Browse

Search for: rheumatoid arthritis    methotrexate    autoimmune disease    biomarker    gene expression    GWAS    HLA genes    non-HLA genes   

ID PMID Title PublicationDate abstract
19105681 Do carotid artery diameters manifest early evidence of atherosclerosis in women with rheum 2009 Jan OBJECTIVE: Given the high incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), we examined the associations between RA diagnosis and characteristics and evidence of carotid atherosclerosis. We take a unique approach by evaluating lumen and interadventitial diameters in addition to intima-media thickness and plaque. METHODS: Ninety-three women with RA were matched with 93 healthy women by age, race, and menopause status. In cross-sectional analyses, we compared common carotid artery measures between groups and examined their relationships with measures of RA severity and activity. RESULTS: Mean age was 53.3 years, and median RA duration was 14 years. Lumen diameter in patients was significantly greater than in healthy women (5.50 vs. 5.19 mm, p < 0.001), as was interadventitial diameter (6.92 vs. 6.61 mm, p < 0.001). Having RA also was independently associated with greater lumen (beta = 0.256, p < 0.01) and interadventitial (beta = 0.261, p < 0.01) diameters, after controlling for cardiovascular risk factors and intima-media thickness. Carotid intima-media thickness (0.70 vs. 0.71 mm) was similar, and the prevalence of carotid plaque in patients (21%) was higher but not statistically different from healthy women (15%). In patients with RA, we found positive associations between methotrexate dose and interadventitial diameter, between hypothyroidism and intima-media thickness, and between hypothyroidism and soluble endothelial adhesion molecule and plaque, independent of cardiovascular risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Women with RA have increased carotid artery diameters compared with healthy women. This may reflect premature vascular aging and may be an early indicator of increased cardiovascular risk.
20373059 Golimumab and malignancies: true or false association? 2011 Jun Malignancy is one of the comorbidities linked to golimumab, a biological TNF-α blocker. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched different databases and analyzed original publications to elucidate the remaining open question about the real association of malignancies with golimumab therapy. The most frequent cancer in patients treated with golimumab, in association or not with methotrexate, is the lung adenocarcinoma. However, lymphoma is not very commonly represented in these patients. We show that there is no major and evident risk of malignancies associated with golimumab in current scientific literature. An increased risk of malignancies may be associated with golimumab, but this warrants further clinical confirmation. Also, this risk mentioned in different studies must be taken with caution because of number of limits and biases.
19213235 Infectious complications in patients with psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis treated with 2009 Feb Treatment of patients with moderate-severe psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis includes systemic biologic, antimetabolite, and immunosuppressive therapy. However, adverse events such as serious infectious complications must be considered before starting therapy and throughout treatment. The authors describe the case of a male on combination etanercept and methotrexate for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis for years who developed a spontaneous epidural abscess with resulting quadriplegia. In addition, a review of the literature was performed looking at the risk of serious infectious complications with antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) monotherapy or combination therapy with methotrexate fro the treatment of psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis. Serious infectious risk does not appear to be increased with etanercept or other anti-TNF agents either alone or in combination with methotrexate. Nevertheless, clinicians are cautioned to carefully weigh the risks and benefits of treating with anti-TNF agents in patients who are prone to infection.
20472598 IL-33 induces neutrophil migration in rheumatoid arthritis and is a target of anti-TNF the 2010 Sep OBJECTIVES: Interleukin 33 (IL-33) is a new member of the IL-1 family of cytokines which signals via its receptor, ST2 (IL-33R), and has an important role in Th2 and mast cell responses. This study shows that IL-33 orchestrates neutrophil migration in arthritis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Methylated bovine serum albumin (mBSA) challenge in the knee joint of mBSA-immunised mice induced local neutrophil migration accompanied by increased IL-33R and IL-33 mRNA expression. Cell migration was inhibited by systemic and local treatments with soluble (s)IL-33R, an IL-33 decoy receptor, and was not evident in IL-33R-deficient mice. IL-33 injection also induced IL-33R-dependent neutrophil migration. Antigen- and IL-33-induced neutrophil migration in the joint was dependent on CXCL1, CCL3, tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) and IL-1beta synthesis. Synovial tissue, macrophages and activated neutrophils expressed IL-33R. IL-33 induces neutrophil migration by activating macrophages to produce chemokines and cytokines and by directly acting on neutrophils. Importantly, neutrophils from patients with rheumatoid arthritis successfully treated with anti-TNFalpha antibody (infliximab) expressed significantly lower levels of IL-33R than patients treated with methotrexate alone. Only neutrophils from patients treated with methotrexate alone or from normal donors stimulated with TNFalpha responded to IL-33 in chemotaxis. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that suppression of IL-33R expression in neutrophils, preventing IL-33-induced neutrophil migration, may be an important mechanism of anti-TNFalpha therapy of inflammation.
