Search for: rheumatoid arthritis methotrexate autoimmune disease biomarker gene expression GWAS HLA genes non-HLA genes
ID | PMID | Title | PublicationDate | abstract |
---|---|---|---|---|
17326817 | Patients with early rheumatoid arthritis exhibit elevated autoantibody titers against mild | 2007 | Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disease, associated with an excess of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality due to accelerated atherosclerosis. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL), the antibodies against oxLDL and the lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) may play important roles in inflammation and atherosclerosis. We investigated the plasma levels of oxLDL and Lp-PLA2 activity as well as the autoantibody titers against mildly oxLDL in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA). The long-term effects of immunointervention on these parameters in patients with active disease were also determined. Fifty-eight ERA patients who met the American College of Rheumatology criteria were included in the study. Patients were treated with methotrexate and prednisone. Sixty-three apparently healthy volunteers also participated in the study and served as controls. Three different types of mildly oxLDL were prepared at the end of the lag, propagation and decomposition phases of oxidation. The serum autoantibody titers of the IgG type against all types of oxLDL were determined by an ELISA method. The plasma levels of oxLDL and the Lp-PLA2 activity were determined by an ELISA method and by the trichloroacetic acid precipitation procedure, respectively. At baseline, ERA patients exhibited elevated autoantibody titers against all types of mildly oxLDL as well as low activity of the total plasma Lp-PLA2 and the Lp-PLA2 associated with the high-density lipoprotein, compared with controls. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the elevated autoantibody titers towards oxLDL at the end of the decomposition phase of oxidation and the low plasma Lp-PLA2 activity are independently associated with ERA. After immunointervention autoantibody titers against all types of oxLDL were decreased in parallel to the increase in high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein-Lp-PLA2 activity. We conclude that elevated autoantibody titers against oxLDL at the end of the decomposition phase of oxidation and low plasma Lp-PLA2 activity are feature characteristics of patients with ERA, suggesting an important role of these parameters in the pathophysiology of ERA as well as in the accelerated atherosclerosis observed in these patients. | |
17654684 | Remission of lymphoma after withdrawal of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis: relationsh | 2007 Dec | Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with an increased risk of developing lymphoma. Although the pathogenesis is still unclear, the increased risk appears to be related to the high inflammatory activity of RA, immunosuppressive agents, or Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. We investigated the relationship between EBV latent infection and methotrexate (MTX)-associated lymphoma in RA patients. Nine patients were diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) during MTX treatment for RA in a multicenter study. The pathologic findings were consistent with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in 8 patients and peripheral T-cell lymphoma, unspecified in 1. EBV infection was detected in 3 patients by in situ hybridization. Among all 9 patients who were initially treated by MTX withdrawal alone, 2 obtained spontaneous complete response (CR), 1 had partial response, 2 had stable disease (SD), and 4 had progressive disease. Both patients who had a CR and 1 who had SD were positive for EBV. Further examination of the latent EBV infection patterns revealed that 2 patients who obtained a CR had latency Type III, and the other with SD had latency Type II. These results demonstrate that immunodeficiency caused by MTX treatment is associated with the development of EBV-related NHL in RA patients. In patients who were treated by MTX for RA and developed NHL, remission can be observed following MTX withdrawal especially in NHL with latency Type III EBV infection. The analysis of EBV infection, including the latency types, is useful to decide the optimum therapeutic strategy. | |
17114801 | Influenza vaccination as model for testing immune modulation induced by anti-TNF and metho | 2007 Apr | OBJECTIVES: To compare serological response to influenza vaccine in patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with tumour necrosis factor (TNF) blockers and/or methotrexate (MTX) and controls. METHODS: Altogether, 149 patients with RA and 18 healthy subjects were vaccinated. Fifty patients were treated with TNF blockers (etanercept or infliximab) in combination with MTX (TNF blockers + MTX), while 62 patients received TNF blockers alone or with other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (TNF blockers without MTX). Thirty-seven patients were treated with MTX without TNF blockers (MTX). Vaccination was performed with trivalent vaccine (Influvax or Vaxigrip) both