Browse

Search for: rheumatoid arthritis    methotrexate    autoimmune disease    biomarker    gene expression    GWAS    HLA genes    non-HLA genes   

ID PMID Title PublicationDate abstract
16014674 Vaccination against influenza in rheumatoid arthritis: the effect of disease modifying dru 2006 Feb OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of vaccination against influenza virus in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, with special emphasis on the effect of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) blockers. METHODS: 82 rheumatoid patients and 30 healthy controls were vaccinated with a split-virion inactivated vaccine containing 15 mug haemagglutinin (HA) per dose of each of B/Hong Kong/330/2001 (HK), A/Panama/2007/99 (PAN), and A/New Caledonian/20/99 (NC). Disease activity was assessed by tender and swollen joint count, morning stiffness, evaluation of pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire, ESR, and C reactive protein on the day of vaccination and six weeks later. Haemagglutination inhibiting (HI) antibodies were tested by a standard WHO procedure. Response was defined as a fourfold or more rise in HI antibodies six weeks after vaccination, or seroconversion in patients with a non-protective baseline level of antibodies (<1/40). Geometric mean titres (GMT) were calculated to assess the immunity of the whole group. RESULTS: Six weeks after vaccination, a significant increase in GMT for each antigen was observed in both groups, this being higher in the healthy group for HK (p=0.004). The percentage of responders was lower in rheumatoid patients than healthy controls (significant for HK). The percentage of responders was not affected by prednisone or any DMARD, including methotrexate, infliximab, and etanercept. Indices of disease activity remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Influenza virus vaccine generated a good humoral response in rheumatoid patients, although lower than in healthy controls. The response was not affected by the use of prednisone or DMARDs.
18534016 The human anti-IL-1 beta monoclonal antibody ACZ885 is effective in joint inflammation mod 2008 INTRODUCTION: IL-1beta is a proinflammatory cytokine driving joint inflammation as well as systemic signs of inflammation, such as fever and acute phase protein production. METHODS: ACZ885, a fully human monoclonal antibody that neutralizes the bioactivity of human IL-1beta, was generated to study the potent and long-lasting neutralization of IL-1beta in mechanistic animal models as well as in a proof-of-concept study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). RESULTS: The mouse IL-1 receptor cross-reacts with human IL-1beta, and it was demonstrated that ACZ885 can completely suppress IL-1beta-mediated joint inflammation and cartilage destruction in mice. This observation prompted us to study the safety, tolerability and pharmacodynamic activity of ACZ885 in RA patients in a small proof-of-concept study--the first to be conducted in humans. Patients with active RA despite treatment with stable doses of methotrexate were enrolled in this dose escalation study. The first 32 patients were split into four cohorts of eight patients each (six were randomly assigned to active treatment and two to placebo). ACZ885 doses were 0.3, 1, 3 and 10 mg/kg, administered intravenously on days 1 and 15. To explore efficacy within 6 weeks of treatment, an additional 21 patients were randomly assigned to the 10 mg/kg cohort, resulting in a total of 20 patients dosed with 10 mg/kg and 15 patients treated with placebo. There was clinical improvement (American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria) at week 6 in the 10 mg/kg treatment group; however, this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.085). A statistically significant reduction in disease activity score was observed after 4 weeks in the 10 mg/kg group. Onset of action was rapid, because most responders exhibited improvement in their symptoms within the first 3 weeks. C-reactive protein levels decreased in patients treated with ACZ885 within 1 week. ACZ885 was well tolerated. Three patients receiving ACZ885 developed infectious episodes that required treatment. No anti-ACZ885 antibodies were detected during the study. CONCLUSION: ACZ885 administration to methotrexate-refractory patients resulted in clinical improvement in a subset of patients. Additional studies to characterize efficacy in RA and to determine the optimal dose regimen appear warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00619905.