20703488 [Non-TNF biologicals in the therapeutic strategy for rheumatoid arthritis]. 2010 Sep The spectrum of agents available for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has become more diversified: In addition to TNF-blocking agents, Abatacept, Rituximab and Tocilizumab have now become available for the treatment of RA. All three agents were approved for patients with insufficient response/intolerability to TNF-blockers; Tozilizumab and Abatacept have also been approved for TNF-naive patients with insufficient response to Methorexate.The present article clarifies the efficacy of these three substances in the treatment algorithm of RA. Current data do not suggest differences in general; therefore, individual considerations may result in patient-specific decisions as to which drug should be used after insufficient response to a TNF-blocking agent or Methotrexate. Possible arguments are discussed.
21182767 Increased frequency of metabolic syndrome among Vietnamese women with early rheumatoid art 2010 INTRODUCTION: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality due to cardiovascular disease, and this occurs early in the disease process. The metabolic syndrome (MetS) may contribute to the excess cardiovascular burden observed in RA; however, little information is available regarding MetS in early RA. We aimed to identify the prevalence of MetS and to determine the potential factors associated with the presence of MetS in Vietnamese women with early RA. METHODS: A total of 105 consecutive women with early RA (disease duration ≤3 years) and 105 age-matched healthy women were checked for MetS according to six MetS definitions (Joint Consensus, International Diabetes Federation, National Cholesterol Education Program 2004 and 2001, European Group for Study of Insulin Resistance, and World Health Organization). Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to determine independent predictors of MetS in women with RA. RESULTS: Prevalence of MetS varied from 16.2% to 40.9% according to the definitions used in women with RA, and was higher (P < 0.001) than in healthy controls (from 10.5% to 22.9%). Among individual components of MetS, differences between women with RA and controls were observed for hypertension (P < 0.001), low high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels (P < 0.001), and abdominal obesity (P = 0.019). After adjusting for age and physical activity, higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (odds ratios (OR) = 1.516, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.073 to 3.195, P = 0.042), disease activity score (DAS28) (OR = 1.736, 95% CI: 1.293 to 2.786, P = 0.019), health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) score (OR = 1.583, 95% CI: 1.195 to 2.367, P = 0.035), and less methotrexate use (OR = 0.736, 95% CI: 0.547 to 0.962, P = 0.024) remained significant independent predictors of the presence of MetS in women with RA. CONCLUSIONS: Women with early RA already had higher prevalence of MetS compared with healthy controls. Higher systemic inflammatory marker, disease activity and disability scores, and less methotrexate use were independent predictors associated with the presence of MetS in women with early RA. These findings suggest that physicians should screen for MetS in women with early RA to control its components and therefore reduce their risk of cardiovascular diseases.
20230188 The clinical efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis. 2010 May IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD: The treatment of rheumatoid arthritis has changed dramatically over the past 25 years, first with the introduction of methotrexate and then the introduction of biologic therapy. These agents have provided patients with multiple treatment options to try to achieve disease remission. Unfortunately, no one single agent is fully effective in every patient; different patients respond to different therapies, even those with the same mechanism of action, in different ways. Another medication, such as certolizumab pegol, is a welcome addition to our treatment armamentarium of rheumatoid arthritis. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW: The basis of this review is all the peer-reviewed manuscripts found in PubMed and Medline searches from 1990 to 2009 and abstracts on certolizumab pegol presented at the American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism within the past 5 years. WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: This review should enable the reader to fully understand the benefit:risk ratio of certolizumab pegol in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Certolizumab pegol is an effective agent either in combination with methotrexate or as monotherapy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with a safety profile similar to other approved TNF inhibitors.
