Browse

Search for: rheumatoid arthritis    methotrexate    autoimmune disease    biomarker    gene expression    GWAS    HLA genes    non-HLA genes   

ID PMID Title PublicationDate abstract
19560810 Golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis after treatment with tumour necrosi 2009 Jul 18 BACKGROUND: Tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) inhibitors are frequently used to treat rheumatoid arthritis, but whether use of a different TNFalpha inhibitor can improve patient response is unknown. We assess the efficacy and safety of the TNFalpha inhibitor golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who had previously received one or more TNFalpha inhibitors. METHODS: 461 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis from 82 sites in 10 countries were randomly allocated by interactive voice response system, stratified by study site and methotrexate use, to receive subcutaneous injections of placebo (n=155), 50 mg golimumab (n=153), or 100 mg golimumab (n=153) every 4 weeks between Feb 21, 2006, and Sept 26, 2007. Allocation was double-blind. Eligible patients had been treated with at least one dose of a TNFalpha inhibitor previously. Patients continued stable doses of methotrexate, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, oral corticosteroids, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The primary endpoint was achievement at week 14 of 20% or higher improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria for assessment of rheumatoid arthritis (ACR20). At week 16, patients who had less than 20% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts were given rescue therapy and changed treatment from placebo to 50 mg golimumab, or from 50 mg to 100 mg golimumab. Drug efficacy was assessed by intention to treat and safety was assessed according to the study drug given. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00299546. FINDINGS: Patients had discontinued previous TNFalpha inhibitors because of lack of effectiveness (269 [58%] patients) or reasons unrelated to effectiveness (246 [53%] patients), such as intolerance and accessibility issues. Patients had active disease, which was indicated by a median of 14.0 (IQR 9.0-22.0) swollen and 26.0 (16.0-41.0) tender joints for the whole group. 28 (18%) patients on placebo, 54 (35%) patients on 50 mg golimumab (odds ratio 2.5 [95% CI 1.5-4.2], p=0.0006), and 58 (38%) patients on 100 mg golimumab (2.8 [1.6-4.7], p=0.0001) achieved ACR20 at week 14. Two patients were never treated, and 57 patients did not complete the study because of adverse events, unsatisfactory treatment effect, loss to follow-up, death, or other reasons. 155 patients on placebo, 153 on 50 mg golimumab, and 153 on 100 mg golimumab were assessed for drug efficacy. For weeks 1-16, serious adverse events were recorded in 11 (7%) patients on placebo, 8 (5%) on 50 mg golimumab, and 4 (3%) on 100 mg golimumab. For weeks 1-24, after some patients were given rescue therapy, serious adverse events were recorded in 15 (10%) patients on placebo, 14 (5%) on 50 mg golimumab, and 8 (4%) on 100 mg golimumab. INTERPRETATION: Golimumab reduced the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with active disease who had previously received one or more TNFalpha inhibitors. FUNDING: Centocor Research and Development and Schering-Plough Research Institute.
19751268 A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of etanercept for treatin 2009 Oct The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of etanercept (ETA) for treating rheumatoid arthritis. A systematic review was performed to search for randomized clinical trials comparing subcutaneous doses of ETA at 25 mg twice a week or 50 mg weekly to a placebo group, with or without methotrexate. Studies of low quality (less than 3 points on Jadad's scale) were excluded. The efficacy was assessed by using the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). Safety data were evaluated based on serious adverse events, serious infections, malignancy and deaths. Withdrawals as a result of adverse events or lack of efficacy were also evaluated. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 2385 patients. In the efficacy meta-analysis, a greater number of ETA-treated patients achieved the efficacy criteria within 6 months of treatment, where the relative risk (RR) was 2.94 [2.27, 3.81] for achieving ACR20, 5.28 [3.12, 8.92] for ACR50 and 4.83 [1.74, 13.47] for ACR70. After 1 year, the RR for achieving ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 were 1.14 [1.07, 1.23], 1.36 [1.21, 1.53] and 1.56 [1.30, 1.88], respectively. This response rates were higher for ETA-treated patients in comparison with control group patients. For safety, there were no statistically significant differences between treated patients and controls. This was also confirmed by withdrawals as a result of adverse events, which were not statistically different between the two groups. However, more patients withdrew from control groups because of a lack of efficacy as compared with ETA groups (RR = 0.48 [0.30, 0.78]).