16573354 Spotlight on infliximab in Crohn disease and rheumatoid arthritis. 2006 Infliximab (Remicade) is a chimeric monoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha that has shown efficacy in Crohn disease and rheumatoid arthritis with a disease-modifying activity and rapid onset of action. It is administered intravenously, generally in a schedule with initial infusions at 0, 2, and 6 weeks, followed by administration once every 8 weeks. Infliximab is effective in the treatment of patients with moderately to severely active Crohn disease with an inadequate response to other treatment options or those with fistulizing disease. In combination with methotrexate, infliximab reduced signs and symptoms and delayed disease progression in patients with active, methotrexate-refractory rheumatoid arthritis and in those with early disease. The drug was generally well tolerated. Recrudescence of tuberculosis infection and worsening of heart failure and demyelinating disease are among some of the concerns with anti-TNFalpha therapy, requiring cautious use of these agents in high-risk patients. Current data suggest that infliximab may be cost effective, especially when long-term clinical outcomes and burden of the diseases are taken into account. More robust, prospective pharmacoeconomic studies are required to better ascertain the cost effectiveness of infliximab. Direct head-to-head comparative trials of infliximab with other biological agents are not yet available and would be helpful in determining with greater certainty the place of infliximab in the management of these diseases. Nonetheless, infliximab, like other biological agents, is a valuable treatment option in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn disease (including fistulizing disease) or rheumatoid arthritis (including early disease).
16504996 Power Doppler sonography monitoring of synovial perfusion at the wrist joints in patients 2006 Nov OBJECTIVE: To use power Doppler sonography (PDS) to evaluate changes in synovial perfusion induced by adalimumab in the wrist joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: 48 wrists of 24 patients (18 women and 6 men) were examined. Despite prior treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, including methotrexate, patients with clinically active rheumatoid arthritis were recruited in two rheumatological centres to receive 40 mg adalimumab subcutaneously every other week. Clinical, laboratory and PDS assessments were carried out at 0, 2, 6 and 12 weeks. Clinical and laboratory measurements of disease activity included physician's global assessment of disease activity, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and serum levels of C reactive protein. The Disease Activity Score for 28 joints (DAS28) was calculated. PDS signal was scored from 0 to 3 according to the overall expression of PDS findings at the wrists. RESULTS: A significant reduction in both clinical (p<0.001) and PDS findings (p<0.001) was found at all follow-up examinations. A tendency to positive correlation (Spearman's r = 0.382; p = 0.067) was shown between reduction in PDS score and improvement in DAS28 at week 2 examination. CONCLUSION: PDS detected a rapid and significant reduction in synovial perfusion at the wrist joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving adalimumab. Ongoing follow-up will provide further information regarding the persistence of considerable reduction in PDS signal score and its correlation with DAS28.
16690341 Cardiovascular risk and rheumatoid arthritis: clinical practice guidelines based on publis 2006 Jul OBJECTIVE: To develop clinical practice guidelines for the evaluation and management of cardiovascular risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), using the evidence-based approach and expert opinion. METHODS: Recommendations were developed using the evidence-based approach and expert opinion: A scientific committee used a Delphi procedure to select five questions, which formed the basis for developing the recommendations; Evidence providing answers to the five questions was sought in the literature; Based on this evidence, recommendations were developed by a panel of experts. RESULTS: The recommendations were as follows: 1) In patients with RA, attention should be given to the risk of cardiovascular disease, which is responsible for an excess burden of morbidity and mortality; 2) It must be recognized that RA may be an independent cardiovascular risk factor. Persistent inflammation is an additional risk factor; 3) The cardiovascular risk should be evaluated, and modifiable risk factors should be corrected; 4) In patients with RA requiring glucocorticoid therapy, the need for cardiovascular risk minimization is among the reasons that mandate the use of the minimal effective dose; 5) It should be recognized that methotrexate may protect against cardiovascular mortality in patients with RA; 6) It should be recognized that TNFalpha antagonists remain contraindicated in patients with RA and severe heart failure. TNFalpha antagonists do not seem to worsen moderate heart failure and may protect against cardiovascular mortality; 7) AFSSAPS recommendations about LDL-cholesterol objectives should be followed, with active RA being counted as a cardiovascular risk factor; 8) In patients with RA, statin therapy should be considered only when cholesterol levels are elevated despite appropriate dietary treatment; 9) RA per se does not indicate aspirin for primary prevention. When aspirin is used for secondary prevention, it should be recognized that concomitant treatment with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may decrease the antiplatelet effects and increase the gastrointestinal side effects of aspirin therapy.