containing 15 microg haemagglutination inhibition (HI) of each of two A strains (H1N1 and H3N2) and one of B strains (B1 or B2). Serum samples were collected prior to and 4-6 weeks after vaccination and titrated against all four strains using HI assay. A positive immune response was defined as > or =4-fold increase compared with pre-vaccination titre levels. A titre > or =40 was considered protective. Pre- and post-vaccination geometric mean titres (GMT) were compared. RESULTS: Post-vaccination titre levels increased significantly in all groups, also reflected by high frequencies of positive immune responders. A positive immune response to combinations of all strains was significantly better for the MTX group. Individuals with protective levels before vaccination responded less well as a group. CONCLUSIONS: RA patients treated with MTX without TNF blockers had significantly better serological response to influenza vaccination compared with those receiving TNF blockers alone or in combination with MTX and/or other DMARDs. However, the immune response is sufficiently large to warrant influenza vaccination to all RA patients regardless of treatment. | |
16465653 | Safety and efficacy of etanercept treatment in elderly subjects with rheumatoid arthritis. | 2006 Feb | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate safety and efficacy of etanercept treatment in elderly (age > or = 65 yrs) and younger adult subjects (age < 65 yrs) with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Subset analyses were used to describe the safety and efficacy of etanercept in elderly and younger subjects treated for early and disease modifying antirheumatic drug-resistant or late-stage RA (ERA and LRA) in one of 4 randomized controlled clinical studies (N = 1353) or 2 longterm extensions (N = 1049). RESULTS: Rates of serious adverse events tended to be higher in elderly than younger subjects; however, rates of safety events observed in elderly etanercept-treated subjects did not exceed rates in elderly placebo or methotrexate (MTX)-treated subjects. With regard to efficacy measures [American College of Rheumatology 20% response (ACR20), ACR50, and ACR70], elderly subjects tended to have somewhat less robust responses to treatment than younger subjects. However, for both age groups, treatment with etanercept resulted in improved efficacy and function compared with control treatment, and combination therapy with etanercept plus MTX resulted in greater efficacy than either etanercept or MTX used alone. Efficacy responses of elderly subjects were sustained for up to 6 years. Radiographic progression (measured using modified Sharp Score) after one year of treatment was lower in subjects treated with both etanercept and MTX compared with subjects treated with either agent used alone, and this pattern was similar in both age groups. CONCLUSION: Consistent with responses in younger subjects, elderly subjects with RA treated with etanercept experienced significant improvement in disease activity and function without incurring additional safety concerns. | |
16393444 | Real-world effectiveness of select biologic and DMARD monotherapy and combination therapy | 2006 Jan | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of select biologics, methotrexate (MTX), and other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in the management of adult rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in routine clinical practice. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: RADIUS (Rheumatoid Arthritis DMARD Intervention and Utilization Study) comprises two prospective, 5-year, observational registries of over 10 000 patients. Over 4600 patients who initiated MTX or a biologic regimen (etanercept [ETN], infliximab [INF], ETN + MTX, and INF + MTX) and who had at least one on-regimen, follow-up evaluation, were included in this analysis. Adalimumab was not included because it had not yet received FDA approval at RADIUS initiation. Other common DMARD regimens (N = 762) were also compared with MTX. Patients who initiated less commonly used regimens, such as anakinra or cyclosporine, and those who did not have at least one on-regimen, follow-up evaluation, were not eligible for this analysis. Because ESR/CRP measurements were often not available, a modified ACR20 response (mACR20), defined as three out of four response criteria excluding ESR/CRP, was used to assess response at 12 months. Logistic regression analysis was performed to control for baseline covariates that may affect outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a mACR20 response at 12 months post-RADIUS entry. RESULTS: After adjusting for baseline covariates, patients receiving either ETN + MTX or ETN monotherapy were more likely to achieve a mACR20 response at 12 months than patients receiving MTX alone (odds ratio [OR] 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.52; p < 0.01 and OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02-1.47; p < 0.05, respectively). Conversely, patients treated with MTX + leflunomide (LEF) were less likely to achieve a mACR20 response than those receiving MTX alone (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.96; p < 0.05). Significant differences were not observed between patients receiving MTX alone and either INF + MTX, MTX + hydroxychloroquine, MTX + hydroxychloroquine + sulfasalazine, INF monotherapy, or LEF monotherapy. CONCLUSION: These data from routine rheumatology clinical practice settings highlight the effectiveness of common biologic and DMARD therapies, and provide additional data beyond those of randomized, controlled trials. | |