20204668 Retrospective clinical study of the efficacy of lower-dose methotrexate and infliximab the 2010 Jun The objective of this study is to compare the long-term outcomes of infliximab therapy with lower-dose methotrexate (MTX; < or = 4 mg per week) and with standard-dose MTX (> or = 6 mg per week) in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. One hundred thirty-eight patients with refractory RA were treated with intravenous infliximab; 106 patients underwent lower-dose MTX therapy, and 32 patients underwent standard-dose MTX therapy. Treatment responses at 54 weeks or last observation carried forward (LOCF) assessed using the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria were compared between the two groups. Eighty-eight patients (81.1%) in the lower-dose MTX group and 27 patients (84.3%) in the standard-dose MTX therapy completed 54 weeks of infliximab treatment. A EULAR response criteria good and moderate response was seen in 70.9% in the lower-dose group and 74.1% in the standard-dose group. Good and moderate treatment responses at 54 weeks or LOCF were seen in 66.0% in the lower-dose group and 68.7% in the standard-dose group. The outcome in the lower-dose MTX group was not significantly different from that in the standard-dose group. Therapy with MTX and infliximab was effective in Japanese RA patients, regardless of MTX dosage.
20082236 Comparison of combination therapies in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: leflunomide- 2010 May To compare the efficacy and safety of leflunomide (LEF)-anti-TNF-alpha combination therapy to methotrexate (MTX)-anti-TNF-alpha combination therapy in a group of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We have recruited 120 patients with RA with a high disease activity despite being treated with MTX (15 mg/week) or LEF (20 mg/die) for 3 months, without side effects. In each of these patients, therapy with either MTX or LEF was continued and randomly combined with an anti-TNF-alpha drug: etanercept, infliximab, or adalimumab. Patients were assessed at study entry and at 4, 12, and at 24 weeks. The efficacy endpoints included variations in the DAS28-ESR and the ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 responses. At each visit, any side-effect was recorded. There were no statistically significant differences in the DAS28 variations and in the ACR responses between the two groups or among the six subgroups. The number of discontinuation due to the appearance of serious side effects was higher, but not statistically significant, in the LEF-anti-TNF-alpha group than in the MTX-anti-TNF-alpha group. Other adverse events that did not necessitate the discontinuation of therapy occurred much more frequently in patients treated with MTX than in those treated with LEF. Anti-TNF-alpha drugs can be used in combination not only with MTX, but also with LEF, with the same probability of achieving significant clinical improvement in RA patients and without a significantly greater risk of serious adverse events. In contrast, it seems that combination therapy with LEF-anti-TNF-alpha is more readily tolerated than combination therapy with MTX-anti-TNF-alpha.
20663404 Rheumatologists' recommended patient information when prescribing methotrexate for rheumat 2010 Jul OBJECTIVES: Accurate communication of information concerning the risks and benefits of medications is essential for adherence and patient safety. A diverse array of information and sources makes it difficult to know exactly what to tell a patient with rheumatoid arthritis about methotrexate. OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to determine what key information patients must know about methotrexate and the key reasons they should call their doctor while they are taking methotrexate. METHODS: Three hundred and forty-four Canadian rheumatologists were sent a survey containing open-ended questions to gain uncued narrative perspectives from each individual's experience. The survey was designed to determine what must all patients taking methotrexate know and when must patients taking methotrexate call a physician? Emergent coding was used to establish a set of categories to form a checklist for coding. A second member checking survey was sent to gain confirmation and validation of themes developed from the initial survey. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy out of 344 (49.5%) surveys were completed. Regular blood testing, once weekly dosing, risk of infection, pregnancy and lactation information, alcohol limitation, potential lung toxicity, and drug interactions were thought to be important. Patients should call if they became pregnant, developed symptoms suggestive of lung toxicity, developed an infection, severe mouth sores, or were concerned about any side effects warranting the discontinuation of the medication. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to describe, from a rheumatologist's perspective, the key important information that all patients should know and when patients should call their doctor when taking methotrexate.