18260176 The risk of hospitalized infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. 2008 Mar OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at increased risk of hospitalized infection and whether the risk varies by RA treatment. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from a medical and pharmacy claims managed-care database from 1999 to 2006. A total of 24,530 patients were included in the RA cohort; a random sample of non-RA patients served as a comparison cohort (n = 500,000). Rates of hospitalized infection were compared between the cohorts. A nested case-control analysis was performed within the RA cohort to assess the effect of current RA medication use on hospitalized infection risk. RESULTS: A total of 1,993 patients with RA and 11,977 non-RA patients experienced a hospitalized infection. The rate of first hospitalized infection was higher in the RA cohort [adjusted hazard ratio = 2.03; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.93-2.13]. In the case-control analysis, the current use of biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) was associated with slightly increased risk of hospitalized infection [rate ratio (RR) = 1.21; 95% CI 1.02-1.43]. Methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine were associated with decreased risk. Oral corticosteroid use increased risk (RR = 1.92; 95% CI 1.67-2.21), and there was a dose-related effect [< or = 5 mg/day: RR = 1.32 (95% CI 1.06-1.63), 6-10 mg/day: RR = 1.94 (95% CI 1.53-2.46), > 10 mg/day: RR = 2.98 (95% CI 2.41-3.69)]. CONCLUSION: These data confirm that individuals with RA are at increased risk of hospitalized infection compared to those without RA. Oral corticosteroid use was associated with a dose-related increase. Biological DMARD use was associated with slightly elevated risk; however, this may reflect confounding and channeling bias.
16758511 Cost-effectiveness analysis of MTHFR polymorphism screening by polymerase chain reaction i 2006 Jul OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a strategy based on methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) genotype screening is more cost-effective than the conventional strategy in reducing the risk of methotrexate (MTX)-related toxicity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We consecutively enrolled 385 patients with RA (355 female, 30 male) who had received MTX and identified toxicity associated with MTHFR C677T genotypes. We designed a hypothetical decision model to compare the genotype-based strategy with the conventional strategy. The time horizon was set as 1 year, and direct medical costs were used. The measured outcomes were the total expected cost, the effectiveness, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. RESULTS: MTHFR genotype distribution revealed 133 patients (34.6%) with 677CC, 193 (50.1%) with 677CT, and 59 (15.3%) with 677TT. A total of 154 patients (40.0%) exhibited MTX-related toxicity. Compared to RA patients with the CC genotype, the odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for risk of toxicity was 3.8 (2.29-6.33) for the CT genotype, and 4.7 (2.40-9.04) for the TT genotype. In the base-case model, the total expected cost and the probability of continuing MTX medication for the conventional and genotype-based strategies were 851,415 Korean won (710 US dollars) and 788,664 Korean won (658 US dollars), and 94.03% and 95.58%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The MTHFR C677T polymorphism may be an important predictor of MTX-related toxicity in patients with RA. The cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that the genotype-based strategy is both less costly and more effective than the conventional strategy for MTX therapy.
17404734 Transcription regulatory polymorphism -43T>C in the 5'-flanking region of SLC19A1 gene cou 2007 Sep The reduced folate carrier (RFC) protein (SLC19A1-gene) has central role in the uptake and intracellular accumulation of folates. In this respect, we investigate whether SLC19A1 genetic variations could affect rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patient response to antifolate treatment. One hundred six unrelated RA patients were enrolled in this study. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) was used as the screening method for genetic variants. Unusual SSCP patterns were characterized by direct sequencing of the PCR products and subsequently restriction assays were established. Western blot analysis of RFC protein was performed in respect of the identified SLC19A1 genotypes. Patient response to methotrexate (MTX) was evaluated using disease activity for 28 joint indices score, American College of Rheumatology 20% and 50% scores. No mutation was found in the SLC19A1 gene, but three polymorphic variants: the -43T>C in the 5'-flanking sequence to the ATG-transcription start site; and the 80G>A (R27H) and 696C>T (P232P) in the coding gene sequence. The wild type alleles of the three polymorphisms were in strict linkage disequilibrium. Western blot analysis revealed that the non-wild type allele of polymorphism -43T>C is associated with low RFC protein expression levels. Furthermore, the genotypic analysis of the functional polymorphic variant -43T>C revealed to be insufficient to predict patient response to MTX therapy. According to recent literature, several transport systems account for folate membrane transport. Additionally, in previous studies discrepancies have been reported to exist between the same genetic variants and their use in prediction of patient response to MTX therapy. Therefore, the present genotypic-phenotypic association study of a functional polymorphism revealed the need of a complex genotypic analysis in order to predict patient response to folate antagonists' therapy.