20329616 [Clinical efficacy of Corydalis composite combined with methotrexate in treating rheumatoi 2009 Nov OBJECTIVE: To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of Corydalis composite (CDC) combined with methotrexate (MTX) in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Seventy-six RA patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups, 37 in the treated group received the combined therapy, and the 39 received MTX treatment alone, all were treated for 12 weeks. Efficacy of treatment was evaluated adopting the standard of American College of Rheumatology (ACR), taking ACR20 as the chief criterion; ACR50, ACR70 as well as the clinical indexes and items in Health Account Questionnaire (HAQ) as the auxiliary criteria, including joint swelling index, joint tenderness index, holding power, morning stiffness time, resting pain, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein. And the adverse reaction was recorded at the same time. RESULTS: After being treated for 4, 8 and 12 weeks, the ACR20 response rate reached 35.14%, 59.46% and 70.27% respectively in patients of the treated group, while that in the control group was 17.95%, 35.90% and 46.15% respectively, significant difference between groups was shown in the outcome of week 8 and 12 (P < 0.05). ACR50 and ACR70 improving rate at all the time points of observation were increased in the treated group, with the ACR50 improving rate at week 12 higher than that in the control group (43.24% vs. 20.51%, P < 0.05). As compared with the control group, the improvements in all the auxiliary criteria were more significant in the treated group (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reaction was less in the treated group than in the control group (32.43% vs. 56.41%, P < 0.05), particularly in term of the damage on liver (0 vs. 10.26%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: CDC combined with MTX is more effective than MTX alone in treating active RA with less adverse reaction.
20447957 Current evidence for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with biological disease-modify 2010 Jun OBJECTIVES: To review the evidence for the efficacy and safety of biological agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to provide data to develop treatment recommendations by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Task Force. METHODS: Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant articles on infliximab (IFX), etanercept (ETN), adalimumab (ADA), certolizumab-pegol (CZP), golimumab (GLM), anakinra (ANA), abatacept (ABT), rituximab (RTX) and tocilizumab (TCZ) published between 1962 and February 2009; published abstracts from the 2007-2008 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and EULAR conference were obtained. RESULTS: 87 articles and 40 abstracts were identified. In methotrexate (MTX) naïve patients, biological therapy with IFX, ETN, ADA, GLM or ABT has been shown to improve clinical outcomes (level of evidence 1B). In MTX/other synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) failures all nine biological agents confer benefit (1B), with lower efficacy noted for ANA. RTX, ABT, TCZ and GLM demonstrate efficacy in tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) failures (1B). Less evidence exists for switching between IFX, ETN and ADA (3B). Biological and MTX combination therapy is more efficacious than a biological agent alone (1B). A safety review shows no increased malignancy risk compared with conventional DMARDs (3B). TNFi are generally associated with an increased risk of serious bacterial infection, particularly within the first 6 months of treatment initiation; increased tuberculosis (TB) rates with TNFi are highest with the monoclonal antibodies (3B). CONCLUSIONS: There is good evidence for the efficacy of biological agents in patients with RA. Safety data confirm an increased risk of bacterial infection and TB with TNFi compared with conventional DMARDs.
19638454 Methotrexate therapy in rheumatoid arthritis after failure to sulphasalazine: to switch or 2009 Oct OBJECTIVES: MTX, either alone or in combination with SSZ, is effective in the treatment of RA. Trials have shown that, after SSZ failure, the addition of MTX to SSZ is more effective than a switch to MTX. Whether this is also the case in daily practice has not been analysed yet. In this study, we compared the efficacy of a switch to MTX monotherapy with that of the addition of MTX to SSZ in the daily clinical practice of RA patients who had failed SSZ monotherapy in the Nijmegen RA Inception Cohort. METHODS: For this study, 230 patients who failed to SSZ monotherapy were followed for up to 52 weeks. A total of 124 underwent a switch to MTX alone, whereas 106 patients received the combination of MTX and SSZ. The primary outcome measure was the mean change in the disease activity score (DAS28) after 24 weeks. RESULTS: Both treatment groups showed a significant decrease in DAS28 after 24 weeks, which was similar in both groups. Drug survival analysis showed that the chance to stop with a DMARD within 52 weeks was higher in the MTX-SSZ group (P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In RA patients who failed to SSZ the clinical efficacy of a switch to MTX monotherapy was similar to that of the addition of MTX, suggesting that in daily clinical practice a switch to MTX is a good option for patients with an inadequate response to SSZ.