19808132 An evidence-based assessment of the clinical significance of drug-drug interactions betwee 2009 Aug BACKGROUND: Clinically relevant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) must be recognized in a timely manner and managed appropriately to prevent adverse drug reactions or therapeutic failure. Because the evidence for most DDIs is based on case reports or poorly documented clinical information, there is a need for better assessment of their clinical relevance. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the interdisciplinary agreement between rheumatologists and clinical (hospital) pharmacists in assessing the clinical relevance of DDIs with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and non-DMARD medications. METHODS: Potential DDIs were identified from the medical literature using MEDLINE and EMBASE for the years 1968-2009. The following search terms were used for the key word, title, and abstract sections of the publications: interaction(s), DMARD, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug(s), antirheumatic, rheumatology, rheumatoid arthritis, and the names of the individual DMARDs of interest (abatacept, adalimumab, anakinra, auranofin, aurothioglucose, aurothiomalate, d-penicillamine, etanercept, gold, [hydroxy]-chloroquine, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, IL1-RA, infliximab, leflunomide, methotrexate, rituximab, and sulfasalazine/sulphasalazine). Reference lists of the retrieved publications were searched for further information on potential DDIs. All pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic DDIs between a DMARD and a non-DMARD identified were included in the study, with the exception of evidence regarding DMARD doses higher than used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and interactions with phytotherapeutic or homeopathic preparations. Using a standard information set for each DDI (eg, from product labeling, textbooks, and the medical literature), a group of rheumatologists and a group of clinical pharmacists independently assessed whether the individual drug-DMARD combinations interacted and whether they required immediate intervention. Both groups consisted of 3 members (2 men and 1 woman), aged 40 to 60 years, who had >5 years of clinical experience and were currently involved in clinical practice in large, nonacademic teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. RESULTS: Forty potential DDIs with DMARDs were retrieved and assessed by the 2 groups. For 30 (75%) of these, rheumatologists and clinical pharmacists agreed about the requirement for immediate intervention. Specifically, 17 drug combinations (43%) were judged to interact and to require immediate intervention, and 13 combinations (33%) were judged either not to interact or to interact but not to require immediate intervention. For 10 combinations (25%), rheumatologists and clinical pharmacists were not in agreement. Overall, agreement between the groups was good (kappa = 0.80) for judging whether the drug combinations were interactions, and agreement was fair (kappa = 0.39) for judging whether immediate intervention was required. Prospective analysis of the data showed that rheumatologists tended to recommend immediate intervention more often when the adverse reaction to the DDI involved an increased risk of toxicity of the DMARD. In contrast, clinical pharmacists more often advocated immediate intervention when the adverse reaction involved decreased effectiveness of the DMARD. CONCLUSION: For a subset of DMARD-drug combinations, rheumatologists and clinical pharmacists differed in their assessments of clinical relevance.
20952478 Rheumatoid arthritis disease-modifying antirheumatic drug intervention and utilization stu 2011 Jan OBJECTIVE: to report the rates of serious adverse events (SAE), serious infectious events (SIE), and events of medical interest (EMI) in patients receiving etanercept; to identify the risk factors for SAE, SIE, and EMI; and to report time to switching from etanercept therapy, reasons for switching, and time to restarting treatment with etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in US clinical practice. METHODS: adults ≥ 18 years of age who fulfilled the 1987 American Rheumatism Association criteria for RA were eligible for enrollment in 2 prospective, 5-year, multicenter, observational registries. RADIUS 1 (Rheumatoid Arthritis DMARD Intervention and Utilization Study) enrolled patients with RA who required a change in treatment [either an addition or a switch of a biologic or nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)]. In RADIUS 2, patients with RA were required to start etanercept therapy at entry. Patients were seen at a frequency determined by their rheumatologist. RADIUS 1 and RADIUS 2 were registered under the US National Institutes of Health ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT00116714 and NCT00116727, respectively. RESULTS: in these patients, SAE, SIE, and EMI occurred at rates comparable to those seen in clinical trials. No unexpected safety signals were observed. Rates for SAE, SIE, and EMI in etanercept-treated patients were comparable to rates observed in patients receiving methotrexate monotherapy and did not increase with greater exposure to etanercept therapy. CONCLUSION: the RADIUS registries provide a better understanding of the safety of etanercept in patients with RA in the US practice setting.