16463431 Splitting high-dose oral methotrexate improves bioavailability: a pharmacokinetic study in 2006 Mar OBJECTIVE: To study the bioavailability of a divided higher oral dose of methotrexate (MTX), in comparison to a single dose, in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A pharmacokinetic analysis was performed in 10 patients with RA taking a stable dose (25-35 mg weekly) of MTX. Separated by one week, a pharmacokinetic analysis was performed in each patient after an oral single dose, and after an equal but split dose separated by 8 hours. MTX serum concentrations were measured by a fluorescence polarization immunoassay technique. Analysis was performed by calculation of the area under the curve (AUC) by the trapezoidal rule and by means of an iterative 2-stage Bayesian population procedure, obtaining population and individual pharmacokinetic parameters. For the population analysis, data from 15 patients in our previous study comparing oral and subcutaneous administration of MTX were also used. RESULTS: The median MTX dose was 30 mg weekly (range 25-35 mg). The bioavailability of the split dose was 28% higher compared to the single dose (p = 0.007). In the population pharmacokinetic modeling, a 2-compartment model best described the serum MTX concentration versus time curves. The mean bioavailability after single-dose and split-dose MTX was 0.76 and 0.90, respectively, compared to subcutaneous administration. There was a statistically significant difference in the bioavailability of the 2 oral administration regimens (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: The bioavailability of oral higher dose MTX in adult patients with RA can be improved by splitting the dose.
17334338 Drug insight: Anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy for inflammatory arthropathies during rep 2007 Mar Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists are widely used to reduce disease activity and joint damage, and to improve health-related quality of life in patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, or psoriatic arthritis. To date, no increased risk of embryotoxicity or teratogenicity, or adverse pregnancy outcome (such as birth defects, premature birth, and low birth weight) has been reported in patients with inflammatory arthropathies treated with anti-TNF therapy, compared with the general population. However, the available data are limited, and methotrexate, which is commonly used in combination with anti-TNF drugs, is teratogenic. Until more data are available, no firm conclusions can be reached regarding the safety of anti-TNF therapy in pregnancy. Nevertheless, in selected cases where there is high disease activity, anti-TNF therapy might be recommended, depending on the results of individual risk-benefit analyses. Fully informed consent from the mother is needed in such cases. Anti-TNF agents are not usually used during lactation, although the risk of toxicity is probably negligible.
18325087 Cardiovascular disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the QUEST-RA st 2008 INTRODUCTION: We analyzed the prevalence of cardiovascular (CV) disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and its association with traditional CV risk factors, clinical features of RA, and the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in a multinational cross-sectional cohort of nonselected consecutive outpatients with RA (The Questionnaires in Standard Monitoring of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Program, or QUEST-RA) who were receiving regular clinical care. METHODS: The study involved a clinical assessment by a rheumatologist and a self-report questionnaire by patients. The clinical assessment included a review of clinical features of RA and exposure to DMARDs over the course of RA. Comorbidities were recorded; CV morbidity included myocardial infarction, angina, coronary disease, coronary bypass surgery, and stroke. Traditional risk factors recorded were hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, smoking, physical inactivity, and body mass index. Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence interval [CI]) for CV morbidity were calculated using Cox proportional hazard regression models. RESULTS: Between January 2005 and October 2006, the QUEST-RA project included 4,363 patients from 48 sites in 15 countries; 78% were female, more than 90% were Caucasian, and the mean age was 57 years. The prevalence for lifetime CV events in the entire sample was 3.2% for myocardial infarction, 1.9% for stroke, and 9.3% for any CV event. The prevalence for CV risk factors was 32% for hypertension, 14% for hyperlipidemia, 8% for diabetes, 43% for ever-smoking, 73% for physical inactivity, and 18% for obesity. Traditional risk factors except obesity and physical inactivity were significantly associated with CV morbidity. There was an association between any CV event and age and male gender and between extra-articular disease and myocardial infarction. Prolonged exposure to methotrexate (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.81 to 0.89), leflunomide (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.79), sulfasalazine (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.87 to 0.98), glucocorticoids (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.92 to 0.98), and biologic agents (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.81; P < 0.05) was associated with a reduction of the risk of CV morbidity; analyses were adjusted for traditional risk factors and countries. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, prolonged use of treatments such as methotrexate, sulfasalazine, leflunomide, glucocorticoids, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha blockers appears to be associated with a reduced risk of CV disease. In addition to traditional risk factors, extra-articular disease was associated with the occurrence of myocardial infarction in patients with RA.