20926257 PubMed had a higher sensitivity than Ovid-MEDLINE in the search for systematic reviews. 2011 Jul OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of Ovid-MEDLINE vs. PubMed for identifying randomized controlled trials of methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We created search strategies for Ovid-MEDLINE and PubMed for a systematic review of MTX in RA. Their performance was evaluated using sensitivity, precision, and number needed to read (NNR). RESULTS: Comparing searches in Ovid-MEDLINE vs. PubMed, PubMed retrieved more citations overall than Ovid-MEDLINE; however, of the 20 citations that met eligibility criteria for the review, Ovid-MEDLINE retrieved 17 and PubMed 18. The sensitivity was 85% for Ovid-MEDLINE vs. 90% for PubMed, whereas the precision and NNR were comparable (precision: 0.881% for Ovid-MEDLINE vs. 0.884% for PubMed and NNR: 114 for Ovid-MEDLINE vs. 113 for PubMed). CONCLUSION: In systematic reviews of RA, PubMed has higher sensitivity than Ovid-MEDLINE with comparable precision and NNR. This study highlights the importance of well-designed database-specific search strategies.
19628340 Methotrexate-associated lymphoproliferative disorders mimicking angioimmunoblastic T-cell 2010 Jan 15 Patients affected by autoimmune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis, and dermatomyositis) treated with methotrexate (MTX) develop lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs). These cases have been reported to be diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, or polymorphous post-transplant LPDs. However, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) is extremely rare in the medical literature. In this report, we describe three cases of RA patients who developed MTX-associated LPDs resembling AITL. They developed systemic lymph node swelling after initiation of MTX. The affected lymph nodes showed the histological finding of AITL: polymorphous infiltrates, mainly T-cells and arborizing high endothelial venules. Two cases showed a predominance of CD4-positive cells in proliferative T-cells, whereas the third case showed CD8-positive cells. CD10 was negative in all cases. RNA in situ hybridization of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) demonstrated EBV-positive B-cells to be scattered in two cases, but not in one case. The lymphoadenopathy spontaneously regressed with cessation of MTX in all three cases, but one case recurred. These are interesting cases of MTX-associated LPDs mimicking AITL, and cessation of MTX is the only cure for patients with MTX-associated LPDs resembling AITL.
20964833 Infliximab therapy increases body fat mass in early rheumatoid arthritis independently of 2010 INTRODUCTION: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with changes in body composition and bone mineral density (BMD). The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether anti-TNF treatment in early RA has an impact on body composition and BMD besides that which could be achieved by intensive disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) combination therapy. METHODS: Forty patients with early RA who failed treatment with methotrexate up to 20 mg/week for 3 months were randomised to addition of sulphasalazine and hydroxychloroquine (treatment A) or addition of infliximab (treatment B). At 3, 12 and 24 months, body composition and BMD were assessed by total-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. At the same time points, leptin, adiponectin, apolipoproteins, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and markers of bone remodelling were analysed. Compliance to treatment was considered in the analyses. Data were analysed with a mixed, linear model. RESULTS: Patients treated with anti-TNF had a significant increase in fat mass at 2 years, 3.8 (1.6 to 5.9) kg, in contrast to patients in treatment A, 0.4 (-1.5 to 2.2) kg (P = 0.040), despite similar reduction in disease activity. Both treatment strategies prevented loss of muscle mass and bone. Leptin concentrations increased significantly in both groups at 2 years and adiponectin increased significantly at 2 years in treatment A and at 1 year in treatment B. There were no significant changes in apolipoproteins or IGF-1. The markers of bone resorption decreased at 12 months in both treatment groups with no significant difference between the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab therapy increased body fat mass, an effect that was not achieved with the combination of DMARDs, despite a similar reduction in disease activity, and thus seemed to be drug specific. The increase of fat mass was not associated with an exacerbated atherogenic lipid profile. Leptin and adiponectin concentrations increased in both treatment groups. The increase of adiponectin may partially explain the reduced frequency of cardiovascular diseases found when disease activity is reduced in RA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN39045408.
20433955 Strategies after the failure of the first anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agent in rheuma 2010 Jun During the last two decades fundamental changes have taken place in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The effective establishment of methotrexate as the anchor drug and the introduction of new drugs, in particular anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha blockers and the novel biologics have made the goal of remission feasible for plenty of RA patients. However, almost 14-38% of patients do not respond to first-line anti-TNF-alpha treatment at all and as many as 40% discontinue these drugs within a year and 50% within 2 years. Currently, no recommendations exist as regards the treatment of RA patients after TNF-alpha-antagonist failure. In this review the issue of anti-TNF-alpha therapy failure is discussed. Further, the various options for overcoming the apparent failure are explored according to evidence from the published literature.