19758236 TNF-alpha antagonist survival rate in a cohort of rheumatoid arthritis patients observed u 2009 Sep A cohort of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in the Lombardy Rheumatology Network (LOHREN) registry and receiving anti-TNF therapy was evaluated after 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Of the 1114 patients in the registry 1064 met the clinical criteria for inclusion with 519 receiving infliximab, 303 adalimumab, and 242 etanercept. The therapeutic survival curve of these patients showed that the likelihood of continuing anti-TNF therapy was 78.8% after 12 months, 65.2% after 24 months, and 52.9% after 36 months, with a risk of dropout similar for inefficacy and adverse events. There were 405 anti-TNF therapy discontinuations (38.1%): 180 (16.9%) due to inefficacy, 194 (18.2%) adverse events, and 31 (2.9%) other reasons. Four deaths (2 septicemia, 1 postinfective cerebritis, 1 heart failure) were considered to be related to anti-TNF therapy. Of the discontinuations, 219 (54.1%) occurred within the first 12 months: 110 due to adverse events, 89 inefficacy, and 20 due to other reasons. After 36 months, the likelihood of survival on etanercept (62.5%) was significantly greater than the likelihood of survival on infliximab (49.1%) or adalimumab (53.6%). A higher risk of therapy discontinuations due to adverse events was associated with increasing age, a corticosteroid > 5 mg/day, a high erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), a higher risk of therapy discontinuations due to inefficacy was associated with the previous use of > or = 4 disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and a high ESR. Comorbidities, increasing DAS28 values and co-therapy with methotrexate were associated with a lower risk of discontinuation.
19487269 E-selectin, interleukin 18, serum amyloid a, and matrix metalloproteinase 9 are associated 2009 Jul OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of golimumab (human monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor-alpha) plus methotrexate (MTX) on selected inflammatory biomarkers, and to determine if these effects predict clinical response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Sera from adults with active RA despite MTX therapy, who received subcutaneous injections of placebo + MTX (MTX alone, n = 34) or golimumab 50 or 100 mg every 2 or 4 weeks + MTX (n = 137), were analyzed for levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), serum amyloid A (SAA), interleukin 18 (IL-18), E-selectin, matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9), and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1). RESULTS: Golimumab + MTX treatment significantly decreased serum CRP, SAA, IL-18, E-selectin, TIMP-1, and MMP-9 levels (median percent changes of -4.1% to -74.3% across treatment groups) versus MTX alone (-5.8% to 9.7%) when first measured at Week 4; decreases were sustained through Week 16. Larger magnitudes of decrease in all biomarkers were observed for clinical responders versus nonresponders. For golimumab + MTX, regression analyses including all biomarkers and select clinical measures showed that reductions in levels of several markers (SAA, E-selectin, MMP-9) as early as Week 4 correlated significantly with improvement in swollen joint count (SJC) at Week 16, as did reductions in E-selectin with improvement in tender joint count at Week 16. After accounting for the biomarkers, however, treatment group was no longer significant for SJC. CONCLUSION: Significant decreases in several inflammatory biomarkers were associated with golimumab + MTX therapy. Decreases in serum levels of SAA, E-selectin, and MMP-9 at Week 4 may be useful in predicting clinical response at Week 16.