18535115 | Improvements in clinical response between 12 and 24 weeks in patients with rheumatoid arth | 2008 Oct | BACKGROUND: Whereas many patients respond quickly to treatment with tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, some patients may experience significant but delayed responses. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical response between 12 and 24 weeks in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis from the Trial of Etanercept and Methotrexate with Radiographic Patient Outcomes. METHODS: Clinical response was assessed at 24 weeks in 12-week non-responders, according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria. The proportion of subjects who successfully maintained response to 52 weeks was analysed, as were radiographic outcomes. RESULTS: Data from 682 subjects were included in the analysis. Non and partial responders in all three groups (etanercept, methotrexate and etanercept plus methotrexate) at week 12 showed an improvement in responses at week 24. Over 80% of the week 24 ACR20/50/70 responders in the etanercept plus methotrexate arm sustained their response to 52 weeks. In the etanercept arms, a delayed clinical response was not associated with increased radiographic progression at week 52. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of non and partial responders to etanercept with or without methotrexate therapy at week 12 achieved a good clinical response or improved their overall clinical response at week 24. Discontinuing TNF inhibitor therapy at 12 weeks may be premature in some rheumatoid arthritis patients. | |
18388521 | Immunization of patients with rheumatoid arthritis with antitumor necrosis factor alpha th | 2008 May | PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this study is to highlight the recent findings on the use of methotrexate and/or TNFalpha-blockers in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis and their effects on the immune response to various vaccines. RECENT FINDINGS: Regarding influenza vaccination, methotrexate monotherapy is not associated with a decreased response, whereas the use of etanercept and infliximab in combination with methotrexate may cause lower titers and lower response rates. Concerning pneumococcal vaccination, methotrexate seems to impair responsiveness. The concomitant use of adalimumab and methotrexate is also associated with decreased response, whereas the concomitant use of etanercept or infliximab seems not to have an effect on response rates. As immunological pathways seem to play a major role, T-cell-dependent pneumococcal vaccines are designed to achieve higher response rates and protective titers. SUMMARY: Patients with rheumatic disorders are more likely to develop preventable infectious diseases, which underlines the importance of adequate immunoprotective titers. Several studies have shown that the combination of methotrexate and certain TNFalpha-blockers are affecting the responsiveness to vaccines. Further findings indicate that the response also depends on what type of vaccine is used. | |
17768173 | Factorial randomised controlled trial of glucocorticoids and combination disease modifying | 2008 May | OBJECTIVE: Treating early active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) monotherapy achieves incomplete outcomes and intensive treatment seems preferable. As the relative benefits of combining two DMARDs, one DMARD with glucocorticoids and two DMARDs with glucocorticoids are uncertain we defined them in a factorial trial. METHODS: A 2-year randomised double-blind factorial trial in patients with RA within 2 years of diagnosis treated with methotrexate studied the benefits of added ciclosporin, 9 months intensive prednisolone or both (triple therapy). The primary outcome was the number of patients with new erosions. Secondary outcomes included Larsen's x-ray scores, disability, quality of life and adverse events. FINDINGS: 1391 patients were screened and 467 randomised. Over 2 years 132 (28%) changed therapy and 88 (19%) were lost to follow-up. The number of patients with new erosions was reduced by nearly half by adding ciclosporin or prednisolone (p = 0.01 and 0.03); both treatments reduced increases in Larsen's x-ray scores by over 2 units (p = 0.008 and 0.003). A further reduction in erosive damage was seen with combined use of both treatments. Their effects on erosive damage appeared independent. Triple therapy reduced disability and improved quality of life compared with methotrexate; ciclosporin and prednisolone acted synergistically. More patients withdrew because of adverse events with triple therapy, without an increase in serious adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the existence of a "window of opportunity" in early RA, when intensive combination therapy produces sustained benefits on damage and disability. Although methotrexate-prednisolone combinations reduce erosive damage, the synergistic effect of two DMARDs is needed to improve quality of life. | |