20721827 CH-1504, a metabolically inert antifolate for the potential treatment of rheumatoid arthri 2010 Aug CH-1504, being developed by Chelsea Therapeutics Inc under license from the University of South Alabama, is an orally available, metabolically inert antifolate, for the potential treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). CH-1504 is an analog of methotrexate (MTX) but differs from the classical antifolates because of an improved safety and tolerability profile. A significant proportion of the toxicity profile of MTX can be attributed to its polyglutamylated and hydroxylated metabolites; therefore, metabolism-blocked antifolates, such as CH-1504, have been designed to prevent the accumulation of toxic metabolites. Preclinical studies and phase II clinical trials indicated that CH-1504 and MTX inhibit dihydrofolate reductase activity with equal potency. In a phase II, proof-of-concept trial in patients with RA, CH-1504 was associated with improved tolerability and reduced hepatotoxicity as compared with MTX; in addition, improvements in the American College of Rheumatology response rates were similar following treatment with either CH-1504 or MTX. Furthermore, Chelsea Therapeutics are developing the L-isomer of CH-1504, CH-4051, which displays improved in vitro potency over with racemate and appears to be Chelsea Therapeutics' preferred candidate for future development. Inert antifolates appear to be a promising drug class for the treatment of RA because the disease-modifying properties of MTX are retained, but the therapeutic window of the inert antifolates is improved. However, further trials are required to establish the efficacy and long-term safety in a wider population of patients with RA.
21125264 Power estimation using a population pharmacokinetics model with optimal design by clinical 2011 Mar OBJECTIVES: The aim of this article was to determine the power for pharmacokinetic interaction investigations using population a pharmacokinetic modelling approach with optimal sampling designs and clinical trial simulations. METHODS: A clinical trial simulation approach was proposed to estimate the power for pharmacokinetic effects in drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies. This approach consisted of: (1) population pharmacokinetic (PK) model(s) was characterised for the drug(s) studied; (2) D-optimal design strategy was applied based on these model(s) to determine optimal sampling times for DDI investigation; (3) clinical trial simulations under particular study designs, for example a randomised parallel design, were used to evaluate the sample size needed for studying PK interaction. The approach was described using an example investigating the impact of a new anti-inflammatory drug on methotrexate (MTX) exposure in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. RESULTS: The power for evaluating PK interaction largely depended on the interindividual variability (IIV) in PK parameters. Residual variability was also influential to a lesser degree in the sample size determination using the proposed approach. It required 40-60 participants for scenarios where IIV was relatively low in order to achieve 90% power. However, a sample size of 80 individuals was required to reach 90% power where both IIV and residual variances were high. Under the same IIV assumptions, the proposed approach in general required a smaller sample size compared with the standard noncompartmental analysis method with intensive blood samples to attain the target power. When IIV was low, the difference in the power between the two approaches was relatively small. CONCLUSIONS: Population PK modelling with optimal design and clinical trial simulation to determine sample size when designing drug-drug interaction studies was efficient and cost effective.
20544244 When should we use parenteral methotrexate? 2010 Oct Oral methotrexate is the benchmark against which other disease-modifying anti rheumatic drugs are measured. The use of parenteral methotrexate for those failing to tolerate or respond to oral therapy is accepted, but indications for its use and its place in the therapeutic ladder have not been fully investigated. We assessed the use of parenteral methotrexate (MTX) in our rheumatoid arthritis (RA) population and compared the characteristics of these patients to a matched group of those on oral therapy. We compared response rates to each approach using DAS 28 scores, ESR and visual analogue scales. Inferences on costs of parenteral therapy were made and predictors of response defined. We found that 10% of our total RA patient population were on parenteral methotrexate, having failed to tolerate or respond to oral therapy. Seventy-five percent of these met the criteria for the use of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents. Overall response rates were equivalent to those obtained by responders to oral MTX. Patients on parenteral therapy were younger and were more likely to have extreme values of body mass index (BMI) than those on oral therapy. The approach was economically viable, although many patients unnecessarily attended hospital to receive their injections. We advocate consideration of parenteral MTX in all RA patients unresponsive to oral therapy prior to treatment with anti-TNF therapy. Response to parenteral therapy can be predicted by low BMI (below 22 kg/m(2)), possibly as a result of malabsorption, or by high BMI (over 30) as a result of gastrointestinal intolerance. A mechanism to deliver this option through self-administration in the community should be encouraged.