19326165 Rosai-Dorfman disease with factor XII deficiency. 2009 Jun A 17-year-old female patient presented with chronic symmetrical oligoarthritis of both knees and ankles, xerostomia, xerophthalmia, multiple bilateral lymphadenopathies in the cervical region, and bilateral parotid enlargement with the histological finding of chronic sialoadenitis. She had been already given methotrexate, chloroquine, and corticosteroids with the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) before referral to our outpatient clinic. Because her complaints and the lumps did not remit and she could be classified as neither RA nor primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS) according to 1987 ACR RA criteria or European preliminary criteria for SS, lymph node biopsy was repeated and revealed the diagnosis of Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD) with the histological findings of histiocytes, phagocyting lymphocytes in enlarged sinuses, and mature plasma cells infiltrating the pulpa. All the medications were stopped after the pathological diagnosis of RDD and consulting with the Division of Hematology. She was reevaluated with magnetic resonance imaging, which showed dense infiltrative areas around knee and ankle joints, and computed tomography that showed a soft tissue mass surrounding the descending aorta and upper part of the abdominal aorta. Activated partial thromboplastin time was found to be prolonged in prebiopsy examinations, and factor XII deficiency was detected after detailed hematological evaluation. The symptoms of joint involvement were relieved with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. She has been followed-up without medication without obvious clinical or laboratory change. We herein report a patient with RDD mimicking RA and SS. We consider that RDD should be kept in mind especially in patients with resistant symptoms to conventional therapies, younger disease onset, and predominant parotid and lymph node enlargement.
20085177 Traditional herbal medicines (Kampo) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving conc 2010 Jan OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of traditional herbal medicines (THM: Kampo) used in combination with oral methotrexate (MTX) in order to control the disease activity of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients whose disease remains active despite treatment with MTX. METHODS: Patients (n=13; male:female = l:12) with RA who achieved only a suboptimal response to MTX therapy (> or =6 mg/week and > or =6 months) were enrolled in this assessment. All patients were treated with Keishinieppiittokaryojutsubu (KER; decoction) according to the traditional diagnostic system. Every 3 months, joint symptoms were examined, and routine blood analysis and general serological tests including anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (aCCP) were performed, and then we calculated the disease activity score of 28 joints (DAS28). RESULTS: One patient withdrew from the study after 4 weeks and discontinued consultations with our department for unknown reasons. Five (41.7%) of the twelve patients were defined as responders, and seven patients (58.3%) were classified as nonresponders based on DAS28-CRP findings. On comparison between responders and nonresponders, there was no significant difference with regard to age or disease duration and the dosages of concomitant prednisolone at baseline. KER responders had lower levels of aCCP at baseline than nonresponders (mean +/- standard deviation: 329.2 +/- 113.9 U/mL vs 623.8 +/- 242.8 U/mL, respectively) (P = .046, Mann-Whitney test). Furthermore, responders to KER showed a significant decrease in the serum levels of aCCP. The annual cost for KER treatment is much less than that for other new drugs. CONCLUSION: In patients whose active RA persists despite treatment with MTX, KER in combination with MTX is safe and well tolerated and provides clinical and economic benefits. Furthermore, pretreatment serum levels of aCCP are a useful predictor of a good response to KER treatment, and a decrease in serum levels of aCCP may be an adjunctive indicator in predicting the efficacy of this kind oftreatment.
20082756 [Efficacy of Shenshi Qianghuo Dihuang Decoction in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized cont 2010 Jan BACKGROUND: In China, patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are often treated with traditional Chinese herbal medicine. There are certain advantages of traditional Chinese medicine therapy in treatment of RA. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and adverse reaction of Shenshi Qianghuo Dihuang Decoction (SQDD), a compound traditional Chinese herbal medicine, in treatment of RA. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: This was a 24-week prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Ninety RA patients meeting inclusion criteria from Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine were randomly assigned to receive SQDD or methotrexate (MTX) with 45 cases in each group. The patients in SQDD group were orally administered with SQDD twice daily, and the patients in MTX control group were treated by oral administration of 15 mg MTX once a week. All the RA patients were treated for 24 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the number of patients achieving the American College of Rheumatology 20% response. Clinical and laboratory parameters including tender joint count and swollen joint count, patient's global assessment and physician's global assessment (using a 0-10 cm visual analogue scale), duration of morning stiffness, plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) level, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and value of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody were assessed. RESULTS: After 24-week treatment, the response rates in SQDD group and MTX group were 62.53% (24/41) and 67.5% (28/40) respectively, and there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The patient's global assessment and physician's global assessment, morning stiffness, grip strength, tender joint count, swollen joint count and the levels of ESR, CRP and anti-CCP antibody in SQDD and MTX groups were improved significantly as compared with those before treatment, and there were no significant differences between the two groups. The efficacy of MTX in improving rest pain and joint tenderness was better than that of SQDD (P<0.05). The incidence rate of adverse reactions in SQDD group was 9.75%(4/41), significantly lower than 32.5% (13/40) in MTX group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: SQDD has a therapeutic effect on RA, and the adverse reactions are less than MTX.
