significant body of experimental evidence has implicated the proinflammatory cytokine IL-1 in the pathogenesis of RA. For example, IL-1beta overexpression in rabbit knee joints causes arthritis with clinical and histological features characteristic of RA, whereas IL-1 deficiency is associated with reduced joint damage. In experimental models, IL-1 blockers, including IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), significantly reduce clinical and histological disease parameters. In RA patients, plasma and synovial fluid concentrations of IL-1 are elevated, and these correlate with various parameters of disease activity. The production of endogenous IL-1Ra, however, appears to be insufficient to balance these higher IL-1 levels. The efficacy of blocking IL-1 in patients with active RA has been established in controlled clinical trials of anakinra, a recombinant human IL-1Ra (r-metHuIL-1ra). When used alone or in combination with methotrexate, anakinra significantly reduces the clinical signs and symptoms of RA compared with placebo. Taken together, these results indicate that IL-1 plays an important role in the pathogenesis of RA.
15146409 Radiographic, clinical, and functional outcomes of treatment with adalimumab (a human anti 2004 May OBJECTIVE: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) is an important proinflammatory cytokine that mediates inflammatory synovitis and articular matrix degradation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We investigated the ability of adalimumab, a human anti-TNF monoclonal antibody, to inhibit the progression of structural joint damage, reduce the signs and symptoms, and improve physical function in patients with active RA receiving concomitant treatment with methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: In this multicenter, 52-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 619 patients with active RA who had an inadequate response to MTX were randomized to receive adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously every other week (n = 207), adalimumab 20 mg subcutaneously every week (n = 212), or placebo (n = 200) plus concomitant MTX. The primary efficacy end points were radiographic progression at week 52 (total Sharp score by a modified method [TSS]), clinical response at week 24 (improvements of at least 20% in the American College of Rheumatology core criteria [ACR20]), and physical function at week 52 (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]). RESULTS: At week 52, there was statistically significantly less radiographic progression, as measured by the change in TSS, in the patients receiving adalimumab either 40 mg every other week (mean +/- SD change 0.1 +/- 4.8) or 20 mg weekly (0.8 +/- 4.9) as compared with that in the placebo group (2.7 +/- 6.8) (P < or = 0.001 for each comparison). In addition, there were statistically significant changes in the components of the TSS. At week 24, ACR20 responses were achieved by 63% and 61% of patients in the adalimumab 40 mg every other week and 20 mg weekly groups, respectively, versus 30% of patients in the placebo group (P < or = 0.001 for each comparison). At week 52, ACR20 responses were achieved by 59% and 55% of patients taking adalimumab 40 mg every other week and 20 mg weekly, respectively, versus 24% of patients taking placebo (P < or = 0.001 for each comparison). At week 52, physical function as measured by the HAQ demonstrated statistically significant improvement with adalimumab 40 mg every other week and 20 mg weekly compared with placebo (mean change in HAQ score -0.59 and -0.61, respectively, versus -0.25; P < or = 0.001 for each comparison). A total of 467 patients (75.4%) completed 52 weeks of treatment. Adalimumab was generally well tolerated. Discontinuations occurred in 22.0% of adalimumab-treated patients and in 30.0% of placebo-treated patients. The rate of adverse events (both serious and nonserious) was comparable in the adalimumab and placebo groups, although the proportion of patients reporting serious infections was higher in patients receiving adalimumab (3.8%) than in those receiving placebo (0.5%) (P < or = 0.02), and was highest in the patients receiving 40 mg every other week. CONCLUSION: In this 52-week trial, adalimumab was more effective than placebo at inhibiting the progression of structural joint damage, reducing the signs and symptoms, and improving physical function in patients with active RA who had demonstrated an incomplete response to MTX.
15039494 Improvement in health utility among patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalim 2004 Jun OBJECTIVES: To compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL), as measured by health utility, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with adalimumab (a human anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) monoclonal antibody) plus methotrexate or placebo plus methotrexate. METHODS: HRQoL data were obtained in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multidose clinical trials conducted in the United States and Canada. The Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) was administered in both studies at baseline, at the end of the study and at two time points in between. Patients' HUI3 scores were compared with population norm scores. Change in HUI3 was defined as the end-of-study score minus the baseline score. Utility gained throughout the study was measured by area under the utility curve and expressed as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Statistical testing adjusted for confounders and used the Dunnett test to account for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: Patients' utility scores at baseline were low (range of treatment group means 0.38-0.44) compared with population norms (0.88). HUI3 mean changes from baseline scores for adalimumab-treated patients were 0.22 and 0.21 in the two trials, whereas placebo patients' changes were 0.04 and 0.07. The rate of QALYs gained per year in the treatment group compared with the placebo group were 0.145 in the ARMADA trial and 0.104 in the DE019 trial. All gains were clinically important and statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with adalimumab plus methotrexate provides clinically important and statistically significant improvements in HRQoL as measured by health utility in patients with RA. This translates into measurable and important gains in QALYs.
15154871 Filtration leukocytapheresis therapy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis patients res 2004 Jun Filtration leukocytapheresis (LCP) is a treatment for abnormal autoimmune states, which removes responsible leukocytes from the peripheral blood. To examine the efficacy of LCP therapy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), nine patients were selected, who were either resistant to methotrexate, or failed with methotrexate due to drug ineffectiveness or adverse side effects. For these patients, LCP therapy was performed once a week for five weeks. After five LCP treatments, the patients were observed for 12 weeks, to test the efficacy of the treatment. The definition of improvement given by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR core set) was used for efficacy evaluation of LCP therapy. As the result, 77.8% of the patients showed an ACR 20% response and 44.4% of the patients showed an ACR 50% response. With improvement of joint symptoms, IL-6 was significantly decreased at 8 weeks and 12 weeks after the treatment. The expression of adhesion molecules CD11a, CD11b, and CD18 on granulocytes decreased directly after the LCP treatment. No adverse side effect was monitored during the study period. These results indicates that LCP treatment is a useful treatment for RA patients who were resistant to methotrexate, or failed with methotrexate due to ineffectiveness or side effects of the drug.
14532140 Comparison of the efficacy of the tumour necrosis factor alpha blocking agents adalimumab, 2003 Nov OBJECTIVE: To determine, using the method of adjusted indirect comparisons, whether there are differences in efficacy of tumour necrosis factor (TNF alpha) blocking agents, as measured by the rate ratios for American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20, 50, and 70 responses, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with an incomplete response to methotrexate. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify placebo controlled trials of 24-30 weeks' duration of combination therapy that used a step-up approach with the addition of TNF alpha blocking agents to methotrexate. The method of "adjusted indirect comparisons" was used to compare results across trials to determine the relative risk for an ACR20 or 50 response. RESULTS: Placebo controlled trials for adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab provided data on ACR20 and 50 responses. Both the similarity of demographic and disease characteristics of patients at entry, and the homogeneity of response rates in the placebo groups across trials, suggested that comparing results across trials was valid. The relative risk for obtaining an ACR20 and 50 response derived from the adjusted indirect comparisons of the TNF alpha blocking agents did not significantly differ from unity. CONCLUSION: The analysis showed that the three currently marketed TNF alpha blocking agents have similarly efficacy when added to methotrexate in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis with active disease.
total：9168 literature First Prev 5 pages 8687888990 Next 5 pages Last