19297346 Comparison of tocilizumab monotherapy versus methotrexate monotherapy in patients with mod 2010 Jan BACKGROUND: The anti-interleukin (IL) 6 receptor antibody tocilizumab inhibits signalling of IL6, a key cytokine in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) pathogenesis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate through the AMBITION study the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab monotherapy versus methotrexate in patients with active RA for whom previous treatment with methotrexate/biological agents had not failed. METHODS: This 24-week, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study, randomised 673 patients to either tocilizumab 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks, or methotrexate, starting at 7.5 mg/week and titrated to 20 mg/week within 8 weeks, or placebo for 8 weeks followed by tocilizumab 8 mg/kg. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response at week 24. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat analysis demonstrated that tocilizumab was better than methotrexate treatment with a higher ACR20 response (69.9 vs 52.5%; p<0.001), and 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) <2.6 rate (33.6 vs 12.1%) at week 24. Mean high-sensitivity C-reactive protein was within the normal range from week 12 with tocilizumab, whereas levels remained elevated with methotrexate. The incidence of serious adverse events with tocilizumab was 3.8% versus 2.8% with methotrexate (p = 0.50), and of serious infections, 1.4% versus 0.7%, respectively. There was a higher incidence of reversible grade 3 neutropenia (3.1% vs 0.4%) and increased total cholesterol > or =240 mg/dl (13.2% vs 0.4%), and a lower incidence of alanine aminotransferase elevations >3x-<5x upper limit of normal (1.0% vs 2.5%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Tocilizumab monotherapy is better than methotrexate monotherapy, with rapid improvement in RA signs and symptoms, and a favourable benefit-risk, in patients for whom treatment with methotrexate or biological agents has not previously failed.
20473756 The efficacy and safety of rituximab for the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis: a s 2011 Nov The aims of this study were to assess the efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The authors surveyed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the efficacy of rituximab in disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) (including methotrexate [MTX]) or tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-blocker-resistant or intolerant patients with active RA using Medline, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and manual searches. Meta-analysis of RCTs was performed to determine the treatment efficacy and safety outcomes of rituximab (1 course, consisting of two infusions of 1,000 mg each) concomitant with MTX. The three RCTs included 938 DMARD or TNF-blocker-resistant or intolerant RA patients. Follow-up periods ranged from 24 to 48 weeks. American College of Rheumatology response (ACR) 20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates were significantly higher for the rituximab plus MTX than for placebo controls (primary efficacy outcome, ACR50; risk ratio [RR] 3.648, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.478-5.369, P < 0.001). For those treated with rituximab, the incidence adverse events of all systems were not higher than in those treated with placebo (RR 1.062, 95% CI 0.912-1.236, P = 0.438). With respect to the number of patients that experienced at least one serious adverse event, no significant difference was observed between patients treated with rituximab and placebo (RR 0.855, 95% CI 0.622-1.174, P = 0.333). A single course of rituximab with concomitant MTX therapy was found to be effective in DMARD or TNF-blocker-resistant or intolerant patients with active RA.
21097801 Indirect comparisons of the efficacy of biological antirheumatic agents in rheumatoid arth 2011 Feb BACKGROUND: The availability of increasing numbers of biological agents for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) offers several therapeutic options. While all biologicals have proven effective in trials, very limited direct comparisons are available. The objective of the present work was to compare the efficacy of biologicals (anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents, rituximab, abatacept, tocilizumab) in patients with RA with active disease and (i) an inadequate response (IR) to methotrexate (IR-MTX), (ii) an IR to anti-TNF agents (IR-anti-TNFs) using indirect comparisons. METHODS: Randomised clinical trials were identified examining the efficacy of a biological agent in RA at 6 months in patients with an IR-MTX or with an IR-anti-TNF. To compare the relative efficacy of biologicals, adjusted indirect comparison meta-analytic methods to estimate the ORs of achieving a 50% improvement according to American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR50) response at 6 months were used. RESULTS: A total of 18 published trials and 1 abstract were included in the analyses. In IR-MTX, anti-TNFs had the same probability of reaching an ACR50 compared to 'non-anti-TNF biologicals' taken together (OR 1.30, 95 % CI 0.91 to 1.86). However, when compared to specific biological agents, anti-TNFs demonstrated a higher probability of reaching an ACR50 than abatacept (OR 1.52, 95 % CI 1.0 to 2.28), but not in comparison to rituximab and tocilizumab. In IR-anti-TNF, no significant differences existed between rituximab, tocilizumab, abatacept and golimumab. [corrected] CONCLUSIONS: In a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials of patients with IR-MTX, anti-TNFs demonstrated a higher probability of achieving an ACR50 response than abatacept. In IR-anti-TNF, no difference was found between rituximab, tocimizumab, abatacept and golimumab.