20393970 Methotrexate monotherapy versus methotrexate combination therapy with non-biologic disease 2010 Apr 14 BACKGROUND: Methotrexate (MTX) is among the most effective disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with less toxicity and better tolerability. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of MTX monotherapy compared to MTX combination with non-biologic DMARDs in adult with RA. SEARCH STRATEGY: Trials were identified in MEDLINE (1950 to 2009), EMBASE (1980 to 2009), the Cochrane Controlled trials Registry (CENTRAL) (up to 2009), the American and European scientific meeting abstracts 2005-9, the reference lists of all relevant studies, letters, and review articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials comparing MTX monotherapy versus MTX combined with other non-biologic DMARDs of at least 12 weeks of trial duration in adult RA patients. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently identified eligible studies,extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias of relevant studies.The efficacy analysis was stratified into 3 groups based on previous DMARDs use: DMARD naive, MTX inadequate response, and non-MTX DMARDs inadequate response. The toxicity analysis was stratified by DMARD combination and pooled across trials for each combination. Our prespecified primary analysis was based on total withdrawal rates for efficacy or toxicity. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 19 trials (2,025 patients) from 6,938 citations were grouped by the type of patients randomised. Trials in DMARD naive patients showed no significant advantage of the MTX combination versus monotherapy; withdrawals for lack of efficacy or toxicity were similar in both groups (risk ratio (RR) 1.16, 95% CI.0.70 to 1.93, absolute risk difference(ARD) 5%, 95%CI-3% to 13%). Trials in MTX or non-MTX DMARDs inadequate responder patients also showed no difference in withdrawal rates between the MTX combo versus mono groups with RR 0.86 95% CI 0.49 to1.51, ARD -2 %, 95% CI-13 % to 8 % and RR 0.75 95% CI 0.41 to 1.35, ARD -10%, 95% CI -31% to 11%, respectively. Significant reductions of pain and improvement in physical function (measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire or HAQ) were found in the MTX combination group, but only in MTX-inadequate responders (absolute risk difference -9.72%, 95%CI -14.7% to -4.75% for pain and mean difference (MD) -0.28, 95%CI -0.36 to -0.21 (0-3) for HAQ). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: When the balance of efficacy and toxicity is taken into account, the moderate level of evidence from our systematic review showed no statistically significant advantage of the MTX combination versus monotherapy. Trials are needed that compare currently used MTX doses and combination therapies.
20516029 Canadian recommendations for use of methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. 2010 Jul OBJECTIVE: To develop recommendations for the use of methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Canadian rheumatologists who participated in the international 3e Initiative in Rheumatology (evidence, expertise, exchange) in 2007-2008 formulated 5 unique Canadian questions. A bibliographic team systematically reviewed the relevant literature on these 5 topics. An expert committee consisting of 26 rheumatologists from across Canada was convened, and a set of recommendations was proposed based on the results of systematic reviews combined with expert opinions using a nominal group consensus process. RESULTS: The 5 questions addressed drug interactions, predictors of response, strategies to reduce non-serious side effects, variables to assess clinical response, and incorporating patient preference into decision-making. The systematic review retrieved 93 pertinent articles; this evidence was presented to the expert committee during the interactive workshop. After extensive discussion and voting, a total of 9 recommendations were formulated: 2 on drug interactions, 1 on predictors of response, 2 on strategies to reduce non-serious side effects, 3 on variables to assess clinical response, and 1 on incorporating patient preferences into decision-making. The level of evidence and the strength of recommendations are reported. Agreement among panelists ranged from 85% to 100%. CONCLUSION: Nine recommendations pertaining to the use of MTX in daily practice were developed using an evidence-based approach followed by expert/physician consensus with high level of agreement.