17969901 | [Clinical observation on effect of total glucosides of paeony combined with methotrexate o | 2007 Sep | OBJECTIVE: To observe the effect of total glucosides of paeony (TGP) combined with methotrex-ate (MTX) on rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Two hundred and sixty patients were assigned to two groups, the treated group (180 cases) was orally administered with MTX plus TGP, and the control group (80 cases) with MTX plus sulfasalazine (SSZ). The therapeutic course for both groups was 24 weeks. The clinical effect and the indexes for RA were observed after treatment. RESULTS: The total effective rate at the 4th, 8th, 12th, 24th week of the treatment was 70%, 81%, 94%, 98% in the treated group, and 60%, 85%, 93%, 94% in the control, respectively, with insignificant difference found between the two groups (P > 0.05). Various indexes of RA were markedly improved in both two groups after treatment but the improvement in the treated group was better than that in the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: TGP combined MTX treatment shows favorable effect on RA, showing a quicker initiation with less side-effect and higher compliance. | |
16835876 | Effects of thymoquinone (volatile oil of black cumin) on rheumatoid arthritis in rat model | 2006 Oct | Many studies have been carried out in recent years on the pharmacological effects of nigella sativa seeds that have uncovered their antiinflammatory and immunological effects. The objective of this study was to explore the antiinflammatory effects of thymoquinone on arthritis in rat models. Rats with arthritis induced by Freund's incomplete adjuvant were assigned into five groups: group 1: controls 0.9% NaCl (n = 7); group 2: 2.5 mg/kg thymoquinone (n = 7); group 3: 5 mg/kg thymoquinone (n = 7); group 4: Bacilli Chalmette Guerin (BCG) 6 x 10(5) CFU (n = 7); group 5: methotrexate 0.3 mg/kg (n = 7). Signs of inflammation on the claw and radiological signs were searched for and TNF-alpha and IL-1beta were measured. The results of control and other groups were compared. As a result, thymoquinone, confirmed clinically and radiologically, suppressed adjuvant-induced arthritis in rats. | |
17182267 | Long-term results of infliximab therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: experience acquired by th | 2007 Jan | OBJECTIVE: Infliximab is effective in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Add-on infliximab therapy in patients on methotrexate results in a rapid gain in effectiveness, which lasts at least 1 year. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and continuation rate of infliximab in patients with RA after the first year of treatment. METHODS: The first 50 patients with RA who were given infliximab in the North-Pas-de-Calais region of France were included in a multicenter open-label study. The patients had severe RA or failed to respond to conventional medications. Infliximab was given in a dosage of 3 mg/kg every 8 weeks in combination with methotrexate. Effectiveness was evaluated using the DAS28-3 score and EULAR response criteria. The dates and reasons of infliximab discontinuations were recorded. RESULTS: The 2-year infliximab continuation rate was 70%. Serious adverse events requiring infliximab discontinuation occurred in 7 patients. Mean DAS28-3 scores in the 35 patients who took infliximab for at least 2 years were 6.42 at baseline, 4.33 after 30 weeks, 4.31 after 54 weeks, and 3.86 after 102 weeks. According to EULAR criteria after 102 weeks, there were 12 good responders, 18 moderate responders, and 5 nonresponders. CONCLUSION: Experience acquired in the North-Pas-de-Calais district of France suggests that infliximab is continued for more than 2 years in more than two-thirds of patients and remains effective over this period. | |
16393443 | Real-world utilization of DMARDs and biologics in rheumatoid arthritis: the RADIUS (Rheuma | 2006 Jan | OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (DMARD) Intervention and Utilization Study (RADIUS) is a unique, real-world, prospective, 5-year, observational study of over 10 000 patients with RA. RADIUS provides a snapshot of use patterns, effectiveness, and safety of DMARDs, biologics, and combination therapies used to manage RA in clinical practice. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with RA requiring a new DMARD or biologic (addition or switch) were eligible for the RADIUS study. Two separate patient cohorts were enrolled; RADIUS 1 patients initiated any new therapy at entry, and RADIUS 2 patients initiated etanercept at entry. Patient demographics and disease activity measures were collected at study entry, and baseline characteristics were summarized for various subgroups. Effectiveness, safety, and patterns of use will be tracked for therapies utilized during the 5-year study. RESULTS: RADIUS 1 enrolled 4959 patients, and RADIUS 2 enrolled 5102 patients, mostly at community private practices (88%). In RADIUS 1, most patients initiated methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy, followed by MTX in combination with a biologic (e.g. infliximab plus MTX) or other DMARD. In RADIUS 2, most patients initiated etanercept in combination with MTX, followed by etanercept monotherapy. When a new therapy was required, physicians tended to add another therapy versus switching therapies. Patients initiating a biologic had a longer duration of RA and more severe disease compared with patients initiating non-biologic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: These real-world data provide evidence of the prescribing practices of rheumatologists in 2001-2003. Future analyses will allow evidence-based comparisons of the long-term safety and effectiveness of DMARDs, biologics, and combination therapies to assist physicians in clinical decision-making. | |
18516965 | [Paradigm shift in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis by biologics]. | 2008 Apr | Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, systemic inflammatory disease that causes significant morbidity and mortality. TNF-alpha plays a pivotal role in the pathological processes of RA by accumulation of inflammatory cells and the self-perpetuation of inflammation, leading to cartilage and bone destruction. Two TNF inhibitors, infliximab, an anti-TNF-alpha chimeric monoclonal antibody, and etanercept, a fusion protein of soluble TNF receptor and Fc portion of immunoglobulin, were marketed in 2003 and 2005, respectively, in Japan. The combinational use of biologics targeting TNF-alpha and methotrexate (MTX) have revolutionized the treatment of RA, producing significant improvement in clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes not seen previously. Namely, biologics targeting TNF have brought about a paradigm shift in the treatment outcome of RA; i) remission induction and maintenance, ii) suppression of progress of joint destruction, iii) improvement of mortality. Furthermore, recent controlled trials have shown that biologics targeting cell surface molecules on B cells and T cells are effective in RA patients with active disease despite TNF inhibitors. Thus, targeting cytokines and lymphocytes not only expands the array of treatments for RA but also provides important insights into the pathogenesis of this disease. In this review, how to use TNF inhibitors for the treatment of RA will also be discussed from domestic as well as global evidence. | |
19033290 | Optimal dosage and route of administration of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis: a syst | 2009 Jul | OBJECTIVES: To review systematically the available literature on the optimal dosage and route of administration of methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), as an evidence base for generating clinical practice recommendations. METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism meeting abstracts, searching for randomised controlled trials evaluating various dosages or routes of administration of methotrexate in RA. Articles that fulfilled predefined inclusion criteria were systematically reviewed and the quality was appraised. Effect sizes and odds ratios for clinical, radiological and toxicity outcomes were calculated and directly or indirectly compared between study groups using methotrexate in different dosages or by different routes. RESULTS: A total of 38 publications out of 1748 identified references was included in the review. Start doses of 25 mg/week or fast escalation with 5 mg/month to 25-30 mg/week were associated with higher clinical effect sizes and more (gastrointestinal) adverse events in comparison with doses of 5-15 mg/week or slow escalation. Starting with 15 mg/week subcutaneous versus oral methotrexate was associated with higher clinical efficacy but more withdrawal due to toxicity in early RA. In longstanding RA, after failure on 15-20 mg/week orally, a switch to 15 mg/week intramuscularly with subsequent dose escalation did not result in increased efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Starting on methotrexate 15 mg/week orally, escalating with 5 mg/month to 25-30 mg/week, or the highest tolerable dose, with a subsequent switch to subcutaneous administration in the case of an insufficient response, seems to be the optimal evidence-based dosing and routing recommendation for methotrexate in RA. | |
18627338 | Is tocilizumab an option for the treatment of arthritis? | 2008 Aug | BACKGROUND: Some patients with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis are resistant to inhibitors of interleukin-1 and tumour necrosis factor. Raised levels of interleukin-6 are associated with both these conditions. Tocilizumab is a humanised monoclonal antibody that binds to both forms of interleukin-6 receptor that has recently been used in Phase III trials in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis. METHODS: The study conducted an evaluation of Phase III trials with tocilizumab. RESULTS: In the Tocilizumab Pivotal Trial in Methotrexate Inadequate Responders the primary efficacy end-point was the proportion of subjects with a 20% improvement in their rheumatoid arthritis signs and symptoms according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria and, at 24 weeks, this value was 26% with placebo and was increased to 48 and 59% with tocilizumab at 4 and 8 mg respectively. In the trial of tocilizumab in systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis, the primary end-point in the open-label lead-in was the proportion of subjects achieving an American College of Rheumatology Pediatric 30 response and 91% of subjects had achieved this at 6 weeks. This response was maintained by the majority of subjects being treated with tocilizumab during a 12-week double-blind trial and 48 weeks of open trial follow-up. Small numbers of subjects developed infections in both studies. CONCLUSIONS: Provided long-term safety can be established, tocilizumab will probably become part of the treatment for rheumatoid arthritis and may become a major breakthrough for the treatment of systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis. | |
17278017 | Scientific basis for the efficacy of combined use of antirheumatic drugs against bone dest | 2007 | Finding a means to ameliorate and prevent bone destruction is one of the urgent issues in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Recent studies revealed bone-resorbing osteoclasts to be essential for arthritic bone destruction, but to date there has been scarce experimental evidence for the underlying mechanism of the bone-protective effect of antirheumatic drugs. Here we examined the effects of one or a combination of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on osteoclast differentiation to provide a cellular and molecular basis for their efficacy against bone destruction. The effects on osteoclast precursor cells and osteoclastogenesis-supporting cells were distinguished by two in vitro osteoclast culture systems. Methotrexate (MTX), bucillamine (Buc) and salazosulphapyridine (SASP) inhibited osteoclastogenesis by acting on osteoclast precursor cells and interfering with receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand (RANKL)-mediated induction of the nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) c1. MTX and SASP also suppressed RANKL expression on osteoclastogenesis-supporting mesenchymal cells. Interestingly, the combination of three antirheumatic drugs exerted a marked inhibitory effect on osteoclastogenesis even at a low dose at which there was much less of an effect when administered individually. These results are consistent with the reported efficacy of combined DMARDs therapy in humans and suggest that osteoclast culture systems are useful tools to provide an experimental basis for the bone-protective effects of antirheumatic drugs. | |
16899502 | Autoantibodies, metalloproteinases and bone markers in rheumatoid arthritis patients are u | 2007 Mar | OBJECTIVES: To identify biochemical, immunological and bone markers as predictors of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients' responses to infliximab. METHODS: A total of 76 patients with active RA (American College of Rheumatology criteria), refractory to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, including methotrexate, received infliximab (3 mg/kg) infusions at weeks 0, 2, 6, and then every 8 weeks in combination with methotrexate or leflunomide. At week 14, infliximab efficacy was evaluated using disease activity score (DAS)28. A serum sample, collected just before starting infliximab, was tested by ELISA (unless stated otherwise) for the following immunological markers: rheumatoid factor by agglutination and ELISA (IgA, IgG and IgM isotypes); anti-cyclic citrullinated protein; autoantibodies recognizing calpastatin domain I and its 27 C-terminal fragment, glucose-6-phosphate isomerase, alpha-enolase; anti-keratin and anti-perinuclear factor antibodies (immunofluorescence); biochemical markers: C-reactive protein (nephelometry), metalloproteinase-1 and -3, tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases-1 and -2, antioxidants (vitamins A and E; selenium); bone resorption markers: pyridinoline, deoxypyridinoline, osteoprotegerin, soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand, cartilage oligomeric matrix protein. Each parameter's predictive value of the response to infliximab was analysed using Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney and chi-square tests. Hierarchical clustering was performed with The Institute for Genomic Research (TIGR) multiple experiment viewer software. RESULTS: Good, moderate and non-responder rates were 6.5, 61.8 and 31.5%, respectively. No significant difference was observed between responders and non-responders, regardless of the serum parameters considered. Analysis of dichotomous or continuous variables failed to identify markers predictive of a good or poor response to infliximab. CONCLUSION: The search for soluble markers in RA patients' sera likely to predict response to infliximab because of their involvement in RA pathogenesis seems disappointing. However, because of the limited power to detect smaller differences in biomarkers, the present study is a preliminary exploratory analysis. | |