18565255 Methotrexate selectively modulates TH1/TH2 balance in active rheumatoid arthritis patients 2008 Mar OBJECTIVE: The mechanism by which low dose methotrexate (MTX, the gold standard treatment for rheumatoid arthritis) exerts its anti-inflammatory effect in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients is still debated. Lately, the MTX immunosuppressive effect has been related to apoptosis, especially in active RA patients, with ROS involvement. METHODS: In the present research we investigated MTX oxidative effect and its ability to modulate immune balance in active versus non-active RA patients. RESULTS: Our results show that MTX induces IL-10 secretion (a TH2 cytokine) and significantly reduces TH1 profile in Peripheral Mononuclear Cells (PMNC) derived from active RA patients (n=28). Additionally, we found that MTX modulates the immune status towards TH2 dominance by decreasing the IL-12R and the CXCR3 receptors typical for the TH1 population. Moreover, MTX was found to inhibit the production of nitric oxide (NO) in these patients, a phenomenon that might contribute to MTX action toward cytokine homeostasis. A significant correlation was found between MTX IL-10 induction and NO inhibition in active RA patients. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that, in active RA patients, apoptosis induction by MTX may be primarily due to IL-10 production via modulation of oxidative stress, which may restore the critically important immune balance. These findings may contribute to determining which group of RA patients may better respond to MTX therapy.
16652417 Controlled trial of methotrexate versus CH-1504 in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. 2006 May OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical efficacy, safety, tolerability, and toxicity profile of a metabolically stable antifolate, CH-1504, compared to methotrexate (MTX) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A 24-week open-label trial of MTX and CH-1504 was performed in 20 patients with RA. RESULTS: Improvements in clinical and laboratory indicators were observed in both study groups. Improvement in the CH-1504 group was greater than in the MTX group. Both treatments were generally well tolerated; however, the liver function test abnormalities and gastrointestinal related adverse events expected with this class of medication were not seen with CH-1504. CONCLUSION: CH-1504 appears to be clinically efficacious and may possess a superior safety and tolerance profile compared to MTX.
17642239 [Targeting CD20 in rheumatoid arthritis]. 2007 Jul Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by severe synovitis and bone destruction. Although anti-rheumatic drugs including methotrexate along with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocker markedly improved the disease activity, the treatment for the patients who failed to TNF blockers still has not been established. Recent clinical trials with CD20 antibody(rituximab and HuMax-CD20) provide sufficient evidence of excellent tolerability and high efficacy of therapy in refractory RA. A single course of rituximab, which is a genetically engineered chimeric murine variable regions/human IgG1 anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, with concomitant MTX therapy provided significant and clinically meaningful improvements in disease activity in patients with active, longstanding RA who had an inadequate response to one or more anti-TNF therapies.
17642250 [Induction of malignant neoplasm]. 2007 Jul Anti -rheumatic drugs are classified to immunosuppressive drugs/immunisation adjustment drugs/biological drugs. The induction of malignant neoplasm by biological drugs having tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitory action has been concerned about, and various epidemiological studies have been done. It has been shown that methotrexate could induce a malignant lymphoma in patients with rheumatoid arthritis at time. With regard to malignant neoplasm induction by biological drugs, there are some reports to suggest the risk, but there are many problems about accuracy of statistics. In this paper, epidemiological analyses which refer to the risk of complications or induction of malignant neoplasm by methotrexate and biological drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, has been reviewed.
18344640 Eosinophilic pneumonia (EP) associated with rheumatoid arthritis in which drug-induced eos 2008 A 72 year-old man. He was diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis in 2002. In January 2005 he noted productive cough and fever; he was diagnosed as eosinophilic pneumonia (EP). We discontinued administration of bucillamine and methotrexate and started to treat with oral prednisolone 30 mg daily. To rule out drug-induced EP, prednisolone was tapered by 10 mg per week. Consolidation occurred in the right lower lobe when prednisolone was decreased to 5 mg daily. After increasing the dose of prednisolone to 30 mg daily again, consolidation was promptly resolved. It was considered to be important to rule out drug-induced EP.