19538103 Mechanisms underlying methotrexate-induced pulmonary toxicity. 2009 Jul BACKGROUND: Methotrexate (MTX) has been widely used for the treatment of inflammatory diseases and rheumatoid arthritis, as well as a variety of tumors. However, MTX-induced pulmonary toxicity is a serious and unpredictable side effect of the therapy, which includes allergic, cytotoxic or immunologic reactions, and is a major clinical problem. OBJECTIVE: To summarize the mechanisms of action involved in MTX-induced pulmonary toxicity. METHODS: We reviewed the literature describing MTX-induced adverse pulmonary effects and the mechanisms of action underlying MTX-induced pulmonary toxicity. CONCLUSION: The mechanisms underlying MTX toxicity are complex. The clinical effects may be attributable to both the anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects of MTX. The mechanisms causing the side effects of MTX include mutation of the genotype, inhibition of transport, MTX-polyglutamates and P-glycoprotein binding with MTX. The p38 MAPK-signaling pathway is especially associated with a pulmonary inflammatory response. These mechanisms can be applied to optimize drug treatment.
19772806 Systematic review on the safety of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis regarding the repr 2009 Jul OBJECTIVE: To analyze the safety of methotrexate (MTX) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) regarding the reproductive system (fertility, pregnancy, and breastfeeding). METHODS: Systematic review of studies retrieved by a sensitive search strategy in Medline (1961 - October 2007), Embase (1961 - October 2007), Cochrane Library (up to October 2007), and from the abstracts of the ACR (2005, 2006) and EULAR (2005 - 2007) annual scientific meetings. SELECTION CRITERIA: a) population: studies had to include patients with RA; b) intervention and control: discontinuation of MTX or elective abortion versus continuation of MTX or continuing pregnancy; and c) outcomes: infertility, oligospermia, reversibility, miscarriages, malformations, premature babies, healthy newborn, percent of the dose of MTX that passes to human milk, adverse effects in the lactating child. There was no limitation regarding study design, except for case reports, or language. RESULTS: MTX and pregnancy: we selected 6 articles for detailed evaluation from 847 initial ones from the literature search. They were descriptions of cases obtained from searching retrospectively clinical databases of individual centers or from surveys. Patients had been exposed to MTX at doses used in rheumatology (5-25 mg/w), from conception to first trimester of pregnancy. Total number of MTX exposed pregnancies is 101, and the pooled outcomes (elective abortion not included): 19 miscarriages (23% of pregnancies); 55 live births (66% of pregnancies); and 5 of them had minor neonatal malformations (5% of pregnancies). The rate of induced abortions is 18%. MTX and lactation and fertility: no articles fulfilled the selection criteria. There is indirect evidence on the excretion of MTX in human milk and probably of reversible infertility from case reports. CONCLUSIONS: This review exposes the shortage of data on the safety and risks of MTX during conception, pregnancy and lactation at the doses commonly used in rheumatology. MTX and pregnancy: there is not sufficient evidence to support whether it is MTX or the disease what underlies miscarriage in these patients. Pooling the data from the studies included, the rates of miscarriages and of birth defects are similar to the rates observed in healthy population. MTX and lactation and fertility: there is absence of confirming evidence.
20437072 CD8(+) T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder associated with Epstein-Barr virus in a patient 2010 Oct A 75-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who was receiving methotrexate (MTX) therapy developed Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated CD8(+) T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder (LPD) and meningoencephalitis. She was successfully treated with acyclovir and corticosteroids plus MTX cessation. T-cell LPD is relatively rare in RA patients receiving MTX. To our knowledge, this is the first report of CD8(+) T-cell LPD with EBV genome occurring during MTX therapy for RA. EBV infection should be carefully monitored to assess severe EBV-associated complications.