17021714 | Adenosine and cytokine levels following treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with dipyridamol | 2006 Nov | Adenosine can suppress the release of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) from activated monocytes and macrophages, and may contribute to the anti-inflammatory activities of methotrexate and sulphasalazine. Dipyridamole inhibits the cellular uptake and metabolism of adenosine and we have, therefore, examined the effects of dipyridamole in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in an attempt to alleviate their symptoms. Forty patients aged 18-75 years were randomised to receive dipyridamole 400 mg/day or placebo. Blood samples were taken at baseline and at monthly intervals for 6 months. Purines were determined by HPLC and cytokines by ELISA. After 3 months of treatment there were significant reductions in neopterin levels and in the modified Health Assessment Questionnaire score, but these were not maintained. Dipyridamole had no effect on disease severity or the levels of purine metabolites, interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta), IL-6, TNF-alpha, lipid peroxidation products, erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein. In conclusion, rheumatoid arthritis patients showed no clinical improvement following treatment with dipyridamole for 6 months. | |
16646989 | Atherogenic lipid profile is a feature characteristic of patients with early rheumatoid ar | 2006 | We investigated lipid profiles and lipoprotein modification after immuno-intervention in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA). Fifty-eight patients with ERA who met the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria were included in the study. These patients had disease durations of less than one year and had not had prior treatment for it. Smokers or patients suffering from diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, liver or kidney disease, Cushing's syndrome, obesity, familiar dyslipidemia and those receiving medications affecting lipid metabolism were excluded from the study. Sixty-three healthy volunteers (controls) were also included. Patients were treated with methotrexate and prednisone. Lipid profiles, disease activity for the 28 joint indices score (DAS-28) as well as ACR 50% response criteria were determined for all patients. The mean DAS-28 at disease onset was 5.8 +/- 0.9. After a year of therapy, 53 (91.3%) patients achieved the ACR 20% response criteria, while 45 (77.6%) attained the ACR 50% criteria. In addition, a significant decrease in the DAS-28, C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were observed. ERA patients exhibited higher serum levels of total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglycerides, whereas their serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels were significantly lower compared to controls. As a consequence, the atherogenic ratio of TC/HDL-C as well as that of LDL-C/HDL-C was significantly higher in ERA patients compared to controls. After treatment, a significant reduction of the atherogenic ratio of TC/HDL-C as well as that of LDL-C/HDL-C was observed, a phenomenon primarily due to the increase of serum HDL-C levels. These changes were inversely correlated with laboratory changes, especially CRP and ESR. In conclusion, ERA patients are characterized by an atherogenic lipid profile, which improves after therapy. Thus, early immuno-intervention to control disease activity may reduce the risk of the atherosclerotic process and cardiovascular events in ERA patients. | |
18173913 | A multicenter study of leukocytapheresis in rheumatoid arthritis. | 2007 Nov | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of leukocytapheresis (LCAP) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that is refractory to disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), we conducted a prospective, multicenter, open-label clinical trial. METHODS: We enrolled 38 active RA patients, including 32 patients who showed an inadequate response to > or = 2 DMARDs and 6 patients with rapidly progressive RA. All patients continued drug therapy and were treated with 5 LCAP sessions conducted at 1-week intervals. The clinical response was evaluated at baseline before starting LCAP and at 4 weeks after the completion of all the LCAP sessions using the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and the 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR). RESULTS: Of the 35 patients who fulfilled the study's eligibility criteria, 24 (69%), 10 (29%), and 23 (66%) patients achieved 20% (ACR20), 50% (ACR50), and DAS28-C-reactive protein (CRP) EULAR improvement, respectively. The mean DAS28-CRP score of the 35 patients decreased significantly from 5.99 +/- 0.92 at baseline to 4.54 +/- 1.39 after treatment. Comparison analysis of the ACR20 responders and non-responders to LCAP revealed that 22 of 24 responders (92%) concomitantly received methotrexate, whereas significantly fewer, that is, 6 of 11 non-responders (55%) received methotrexate. Less frequent and transient mild-to-moderate adverse events, including nausea and headache, were seen in 12 of 189 LCAP sessions (6.3%). CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate the usefulness of LCAP in combination with DMARDs, particularly methotrexate, as an effective and safe treatment for refractory RA. |