17301106 Clinical response to adalimumab: relationship to anti-adalimumab antibodies and serum adal 2007 Jul BACKGROUND: A substantial proportion of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) do not respond, or lose initial response, to adalimumab treatment. One explanation for non-response is that patients develop anti-adalimumab antibodies. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence of formation of antibody against adalimumab and the association with serum adalimumab concentrations and clinical response. METHODS: In a cohort of 121 consecutive patients with RA treated with adalimumab, serum adalimumab concentrations and antibodies against adalimumab were measured together with clinical response variables before and up to 28 weeks after the start of treatment. RESULTS: Anti-adalimumab antibodies were detected in 21 patients (17%) during 28 weeks of treatment. EULAR non-responders had antibodies significantly more often than good responders (34% vs 5%; p = 0.032). Patients with antibodies showed less improvement in disease activity (mean (SD) delta DAS28 0.65 (1.35)) than patients without antibodies (mean delta DAS28 1.70 (1.35)) (p = 0.001). Patients with antibodies during follow-up had lower serum adalimumab concentrations at 28 weeks than patients without antibodies (median 1.2 mg/l, range 0.0-5.6 vs median 11.0 mg/l, range 2.0-33.0, respectively; p<0.001). Good responders had higher serum adalimumab concentrations than moderate responders (p = 0.021) and non-responders (p = 0.001). Concomitant methotrexate use was lower in the group with anti-adalimumab antibodies (52%) than in the group without antibodies (84%) (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Serum antibodies against adalimumab are associated with lower serum adalimumab concentrations and non-response to adalimumab treatment.
18854885 [Sustained response to infliximab treatment in two cases of early rheumatoid arthritis tha 2008 Jul The authors report two cases of active seropositive rheumatoid arthritis who were treated in an early phase of the disease with infliximab plus methotrexate obtaining a clinical remission. The benefit was maintained after the discontinuation of the anti-TNF alpha inhibitor for adverse events, indicating that the early administration of the drug may be followed by a sustained remission.
18501101 Incidence of lymphoma in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of the li 2008 Apr To our knowledge, this review is the most broad and only systematic survey to date of the rheumatology, oncology, and epidemiology literature to determine the prevalence of lymphoma in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This survey is analyzed to determine whether the association between RA and increased lymphoma risk is a result of the risks conferred by medications used to treat RA or a result of the disease itself. PubMed was searched for articles from 1964 to May 2007 using the Medical Subject Heading terms "arthritis, rheumatoid, and lymphoma." Twenty-six studies met inclusion and exclusion criteria and are included for review. Most studies confirmed an approximate 2-fold increase in lymphoma incidence in patients with RA. Contrary to a widely held belief about medication toxicity in RA, most studies did not reveal a statistically significant increased risk of lymphoma with methotrexate or azathioprine. An increased lymphoma incidence with tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors was suggested; however, follow-up in the studies considered was too short to definitively determine increased risk. Most studies differed in which medications they evaluated in determining their impact on lymphoma risk, making studies difficult to compare. Confounding by disease severity (patients with the most severe disease are treated with the strongest medications) in most studies makes the association between lymphoma risk and medications and/or disease severity difficult to assess. Recent work suggests that it is the disease itself, not its treatment, that is associated with increased risk of lymphoma in patients with RA.
18025440 Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and harms of disease-modifying medications fo 2008 Jan 15 BACKGROUND: The comparative effectiveness of rheumatoid arthritis therapies is uncertain. PURPOSE: To compare the benefits and harms of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for adults with rheumatoid arthritis. DATA SOURCES: Records limited to the English language and studies of adults were identified by using MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts from 1980 to September 2007. STUDY SELECTION: Two persons independently selected relevant head-to-head trials and prospective cohort studies with at least 100 participants and 12-week follow-up and relevant good- or fair-quality meta-analyses that compared benefits or harms of 11 drug therapies. For harms, they included retrospective cohort studies. DATA EXTRACTION: Information on study design, interventions, outcomes, and quality were extracted according to a standard protocol. DATA SYNTHESIS: Head-to-head trials (n = 23), mostly examining synthetic DMARDs, showed no clinically important differences in efficacy among synthetic DMARDs (limited to methotrexate, leflunomide, and sulfasalazine) or among anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs (adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab). Monotherapy with anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs resulted in better radiographic outcomes than did methotrexate but no important differences in clinical outcomes (for example, 20%, 50%, or 70% improvement according to American College of Rheumatology response criteria). Various combinations of biological DMARDs plus methotrexate improved clinical response rates and functional outcomes more than monotherapy with either methotrexate or biological DMARDs. In patients whose monotherapy failed, combination therapy with synthetic DMARDs improved response rates. Numbers and types of short-term adverse events were similar for biological and synthetic DMARDs. The evidence was insufficient to draw conclusions about differences for rare but serious adverse events for biological DMARDs. LIMITATION: Most studies were short-term efficacy trials conducted in selected populations with few comorbid conditions. CONCLUSION: Limited available comparative evidence does not support one monotherapy over another for adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Although combination therapy is more effective for patients whose monotherapy fails, the evidence is insufficient to draw firm conclusions about whether one combination or treatment strategy is better than another or is the best treatment for early rheumatoid arthritis.