20359858 Therapeutic efficacy of experimental rheumatoid arthritis with low-dose methotrexate by in 2010 Sep Low-dose methotrexate (MTX), a traditional folate antagonist and disease-modifying antirheumatic drug administered weekly either alone or as combination therapy, is widely accepted as the gold standard in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment. Although its mechanism of action in RA is still poorly understood, MTX potentially acts via antiproliferative, anti-inflammatory, and/or immunosuppressive means. The therapeutic mechanisms and efficacy of low-dose MTX and the oral tolerance protein natural chicken type II collagen (nCCII) were compared in vitro and in vivo using an established collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) rat model. We used clinical visual scoring, radiographic X-ray analysis, histopathological examination, and sera anti-CII IgG measurements to determine the severity of disease with and without treatment. Low-dose MTX had significant clinical therapeutic efficacy against established CIA. Similar to nCCII, MTX mediated CIA by specific immunotolerant effects and not by nonspecific immunosuppression. The mechanism underlying the therapeutic efficacy could be at least partially attributed to the increased production of CD4+CD25+ Treg cells. These cells specifically downmodulated the T lymphocyte proliferative response to CCII but not PHA, induced a Th1-to-Th2 shift, downregulated Th1 cytokines, and upregulated both Th2 and Th3 cytokines. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that low-dose MTX probably serves as a potent inducer of specific immunotolerance but not of nonspecific immunosuppression in the treatment of RA.
19581281 Adverse events and factors associated with toxicity in patients with early rheumatoid arth 2010 Jun OBJECTIVE: To evaluate toxicity profiles in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated either according to an intensive or a conventional treatment strategy approach with methotrexate (MTX) and to study factors associated with MTX-related toxicity. METHODS: Data were used from the Computer-Assisted Management in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (CAMERA) study, in which clinical efficacy of an intensive treatment strategy with MTX was more beneficial than a conventional treatment strategy approach. In this study, data on adverse events (AEs) were compared between the two strategy groups. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify possible associations between factors assessed at baseline and withdrawal due to MTX-related AEs or liver toxicity at follow-up. RESULTS: Although significantly more patients in the intensive strategy group experienced MTX-related AEs than in the conventional strategy group, all recorded AEs were relatively mild. A higher body mass index (BMI) was significantly associated with withdrawal due to MTX-related AEs in the multiple regression analyses (odds ratio=1.207, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.44, p=0.033). There was a trend towards an association between diminished creatinine clearance and MTX withdrawal. For liver toxicity, increased serum liver enzymes at baseline were associated with liver toxicity during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Although the occurrence of AEs in the intensive strategy group was higher than in the conventional strategy group, the previously observed clinical efficacy of an intensive treatment strategy seems to outweigh the observed toxicity profiles. When starting MTX, attention should be given to patients with a high BMI and those with increased levels of liver enzymes and decreased renal function.
19293160 Patient-reported outcomes improve with etanercept plus methotrexate in active early rheuma 2010 Jan OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of etanercept (ETN) 50 mg once weekly plus methotrexate (MTX) versus MTX alone on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and the relationship between remission and PRO improvement. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomised clinical trial (COMET), PROs included: the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), EuroQoL health status, fatigue and pain visual analogue scales, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Medical Outcomes Short-Form-36. Mean changes from baseline were analysed by analysis of covariance using the last observation carried forward method. Results from week 52 are presented. RESULTS: Most PROs demonstrated significantly greater improvements with ETN+MTX than MTX alone, including physical functioning, pain, fatigue and overall health status. A significantly greater improvement in HAQ score was observed in the ETN+MTX than the MTX group (-1.02 vs -0.72; p<0.001) and a greater proportion reached the minimal clinically important difference of 0.22 (88% vs 78%; p<0.006). The relationship between PRO score and clinical status indicated that improvement was greatest among patients achieving remission. CONCLUSIONS: Early treatment with ETN+MTX leads to significantly greater improvements in multiple dimensions of PROs than MTX alone. The close relationship between disease activity and PRO improvement suggests that early treatment, with remission as a goal, should maximise the chance of restoring normal functioning and HRQoL.